Oliver Fairhurst
analysed the UK Court of Appeal's decision in
Thom Browne Inc & Anor v adidas AG, which upheld the invalidity of six of adidas’s three-stripe position marks. The judgment found that the marks, despite their inherent fame, were insufficiently clear, precise, and certain due to the vagueness in their written descriptions, leading to an impermissible multiplicity of signs.
Katfriend
Caroline Wanjiru Muchiri examined the Kenyan Court of Appeal's "Basmati" decision, which dismissed oppositions to several trade mark applications containing BASMATI RICE. The court's controversial finding that GI protection must flow from registration as a collective mark effectively undermined the protection of unregistered rights via the common law tort of passing off in Kenya.
Jocelyn Bosse also
reported on the continuing Basmati saga in New Zealand, where the High Court upheld the rejection of an Indian authority's application to register BASMATI as a certification mark. The Court ruled that the mark lacked distinctiveness because the proposed rules would unlawfully exclude Pakistani producers who used the term in good faith, highlighting the essential need for cooperation in transboundary GI claims.