Issue 91 in innotop: Problems with non-interactive execution

22 views
Skip to first unread message

inn...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 7, 2013, 2:59:16 PM10/7/13
to innotop...@googlegroups.com
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 91 by jgoatc...@sparefoot.com: Problems with non-interactive
execution
http://code.google.com/p/innotop/issues/detail?id=91

What steps will reproduce the problem?
Execute:
innotop --delay 10 --host my.host.com --mode T --nonint --timestamp

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I expected to get info about transactions. Instead, I got this error:

"Use of uninitialized value $mysqlversion in pattern match (m//) at
/usr/local/bin/innotop line 473."

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
innotop Ver 1.9.1
on Amazon Linux AMI release 2012.03

Please provide any additional information below.

Executing:
innotop --delay 10 --host my.host.com
with a subsequent press of "T" to report transaction info works just fine.

Overall:
- modes A, Q, O, C and K (and perhaps others) work just fine with:
innotop --delay 10 --host my.host.com --mode ? --nonint --timestamp
- modes B, D, F, I, L and T (and perhaps others) do not work. All of these
modes produce the same error I report above.


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

inn...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 7, 2013, 3:06:50 PM10/7/13
to innotop...@googlegroups.com

Comment #1 on issue 91 by jgoatc...@sparefoot.com: Problems with
non-interactive execution
http://code.google.com/p/innotop/issues/detail?id=91

This *may* be a dup of issue 87.

inn...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 31, 2013, 9:58:41 AM10/31/13
to innotop...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 87

Comment #2 on issue 91 by g...@dakin.be: Problems with non-interactive
execution
http://code.google.com/p/innotop/issues/detail?id=91

Yes, this is a duplicate of issue 87
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages