Ah, I see! I thought you had problems running InMAP, please ignore the earlier message. What SR does is that it is pre-set matrices for US-specific sources and receptors which only increases the computational efficiency. Other than that results would be identical with and without the SR matrices in play. These SR matrices are a simulation of many InMAP runs and show the relationship of each location in the US and reduce the whole complex process down to simple matrix operations, and in that way, it provides computational efficiency.
As for your question, please don't bother with SR as it will not provide you with an answer. I think, your question is something to think for yourself in your own setting. If you are interested in the marginal changes in pollution concentration from each source you would want to feed your emissions data from different sources separately and you would understand their contribution, but this would be an exhausting process. As you currently feed all the pollution changes in different locations you get the combined effect for each grid cell. If for some valid reason, you want disaggregated results you might want to group your emission sources. For instance, EGUs altogether are causing these much changes, manufacturing altogether causing that much changes etc. In each case, you can group your sources and feed them into InMAP and save the result for each and then you could compare the results with each other and you would be able to tell something about their spatial distribution. While there should be smarter ways of doing this in your setting, SR would not be useful to find an answer to your question.
Good luck!
Anil