Hi Bob!
It's been a while indeed but really nice to hear from you :)
The python implementation is stricter than what the first version of the specifications allowed and what the ISAcreator could right.
So even though I have not tested the situations you describe, I have some reservations about the isa python parsers would support it.
One thing is known is that the ISA-JSON serialization allows more complex representations than the ISA-Tab one. (e.g. Samples deriving from Sample).
Your requests for `ISA Source` deriving from another `ISA Source` isn't allows by the ISA JSON schema. I will however double check the behaviour of the ISA-API.
Happy to discuss further the use cases.
Many thanks!
Phil
--
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "ISAforum" group.
To post to this group, send email to isaf...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
isaforum+u...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/isaforum?hl=en-GB
Visit the ISA tools website at http://isa-tools.org and http://isacommons.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISAforum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to isaforum+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/isaforum/ca5ed1e1-0489-49b8-bab0-48e97b363623n%40googlegroups.com.