Hello, all!
Please see our working agenda below for this year’s meeting. It is a little generous with time to hopefully allow us to move at a good clip and give folks some of their evening back.
For those unable to attend, the session will be recorded using zoom and shared after processing with a password-protected link using Zoom cloud hosting.
Caucus on Intellectual Property and Composition/Communication Studies
3/14/2022, 5:00pm-7:30pm EDT
https://odu.zoom.us/j/95926501295
I will attempt to open the room a little early (around 4:45pm Eastern) for interested folks to socialize and settle in with a nice cup of tea.
See you all soon!
Very Respectfully,
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Intellectual Property Caucus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to intellectual-propert...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/intellectual-property-caucus/MN2PR17MB30701663D24FF9605F468881C90F9%40MN2PR17MB3070.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.
I can attend for the first hour.
Dr. Kim D. Gainer
Professor of English and Associate Dean,
College of Humanities and Behavioral Sciences
Radford University
Radford, VA 24142-6940
Hemphill Hall 3405
From: intellectual-p...@googlegroups.com <intellectual-p...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Clancy Ratliff
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 10:31 AM
To: intellectual-p...@googlegroups.com
Cc: kyleds...@gmail.com; klun...@writing.ucsb.edu; kan...@tamu.edu; hal...@purdue.edu; mike.e...@wsu.edu; jga...@fau.edu; morganc...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Agenda: CCCC Intellectual Property Standing Group Business Meeting
NOTICE: This email originated externally. It is not from a Radford University account. Use caution responding, opening attachments, or clicking links.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/intellectual-property-caucus/CAPBEbZw62xeg5x1JLeyq2z1Nu9C-jmibwU37JS%2BM1yo%2BGTuRrA%40mail.gmail.com.
I won’t make it. I’m having oral surgery this afternoon, and I expect to be very loopy afterward.
Laurie Cubbison
Professor of English, Coordinator of the GTA/GTF Mentoring Program
Department of English Radford University Box 6935 Radford VA 24142
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/intellectual-property-caucus/CAMT1SaWH4Z6HxDsz5FahxdW8vDW6moCzJgstjHPis%2B_WA79VKQ%40mail.gmail.com.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Intellectual Property Caucus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to intellectual-propert...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/intellectual-property-caucus/MN2PR17MB30701663D24FF9605F468881C90F9%40MN2PR17MB3070.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.
--
Looking forward! I hope all are well. As insulated from current events as this CCCC seems to have been, I hope we might have some things to say about topics like
Take care,
Mike
From:
Timothy Amidon <ami...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:30
To: intellectual-p...@googlegroups.com <intellectual-p...@googlegroups.com>
Cc: hal...@purdue.edu <hal...@purdue.edu>, jga...@fau.edu <jga...@fau.edu>, kan...@tamu.edu <kan...@tamu.edu>, klun...@writing.ucsb.edu <klun...@writing.ucsb.edu>, kyleds...@gmail.com <kyleds...@gmail.com>, Edwards, Mike <mike.e...@wsu.edu>,
morganc...@gmail.com <morganc...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda: CCCC Intellectual Property Standing Group Business Meeting
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/intellectual-property-caucus/BY3PR01MB66766CCF4CCF7C6F45C67C15870F9%40BY3PR01MB6676.prod.exchangelabs.com.
Hi all,
I notice CCCC has disappeared the “we own your content” IP agreement from the conference website. I thought we had discussed that problematic requirement to sign the agreement on the list, but I can’t find it in the archives. Does anybody have a copy of the agreement?
I’m still puzzled by this year’s decision to abandon aievolution and go with forj.ai, and I’m wondering if some of the pushback the organizers received about IP from the aievolution “we own your content” agreement contributed to the decision to switch to forj.ai.
Thanks,
Mike