 |
| Kat enjoying tea outdoors. |
In the second half of May, IPKat had something for every IP taste. If spring has kept you busy outdoors, here’s your round‑up:
Artificial Intelligence
Rose Hughes
explored the topic of shadow use of AI as a growing and dangerous consequence of restricting AI access within the patent profession.
Patents
Rose Hughes
analysed
the differing US and European approaches to functional antibody claims
and the interpretation of routine work by a skilled person, in light of
the recent
Teva v. Eli Lilly Federal Circuit decision.
Designs
Marcel Pemsel
provided a list of takeaways from the recent General Court judgment in
Crocs v EUIPO – Gor Factory (Chaussure) (T‑228/25).
Trade MarksMarcel Pemsel
reported on the General Court’s judgment in
Les Éditions Albert René v EUIPO (T‑24/25),
drawing a few takeaways on the challenges of protecting fictional
characters, the impact of relevant‑public findings, and the evolving
relevance of the ® symbol use.
Söğüt Atilla Aydın
commented
on a recent decision of the EUIPO’s Fifth Board of Appeal, which
considered whether the mark TOUCH YOUR BOOBS is contrary to public
policy or accepted principles of morality.
Geographical IndicationsKatfriend Rebeca Ferrero Guillén
reviewed Análisis Jurídico de la Denominación de Origen Protegida --El caso del queso manchego (Legal Analysis of the Protected Designation of Origin -- The Case of Manchego Cheese) by Anastasiia Kyrylenko.
CopyrightSöğüt Atilla‑Aydın
reviewed Giulia Walter’s
Art and Copyright Law: An Interdisciplinary Study on Interpictoriality (Routledge, 2025) -- a study of how artists’ reuse of existing works interacts with copyright rules.
Competition Law
Oliver Fairhurst
examined the UK Court of Appeal’s decision in
Deckers v Up & Running (UK) Ltd, centering on whether brands may impose limits on retailers’ online sales channels.
MiscellaneousClaire Gregg
highlighted a range of news, events, and opportunities from the IP world.
Photo by Hassan Bouamoud from Pexels.