Injector Script

[Elvisa Schimke]

Ifigured it had to do with the library not being available on the load injector. But didn't realize I had to manually move/copy it between machines. Doesn't that at least somewhat nullify the advantage of using functions?

This extension allows you to inject one or more scripts when loading a page.The extension can inject hosted scripts by adding a tag to the web page header once loaded or evaluate a local script with the "eval" function.You can manage the scripts yourself and you can choose to run them manually or automatically.A script editor is also integrated to add/modify your own scripts.This extension allows you to inject one or more scripts when loading a page.The extension can inject hosted scripts by adding a tag to the web page header once loaded or evaluate a local script with the "eval" function.You can manage the scripts yourself and you can choose to run them manually or automatically.A script editor is also integrated to add/modify your own scripts.

The Dynamics 365 Commerce module library provides two prebuilt script injector modules: external script and inline script. You can add these modules to a page or page template to inject inline or external scripts into the HTML head, body begin, or body end of a page as needed. For example, you can add a script for integration with third-party analytics, or other service scripts.

The external script module allows you to add JavaScript from external sources by providing a URL that points to a valid JavaScript file. After the module is added using Commerce site builder, the script URL can be added to the Script source property.

The external script module includes the execute script asynchronously and defer script execution configuration properties. The execute script asynchronously property specifies whether the script should be executed asynchronously. The defer script execution property specifies whether the script should be executed when the page has finished parsing configuration properties.

The following illustration shows an external script injector module that is being configured on a page template. The Script source property box is where you add the URL that points to the script source code that will be injected into the HTML for the rendered page.

The inline script module allows you to add inline JavaScript code directly to a page template or page. After the module is added using Commerce site builder, the script can be pasted into the Inline script property box, as highlighted in the following illustration.

In some cases, you might have to inject scripts into your site or site pages, but the prebuilt script injector modules from the module library aren't flexible as you require. For example, you might want additional configuration fields to be exposed in the authoring tools. In these cases, you can extend the prebuilt script injector modules into new custom script injector modules. You can put a custom script injector module on a page, in a shared template, or in a master template.

To create a custom script injector you can use HtmlHeadInclude, which is a React Higher-Order Component that allows you to insert elements into the head of the page. It is simple to use, and you can add any elements you want in your view file between the tags, as shown in the following example.

Inline script content should be saved as a string and then inserted into the script using the React dangerouslySetInnerHTML attribute (to avoid escaping special characters), and the data-load-point attribute must be specified on script tags. This attribute controls where the script tag should be placed. Possible values include headStart, headEnd, bodyStart, and bodyEnd.

The particular case I'm thinking of is correlating alerts produced by another management tool (e.g. SiteScope or Tivoli) with data already stored in Splunk. The other management tools have the ability to run a command-line program or script in response to an alert, but what program should I call in order to inject data into Splunk?

I realize there are workarounds here, like piping the output of the script into a directory and having splunk index that directory, but I'm wondering if there's a direct connection possible without a directory as an intermediary.

If going of the network is somehow inconvenient (not a fan of nc), you can also set up a FIFO (named pipe) input and write your data to this. This has the positive that the flow control will give you a good idea when the data has been fully accepted. It has of course the negative of all transient data interfaces that it will be difficult to review in case of a problem.

You are free to include and distribute any script on this page in your mods, with or without credits on your mod page (it's always appreciated though).

BUT the use in mods/files that are being sold for money or come with other forms of monetary gain is PROHIBITED.

I wrote last year about my first usage of Gulp in an ASP.Net project. I used Gulp to replace the Web Optimization functionality that is due to disappear when ASP.Net v5 ships. What I came up with was an approach that provided pretty much the same functionality; raw source in debug mode, bundling + minification in release mode.

It worked by having a launch page which was straight HTML. Embedded within this page was JavaScript that would, at runtime, load the required JavaScript / CSS and inject it dynamically into the document. This approach worked but it had a number of downsides:

Quite a lot going on here isn't there? Accordingly, initial startup time was slower than you might hope. 2. The "F" word: FOUC. Flash Of Unstyled Content - whilst all the hard work of the page load was going on (before the CSS had been loaded) the page would look rather ... bare. Not a terrible thing but none too slick either. 3. The gulpfile built both the debug and the release package each time it was run. This meant the gulp task generally did double the work that it needed to do.

I wanted to see if I could tackle these issues. I've recently been watching John Papa's excellent Pluralsight course on Gulp and picked up a number of useful tips. With that in hand let's see what we can come up with...

The main issue with the approach I've been using is the dynamic loading. It makes the app slower and more complicated. So the obvious solution is to have my gulpfile inject scripts and css into the template. To that end it's wiredep & gulp-inject to the rescue!

gulp-inject (as the name suggests) is used to inject script and link tags into source code. I'm using Bower as my client side package manager and so I'm going to use wiredep to determine the vendor scripts I need. It will determine what packages my app is using from looking at my bower.json, and give me a list of file paths in dependency order (which I can then pass on to gulp-inject in combination with my own app script files). This means I don't have to think about ordering bower dependencies myself and I no longer need to separately maintain a list of these files within my gulpfile.

This is the magic. This picks up the launch page (index.html), takes the JavaScript and CSS and injects the corresponding script and link tags into the page and writing it to the build folder. Either the original source code or the bundled / minified equivalent will be used depending on whether it's debug or release.

If it's the scripts-debug task we copy all these files into the build/debug folder. If it's the scripts-release task we also bundle, minify and strip the TypeScript out too and copy into the build/release folder.

build-debug and build-release (as their name suggests) either perform a build for release or a build for debug. If you remember, the web optimization library in ASP.Net serves up the raw code ("debug" code) if the compilation debug flag in the web.config is set to true. If it is set to false then we get the bundled and minified code ("release" code) instead. Our default task tries its best to emulate this behaviour by doing a very blunt regex against the web.config. Simply, if it can match <compilation debug="true" then it runs the debug build. Otherwise, the release build. It could be more elegant but there's a dearth of XML readers on npm that support synchronous parsing (which you kinda need for this scenario).

What I intend to do soon is switch from using the web.config to drive the gulp build to using the approach outlined here. Namely plugging the build directly into Visual Studio's build process and using the type of build there.

Hopefully what I've written here makes it fairly clear how to use Gulp to directly inject scripts and styles directly into your HTML. If you want to look directly at the source then check out the Proverb.Web folder in this repo.

It appears a bit of manual cleaning for removal of it is required. Also, do not use the script posted in this link since it was written specifically for the OP. However, I would check the below locations for presence of the files listed;

As an administrator, I scanned the entire system from top to bottom. I could not find a virus. I turned off .Net Framework in the open or close windows features menu. The problem is still the same. I am getting a "Threat Removed" warning in 25-30 seconds. it started to be annoying. When I click on the DotNet text, the My Computer menu opens.

Referring to the Eset logs shown in the linked Eset Russian web site posting, they show that multiple coin miners had been found on the poster's device previously. You may want to start manually monitoring for unusual CPU activity on this device.

3a8082e126