Reset Key Chain

[Consuela Ellett]

Previously I was able to daisy chain three U2415 monitors on a single displayport connection. A few days ago it "glitched" and turned one monitor into 640x480. In trying to reset this I ended up disconnecting the monitors and reconnecting them and deleting them from device manager. Now however I can only convince 2 monitors to function. For it to work I must disable DP1.2 on the middle monitor. If I enable DP1.2 on the middle monitor it freaks out and all monitors stop working. I've tried reinstalling various versions of the Intel driver.

Please be aware that the content on that site is not controlled by Intel. This information is offered for your convenience and should not be viewed as an endorsement by Intel for the merchants or services offered there.

After posting, my work laptop the next day also decided to glitch (also using intel graphics). I ended up swapping the order of the monitors in the chain and it began working again, including on my personal desktop. To try and reproduce the problem I put the arrangement back and it also is now working. I can't help but think something is remembering something and reassociating the MST hubs improperly. Reordering the monitors seems to clear that out and allow them to function again. This only seems to happen in my testing when two mst hubs are chained together (As is the case with three U2415 monitors). I did find today that the Intel Graphics control panel on the windows store has an additional feature that shows the "Displayport Topology" It appears to think when it is glitched that the second hub has no displays attached despite it being integrated into the display and should at least see one.

While checking the SSU reports I noticed that your BIOS is out of date, that you have 2 graphics cards installed (the Intel integrated and a Radeon* one) but your motherboard's website does not indicate that your motherboard support's hybrid graphics, and that your RAM frequency is set above the supported by your processor.

Please contact your motherboard manufacturer (in this case Asus*) to get assistance on getting your BIOS up to date. Also, keep in mind that if you would like to use the Intel graphics card and it's graphics functionalities you will have to remove the Radeon* graphics card.

It is very hard to tell if the phenomenon (such as today I managed to have the middle monitor in the chain not come on but the first and third did) is due to the graphics driver or the monitors (U2415) themselves. I get the feeling that while a 3 monitor chain is "supported" it isn't really tested by Dell or Intel.

Intel does not verify all solutions, including but not limited to any file transfers that may appear in this community. Accordingly, Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade.

This seems very easy. So easy that it should be part or the kit to begin with. Chains marked exactly where they need to be and a unistrut or similar top beam shipped with the kit with pre drilled motor brackets. That way the motor spacing is exactly the same on every kit. In theory calibration could be skipped. People would just put the marked chains on the 12 o clock sprockets enter in the details and be ready to cut.

Would someone with the standard chains that have marked their chains be so kind as to count how many links from the end that is attached to the sled to the marked chain? This way people should be able to always get the correct number of links to do if their marks wear off without having to go through calibration again.

I am making a drawing, using "Chain Set" option to organize my dimensions. Because I do not have a lot of space for one dimension, I pull this dimension on the outside. Everything is fine until I move the view, then "Chain Set" dimensions gets reset and I have to pull them out again. I am using Inventor 2020.3 (when I was using Inventor 2016, there was no issue with this, dimensions stayed as there were put). This should be fixed.

Hi! There must be some difference in drawing style. I can only reproduce the behavior with a chain dimension having an unanchored point. Could you share the example files here so we can take a closer look?

I was able to reproduce the behavior and I found the setting that is causing it. The screencast shows that if you change the Dimension Text Alignment setting in the drawing tab of the document settings it will behave as you are intending. It is curious that this setting should change the behavior of just the chain set dimensions. I did try it with regular chain, baseline, baseline set, and normal dimensions and the chain set is the only one that moves the dimensional value back to the original position. @johnsonshiue is this as it is intended or this a bug?

Many thanks for sharing the detail! I am seeing the behavior now. Like Andrew mentioned, it was related to the Text Alignment setting. Indeed, it seems unique to Chained Dimension, which is wrong. I believe it is a bug. I will work with the project team to understand it better.

LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.

Birds fly together in flocks. In a process termed by scientists as a murmuration, they fly together without a plan. Scientists believe the movements are coordinated by observing what others around them are doing. Today, I liken the current path of supply chain leaders at the fall events to this flock of birds. The focus of summits/public supply chain events is on refining current processes when I believe that we need a supply chain reset. The answer is not a digital transformation. Instead, there is a need to step back and question the problem that we are trying to solve.

You might ask, "Why?" Followed, but, "Why, Why, Why?" I think that the current definition of supply chain planning is outdated. Planners experiencing burnout is not new, but the work-life balance issues are growing. In this post and the report that I am currently writing on Building Outside-in Supply Chain Planning Processes, I share some reasons to change:

• The order is a poor proxy for demand. Demand latency (the time from purchase in the channel to the manufacturer seeing the order) is 2-20 weeks. The mining of pattern recognition of orders to drive a forecast is out of step with the market. In addition, the extreme variation of buying patterns during the pandemic makes order history less relevant to predict demand.
• We don't have end-to-end planning. Traditional planning focuses on mitigating manufacturing constraints. Procurement and logistics operate largely in isolation. For example, DRP and TMS have nothing in common. We need to be able to make better trade-offs between source, make and deliver.
• The need to Improve FVA. Demand forecasts based on channel data versus order data improve Forecast Value Added (FVA) by 100-200%. In three years of testing, the use of channel data in forecasting engines dramatically improves FVA when compared to forecasting on order data. (The use of more advanced engines with narrow AI improves the demand plan slightly, while the use of channel data shows dramatic improvements. This is especially relevant considering that 8 out of 10 deployments we have measured currently show a negative FVA. (Imagine investing in all of the technology and headcount to degrade the forecast.)
• The imperative to manage the form and function of inventory. Today, manufacturers hold twenty-eight more days of inventory when compared to the pre-recession inventories of 2007. The increases in in-transit and cycle stock inventories outpaced improvements in safety stock optimization. Only 9% of companies actively design their networks.
• The growing issue with the rise in supply variability. Today, most companies manage safety stock based on demand variability despite the exponential increase in supply variability. Less than 1% of companies update planning batch jobs based on shifts in in-transit lead times and conversion rates. Creating a master data layer to create insights and align supply plans is required to build inventory buffers.

Like the other ebooks, here, we compile the best-read blog posts from the prior year for easy reading. The ebook includes thirty-eight blog posts. I hope that you enjoy it and that the posts allow you to also question the current state.

The evolution of this methodology is If you enjoy our research and are interested in defining the value of networks, please consider filling out our current survey, which is closing this week. In this work, we are trying to get answers from brand owners, contract manufacturers, and suppliers to this value chain. Here is the link.

I'm checking things because of a noise that sounded like cam chain slap. A KTM mechanic told me to reset the cam chain tensioner. I've read this on the forum too. Mine had ONE click on it, so I reset it. Then I pushed on the plunger (or whatever it's called) when it was back on until it stopped. After rechecking, it had TWO clicks. So I don't see how resetting the tensioner is supposed to help.

I've read two sides to the TWO clicks or less for the tensioner. One says to replace the chain. The other says the chain can't wear that much unless you have at least 10k miles on it (mine is maybe 2-3k), and to just replace the chain guides. If the chain is actually out of spec and I just replaced the guides, would I still get TWO clicks or less on the tensioner?

Resetting is a strange term. I supose he wanted you to check & see that it was working?? Maybe he had his head into some other bike? Anyway as long as its not broken it will auto adjust. For the next several thousand miles you can ignore it, when the time comes to do a top end I have a way of measuring how much they have worn from new (and I very seldom replace one)

c80f0f1006