Matt,
I used the HD emulator to image several Intel 310 HDs I and others in
the group held. I used those images on the HD emulator to bring the
Intel 310 up. One of the others in the group used the floppy disk
images you reference to make a clean install of Xenix V 3.0 on another
HD and imaged that HD.
You have to remember I am a retired Computer Engineer. Here I will
begin picking nits! I have many of these boards here and have used many
of them. I want to fully understand your configuration. It would
probable help if you listed all the 310 boards you hold.
I have used iSBC-286/10s and -286/12s in the Intel 310. I have used
EPROMs on these boards but never RAM. That was always on separate
memory card(s), iSBC-028CX/EX, iSBC-056CX/EX, iSBC-012CX/EX,
iSBC-024CX/EX, iSBC-048CX/EX, etc. Are you using static RAMs on these
processor boards or additional RAM boards?
I have iSBC-214s and iSBC-215A, B, and Gs. The 215Gs have iSBX-217 and
iSBC-218 boards for the tape drive and floppy. The iSBC-214 has all
three controllers on the one board. I have never seen a G version of
the iSBC-214. I have seen A, B, D, and G models of the iSBC-215. So I
am confused with iSBC-214G!
Don't worry about the ethernet stuff. You have the old controller,
iSBC-550 pair and the new iSBC-552 single board controller. I have only
used the iSBC-552 board. You will only need the iSBC-552. I am still
trying to find the OpenNet and TCP/IP software we used on the 310s and
320s. I suspect I have the software on one of the USR2 partitions on
the disk images I have.
All of the Intel 310s and SYP-311s I got had good power supplies. Both
my Intel 320s had bad power supplies. It cost a bunch to replace one
320 PS.
I would recommend that you use the HD emulator rather than an actual HD
to restore the system. I understand you have one of Dave's PDP8Online
emulators like I used to get my 310 up. The old MFM drives just are
problems waiting to happen!
So you have the standard tape drive and the 1.2 MB floppy drive. What
shape are the rubber wheels in the tape drive in? Lot of problems
there, as well.
With 4 Maxtor XT-1140 disks, that was nearly 1/2 GB of storage. I had
one system with two large SMD drives that gave us several GB of data
storage. With the OpenNet software, we had desktop access to all of that.
My plan here is to mount the HD emulator in a SYP-311. Then I can share
the HD images with either an Intel 310 or an Intel 320 but moving a
couple of cords. I will put all three in a relay rack. You can probably
just use one 310 chassis for all of it. The 310 has limited board
slots, so that was a limiting factor.
Bill
On 3/17/2025 8:34 PM, Matt Cauvel wrote:
> Hi Bill! Matt Cauvel here, I've been working on our System 310.
> Unfortunately I've been stuck fighting with floppy image formats for
> the last month, we have the Xenix 3.0 boot disk booting but I must
> still have something wrong with the format because /mksys immediately
> falls on its face with a list of missing files/commands. I suspect
> you're referring the same images that are up on BitSavers(?), one copy
> in DMK and one in raw... could I ask what tool(s) you used to write
> those down to media?
>
> This is the hardware we have:
>
> - iSBC 286/10 CPU Board - '286, 1MB RAM
> - iSBC 214G Peripheral Controller
> - iSBC 550 Ethernet Controller (Board Pair)
> - iSBC 522 Ethernet Controller
>
> I have board sets from three systems and a spare chassis with a dead
> power supply. We also have a SYP311 disk expansion chassis. The System
> 310 had a single 140MB Maxtor XT-1140 disk and the expansion chassis
> had three of the same drive, unfortunately something appears to have
> damaged *all* of those disks, they're all acting like the servo
> platter was degaussed and at least one has crashed its heads after
> smacking the spindle/stop. We have a good ST-412 on hand and a few
> other drives that should work.
>
> One half-height 96TPI DS/DD floppy, and one Archive Corp 5945C tape
> drive. I believe our 310 was originally sold as the "iMDX 460-140T"
> storage server package for use as an NDS-II network resource manager.
>
> Open to any thoughts, thanks! - Matt
>
>
> On 2025-03-17 16:01, Dave McGuire wrote:
>> Thanks Bill. Yes, I mentioned below that we do have one of the
>> Gesswein boards. (I say it that way in case you missed some of my
>> other interspersed replies)
>>
>> I didn't know there was a Google Group for these machines; I didn't
>> realize there were many out there. I'm very happy to learn of this.
>>
>> -Dave