Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

19 views
Skip to first unread message

Kliment Markov

unread,
Jan 7, 2026, 10:18:36 AMJan 7
to ipkat_...@googlegroups.com



Graphic by Riana Harvey
If you’re worried the holiday season may have distracted you from the latest in the IP world, this post is here to restore your peace. Here’s a gist of last week on IPKat:

Copyright

Söğüt Atilla-Aydın explored the dispute concerning alleged co-authorship of an academic paper in Prof. Ardemis Boghossian v IOP Publishing Limited & Anorbefore the IPEC.

Patents

Rose Hughes analysed T 1719/21, in which the Board of Appeal confirmed that non-reproducible products may serve as the closest prior art.

Rose discussed T 1601/22, focusing on sufficiency, inventive step, and the rationale behind low‑dose selections in a therapeutic invention.

Trade Marks

Marcel Pemsel reported on PMJC (C-168/24), in which the CJEU addressed when use of a designer’s surname may become deceptive and justify revocation.

Plant IP

Jocelyn Bosse wrapped up 2025’s developments in plant IP law and shared what lies ahead in 2026.

Book Reviews

Former GuestKat Anastasiia Kyrylenko reviewed the third edition of Certification and Collective Marks: Law and Practice, by Jeffrey Belson.

Jocelyn Bosse introduced us to Beer Law (Cambridge University Press, 2025), co-authored by Dan Jerker B. Svantesson, William Van Caenegem, Anthea Gerrard, Radim Polčák, Alain Strowel, and Andreas Wiebe.

Updates

Claire Gregg informed us about early 2026 IP developments, key events, EPO updates, new opportunities, and upcoming IP training courses.
DO YOU WANT TO REUSE THE IPKAT CONTENT? PLEASE REFER TO OUR 'POLICIES' SECTION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUERIES OR REQUESTS FOR PERMISSION, PLEASE GET IN TOUCH WITH THE IPKAT TEAM.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages