I would say that the maintainers of this list are doing a horrible job,
but it seems that there is not anyone maintaining tre list.
===============================================================================
From isode-...@isode.com Mon Mar 11 06:42:59 1996
Return-Path: <isode-...@isode.com>
Delivery-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 06:42:59 -0500
Received: from woozle.isode.com by cassiopeia.ndf.rl.af.mil with SMTP (PP);
Mon, 11 Mar 1996 06:42:42 -0500
Received: from nic.ddn.mil by woozle.isode.com with Internet SMTP (IC MTA);
Mon, 11 Mar 1996 09:13:26 +0000
Received: from kant.dcs.cie.uva.es (kant.dcs.cie.uva.es [157.88.40.253])
by nic.ddn.mil (8.6.12/DNIC) with SMTP id EAA29185
for <is...@nic.ddn.mil>; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 04:13:11 -0500
Message-Id: <1996031109...@nic.ddn.mil>
Received: by kant.dcs.cie.uva.es (1.38.193.5/16.2) id AA03480;
Mon, 11 Mar 1996 11:14:32 +0100
From: 9310706 <fjg...@kant.dcs.cie.uva.es>
Subject: What's the matter ...?
To: is...@nic.ddn.mil
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:14:31 MET
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85.2.1]
Status: R
Are the ISODE discussion group dead ?
It 's only used for marketting, erothic mail and so.
I'll like to discuss about, and only about ISODE !!!.