concerned about short-term consequences

[International Adoption]

Here you might say: "But my child makes everything right now
these transgressions and taking the wrong decisions. How can I change my
opinion about all this?"
 A person making decisions they usually have as positive
and negative consequences; one are found immediately after selecting
solutions and  the relevant act, while others make themselves known
at a later date. The more Mature and experienced a person is, the more attention he pays
long-term effect. So, adolescents tend to focus on
immediate outcomes of their decisions whereas parents give more
attention to their consequences in the future. This fact -- the source of many
conflicts.
 When the parent compels or tries to compel the child to take
a definite decision, he is usually less concerned about short-term consequences
and pays more attention to more distant  the consequences of this decision.
There is, however, much more remote consequence, which
is ignored and the parent and child, namely -- teaching a teenager to see
and consider all the consequences of the decision. Learning to trust the child,
allowing them to make their own decisions and follow them, the parent
achieves short-term benefits of harmonious relations with
a child, and long-term benefits as make sure that gradually
learns to see more clearly and to consider long-term consequences of their own
solutions. When a parent prevents (or tries to prevent) the adoption
child decisions, leading to undesirable long-term effect, 
child is less likely to feel these negative
consequences; even if he faced with them, it pays them enough
attention, as too concerned with the fight against the control of parents.

[Mark Segal]

Prudence? Yes, let prudence. No need to hide shyly nor
from adults nor from children's eyes. No  worse ostentatious Grand gestures, for
which sometimes hides Terry pettiness. And Oh, how the stench
hypocrisy will blow for children from a double play, which (no doubt!) not
hid from their eyes.

[Mark Segal]

POPs up in this regard, a long and unpleasant memory. Settled
in total the country, two families with children. Were close friends, called
friends. Decided to farm together. But to agree on the manner of conducting
costs hesitate. "Their people would be uncomfortable to be considered". And so it went -
spontaneously, "into the cauldron". And all would be well, if not the conversations that
both pairs were in a narrow family circle slowly, hesitating buddies and not
too shy children. Talk about who is who and how much in debt.
No, if the calculation, then a Frank, honest and that there is no need
be ashamed neither to others nor to themselves nor to their
children. And if herschelite, it is also honest and from the heart. So, whatever
others, neither myself nor the children not to "throw dust in eyes". Moreover, with
children that no one has yet succeeded.

[Mark Segal]

And you can save in both large and small. Say, there is nothing wrong in
that younger passed from older clothes. Know two close-knit family. In
one family, the eldest boy, youngest girl, the other Vice versa. They
practice "cross-trade" - change second-hand clothing. But
the money saved go on trips, can once again go to
the theatre, sit in a cafe.