Dear Friends,
There are many & varied explanations some very impressive & some argumentative with lots of feelers without citation, our take on issue of DL & experience certificate is as below, friends having subject matter expertise can definitely comment & correct me wherever feasible:
- There are two kinds of / sets of rules prevailing in our country viz. Central Motor Vehicle Act & State Motor vehicle rules, each state is empowered to make their own state motor vehicle rules, the relevant one is licensing even for track mounted equipments say excavators & examples are Maharastra, Orissa, Himachal Pradesh to name a few, most of the states doesn't call for a DL for heavy machines which are not tyre mounted.
- Conversely all tyre mounted equipments (including Back Hoe loaders) would require an appropriate driving license as per CMV / SMR depending on classification as per respective MV Act whenever plying on public roads, back hoe loaders are an easy example.
- Now the issue of requirement of DL & / or Experience / Training Certificate for track mounted equipments:
- Misc Class D Policy:
- Driver - “Any person including the insured” - Provided that a person
driving holds an effective
driving license at the time of the accident and is not disqualified from
holding or obtaining such a license.
- Provided also that the person holding
an effective Learner’s license may also drive the vehicle * * and that such a person satisfies the requirements of Rule 3
of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989".
- CPM Policies:
- Policy
stipulations on operator.
The Insured shall fully observe the manufacturer’s instructions
for operating, inspection and overhaul, as well as government,
statutory, municipal and all other binding regulations in force concerning
the operation and maintenance of the insured plant and machinery. - Now the issue under CPM Policy is:
- When DL is not applicable the policy calls for - full observance of the manufacturer’s instructions for operating.
- That tentamounts to suitability & fitness of operating person & hence an experience & / or training certificate is called for.
- In such circumstances, being little gray area surveyor has to play a vital role & either of the following & combination of the following comments in CPM & Misc Class D track mounted equipments for rational settlement of the claim without much hasseles as to DL / Experience / Training certificate (if not available / viable)
Quote
-------------
- Surveyor’s recommendations in light of above could be:
- If there is no formal system of issuing experience certificate by
– Manufacturer, Authorized Dealer / Supplier, previous employers in that
case the present employer can certify him as fit & proper for the
operation after recommendation of authorized service provider &
evaluation at their end.
- Experience Certificates & / or Training Certificates
substantiating above could be an evidence which can be collected if
possible.
- Exploring operator’s knowledge, experience & expertise of
operating such equipments with present & previous employers.
- The operator could be enquired / questioned about nuances of this
equipment operation, safety precautions, minor maintenance & upkeep.
- Rate his response & knowledge of the equipment operation – is he apparently well conversant or ignorant about norms &
operations of such machines etc & clearly spell out your deliberations as to
fit & properness, suitability of operator in absence of any licensing
provisions.
Note: Step 3, 4 & 5 comes in to play when 1 & 2 doesn't support the claim process, we as independent surveyors can take a call as per step 3, 4 & 5 & most of the time it would serve the purpose.-------------
Unquote
Although apparently the policies are not very explicit on experience & / or training certificate however our take on the situation for smooth settlement of the claim with suitable remarks would help insurers in processing the files.
Here it would be pertinent to note that we are working independently & stake holders / policy holders & system expects a rational working & recommendation from surveyors, little louder thinking tells us that we are not working for insurers (they are the trust fund managers) & we owe certain responsibilities towards the trust fund stake holder be it the claimant policy holder of or non-claimant stake / policy holders who are contributing to the pool.
Inputs from friends are awaited.