It's not dead. When I have more free time to mess with it, I'm going
to integrate it into the inferno-npe tree. Then it will be like all
the other ports.
That said, a lot of people are waiting for the more information on the
DSi which is a much more interesting device for inferno than the ds
lite or ds fat.
>progress that's been made on this platform has been impressive to say the least :-)
Standing on the shoulders of giants, like the rest of us ;-)
just for completeness:
as it's been pointed above, we're just on a hibernation period.
Current DSi based flashcards run code in ds-compatibility mode,
which means that the Inferno DS port .nds files on the downloads
section will run too on the DSi.
Anyway i'd be interested in confirming it,
anybody want to give it a shot?
--
salva
I've just finished coding a backlight driver for DSLinux and my aim is
to get a driver for the DSerial device working, so DSLinux can use it
as a standard serial port. This will open up a lot of new
possibilities (but no USB host, unfortunately). I'm looking forward
to using my DS with an old 56k modem as a router :-)
Once I have completed this (which is going to take me a long, long
time), I intend to leave the svn in a compilable shape and call it the
end. Already there are problems with newer toolchains not compiling
correctly and I'm guessing that the next time I try to setup a DSLinux
compilation environment, it's not going to work....
I really hope people carry on with the Inferno port though. One of
the major problems with DSLinux is the bloat of the kernel and I was
really interested in seeing what Inferno could do with the limited
hardware available.
It's true *everyone* is waiting for someone to get DSi homebrew
running The trouble is if it takes too long for the new DSi hardware
to be opened, there may not be people around to take advantage of it.
Fingers crossed.....
that makes a lot of sense, i've thought the same wrt dserial/dsbrut for dsi
having a serial line would ease/speed up development/debugging a lot.
> Once I have completed this (which is going to take me a long, long
> time), I intend to leave the svn in a compilable shape and call it the
> end. Already there are problems with newer toolchains not compiling
> correctly and I'm guessing that the next time I try to setup a DSLinux
> compilation environment, it's not going to work....
>
good luck
> I really hope people carry on with the Inferno port though. One of
> the major problems with DSLinux is the bloat of the kernel and I was
> really interested in seeing what Inferno could do with the limited
> hardware available.
>
as far as we're curious about what can be achieved homebrew
in general and by extension this will be active.
> It's true *everyone* is waiting for someone to get DSi homebrew
> running The trouble is if it takes too long for the new DSi hardware
> to be opened, there may not be people around to take advantage of it.
>
> Fingers crossed.....
>
/me can't stand the curiosity & gets one of those nifty bootcards (r4i)
--
salva