Re: MR. V.B.SEHGAL's Vs. IIISLA CASE IN HON'BLE DELHI HIGH COURT AT NEW DELHI

[Chand Bhatia]

Dear Mr. Indora

The penalty of Rs. 50000.00 is not imposed that the petition was not maintainable, but court found that some material facts were not disclosed by the petitioner. This is what is the information given to me.

 

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:37 PM, VINOD KUMAR INDORA <vkin...@gmail.com> wrote:

Respected Wangooji,

Seeking relief on mercy petition is fundamental right but the the matter is held on prima facie ground. If the plaintiff file again he has to deposit 50000 cost as per order. Now it is clear that whoever file petition must accertain first that the matter is maintainable or not. This matter will be decided with IIISLA AOA the court has no jurisdiction to intervien the IIISLA disciplinary matter. However as per my opinion on ground of livelihood the mercy pray to IIISLA will definitely give relief in this matter. The advice given buy you will take time and can not be admired and the result may be adverse and will be upheld as before.

Please resolve issue with President IIISLA or be ready for further 5oooo cost. Court has no power to intervien in like matter. If you want Mersey pettition then IIISLA is your own institutie will  not have to pay any cost the CC + president has power to restore the membership. So far constitutional remedy you may seek direction in any matter after restoration of your work. Only IIISLa can give relief get mandate of cc. No need for litigation sir. Vinod Kumar Indora

On Jul 6, 2017 10:18 AM, "Dileep Wangoo" <surveyors.association@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. V.B.Sehgal,

You have been my colleague, best friend and active member od SURVEYOR's WELFARE ASSOCIATION (Regd.). I am personally pained that you have become target of IIISLA promoted by IRDAI, Hyderabad thereby your livelyhood has been snatched away by the intimidating acts of omission and commission of C/C 12 members of IIISLA.

I have gone through the order of hon'ble DHC dated 04.07.2017 and would like to give you some legal procedure relief receiving suggestions as under:

01. You must not directly challenge the IIISLA removal from register but challenge the impact of it on your livelyhood i.e. challenge the decision of Insurers to stop your work on the presumption of IIISLA's removal from register.

02. Seek relief from the court to stay the decision of Insurers to stop your work till the disposal of the case related to the removal of your name from IIISLA register which is arbitrary, bad in law above all infringement into your RIGHT TO CARRY ON YOUR PROFESSION FOE EARNING LIVELUHOOD under Article 25 of Constitution of India read with Article 19 0f Constitution of India. 

03. Please make all the correspondence between you and IIISLA annexures to the MERCY PETITION and state all the facts and circumstances in the petition. Your Advocate must contest in the Court to RESTORE your LIVELYHOOD till Disposal of the case.

04. Also you must state in the petition that IIISLA's Act has damaged my sincere, dedicated, hardearned reputation etc; etc; with the Insurers by issuing letters to them and following them personally by the C/C of IIISLA for vengenance.

Hope these points may be helpful to you and you may be able to get relief from the court.

With Best Wishes and Best of Luck.

DILEEP  WANGOO    G.S. SURVEYORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (Regd.)

9711427980 / 9015342998

--

c k bhatia
09810231248

[S. Anoop Kumar]

Dear Mr. CK Bhatia,

Let there be some clarity on the issue.

First, the case of Mr. VB Sehgal is not dismissed, but was withdrawn by the petitioner himself due to certain technicalities.

Second, it is wrong to mention that IIISLA has won the case or Mr. VB Sehgal has lost the case as some people are spreading the message and gloating victory of IIISLA.

Third, the petitioner has the right to file the case afresh with complete documents and the petitioner is sure to do that anytime soon or could have already filed the case.

Fourth, the court penalised the petitioner by way of imposing costs at Rs. 50,000.00 for having filed the case without sufficient supporting documents later leading to self withdrawal of case.  The amount is payable to court for their valuable time and not to be taken as costs awarded to the opposite party, that is IIISLA.

Indian courts are not so swift or fast to deliver judgements at such a speed.  But how I wish we are..

Regards,

S Anoop Kumar.

[Dileep Wangoo]