Reminder: IW telecon today 2pm ET

[Timothy Lebo]

A reminder that we have our regular IW telecon today.

Apologies to Patrick for not informing him of the schedule change that we all agreed to last week.

I also regret that I likely will not be able to attend our meetings until 22 November. 

I am sprinting with a colleague here at work to prepare our demonstration for the SAB.

You can find the wiki page for today's meeting at:

http://inference-web.org/wiki/Inference_Web_Meetings#2013

Regards,

Tim

[Patrick West]

I won't be able to make it today as we have our escience meeting 1-2:30. The escience meeting is every other Friday.

Patrick

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "inference-web" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to inference-we...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[Jim McCusker]

Still on deadline, can't make it today either, sorry.

Jim

--

Jim McCusker

Data Scientist

5AM Solutions

jmcc...@5amsolutions.com

http://5amsolutions.com

PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
mcc...@cs.rpi.edu
http://tw.rpi.edu

[Deborah L. McGuinness]

Sorry - It looks like an updated message from me did not go out yesterday.
I had suggested that we skip this week's meeting but that we request that everyone use this hour of time to update the page and to do your action items and that we meet next week.
I was hoping to get a plan for what it took to finish up the mapping and to get the outline for a technical note that would be the basis of both a submission - probably ipaw - and w3c member submission.

Tim - even if you can not make the meeting perhaps you can give us  a status of what else is needed on the mapping agreements

thanks,
deborah

[Timothy Lebo]

On Nov 1, 2013, at 12:11 PM, Deborah L. McGuinness <d...@cs.rpi.edu> wrote:

Sorry - It looks like an updated message from me did not go out yesterday.
I had suggested that we skip this week's meeting but that we request that everyone use this hour of time to update the page and to do your action items and that we meet next week.
I was hoping to get a plan for what it took to finish up the mapping and to get the outline for a technical note that would be the basis of both a submission - probably ipaw - and w3c member submission.

Tim - even if you can not make the meeting perhaps you can give us  a status of what else is needed on the mapping agreements

It's my impression that nobody is willing / able / interested to work on the PML document as anything but a reviewer, and that I'm the only one that has accepted to actually work on the content.

So, I'm the critical path and everybody is on standby for reviewing.

As I've said before, I can't let this take priority for the next several weeks and it can get attention as we gear up for IPAW submissions in March.

If that's not the case, then we can discuss. But, I can't change my priorities right now.

Regards,

Tim