Skip to first unread message

Brian Howell

unread,
Jan 18, 2018, 12:42:21 PM1/18/18
to Ipse Dixit
According to Wikipedia, bail is

...money or some form of property that is deposited or pledged to a court, in order to secure the release from custody or jail of a suspect who has been arrested, with the understanding that the suspect will return for their trial and required court appearances. Bail is a mechanism to release suspects from imprisonment pre-trial, while ensuring their return for trial. If the suspect does not return to court, the bail is forfeited, and the suspect may possibly be brought up on charges of the crime of failure to appear. If the suspect returns to make all their required appearances, bail is returned after the trial is concluded. In some cases, bail money may be returned at the end of the trial, if all court appearances are made, regardless of whether the person is found guilty or not guilty of the crime accused (Wikipedia).


Bail creates a de facto class system: individuals who can afford to pay their own bail (some take out loans that they then end up repaying for years or decades), those who can turn to a bail bondsman (who typically charge a non-refundable 10% of the bail amount and have the legal right to pursue those who subsequently do not return to court—skip bail), and those who can neither pay nor afford the services of a bail bondsman and consequently end up jailed until their case comes to trial, which can sometimes take months. Often times, these people end up losing their homes, their children (who become wards of the courts), and accumulating piles of unpaid bills (which may then go to collection). Obviously these impacts are regardless of guilt. 

I strongly encourage you to take a few minutes to read the following article from the New York Times Magazine on the subject of bail: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/16/magazine/the-bail-trap.html. A somewhat lengthy citation:

England during the Middle Ages, it was emancipatory. Rather than detaining people indefinitely without trial, magistrates were required to let defendants go free before seeing a judge, guaranteeing their return to court with a bond. If the defendant failed to return, he would forfeit the amount of the bond. The bond might be secured — that is, with some or all of the amount of the bond paid in advance and returned at the end of the trial — or it might not. In 1689, the English Bill of Rights outlawed the widespread practice of keeping defendants in jail by setting deliberately unaffordable bail, declaring that ‘‘excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed.’’ The same language was adopted word for word a century later in the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.


But as bail has evolved in America, it has become less and less a tool for keeping people out of jail, and more and more a trap door for those who cannot afford to pay it. Unsecured bond has become vanishingly rare, and in most jurisdictions, there are only two ways to make bail: post the entire amount yourself up front — what’s called ‘‘money bail’’ or ‘‘cash bail’’ — or pay a commercial bail bondsman to do so. For relatively low bail amounts — say, below $2,000, the range in which most New York City bails fall — the second option often doesn’t even exist; bondsmen can’t make enough money from such small bails to make it worth their while.


With national attention suddenly focused on the criminal-justice system, bail has been cited as an easy target for reformers. But ensuring that no one is held in jail based on poverty would, in many respects, necessitate a complete reordering of criminal justice. The open secret is that in most jurisdictions, bail is the grease that keeps the gears of the overburdened system turning. Faced with the prospect of going to jail for want of bail, many defendants accept plea deals instead, sometimes at their arraignments. New York City courts processed 365,000 arraignments in 2013; well under 5 percent of those cases went all the way to a trial resolution. If even a small fraction of those defendants asserted their right to a trial, criminal courts would be overwhelmed. By encouraging poor defendants to plead guilty, bail keeps the system afloat.


But as bail has evolved in America, it has become less and less a tool for keeping people out of jail, and more and more a trap door for those who cannot afford to pay it. Unsecured bond has become vanishingly rare, and in most jurisdictions, there are only two ways to make bail: post the entire amount yourself up front — what’s called ‘‘money bail’’ or ‘‘cash bail’’ — or pay a commercial bail bondsman to do so. For relatively low bail amounts — say, below $2,000, the range in which most New York City bails fall — the second option often doesn’t even exist; bondsmen can’t make enough money from such small bails to make it worth their while.


With national attention suddenly focused on the criminal-justice system, bail has been cited as an easy target for reformers. But ensuring that no one is held in jail based on poverty would, in many respects, necessitate a complete reordering of criminal justice. The open secret is that in most jurisdictions, bail is the grease that keeps the gears of the overburdened system turning. Faced with the prospect of going to jail for want of bail, many defendants accept plea deals instead, sometimes at their arraignments. New York City courts processed 365,000 arraignments in 2013; well under 5 percent of those cases went all the way to a trial resolution. If even a small fraction of those defendants asserted their right to a trial, criminal courts would be overwhelmed. By encouraging poor defendants to plead guilty, bail keeps the system afloat.

 
The State of California is considering eliminating "money bail" on the grounds that it is clearly unjust. 

An article on Reason Magazine's Website about these efforts makes a couple of important additional observations:
  1. There are significant costs to pre-trial detention (Santa Clara spends $204 per day to house accused individuals, while a supervise release program (think electronic ankle bracelets) cost only $15 per day); and
  2. After New Jersey reformed its bail system, overall crime dropped 3.8% and violent crime by 12.4%, and the state's jail population fell by almost 16%.
On Tuesday, January 17th, 2018, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland cleared the way for a trial to determine the constitutionality of both San Francisco's and the State of California's bail system; she also denied a request by plaintiffs to find the bail system unconstitutional—and another by bail bond companies to dismiss the suit. "The judge said a trial is needed to determine whether requiring newly arrested defendants to post bail in order to gain their freedom violates their rights to liberty and equal treatment under the law." (SFGate, 1/17/2018).

So, is bail unconstitutional? And, if not, what should replace it? Is supervised release sufficient for all accuses, as Reason implies?

David Fetter

unread,
Jan 18, 2018, 1:44:22 PM1/18/18
to Ipse Dixit
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:42:21AM -0800, Brian Howell wrote:

> [money bail, the only kind that's actually done, screws poor people]
>
> So, is bail unconstitutional?

Not being a majority on the Supreme Court, I can't say definitively,
and I don't actually care. Slavery is still constitutional per the
13th Amendment, and it was never even vaguely OK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_(film)

> And, if not, what should replace it? Is supervised release
> sufficient for all accuses, as *Reason* implies?

That almost certainly doesn't go far enough.
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/43103-beyond-reform-toward-the-end-of-policing-an-interview-with-alex-vitale

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Dan Robinson

unread,
Jan 18, 2018, 2:16:57 PM1/18/18
to Brian Howell, Ipse Dixit
Thanks for bringing this up.

The "Money Bail" system is blatantly racist and classist.  Any time spent understanding how the system works will uncover just how broken, unfair and rigged this system is.  I have personally spoken with people who have been incarcerated for 6 months to years because they have simply refused to plead guilty to crimes they did not commit but were unable to make bail and were consequently made to languish in the County Jail.  When their cases were finally adjudicated they were released due to the states inability to bring the case to trial.  

Imagine the impact of spending a year in jail, in your mid-twenties - for *nothing*.

People with means are not effected by this system.   The ability to come up with a couple of thousand dollars to get out of jail is something many of us can do easily if pressed.  

This doesn't even touch on the inequality and imbalance of a system where adequate legal representation is a sick joke for the vast number of people in the system.

Alameda County has one of the largest jail populations in the country.  This is the government *we* have directly elected to represent us.

Dan 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ipse Dixit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Ipse-dixit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Ipse-...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Ipse-dixit.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Ipse-dixit/8de6c91c-b14b-4449-a7e0-bdf4fb06114b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

jack saunders

unread,
Jan 18, 2018, 6:18:49 PM1/18/18
to Brian Howell, Ipse Dixit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ipse Dixit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Ipse-dixit+...@googlegroups.com.

The Times mag piece skates too quickly over a governing reality — certainly in urban areas.  I refer to the fear of embarrassing blowback in cases where salient re-offending takes place while awaiting trial.  The author gave this consideration one sentence, but it’s a huge factor.  The ghost of Willie Horton haunts these grounds....and every poor black man looks to the judge (and the mayor, and the governor) like Willie Horton.


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages