Hi All,
Kyle has given me the notes he took on his group's meeting, and I've got my notes. Leaders from the table dealing with issues related to journals and the table relating to legal developments, can I get your notes as well?
Thank you,
Mike
--
Mike Edwards, Ph.D.
http://www.vitia.org/
Assistant Professor, English Department
Washington State University
Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy
Topoi Section Editor
CCCC Intellectual Property Caucus
Senior Chair 2012-2013
On Mar 17, 2013, at 9:02 PM,
intellectual-p...@googlegroups.com wrote:
> Today's Topic Summary
> Group:
http://groups.google.com/group/intellectual-property-caucus/topics
>
> • Resolution on Plagiarism Detection Services [2 Updates]
> • 4Cs IP caucus meeting draft proposal for a standing group [1 Update]
> Resolution on Plagiarism Detection Services
>
ble...@comcast.net Mar 18 01:34AM
>
> Nicely done Clancy, et al.
>
>
> Is the below the resolution as passed? Can we get the updated, so I don't have to search out the typo?
>
>
> Bradley Bleck
>
bleckblog.org
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charlie Lowe" <
low...@mail.gvsu.edu>
> To:
intellectual-p...@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 8:18:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Resolution on Plagiarism Detection Services
>
>
>
>
>
> Charlie Lowe
>
low...@gvsu.edu
> Sent by Samsung Note 2
> On Mar 14, 2013 6:36 PM, "Clancy Ratliff" <
clancy....@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> OK everyone, I just got out of the Resolutions Committee meeting (the open part of it). We spent the better part of an hour revising the version I submitted in February.
>
> The committee members thought it would be more effective to start on a positive note*, so they moved the "does not endorse" part to the first WHEREAS. Remember, if the resolution passes, the whole thing including WHEREASes will be on NCTE's site, so that would hopefully keep Turnitin from being able to co-opt the statement. I did raise that concern with the committee, and they kept that in mind.
>
> * Starting on a positive note: they want to start the BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED part by commending institutions that don't use PDS. The rest of it is pretty much what we wrote, but tweaked slightly. I'm fine with this revision, and that's what will be read at the business meeting. I can't be there for that, but I hope one of you guys can make it.
>
>
>
> Proposed CCCC Resolution:
>
> WHEREAS CCCC does not endorse the use of plagiarism detection services;
>
> WHEREAS plagiarism detection services can compromise academic integrity by potentially undermining students’ agency as writers, treating all students as always already plagiarists, creating a hostile learning environment, shifting the responsibility of identifying and interpreting source misuse from teachers to technology, and compelling students to agree to licensing agreements that threaten their privacy and rights to their own intellectual property;
>
> WHEREAS plagiarism detection services potentially negatively change the role of the writing teacher; construct ill-conceived notions of originality and writing; disavow the complexities of writing in and with networked, digital technologies; and treat students as non-writers;
>
> WHEREAS composition teacher-scholars can intervene and combat the potential negative influences of PDSs by educating colleagues about the realities of plagiarism and the troubling outcomes of using PDSs; advocating actively against the adoption of such services; modeling and sharing ideas for productive writing pedagogy; and conducting research into alternative pedagogical strategies to address plagiarism, including honor codes and process pedagogy;
>
> "BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the Conference on College Composition and Communication commends institutions that offer sound pedagogical alternatives to PDS; encourages institutions that use PDS to implement practices in the best interests of their students, including notifying students at the beginning of the term that the service will be used, providing students with a non-coercive and convenient opt out process, and inviting students to submit drafts to the service before turning in final text.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Clancy Ratliff, Ph.D.
> Assistant Professor and Director of First-Year Writing
> Department of English
> University of Louisiana at Lafayette
>
http://culturecat.net/portfolio/
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Intellectual Property Caucus" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
intellectual-propert...@googlegroups.com .
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out .
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Intellectual Property Caucus" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
intellectual-propert...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out .
>
> Jeffrey Galin <
jeffre...@gmail.com> Mar 17 09:38PM -0400
>
> Resolution passed
>
> 4Cs IP caucus meeting draft proposal for a standing group
> Charlie Lowe <
cel...@gmail.com> Mar 17 01:22PM -0700
>
> Thanks, Mike, for doing this. I just added a couple of comments and my name
> to the list of members.
>
> Charlie
>
> On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:07:33 PM UTC-4, Mike Edwards wrote:
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group intellectual-property-caucus.
> You can post via email.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
> For more options, visit this group.
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Intellectual Property Caucus" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
intellectual-propert...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>