Fwd: Targeted: California Surveillance Ordinances

119 views
Skip to first unread message

White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

unread,
Oct 16, 2017, 8:42:39 AM10/16/17
to Hoop 6

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:33 AM
Subject: Targeted: California Surveillance Ordinances
To: Hoop 6 <indigocrys...@googlegroups.com>



Mind Control and Stalking.jpg

Voice to Skull Microwave Auditory Effect (Voice to Skull)
The P300 response is used at airports, shopping malls and in street cameras in order to check whether individuals have criminal tendencies.  Mobile phones and security cameras in the street get radio signals that can transmit modulated data even when the internet and cell networks are down. Security systems and companies are also able to get unique brain frequencies with the databases used for different purposes.  

There is little current legislation that appears capable of directly protecting neuroprivacy in Europe. There has not been a lot of detailed discussion of the privacy implications of neuroimaging technologies despite the fact that there are major information-gathering initiatives relating to brain data, such as the Human Brain Project (“HBP”) whose purpose is similar to that of the Human Genome Project (“HGP”). In contrast to the HGP, which devotes 3-5% of its budget toward studying the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) of the project, there appears to be little particular focus on, or funding for, the study of the social and ethical implications of gathering such information.

Directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation  against an object; or Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person) by: electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations.

Gang Stalking
The gang gets the unique brain frequency of neighbours, employers and other organisations in order to harass the individual, destroy their work, reputation and future. They tend to harass individuals that do not have a big network, wealth or have contacts within the military, police or security services.  The electronic harassment with voice to skull is used to groom, prostitute, sell organs, consume pre-paid phones, test and use illegal immingrants and any person electronically harassed to kill and manipulate.  

The frequency can be used very low and individuals might not be aware of being targeted. The gang could leave the individual  24/7 with voice to skull and psychotronic torture, and not switch off until they die.  The measurement of radiation, EEG and investigation of the gang's unique brain frequencies will assist in ending psychotronic torture. Some software such as Emotiv, Neurosky Mindwave or  Ibrain will be able to record brain to skull communication. Holograms, pictures and pre-programmed dreams can be recorded with video games. http://www.covertharassment.org/voice-to-skull.html



Psychotronic weapon effects.image00121.jpg



​satellitespies_01.jpg

The ACLU’s Marlow says that support for CCOPS-modeled legislation has largely been bipartisan. “We face neither resistance from the left or right,” Marlow says. “The only place we face resistance is from the police.”

In Pensacola, Florida, a version of the ordinance is being sponsored by City Council member Jewel Cannada-Wynn, and it is backed the state’s NAACP chapter, as well as libertarian and Republican groups.

(article below)


BRAINLINK NEURAL DECODING

Wireless brainlink tethering of non-consensual human beings to a neural decoder which is being monitored twenty four hours a day by a surveillance network is currently happening throughout the western world. A brainlink neural decoder is extremely advanced technology that can be made to read the mind of a human being thousands of miles from where that human mind is being read. People who have been selected to be micro surveilled and to have their minds read are being non-consensually implanted without their knowledge with bio-medical microchips in their brains, which are two-way radio communication devices and also brain mapping devices. Wireless brainlink tethering projects have been set up throughout the western world under the guise of doing research on non conformists and political dissidents , but in reality they are about enabling total lock down enslavement for all of humanity except the would-be enslavers whose names we don't know right now.. This wireless brainlink tethering is being enabled via each human being's unique brain signature which it is being claimed can now be accessed online by people in the know.
 
If you are one of the many people who are covertly tethered wirelessly to a brainlink neural decoder the biomedical implant in your brain can be seen with the aid of an electron microscope.
 
There is brainlink neural decoder technology under the auspices of every government in all NATO countries and most other countries throughout the world. Neural decoder technology is widely available in every government department and it is built into the smart engineered technology of all senior government officials but most government officials dont know they have this capability.
 
Government ministers and government officials who are in the know can only tell us about this brainlink neural decoder technology and how it is being used if we ask them directly. It is not enough to write to them about this matter. You must make direct access to a member of your government and provide written material containing relevant questions and only then are these government ministers obliged to answer your questions. Please do this as a matter of urgency.
Yours Sincerely,
Gretta Fahey


Greetings Everyone who is targeted, This is White Buffalo Calf Woman your Twin Deer Mother (TI). Be aware. Copy and paste and share with others. 

A few things you can do to help yourself with Electronic Harassment. 

Basic Blessing
This is a blessing for a spacial field. Brotherhood, 9 plus 4 is 13, golden cosmic sun. This is the end of the natural order of the evolutionary process, learning to become harmonic with the spacial fields around us. Two suns in the sky, twins, ensures it's proximity, the soul of the spiritual can sink or swim, but those with good eyes, fly in the wind. Welcome to the sacred ghost dance, where the dream is together (asleep, soul and resting and awake, sole and moving, but together a great dreaming, waves of delight, come into sight, a marriage of the heart and mind) once more!

Linear think of a hoop and  moving around it. red road of earth, light waves. 
Spacial field of a hoop from the center, flowing outwards in all directions at once. blue road of heaven, sound waves. 

to bless the spacial field, you would say. 
"I bless the sacred nine streams (light waves) and the four directions (all sound waves) with fire (pure light) and water (blessed sound) and holy dew (water and fire together breath of life)". 

~Drum (interferes with electronic signal) against the chest (until TI sleeps, awake with the drum and start beating). Everything is centered around the heart. 

~Once a day, shake it out with the ghost dance (helps to have others share this responsibility with music or drumming, sing all from the heart, nothing pre-recorded) this relieves the bombardment of signals (light frequencies). 

Grounding: Practice standing like a tree, rooting and limbing, bowing with sun, each child is different. 

[[[[excerpt: A few things you can do to help yourself with Electronic Harassment. 

1. Get a large hand drum and beat it against your body. Nothing will be able to get through. 
2. A signal to extremities, shake it about. It interrupts the signal. 
3. High frequency pitches in the ear, send it back. Just think it and you will know when to stop. All frequency is cancelled when you send it back. 
4. Meditate more than sleep. Meditate by slicing sections of the body to rest at a time (head to toes). When you complete the body, sit up quickly. It will take quite a while to learn. Do not quit and many times people fall asleep. Keep trying. When you are sleeping, they will do more harm to you. It gets faster the more you practice. 
5. Sing, dance and drum daily and when in need. This must be done once a day, to shake off and heal what has been done to you during the last 24 hour period. 
6. Smoke (sativa) cannabis as this effects the mind and heart more, while (indica) will make you sleep. 
7.  Often the throat and voice is targeted to stop you from singing, because this heals (purifies spacial fields). So one type of tone making you gulp feels like a wave that interrupts. Instead of feeling the wave, continue the wave and send it back, like the way computers ping to confirm. Remember that any frequency sent back is cancelled. The issue is it's constancy. So you need other methodologies too. 
8. Bless the mind controllers (talking into the mind) and send them powerful love. Laugh at them often. You laugh often. Listen to comedy. Happiness hurts them, because they do not have happiness. Bless and pray throughout the day. I sing or hit the drum throughout the day, every four hours to get a spiritual connection. To learn more about this way, you will have to practice and join me on a circle for more questions and answers. 
9. Yelling evils and disturbing the neighborhood. Right after they make their noise, you start to sing to cancel out and make it a blessing instead. 
10. Sway to and fro (while sitting and standing), which makes you a moving target, which is more difficult for them. Dance is even better. 

Electronic Harassment and Gang Stalking
(read more at linked sights)

Electronic Torture (Addendum)
🌈Military, Veterans, Rainbow Warriors of Prophecy

White Buffalo Calf Woman Puts Her Sacred Mind into Their Minds 
https://plus.google.com/+WhiteBuffaloCalfWomanTwinDeerMother/posts/8j1kkwx6ASw
🌈 White Buffalo Calf Woman knews & visions circle
https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/112647294491367091490

Ani Kaspar - former Wall Street executive, now TI, to speak about her Targeting Awareness Action Letter found at this link:  https://www.facebook.com/notes/ani-kaspar/targeting-awarenessaction-letter-support-invitation/10155086544159653

Did you know?
...That the CIA has now opened a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Electronic Reading Room where you may search through CIA de-classified files on topics of interest? The site asks: "Do UFOs fascinate you? Are you a history buff who wants to learn more about the Bay of Pigs, Vietnam or the A-12 Oxcart? Have stories about spies always fascinated you? You can find information about all of these topics and more in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Electronic Reading Room."  https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/home

Portman/Murphy Bill Promotes Coordinated Strategy to Defend America, Allies Against Propaganda and Disinformation from Russia, China & Others 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Rob Portman (R-OH) and Chris Murphy (D-CT) today announced that their Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act – legislation designed to help American allies counter foreign government propaganda from Russia, China, and other nations – has passed the Senate as part of the FY 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Conference Report. The bipartisan bill, which was introduced by Senators Portman and Murphy in March, will improve the ability of the United States to counter foreign propaganda and disinformation by establishing an interagency center housed at the State Department to coordinate and synchronize counter-propaganda efforts throughout the U.S. government. To support these efforts, the bill also creates a grant program for NGOs, think tanks, civil society and other experts outside government who are engaged in counter-propaganda related work. This will better leverage existing expertise and empower local communities to defend themselves from foreign manipulation.

“The passage of this bill in the Senate today takes us one critical step closer to effectively confronting the extensive, and destabilizing, foreign propaganda and disinformation operations being waged against us. While the propaganda and disinformation threat has grown, the U.S. government has been asleep at the wheel. Today we are finally signaling that enough is enough; the United States will no longer sit on the sidelines. We are going to confront this threat head-on,” said Senator Portman. “With the help of this bipartisan bill, the disinformation and propaganda used against our allies and our interests will fail.”

“Congress has taken a big step in fighting back against fake news and propaganda from countries like Russia. When the president signs this bill into law, the United States will finally have a dedicated set of tools and resources to confront our adversaries’ widespread efforts to spread false narratives that undermine democratic institutions and compromise America’s foreign policy goals,” said Murphy. “I’m proud of what Senator Portman and I accomplished here because it’s long past time for the U.S. to get off the sidelines and confront these growing threats.”

NOTE: The bipartisan Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act is organized around two main priorities to help achieve the goal of combatting the constantly evolving threat of foreign disinformation. They are as follows:

The first priority is developing a whole-of-government strategy for countering foreign propaganda and disinformation. The bill would increase the authority, resources, and mandate of the Global Engagement Center to include state actors like Russia and China in addition to violent extremists. The Center will be led by the State Department, but with the active senior level participation of the Department of Defense, USAID, the Broadcasting Board of Governors, the Intelligence Community, and other relevant agencies. The Center will develop, integrate, and synchronize whole-of-government initiatives to expose and counter foreign disinformation operations and proactively advance fact-based narratives that support U.S. allies and interests.

Second, the legislation seeks to leverage expertise from outside government to create more adaptive and responsive U.S. strategy options. The legislation establishes a fund to help train local journalists and provide grants and contracts to NGOs, civil society organizations, think tanks, private sector companies, media organizations, and other experts outside the U.S. government with experience in identifying and analyzing the latest trends in foreign government disinformation techniques. This fund will complement and support the Center’s role by integrating capabilities and expertise available outside the U.S. government into the strategy-making process. It will also empower a decentralized network of private sector experts and integrate their expertise into the strategy-making process.
Permalink: http://www.portman.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2016/12/senate-passes-major-portman-murphy-counter-propaganda-bill-as-part-of-ndaa


Gang Stalkers use Smart Phones Remotely Operate Implants Skizit Gesture https://youtu.be/BfWPJqZh0Qc

Richmond City Counsel Member letter to Targeted Individuals
May 6, 2015 Jovanka-Beckles-Letter-for-TIs-1-1.pdf
(attached) and at Sister Amy's google drive
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4CW0K48bFwYRkdrcFgyMHB0NU0/view

NSA (attached)

Torture Psychologists Settle Lawsuit
For Targeted Individuals' Family and Friends


2001 congressional
amy anderson, AMY L ANDERSON
Address: 425 29TH ST ,RICHMONDCA 94804
richmond

Richmond council passes resolution supporting ban on space-based weapons

May 20, 2015

The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.

Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA), introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident who claims she’s been targeted by “remote transmission” from space-based weaponry. Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around the country to speak at Tuesday’s council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.

The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty permanently banning “space-based weapons,” even though the legislation first introduced by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.

Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.

RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.

“I’m going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of dumb ideas,” Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.

The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.

The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from long-range missiles might not be wise.

Pimple disputed what he called “knee-jerk” reactions from RPA members who depicted President Ronald Reagan’s proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as the “Star Wars” initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the project’s moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.

The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, “is you can knock out someone’s weapons long before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.

RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college that predicted truths 20 years in advance.

“It’s easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the wrong mindset,” Martinez said.

Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesn’t support war.

“The weaponization of space…is something I think is extremely immoral and we should not be as a nation engaging in,” Myrick said. “Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset…..that’s why I support this resolution.”

Amy Lee Anderson, a “targeted individual” who brought the matter to Beckles’ attention, was thankful that the council took up the issue.

“No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support,” Anderson said. “We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. It’s hard for someone who has no experience to fathom it, it’s so sophisticated.”

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/20/richmond-council-passes-resolution-supporting-ban-on-space-based-weapons-2/

Richmond Police Swamped by Calls from "Targeted Individuals"
May 31, 2015
 
 


If you find the Richmond Police Department slow to respond to calls for service these days, it may be because they are tied up taking police reports from the nation’s “targeted individuals,” for whom Richmond has become the last great hope. On May 29, Police Chief Chris Magnus wrote in frustration:

We just don't have the resources, including staff, to respond to all these people who are now contacting us because they believe they are being "targeted."  We are getting numerous inquiries and requests from individuals all over the country--some even from other countries related to the Council's recent resolution.  Richmond now seems to be known as the "resource or helpers" for folks from many states with a myriad of mental health and other problems. If these inquires come from actual Richmond residents, we do our best to be thoughtful, kind, and as helpful as we can be.  BUT--we cannot be the department that fields all these requests from around the nation and beyond.

Not only is the Police Department’s phone ringing off the hook; the Mayor’s Office is also getting inquiries, such as this one:

XXX called. She lives in her car. Currently in Carson City, NV. Formerly in Sacramento. Believes she’s being targeted, gang stalked, and electronically stalked. She believes she’s been stalked from Silicon Valley to Sacramento and now to NV where she lives in her car. She was in Laramie, Wyoming for a summer and believes she was stalked there as well.  She’s 60, has gone to the police and the FBI but no one has helped.  She’s been to the VA (she’s a veteran) and was told she needs medication.  She believes things happen when she’s asleep and that her energy is being stolen. She wants to know how she can take advantage of Richmond’s policy so she won’t be stalked and targeted. She’d also like to receive a copy of the policy that the Council passed.

I am trying to figure out how we can use this newfound fame to help market Richmond, much as desolate eastern Nevada has used the Extraterrestrial Highway to lure tourists to an otherwise deserted stretch of desert highway.

I have to confess that two weeks ago I had no idea what a “targeted individual” or “gang stalking” was. Thanks to my more enlightened City Council colleagues, I am now not only familiar with the terms, but Richmond has instantly become the worldwide ground zero for addressing the evils of this pernicious form of harassment.

It turns out that the space based weapons resolution passed by the City Council earlier this week had nothing to do with the future use of space, star wars or war and peace, in the conventional sense.

The resolution has been in the works for nearly a year and is closely tied with a group of people worldwide, commonly known as “targeted individuals,” who believe they are victims of illegal harassment and abuse, generally by intangible methods such as radiation and chemical releases. The Urban Dictionary defines “targeted individuals” as:

Targeted Individuals are people who are illegally and covertly harassed, abused, gang-stalked and spied upon 24/7 by organized groups of persons.

There are several reasons why people become targets and they usually have something to do with sex and money, in that order. The targeting may have to do with a messy divorce, child custody, unrequited love, whistle-blowing, revenge, differences in social, political, or religious beliefs, etc.

Targeting for monetary reasons can include anything from denying you social security benefits or workmen's comp. to outright stealing from your bank account, from sexual slavery to embezzelment, and so on.

Targets should vehemently resist all attempts at being denied any and all kinds of government benefits. Appeal any bad decisions and if you don't like the next decision, appeal it again.

Another claim being made and that is that people might be being targeted for experimental reasons by the military or security agencies, usually, to test out how certain mind-control techniques and weapons work, which goes back to money or sexual slavery.

The main purpose of the assaults is to discredit and control targets. Harassment and abuse is often set up by corporations, businesses, organized criminals, street gangs, right-wing extremists, doctors, dentists, lawyers, or anyone who stands a chance of making any money off of targets.

Targeted Individuals are often hit with gassing (blowing noxious bio/chemical fumes into the target's environment) and they are attacked psychologically, as well. These abuses often lead to the need for psychological and physiological medical attention, thereby providing a good cash flow for the medical community and for big pharma., while taking care of someone's personal problem at the same time. 
According to several Internet postings, Richmond first became the latest champion and best hope of targeted individual rights about a year ago (June 2014) when a “precedent setting meeting” was arranged by then Vice-mayor Jovanka Beckles between the Richmond Police Department and a number of targeted individuals. According to a post by Deborah Dupré, “BREAKING NEWS: Jaw Dropping What Calif. Police Just Did Regarding Targeted Individuals!” 
California has become the first state to pledge aid to targeted individuals (TIs), marking a major breakthrough to an estimated 350,000 innocent Americans suffering from what they say is organized spying or stalking, many of whom also say their perpetrators are covertly using new military grade weapons to attack them…
A breakthrough for TIs (targeted individuals) has occurred in the U.S. – if it holds.  Amy Anderson, a few activists met with Richmond, California vice-mayor and the Richmond police force captain, who pledged that they and their administrations’ will now be working alongside TI victims in their city to assist them, according to an email sent to Dupré. 
 Richmond survivors can now officially call the Richmond police dispatch number if/when they come under electronic attack and file a police report, according to White, a first in the United States.
 Not only that, the captain further stated that he is willing to work with medical personnel in the area informing them of this type of covert criminal activity. 
 Police departments and medical personnel historically dismiss targeted individuals’ reports under electromagnetic attack. They typically mock TIs when reporting for protection and aid, and sometimes worse: they attempt to have the target committed to psychiatric units. In some cases, they have succeeded, intensifying the living nightmare that targets reportedly experience every day of their lives.
TI’s in the Richmond area will soon be able to seek much-needed assistance from their local police or hospital emergency rooms as situations occur, according to White.
“This may lead to other initiatives which would come as we continue to work with the administration regarding our issues,” she said…
“The vice-mayor, police captain and their aides listened patiently to several victims as they recounted their stories in person in the vice-mayor’s office and by conference telephone, regarding the activities of covert harassment groups locally and nationwide,” recounted White. “Then, stunningly, the police captain revealed that he knew of two people who are also victims of this technology.”
The targeted individuals who met with the officials and police found a strategy that worked for them and against local terror groups, possibly state sponsored terror groups.
“Please note that this arrangement could ONLY have happened by meeting with administration officials first.  People have already met with police department personnel with no results,” White said. “Amy started by going directly to the city administration officers, the  vice-mayor and councilmembers (in private meetings, not at the public, televised council broadcasts).
“After the vice-mayor became informed and convinced of our issues in several meetings, she then brought the police department personnel into the discussion, who at that time also became concerned allies in helping victims deal with a covert community terror program. I believe our most available solution at this time will most likely come locally and from the top down.”
Amy’s boyfriend, a security guard with his own business, offered to establish a task force to help TI’s in Richmond. The police captain pledged the assistance of the city of Richmond police department in this effort.
 “We are hoping to get more communities of TI’s involved in organizing locally to get a handle on their stalking and electronic harassment scenarios.”
“The biggest hurdle for TIs is getting people to take their concerns seriously. A proposal made in 2001 by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to ban “psychotronic weapons” (another common term for mind-control technology) was hailed by TIs as a great step forward. But the bill was widely derided by bloggers and columnists and quickly dropped,” according to veteran TI Harland Gerard reporting to the Washington Post in the article Mind Games.
“Doug Gordon, Kucinich’s spokesman, would not discuss mind control other than to say the proposal was part of broader legislation outlawing weapons in space. The bill was later reintroduced, minus the mind control. “It was not the concentration of the legislation, which is why it was tightened up and redrafted,’ was all Gordon would say.”
Police usually take no action when TIs report their victimization in hopes of protection and justice. This news today, therefore, comes as another Targeted Individual landmark case.
In June, California became the first state to pledge aid to targeted individuals (TIs), marking a major breakthrough to an estimated 350,000 innocent Americans suffering from organized spying or stalking, many of whom also say their perpetrators are covertly using new military grade weapons to attack their bodies and their minds.
The breakthrough for American TIs occurred when a group of TIs met with Richmond, California vice-mayor and Richmond police force captain, who pledged that they and their administrations’ will now be working alongside TI victims in their city to assist them, according to an email sent to Dupré. 
Richmond survivors can now call the Richmond police dispatch number if/when they come under electronic attack and file a police report, a first in the United States.
Another Internet post called the Richmond 2014 meeting a “milestone” and the “beginning of a trend:”
There is an interesting development from Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance FFCHS (FREEDOMFCHS.com), the human rights group.  A milestone has been reached because Richmond CA will now take crime reports from Targeted Individuals about Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) abuse and Organized stalking.  This is a first because prior to this, the police would ignore complaints about DEW and Organized Stalking and attribute it as a delusional disorder.  But all that has apparently changed.  I see this as the beginning of a trend and there is no going back.  When someone makes a DEW or Organized Stalking complaint in Richmond Ca and calls the police, a crime report will be written.  This will allow investigations, searches & seizures of weapons and ultimately,  arrests and convictions. 
A June 2, 2014, post, picturing then Vice-mayor Jovanka Beckles, Amy Anderson and others, called the meeting with Richmond Police “a major breakthrough for the T.I community,” 
Richmond T.I.'s and Vice Mayor 
NEW T.I. POLICY IN PLACE IN RICHMOND, CA!

Amy Anderson a longtime Richmond, California resident and Targeted Individual has worked tirelessly for years with her City Officials to increase awareness and to gain support for the T.I. Community.  She has successfully been able to get the Vice Mayor to agree not to allow the installation of additional cell phone towers  in the City since they have been known to be used as directed energy weapons.

The latest victory came on June 20, 2014 when Amy brought along several targeted individuals both in person and over the phone to explain the program and to share their stories with the Vice Mayor and the Police Captain.

The meeting began with the Vice Mayor recapping the previous meeting which included Amy Anderson, and leaders from other Human Rights Organizations.   Amy gave an overview of electronic harassment, Renata Murry, Israel, Gloria Welburn and Robert Brown spoke about Organized Stalking.  Miriam Snyder and Dorothy Mackey gave an overview of the Program and Joseph Whip explained how his Security Company will assist victims who report the crime to the Police.

The two hour meeting ended with the Captain thanking the T.I.’s for their information and explaining that helping the T.I Community would be a new experience for the police department since they are accustomed to dealing with evidence and witnesses.  In the case of Targeting, there is usually very little of either, nevertheless the Captain committed the Richmond Police Department to helping Targeted victims in any way they can, and stated that Targets reporting the crime in the City of Richmond will no longer be deemed mentally ill and placed in mental institutions.  Going forward when a Target reports a crime perpetrated against them, the Richmond Police will provide a safe environment for the victim, file a police report and give a copy of the report to the victim for their records.  The victim will also be referred to the newly formed T.I. Task Force made up of several of the victims present at the meeting.

This is a major breakthrough that has never been done in the T.I. Community; through Amy’s persistence, dedication and commitment to the T.I. Community she has been able to get results that major T.I. Organizations have not been able to accomplish.

This latest breakthrough should restore hope for all Targeted Individuals and should help us to realize that not everyone is involved in the targeting campaign. There is help out there but we must be willing to lose the fear and work hard to get it. This should also be a call to action for all T.I.’s to get active in their Cities so we can take our Cities back one City at a time!
A special thank you to Amy, the Vice Mayor, the Police Captain and the T.I. Community!

Update: The Captain has delivered on his promise to help the T.I. Community and has referred the first Electronic Harassment/Organized stalking victim to the T.I. Task Force….This is major! 
Finally, another 2014 post called the Richmond development a “true breakthrough:”
Richmond, California resident and veteran targeted individual Eleanor White, author of Tortured America, Coping With the Crime, says a true breakthrough for TIs (targeted individuals) has occurred in the U.S. – if it holds. Amy Anderson, a few activists, and White met with Richmond, California vice-mayor and the Richmond police force captain, who pledged that they and their administrations’ will now be working alongside TI victims in their city to assist them.
“The vice-mayor, police captain and their aides listened patiently to several victims as they recounted their stories in person in the vice-mayor’s office and by conference telephone, regarding the activities of covert harassment groups locally and nationwide,” recounted White. “Then, stunningly, the police captain revealed that he knew of two people who are also victims of this technology.”
Local terror groups 
The targeted individuals who met with the officials and police found a strategy that worked for them and against local terror groups, possibly state sponsored terror groups.
“Please note that this arrangement could ONLY have happened by meeting with administration officials first. People have already met with police department personnel with no results,” White said. “Amy started by going directly to the city administration officers, the vice-mayor and councilmembers (in private meetings, not at the public, televised council broadcasts).
“After the vice-mayor became informed and convinced of our issues in several meetings, she then brought the police department personnel into the discussion, who at that time also became concerned allies in helping victims deal with a covert community terror program. I believe our most available solution at this time will most likely come locally and from the top down.”
Amy’s boyfriend, a security guard with his own business, offered to establish a task force to help TI’s in Richmond. The police captain pledged the assistance of the city of Richmond police department in this effort.
“We are hoping to get more communities of TI’s involved in organizing locally to get a handle on their stalking and electronic harassment scenarios.”
Richmond survivors can now officially call the Richmond police dispatch number if/when they come under electronic attack and file a police report, according to White, a first in the United States.
Not only that, the captain further stated that he is willing to work with medical personnel in the area informing them of this type of covert criminal activity. 
Police departments and medical personnel historically dismiss targeted individuals’ reports under electromagnetic attack. They typically mock TIs when reporting for protection and aid, and sometimes worse: they attempt to have the target committed to psychiatric units. In some cases, they have succeeded, intensifying the living nightmare that targets reportedly experience every day of their lives.
TI’s in the Richmond area will soon be able to seek much-needed assistance from their local police or hospital emergency rooms as situations occur, according to White.
“This may lead to other initiatives which would come as we continue to work with the administration regarding our issues,” she said.
Innocent people of all walks of life are conveying that they are being targeted, many detailing what meets the criteria of torture. Some of these targets have not survived, as reported by Deborah Dupré.

Not everyone touched by the “targeted individual” community was happy to see Richmond’s embracement. The mother of a “targeted individual” wrote the following email to me:

Dear Mayor Butt,

I am sending some links below to articles my son sent me regarding an ordinance that he says the City Council voted for and that the Richmond Police will be taking reports for crime investigation for this type of weapon targeting.

My son suffers from mental illness and believes that Voice-Skull or electromagnetic waves generated by groups who target individuals as described in this article.  He keeps using this to support his theory that the reasons he hears voices is that he is being targeted!  Of course, I find this hard to believe but I can't convince him otherwise. He often refers to and site Richmond Police and City Council.

I am doing everything in my power to get him treatment but he holds on to this delusion that he is being targeted.  They Call it Voice-Skull or Synthetic Telepathy

So why am I a writing to you?  I think he is misinterpreting that the Richmond Police are now taking this seriously.  Can you please tell me whether this is true or not.  I need to try to break through his delusion in order to get him to take appropriate medication otherwise he will never be well enough to function again.  This is a young man with a BA MA, very intelligent and very talented who is decompensating and throwing his future away because of this. Part of delusional disorder or Psychosis is that they cannot see that they are delusional and have a problem. This is a serious issues.  I don't see him as any danger other than this destroying his life or  possibly to himself.

Here are the links:  I would greatly appreciate a response from your or someone in your office or the Police Force.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/city-council-votes-to-ban-mind-control-weapon-use-against-residents/5450998

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/mariosorrentino79%40yahoo.com/14d7ae79df748525?compose=14d7cd6a31db5364

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/06/breaking-news-targeted-individual-major-breakthrough-calif-officials-pledge-aid-to-survivors-of-local-terror-groups-2978942.html

Respectfully, 

XXX
http://www.sfgate.com/img/pages/article/opengraph_default.png
Chip Johnson
Richmond Council saves us from space attacks (by 5-2 vote!)
By Chip Johnson on May 26, 2015 6:28 PM 
Dying star --- or space attacker? 
Photo By Getty
Dying star — or space attacker?
The Richmond City Council, in all its wisdom, last week addressed an unforeseen threat to California residents. A silent stalker that travels at light-speed from the heavens above and watches the world with an omniscient, unblinking, unrelenting eye.
I’m talking about space-based mind control weapons, people! Where have you been?
After listening to horror stories from more than a dozen people who believe that government agencies and other parties are watching them from outer space –including one speaker who was “targeted” just before arriving at Richmond City Hall– the council voted 5-2 to approve a resolution to discourage the use of space weapons on earth dwellers.
The resolution approved on May 19 refers to an attempt by a U.S. Congressman 14 years ago to ban space-based weapons. In 2001, then-Rep. Dennis Kucinich, DOhio, introduced the “Space Preservation Act” and “Space Preservation Treaty” that would have banned spaced-based weapons.
The Richmond resolution from Councilwoman Jovanka Beckles doesn’t merely support those attempts to ban space-based weapons, it does so “to ensure that individuals will not be targets of space-based weapons.”
Beckles said in a memo she was introducing the resolution because she had met a Richmond woman who “informed me she was a survivor of such horrible attacks. According to her description, these government patented technologies and weapons interfere and disrupt the targeted individual’s health physically and psychologically by remote transmission.” Beckles said it was a shame that city officials have dismissed their claims.
The way I read this, if I had access to space-based weapons, I could use them to control my editor’s mind — maybe score a couple of extra weeks vacation. Or I could use them to manipulate Ticketmaster and get free tickets to the Warriors playoff game. I’m warming up to the idea of space-based weapons.
Even so, as a public policy matter, I wouldn’t have supported this.
It’s not real.
It may be real in the minds of some people — but it’s not what you’d call a widespread public problem. Yet five councilmembers voted for and passed it. In addition to Beckles, they were Eduardo Martinez, Gayle McLaughlin, Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Nat Bates. Voting no were Vinay Pimple and Mayor Tom Butt.
“For a moment I was inclined to support it simply because of the symbolic relief it would bring to (people), and I could see no downside,” Butt wrote in his weekly newsletter. “On the other hand, I considered the message this would send to the hundred thousand or more Richmond residents who are not “targeted” by mind control technology and do not suffer routine physical pain from space-based weapons.”
Butt said he didn’t think most people would want their elected officials to dwell on this matter. For the council to do so, “especially based on the testimony of  a dozen, mostly out-of-town speakers of questionable credibility, worries me,” he said.
Butt originally viewed the issue as harmless. But he received a letter after the vote that changed his mind.
“My son suffers from mental illness and believes that Voice-Skull or electromagnetic waves generated by groups who target individuals” plague him, the woman told Butt. “He keeps using (the council’s decision) to support his theory that the reasons he hears voices is that he is being targeted! Of course, I find this hard to believe, but I can’t convince him otherwise. He often refers to and cites the Richmond Police and City Council.”
She said the council’s vote is helping her son justify his beliefs and avoid taking his medication.
In all, it’s going to take a lot more than a vote by the Richmond City Council to save us from a space attack. The real question is, what will save us from the Richmond City Council?
Categories: RichmondWacky things 
Barnidge: No more mind-control weapons targeting Richmond residents
By Tom Barnidge Contra Costa Times Columnist
Posted:   05/20/2015 11:25:41 AM PDT# Comments
Everything on today's menu is low-fat and high-fiber. Consume as much as you wish:
Few societal threats escape the watchful eye of the Richmond City Council, so it was no surprise Tuesday night that it voted its opposition to airborne weapons systems that have allegedly targeted residents with mind-control technology. You read that correctly.
After a dozen professed victims told of pain suffered from chemtrails, particle beams and electromagnetic radiation, the council voted 5-2 in favor of Councilwoman Jovanka Beckles' resolution "in support of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty to permanently ban spaced-based weapons," with Mayor Tom Butt and Councilman Vinay Pimple dissenting.
"I'm just a dumb city council person," Butt said, "and this is way, way over my head. I frankly think it's way out of the purview of what this city council should be taking up."
Colleague Nat Bates was more understanding: "I'm going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of dumb ideas."

http://www.tombutt.com/forum/2015/15-05-31.htm




CA Assembly Public Safety Comm Supports SB 21- A Statewide Surveillance Transparency Ordinance

by JP Massar •  • 

“California spends more time regulating barber shops and taco trucks than on regulating surveillance.”

Brian Hofer, Chair of the Oakland Privacy Advisory Commission and member of Oakland Privacy, testified before the California State Assembly Public Safety Committee in Sacramento on June 27th, 2017.  The Committee later passed by measure with a 4-2 vote.  It goes now to the Assembly Privacy Committee and, assuming continued favorable votes, ultimately to the Assembly floor. The legislation, sponsored by Senator Hill, has already passed the California Senate.

Below is a transcript of Brian’s words before the Committee and a video of the SB-21 Hearing

SB 21 - No More Secret Surveillance in California - June 27 APS Hearing

https://youtu.be/TBUtCtRt8uo

Tracy Rosenberg

Published on Jun 28, 2017
June 27 hearing in the CA Assembly Public Safety committee on SB 21, a bill to end secret surveillance in California. The bill passed on call with a 4-2 vote with Ass Bill Qwirk absent but indicating support. Testifying in support of the bill is Dave Maas of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Brian Hofer of Oakland Privacy. Testifying in opposition are representatives from the CA State Sheriffs Assn, CA State Police Officers Assn, CA State District Attorneys Association and the League of California Cities.

Hon. Assemblymembers,

My name is Brian Hofer. I’m a member of Oakland Privacy, and I chair the City of Oakland’s Privacy Advisory Commission. I have worked with the counties of Santa Clara and Alameda, the cities of Berkeley, Palo Alto, Richmond, and Oakland, and the Bay Area Rapid Transit District on similar legislative efforts as the proposal before you. Counting votes at the procurement stage, or at the second stage, the underlying use policies themselves, I’ve been a part of thirteen consecutive unanimous yes votes throughout the greater Bay Area, which I highlight to demonstrate that SB21’s approach is reasonable, collaborative, and politically viable. I thank Senator Hill for his leadership in moving this bill, and ask that you support it.

As someone that has been to the finish line, I can share with you what the impact of SB21 adoption will look like. What we have seen in practice, even in a place as politically aggressive as Oakland, is not a prohibition on surveillance equipment or the educating of criminals as some fear, but rather a narrowing of use. SB21 will encourage mindfulness, forcing us to think about potential impacts and consequences of use prior to implementation.

Senator Hill’s SB741 and 34 are proof that such oversight and transparency is not fatal to legitimate police work. Although the District Attorney’s association is opposing SB21 for what I assume are typical turf battle reasons, they would be wise to look to Alameda County. I had the pleasure of working with DA O’Malley on a use policy for the new cell site simulator she was acquiring. After a public discussion and feedback, which resulted in a strengthened policy and an annual report requirement for added transparency, we went to the Board united and received a unanimous yes vote.

Oakland also implemented a ground-breaking policy after a public discussion before the Privacy Commission and collaborating with our police department. In both instances, the public participation resulted in the proponent acquiring controversial equipment, the political buy-in generated good will, and the increased transparency from the public discussion and accountability led to improved trust of law enforcement. This trust, good-will, and cooperation with and from law enforcement should themselves be seen as valuable public safety goals, and benefits of SB21 adoption.

In response to several of the opposition arguments:

No law enforcement agency in California has quit using cell site simulators or license plate readers due to SB741 or 34’s passage into law last year.

Nowhere in the language of SB21 does it require LE to reveal the technical capabilities of the equipment; it only requires that you describe potential use. None of the policies I’ve written provide more than a cursory explanation of how the equipment works, which makes sense because it’s a use policy, not a technical manual. The opposition letters contain very misleading language on this point.

At the county and city level, equipment acquisition is already publicized and publicly noticed on an agenda, when accepting or allocating funds, or requesting Board or Council sign-off to enter into a contract or purchase agreement. SB21 does not add publicity where it did not previously exist.

There is nothing radical about SB21 per se, other than it hasn’t been done before as to surveillance equipment. California spends more time discussing and imposing regulations on barber shops and taco trucks than on equipment capable of tracking my whereabouts in real time, locating me within my own home, place of worship or doctor’s office, tracking my face as I walk about town. We have use policies for automobiles, office equipment, and other government owned property, requests for proposals and contracting guidelines, annual reports and audits of budgets, crime statistics, and so on. SB21 treats surveillance equipment like any other proposal. Come to the governing body and justify your proposal. Come back later and tell us how you used the equipment. By what standard is this controversial or unreasonable?

I’m happy to answer questions. Thank you for listening.

https://oaklandprivacy.org/2017/06/27/testimony-before-the-ca-assembly-public-safety-committee-on-a-statewide-surveillance-equipment-regulation-ordinance/


Just Approved: Surveillance Technology Regulation Ordinance.

Posted by LaborSolidarityCommittee

Categories: Front PageOpen Mic

It’s been almost a year in the making. The Oakland City Council approved the creation of the Oakland Privacy Advisory Commission (OPAC) a year ago on January 19th, 2016. It held its first meeting on July 14th, 2016 and immediately began work on drafting the surveillance equipment regulation ordinance that it passed on Thursday, Jan 5th, 2017.

Oakland's Privacy Advisory Board just approved surveillance tech ordinance. Goes to council now for final approval.

  •  
  •  

The ordinance (OPAC-Surveillance-Ordinance-Adopted – PDF) demands that existing surveillance equipment have a use policy created, vetted by the OPAC, and approved by the City Council. It also requires that any proposed new surveillance equipment be brought to the attention of the OPAC, that a public hearing be held, and that the City Council only approve of it if the Council

[makes] a determination that the benefits to the community of the surveillance technology outweigh the costs; that the proposal will safeguard civil liberties and civil rights; and that, in the City Council’s judgment, no alternative with a lesser economic cost or impact on civil rights or civil liberties would be as effective.

Finally, the ordinance stipulates that use of each piece of equipment have a log of uses kept, that a yearly summary be available for public inspection, and that the use of the equipment be reviewed periodically to determine whether it is cost-effective and not being abused.

A similar ordinance was passed by the Santa Clara Board of Supervisors in late spring of 2016, while others are in various stages of being considered in Berkeley, by the BART Board, by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors, and by Cambridge, MA.

The Oakland Privacy Advisory Commission arose out of protests against the Domain Awareness Center in 2013 and 2014, catalyzed by Oakland Privacy (nee Oakland Privacy Working Group).  The protests led to the creation of an Ad Hoc Privacy Commission to draft a privacy policy for the non-significantly-scaled-back Domain Awareness Center. In addition to drafting that document, they recommended to the City Council the creating of a standing Privacy Advisory Committee, a recommendation ultimately approved by the Council.

The just-assed ordinance will now go to the Oakland City Council for consideration.

 

—–

Some tweets from the public hearing and vote on the ordinance in the Privacy Advisory Commission meeting on January 7th, 2017.

https://occupyoakland.org/2017/01/just-approved-surveillance-technology-regulation-ordinance/


Date Published: 08/21/2017 04:00 AM

BILL START

SB-21 Law enforcement agencies: surveillance: policies.(2017-2018)

AMENDED  IN  ASSEMBLY  AUGUST 21, 2017
AMENDED  IN  ASSEMBLY  JULY 13, 2017
AMENDED  IN  ASSEMBLY  JULY 03, 2017
AMENDED  IN  SENATE  MAY 26, 2017
AMENDED  IN  SENATE  MAY 03, 2017
AMENDED  IN  SENATE  APRIL 17, 2017
AMENDED  IN  SENATE  MARCH 23, 2017
AMENDED  IN  SENATE  MARCH 14, 2017
AMENDED  IN  SENATE  MARCH 07, 2017

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2017–2018 REGULAR SESSION

SENATE BILLNo. 21


Introduced by Senator Hill
(Coauthor: Senator Bradford)

December 05, 2016


An act to add Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 54999.8) to Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, relating to law enforcement agencies.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


SB 21, as amended, Hill. Law enforcement agencies: surveillance: policies.
Under existing law, a city or county is empowered to perform duties including providing for public safety and law enforcement. A city or county is authorized, either directly or indirectly, to prescribe policies and regulations for law enforcement agencies under its jurisdiction.
This bill would, beginning July 1, 2018, require each law enforcement agency, as defined, to submit to its governing body at a regularly scheduled hearing, open to the public, a proposed Surveillance Use Policy for the use of each type of surveillance technology and the information collected, as specified. The bill would require the law enforcement agency to cease using the surveillance technology within 30 days if the proposed plan is not adopted. The bill would require the law enforcement agency to submit an amendment to the surveillance plan, pursuant to the same open meeting requirements, for each new type of surveillance technology sought to be used. The bill would require the policy and any amendments to be posted on the agency’s Internet Web site. The bill would also require the agency to make specified reports, at approved intervals, concerning the use of surveillance technology, and to make those reports available on the agency’s Internet Web site. The bill would prohibit a law enforcement agency from selling, sharing, or transferring information gathered by surveillance technology, except to another law enforcement agency, as permitted by law and the terms of the Surveillance Use Policy. The bill would provide that any person could bring an action for injunctive relief to prevent a violation of these provisions and, if successful, could recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. The bill would require an agency to discipline an employee who knowingly or intentionally uses surveillance technology in violation of these provisions, as specified. The bill would authorize an agency to temporarily use surveillance technology during exigent circumstances, as specified, without meeting the requirements of these provisions, provided that, among other things, the agency submits a specified report to its governing body within 45 days of the end of the exigent circumstances. circumstances, except as specified.
The bill would establish separate procedures for a sheriff’s department, department or a district attorney, the Department of the California Highway Patrol, and the Department of Justice attorney to establish their own Surveillance Use Policies, instead of submitting them through their governing body. The procedures would include holding a noticed public hearing on the proposed policy, posting the policy on the department’s Internet Web site, amending the policy to include new types of surveillance technology, and publishing a biennial report regarding the department’s use of surveillance technology, as specified.
The bill would also establish procedures for the Department of the California Highway Patrol and the Department of Justice to establish their own Surveillance Use Policies. The bill would, among other things, require that these agencies ensure that the collection, use, maintenance, sharing, and dissemination of information or data collected with surveillance technology is consistent with respect for individual privacy and civil liberties, and that the policy be publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site. The bill would also require that if these agencies intend to acquire surveillance technology, they provide 90 days advance notice on the agency’s Internet Web site, as specified.
The bill would make legislative findings in support of these provisions.
Because this bill would impose additional requirements on local public agencies, it would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, with regard to certain mandates, no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

DIGEST KEY

Vote: majority   Appropriation: no   Fiscal Committee: yes   Local Program: yes  

BILL TEXT

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:


SECTION 1.

 The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) While law enforcement agencies increasingly rely on surveillance technologies because those technologies may enhance community safety and aid in the investigation of crimes, those technologies are often used without any written rules or civilian oversight, and the ability of surveillance technology to enhance public safety should be balanced with reasonable safeguards for residents’ civil liberties and privacy.
(b) Promoting a safer community through the use of surveillance technology while preserving the protection of civil liberties and privacy are not mutually exclusive goals, and policymakers should be empowered to make informed decisions about what kind of surveillance technologies should be used in their community.
(c) Decisions about whether to use surveillance technology for data collection and how to use and store the information collected should not be made by the agencies that would operate the technology, but by the elected bodies that are directly accountable to the residents in their communities who should also have opportunities to review the decision of whether or not to use surveillance technologies.

SEC. 2.

 Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 54999.8) is added to Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, to read:
CHAPTER  15. Surveillance Policies for Law Enforcement

54999.8.
 The following definitions apply for purposes of this chapter:
(a) “Exigent circumstances” means a law enforcement agency’s good faith belief that an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires use of a surveillance technology or the information it provides.
(b) “Governing body” means the elected body that oversees the law enforcement agency or an appointed overseeing body if there is no elected body that provides direct oversight of the law enforcement agency.
(c) “Law enforcement agency” means any police department, sheriff’s department, district attorney, county probation department, transit agency police department, school district police department, the police department of any campus of the University of California, the California State University, or community college, the Department of the California Highway Patrol, and the Department of Justice.
(d) (1) “Surveillance technology” means any electronic device or system with the capacity to monitor and collect audio, visual, locational, thermal, or similar information on any individual or group. This includes, but is not limited to, drones with cameras or monitoring capabilities, automated license plate recognitionsystem, systems, closed-circuit cameras/televisions, International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) trackers, global positioning system (GPS) technology,software designed to monitor social media services or forecast criminal activity or criminality, radio frequency identification (RFID) technology, body-worn cameras, biometric identification technology, hardware or software, and facial recognition technology. hardware or software.
(2) “Surveillance technology” does not include standard public agency computers and software, hardware and software in widespread public use and not used by the law enforcement agency for any surveillance or surveillance-related functions, such as televisions, computers, printers, parking ticket devices, case management databases, medical equipment used to diagnose, treat, or prevent disease or injury, fingerprint scanners, ignition interlock devices, cellular or standard telephones, and two-way radios, or other similar electronic devices.

54999.85.
 (a) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (4), on or before July 1, 2018, a law enforcement agency that uses, or accesses information from, surveillance technology shall submit to its governing body a Surveillance Use Policy to ensure that the collection, use, maintenance, sharing, and dissemination of information or data collected with surveillance technology is consistent with respect for individuals’ privacy and civil liberties. The policy shall be in writing and made publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site prior to the public hearing and after adoption.
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the governing body, at a regularly scheduled hearing pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code), shall consider the policy for adoption by resolution or ordinance on the regular, nonconsent calendar and shall provide an opportunity for public comment before adopting the resolution or ordinance.
(3) Except as provided in paragraph (4), if a submitted Surveillance Use Policy is not adopted by resolution or ordinance by the governing body, the law enforcement agency shall cease use of surveillance technologies within 30 days of the hearing and until the time that a Surveillance Use Policy is adopted.
(4) (A) On or before July 1, 2018, a sheriff’s department, district attorney, the Department of Justice, and the Department of the California Highway Patroldepartment or a district attorney that uses or accesses information from a surveillance technology shall hold a properly noticed public hearing and provide an opportunity for public comment before adopting a Surveillance Use Policy, which shall ensure that the collection, use, maintenance, sharing, and dissemination of information or data collected with surveillance technology is consistent with respect for individuals’ individual privacy and civil liberties. The policy shall be in writing and shall be made publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site prior to the public hearing and after adoption.
(B) On or before July 1, 2018, if the Department of Justice or the Department of the California Highway Patrol use or access information from a surveillance technology, the agency shall adopt a Surveillance Use Policy, which shall ensure that the collection, use, maintenance, sharing, and dissemination of information or data collected with surveillance technology is consistent with respect for individual privacy and civil liberties. The policy shall be in writing and shall be made publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or repeal any obligation of the Department of Justice or the Department of the California Highway Patrol to comply with any requirement found in any other law.
(b) The policy shall pertain to any surveillance technologies already in use or relied upon for information by the law enforcement agency and shall include, in separate sections specific to each unique type of surveillance technology, a description of each surveillance technology used or relied upon for information by the law enforcement agency. Each section covering a separate technology shall, at a minimum include the following:
(1) Authorized purposes for using the surveillance technology.
(2) Types of data that can be and is collected by the surveillance technology.
(3) A description of the job title or other designation of employees and independent contractors who are authorized to use the surveillance technology or to access data collected by the surveillance technology. The policy shall identify and require training for those authorized employees and independent contractors.
(4) Title of the official custodian, or owner, of the surveillance technology responsible for implementing this section.
(5) A description of how the surveillance technology will be monitored to ensure the security of the information and compliance with applicable privacy laws.
(6) The length of time information gathered by the surveillance technology will be retained, and a process to determine if and when to destroy retained information.
(7) Purposes of, process for, and restrictions on the sale, sharing, or transfer of information to other persons and whether, if so, how the collected information can be accessed by members of the public, including criminal defendants.
(8) A process to maintain a record of access of the surveillance technology or information collected by the surveillance technology. At a minimum, the record shall include all of the following:
(A) The date and time the technology is used or the information is accessed.
(B) The data elements the employee used to query the information.
(C) The username of the employee who uses the technology or accesses the information, and, as applicable, the organization or entity with whom the person is affiliated.
(D) The purpose for accessing the information or using the technology.
(9) The existence of a memorandum of understanding or other agreement with another local agency or any other party, whether or not formalized, for the shared use of the surveillance technology or the sharing of the information collected through its use, including the identity of the parties.
(c) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (4), after July 1, 2018, if a law enforcement agency intends to acquire a new type of surveillance technology after the adoption of the policy required by subdivision (a), the agency shall submit an amendment to the policy to include the new type of technology as a new section of the policy and submit the amendment to its governing body for approval consistent with subdivision (a).
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (4) and Section 54999.95, the amendment shall be submitted prior to requesting funds for acquiring, using, or accessing information from the technology and shall be submitted to the governing body at a properly noticed public meeting on the regular, nonconsent calendar and the governing body shall provide an opportunity for public comment before adopting the amendment.
(3) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the amendment shall be in writing and made publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site prior to the public hearing and after adoption. The governing body has 30 days to consider an amendment. If a submitted amendment is not adopted by the governing body, the law enforcement agency shall not request funds for, acquire, use, or access information from the new surveillance technology.
(4) (A) (i) After July 1, 2018, if a sheriff’s department, district attorney, the Department of Justice, or the Department of the California Highway Patrol intends to acquire a new type of surveillance technology after the adoption of the policy required by subdivision (a), that agency shall draft an amendment to the policy to include the new type of technology as a new section of the policy. That agency shall
(ii) A sheriff’s department or a district attorney shall hold a properly noticed public hearing and provide an opportunity for public comment before adopting such an amendment. The amendment shall be in writing and shall be made publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site prior to the public hearing and after adoption.
(iii) The Department of Justice or the Department of the California Highway Patrol shall post the amendment in writing and make it publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site.
(B) If a sheriff’s department, department or a district attorney, the Department of Justice, or the Department of the California Highway Patrol attorney is not in possession of surveillance technology on or before July 1, 2018, and intends to acquire surveillance technology after that date, that agency shall hold a properly noticed public hearing and provide an opportunity for public comment before adopting a Surveillance Use Policy, which shall ensure that the collection, use, maintenance, sharing, and dissemination of information or data collected with surveillance technology is consistent with respect for individuals’ privacy and civil liberties. The policy shall be in writing and shall be made publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site prior to the public hearing and after adoption.
(C) (i) If either the Department of Justice or the Department of the California Highway Patrol is not in possession of surveillance technology on or before July 1, 2018, and intends to acquire surveillance technology after that date, that agency shall prominently post on the agency’s Internet Website a public notice of its intention to commence the process of acquiring surveillance technology not less than 90 days before taking any such steps. The notice shall include a description of information describing the surveillance technology and how it works, including product descriptions from manufacturers, information on the proposed purpose for the surveillance technology, and type of data collected.
(ii) If either the Department of Justice or the Department of the California Highway Patrol is not in possession of surveillance technology on or before July 1, 2018, and acquires it after that date, that agency shall adopt a Surveillance Use Policy, which shall ensure that the collection, use, maintenance, sharing, and dissemination of information or data collected with surveillance technology is consistent with respect for individual privacy and civil liberties. The policy shall be in writing and shall be made publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or repeal any obligation of the Department of Justice or the Department of the California Highway Patrol to comply with any requirement found in any other law.
(d) If, before July 1, 2018, a law enforcement agency has implemented the requirements for an automated license plate recognition system, pursuant to Title 1.81.23 (commencing with Section 1798.90.5) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code or for cellular communications interception technology pursuant to Article 11 (commencing with Section 53166) of Chapter 1, the law enforcement agency shall include the required information as part of the Surveillance Use Policy required by subdivision (a).
(e) If a law enforcement agency is not in possession of surveillance technology on or before July 1, 2018, and intends to acquire surveillance technology after that date, the law enforcement agency shall submit a Surveillance Use Policy to its governing body pursuant to subdivision (a) for consideration. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of a governing body to exercise its budgetary authority in any way if a law enforcement agency makes a budget request to acquire surveillance technology.
(f) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), at a time interval agreed to by the law enforcement agency and the governing body, but not less often than every two years, a law enforcement agency that uses surveillance technologies and which has an approved Surveillance Use Policy shall submit to its governing body a written Surveillance Technology Use Report. The report shall be made publicly available on the agency’s Internet Web site, and shall, at a minimum, include the following:
(A) The acquisition costs for each surveillance technology, as well as the annual operating cost, including personnel costs.
(B) A description of how many The total number of times each type of technology was used in the preceding year and how many the total number of times each type of technology helped apprehend suspects or close a criminal case.

(C)A description of the type of data collected by each surveillance technology, including whether each technology captured images, sound, or other data.

(D)If

(C) The total number of times the surveillance technology was borrowed from or lent to another agency, the identity of that agency, the number of times and the purposes for which the surveillance technology was shared, including any exigent circumstances.

(E)

(D) The total number and classification of the agency employees trained and authorized to use each type of surveillance technology, along with a description of the training provided to agency employees on each type of surveillance technology and how often the training was provided. technology.

(F)Disclosure of whether

(E)  The total number of times any surveillance technology was used in a manner out of compliance with the agency’s Surveillance Use Policy, whether data collected through the use of surveillance technology was inappropriately disclosed, released, or in any other way revealed for a nonapproved reason, and the steps the agency took to correct the error.
(2) Not less than every two years, a sheriff’s department, district attorney, the Department of Justice, and the Department of the California Highway Patrol shall each publish and post on their Internet Web sites, a written Surveillance Technology Use Report containing the information required by subparagraphs (A) through (F).
(g) Nothing in this section shall be construed to do either of the following:
(1) Limit the authority of a governing body to exercise its authority in any way if a law enforcement agency makes a request to acquire surveillance technology.
(2) Prohibit a governing body from holding any public meeting required by this section jointly with another law enforcement agency or governing body.
(h) A governing body may reevaluate any existing Surveillance Use Policy it has previously approved at a properly noticed public meeting on their regular nonconsent calendar.
(i) A law enforcement agency shall not sell, share, or transfer information gathered by surveillance technology, except to another law enforcement agency, and only as permitted by law and as allowed by an approved Surveillance Use Policy. For purposes of this subdivision, the provision of data hosting shall not be considered to be the sale, sharing, or transferring of surveillance technology information.

54999.9.
 (a) In addition to any other sanctions, penalties, or remedies provided by law, any person may seek injunctive relief to prevent a violation under this chapter. The court may award reasonable attorney’s fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred by a prevailing plaintiff.
(b) A law enforcement agency shall take appropriate disciplinary action, consistent with the agency’s existing disciplinary procedures, against an employee who knowingly or intentionally uses surveillance technology in a manner that is not consistent with this chapter or with the agency’s approved Surveillance Use Policy.

54999.95.
 (a) A law enforcement agency may temporarily acquire or temporarily use a surveillance technology in a manner not expressly allowed by a Surveillance Use Policy in exigent circumstances without following the provisions of Section 54999.85 before that acquisition or use unless that acquisition or use in exigent circumstances conflicts with, or is preempted by, other state or federal law.
(b) If a law enforcement agency acquires or uses a surveillance technology in exigent circumstances pursuant to subdivision (a), the agency shall:
(1) Use the surveillance technology to solely respond to the exigent circumstances.
(2) Cease using the surveillance technology when the exigent circumstances end.
(3) Only keep and maintain data related to the exigent circumstances and dispose of any data that is not related to the exigent circumstances.
(4) Report (A) For a law enforcement agency other than the Department of Justice, or the Department of the California Highway Patrol, report that acquisition or use to the governing body within 45 days following the end of the exigent circumstances.
(B) The Department of Justice or the Department of the California Highway Patrol shall publicly disclose that acquisition or use within 45 days following the end of the exigent circumstances in writing on the agency’s Internet Web site.
(c) Any technology temporarily acquired in exigent circumstances shall be returned within seven days following its acquisition, or when the exigent circumstances end, whichever is sooner, unless the technology is submitted to the governing body for approval pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (c), inclusiveinclusive, of Section 54999.85, and is approved. If the agency is unable to comply with the seven-day timeline, the agency shall notify the governing body, who may grant an extension.

SEC. 3.

 The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of this act, which adds Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 54999.8) to Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, furthers, within the meaning of paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution, the purposes of that constitutional section as it relates to the right of public access to the meetings of local public bodies or the writings of local public officials and local agencies. Pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution, the Legislature makes the following findings:
By requiring law enforcement agencies to submit their proposed Surveillance Use Policy for consideration by their governing body at a public hearing, this act furthers the purposes of paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution.
The Legislature also finds and declares that Section 2 of this act, which adds Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 54999.8) to Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, furthers, within the meaning of Section 1 of Article I of the California Constitution, the purposes of that constitutional section as it relates to the inalienable and enforceable right of privacy held by all Californians.

SEC. 4.

 No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution for certain costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district because, in that regard, this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.
However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains other costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

SB-21, A Statewide Surveillance Transparency Law, Passes CA State Senate

by Tracy Rosenberg •  • 0 Comments
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

SB-21 is a bill that would end secret surveillance by CA law enforcement agencies by mandating use polices, impact reports and biannual audits for all surveillance equipment and technology used in CA. SB-21 subjects all spying to an upfront process for local government approval and disclosure to the public. Before it’s used, not afterwards.

The bill just passed the CA State Senate on May 31 by a 21-15 vote and is headed to the Assembly. If you haven’t already emailed your state reps, do so here.

San Jose Mercury News Editorial Board endorsement of SB-21. 

A California Mayor’s First Hand Account Of The Need For Surveillance Transparency

San Diego Tribune Op-Ed on SB-21

 

Facebooktwitter
Related

CA Assembly Public Safety Comm Supports SB 21- A Statewide Surveillance Transparency OrdinanceJune 27, 2017
https://oaklandprivacy.org/2017/05/31/sb-21-a-statewide-surveillance-transparency-law-passes-ca-state-senate/

In the Face of Trump’s Surveillance Threats, Local Movements Demand Disclosure of Police Technologies

by Tracy Rosenberg •  • 

By Candice Bernd, Truthout

 

President Trump issued a proclamation on May 15 dedicating last week to law enforcement officers, saying he would make it a “personal priority” to ensure police are “finally treated fairly.” Meanwhile, around the country, a different set of priorities is taking shape: Cities, counties and even one state are working to push legislation that would force police agencies to disclose their acquisition and use of surveillance technologies to local lawmakers and communities.

At least 19 cities have introduced ordinances that would force transparency in local police departments’ acquisition and use of secretive surveillance technologies, which are disproportionately used to target communities of color. A statewide bill in Maine, sponsored by State Sen. Shenna Bellows, would take similar steps.

The measures being introduced around the country mandate that the acquisition and/or use of local police surveillance tools like “Stingray” cellphone tracking equipment, automated license plate readers, facial recognition technology and closed-circuit television cameras, among other surveillance tools, be explicitly approved by local city councils and subject to a public hearing process that would ensure public input in decisions that directly impact communities’ collective privacy and civil rights.

The multi-state effort is part of the Community Control Over Police Surveillance (CCOPS) initiative, launched in partnership with a coalition of human and civil rights organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the NAACP, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the National Network for Arab American Communities and the Million Hoodies Movement for Justice, among others.

The 19 cities include Washington, DC; New York City; Seattle; Richmond, Virginia; Milwaukee; Miami Beach and St. Louis, among others. According to Chad Marlow, who is advocacy and policy counsel at the ACLU, another 46 cities are organizing to introduce the transparency legislation; many of them are now working to identify a potential sponsor. The growth of the initiative since its launch last year comes as local organizers, faced with the Trump administration’s repressive “law-and-order” agenda, work to find ways to protect vulnerable communities across the US.

Senator Bellows of Maine told Truthout that the bill there is being tabled until next year to allow legislators and stakeholders to work out the details for how a public hearing process will work for state-level law enforcement agencies, as well as to define surveillance technologies in more detail. When the legislation is complete, it could provide a model for other state legislatures to follow.

“A lot of times what happens is people find out after the fact that law enforcement has purchased this new surveillance technology with this unanticipated surveillance capability; and then there’s outrage, and … as legislators we are responding to that outrage rather than getting out in front of it,” Bellows told Truthout.

Bellows’ sponsorship of the bill was, in part, motivated by concerns over the Trump administration’s advocacy for increased surveillance and abuses of power. “In that context, looking at state and local levels, I think putting those safeguards in law now is particularly important, but it matters regardless of who is in power,” she said.

According to Marlow, the Trump administration has been a big factor in the spread of CCOPS legislation and ordinances across the nation. “Certainly, when Trump got elected, it really added an additional level onto the work,” he said. “Our concern was that they wanted to go after particular groups like Muslims, like immigrants, but … given the size of these groups and the size of the country, there’s no way that the federal government has the resources on its own to accomplish the goal that the Trump administration was laying out. So what that means is that they’re going to have to use local law enforcement to help them.”

The Trump administration has an enhanced ability to target vulnerable communities, thanks to an Obama-era practice of providing federal grants to localities to buy surveillance technologies on the condition that the locality provide the federal government with access to its surveillance data. However, CCOPS holds the possibility of interrupting that process.

“What we found is that the CCOPS effort, by requiring an approval process not just for acquiring and using the surveillance technologies, but also for sharing their data, is going to move the city council and the public into the process of reviewing and approving or disapproving … these agreements,” Marlow told Truthout.

That includes many sanctuary jurisdictions that have promised not to comply with the Trump administration’s mass deportation and immigration policies. Moreover, the legislation could provide an additional layer of protection in red states that have passed anti-sanctuary-city legislation. Under the CCOPS ordinances, even if local police participate in assisting federal immigration enforcement, they may not be able to provide access to surveillance technologies, share that surveillance data, or use the technologies for purposes that haven’t been explicitly approved by local lawmakers.

Since the model ordinance does not specifically contain language regarding sanctuary status, it could have a positive impact in protecting targeted communities in a way that doesn’t run afoul of anti-sanctuary laws. Still, the local legislation would not have an impact on what state and federal police agencies can do with surveillance technologies, except potentially in Maine, if Senator Bellows’ legislation eventually passes.

Federal agents are already using counterterrorism surveillance technologies, such as cell-site stimulators, known as “Hailstorm” or “Stingray” devices, to hunt undocumented immigrants amid President Trump’s immigration crackdown. FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents used one such device in March to track down Rudy Carcamo-Carranza in Metro Detroit. Privacy and civil liberties advocates warn the practice could become adopted more widely by local law enforcement agencies working to assist federal immigration enforcement.

So far, CCOPS legislation has already passed, or is poised to pass, in several jurisdictions that have outwardly labeled themselves as “sanctuary” localities, and have vowed to resist the Trump administration’s immigration agenda. For example, CCOPS ordinances have been adopted in Santa Clara County, California and Seattle, Washington. Neither locality has since received a request to acquire or use sensitive surveillance technologies, perhaps because police agencies anticipate such moves will be politically unpalatable to the public.

In Oakland, California, another sanctuary city, a CCOPS ordinance was unanimously approved by the city’s Public Safety Committee, and is slated for a vote by city councilors, with proponents largely expecting its adoption. Brian Hofer is chair of the city’s Privacy Advisory Commission. The Commission was established after controversy over the city’s effort to build a citywide surveillance hub (formerly known as the Domain Awareness Center) that would have monitored people’s activities from cameras and other sensors.

Hofer has been working on the draft ordinance with the city’s sanctuary status in mind, and told Truthout that the Privacy Advisory Commission’s last few meetings have all touched on ICE. He has examined the city’s relationship to ICE, and determined that the city’s license-plate-reader data has ended up in ICE’s hands via area fusion centers. He told Truthout, “We have a paper trail showing that.”

That’s where the draft ordinance comes in.

“Big data is here,” Hofer said. “These big fusion centers where we give everybody access to all our data, both public and private partners: It’s a huge concern. We have a municipal ID card in Oakland…. Secondly, there’s a debit card tied to it, so there’s the financial transaction paper trail. So there’s all these things right now that the Privacy Commission is looking at, how to minimize, to the extent possible, any exposure of Oaklanders to outside [agencies].”

If the ordinance passes, that kind of data sharing would have to be publicly disclosed and approved.

Hofer said the Privacy Advisory Commission used the ACLU’s model legislation and modified it to fit Oakland’s particular privacy needs. The commission proposed the ordinance in January. On Tuesday, May 9, the city’s Public Safety Committee approved it, sending it on to the full council for a vote.

Hofer is working to expand Oakland’s proposed ordinance across other jurisdictions in the Bay Area, and told Truthout that the legislation is now in play in Palo Alto, Berkeley and Richmond, as well as for the Bay Area Rapid Transit system.

Because the ordinance would be governing city employees, it requires dialogue with public unions, including Oakland’s police union. City attorneys are in the process of conferring with the union about the ordinance’s penalties; Hofer expects the union to advocate to eliminate or water down those penalties. After that process concludes, according to Hofer, the council will vote on the ordinance.

“[The union] has always been the elephant in the room,” Hofer said. “They’ve always carried a ton of weight, but recently … their endorsements have been the kiss of death. Candidates they wanted to run on council lost…. Their power has diminished.”

Hofer noted that the union could potentially influence the legislation’s accompanying misdemeanor penalty, but he expects most of the penalty components to survive.

“We’re definitely in this very aggressive, anti-Trump, self-defense mode out here in Oakland,” he said.

But draft CCOPS ordinances haven’t been limited to liberal-leaning localities and sanctuary jurisdictions. They are also cropping up in cities in southern states, including Florida and Mississippi, where civil libertarian-minded conservatives have provided some support.

“People on the political right are as supportive of this bill as people on the political left. It crosses the spectrum, which is why you see it in places like [Pensacola and Hattiesburg],” Marlow tells Truthout.

In Pensacola and Miami Beach, Florida, ACLU staffers are meeting with local law enforcement officials to encourage their support for the CCOPS ordinances, according to Sara Latshaw, who is the ACLU’s director for North Florida.

“Our ordinance in Pensacola has support from both sides of the aisle,” Latshaw told Truthout.

Latshaw explained that while some communities are most concerned about privacy violations, others are more concerned about the disproportionate use of surveillance technologies to target people of color and activists.

“Everyone is at the table for a different reason, which makes it unique and also an opportunity to work with unlikely allies,” Latshaw said. “But certainly for some folks, they are concerned about some of the troubling policy objectives that Trump has brought forward.”

 https://oaklandprivacy.org/2017/05/30/in-the-face-of-trumps-surveillance-threats-local-movements-demand-disclosure-of-police-technologies/

Oakland Privacy Endorses Legislation to Make California a Sanctuary State.June 12, 2017



The West Coast Society For All Victims Of
Organized Stalking And Electronic Harassment

The Vancouver Film School has offered to produce a video campaign to bring public awareness to organized stalking and harassment. Ti involvement entails the following: meeting and speaking with teachers and students to educate them about OS and to steer the film's content. If you are in the Vancouver, Canada, area and wish to take part, please email Mary: westcoa...@gmail.com

GangStalking IS Community Oriented Policing
https://youtu.be/Q73oOUE2gik

James Harken
Published on Jun 23, 2017

https://www.youtube.com/user/FreeTheM... 
“Gang Stalking” is, very likely, a disinformation term created byU.S. intelligence agencies. It refers to the intense, long-term, unconstitutional surveillance and harassment of a person who has been designated as a target by someone associated with America’s security industry. Such operations have nothing to do with criminal gangs. Officialdomestic counterintelligence operations of this type are – apparently – perpetrated by secret society members, community based agents, federal agents and intelligence/security contractors, sometimes with the support of state and local law enforcement personnel. Unofficial operations of this type are, apparently, perpetrated by private investigators and vigilantes – including former agents and cops, some of whom are members of the quasi-governmental Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Units (LEIU), sometimes on behalf of corporate clients and others with connections to the public and private elements of America’s security industry. The goal of such operations – in the parlance of counterintelligence agents – is “disruption” of the life of an individual deemed to be an enemy (or potential enemy) of clients or members of the security state. Arguably, the most accurate term for this form of harassment would be “counterintelligence stalking.” Agents of communist East Germany’s Stasi (state police) referred to the process as Zersetzung (German for “decomposition” or “corrosion” – a reference to the severe psychological, social, and financial effects upon the victim). American and British victims have described the process as “no-touch torture” – a phrase which also captures the nature of the crime: cowardly, unethical (and often illegal), but difficult to prove legally because it generates minimal forensic evidence. Tactics include – but are not limited to – slander, blacklisting, “mobbing” (intense, organized harassment in the workplace), “black bag jobs” (residential break-ins), abusive phone calls, computer hacking, framing, threats, blackmail, vandalism, “street theater” (staged physical and verbal interactions with minions of the people who orchestrate the stalking), harassment by noises, and other forms of bullying. Both the facts and the geographical distribution of relevant published news reports – as well as other evidence cited on this website – suggest that such stalking is sanctioned (and in some cases, orchestrated) by federal agencies; however, news reports, credible anecdotal information, and my own experiences, indicate that such stalking is also sometimes used unofficially for personal and corporate vendettas by current and former corrupt employees of law enforcement and intelligence agencies, private investigators, and their clients.Since counterintelligence stalking goes far beyond surveillance – into the realm of psychological terrorism, it is essentially a form of extrajudicial punishment. As such, the harassment is illegal – even when done by the government. It clearly violates, for example, the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unwarranted searches, and the Sixth Amendment – which guarantees the right to a trial. Such operations also violate similar fundamental rights defined by state constitutions. Stalking is also specifically prohibited by the criminal codes of every state in America. Crimes against Americans at the hands of corrupt government agents and private security thugs have a long history in the U.S. The FBI’s COINTELPRO (“Counterintelligence Program”) scandal in the 1970s was the most notorious high-profile example, but similar abuses of power by “Red Squads” (state and local Law Enforcement Intelligence Units) and private detectives date back to the 19th century.



NEWS & VIEWS
 
NEWS
This former Google executive is building a high-tech hat that she says will make telepathy possible in eight years
 
NSA Surveillance
 
PETITION
Ban Remote Attacks on the Human Nervous System
VIDEOS
Henning Witte Interview
 
Gangstalking is Community-Oriented Policing
 
What is Earthing?

 
Oakland's Privacy Advisory Commission
 
Greetings, everyone.
 
Oakland, California is one of the few cities in the country that I'm aware of that has a Privacy Advisory Commission.  And according to their website, this committee "provides advice to the City of Oakland on best practices to protect Oaklanders' privacy rights in connection with the City's purchase and use of surveillance equipment and other technology that collects or stores our data."
 
The commission has been around since March, 2014 and was created by Oakland's City Council to "develop and advise on citywide privacy concerns."
 
In accordance with their mission, they have recently drafted legislation designed to ensure the privacy rights of its residents. It is called "The Surveillance and Community Safety Ordinance" and can be found at this link: 
 
 
It basically requires law enforcement or any "city entity" to present surveillance equipment to the City Council for review and a public hearing before purchase.  The legislation goes even futher.  Not only does it require Council approval before future surveillance technology purchases, it will also require that such technologies currently in use by its city entities be reviewed to ensure that  "in the City Council's judgment, no alternative with a lesser economic cost or impact on civil rights or civil liberties would be as effective."
 
According to the proposed law: “Surveillance technology” means any electronic device, system utilizing an electronic device, or similar used, designed, or primarily intended to collect, retain, process, or share audio, electronic, visual, location, thermal, olfactory, biometric, or similar information specifically associated with, or capable of being associated with, any individual or group."
 
Will this mean that Oakland's Police Department if they have such weaponry,  will have to fork over its directed energy weapons, voice-to-skull, mind-reading, phantom touch, and dream manipulation technologies?
 
This ordinance even requires publication of surveillance technology complaints from the public and forbids and nullifies non-disclosure agreements with the federal government.  It also includes whistleblower protections.  It is quite comprenensive in its scope.
 
We will see in the coming weeks or months if this ordinance is adopted.  Meanwhile, the County of Santa Clara in California has similar legislation already on the books and the City of Berkeley has proposed a similar bill as well. 
 
More importantly, similar legislation is currently making its way through the California state legislature and so far has been easily scaling the many procedural hurdles on its way to becoming a state law. 
 
If there are TI's in Oakland, we need to be in contact and begin to organize to present your privacy rights violations before your Privacy Advisory Commission representatives for assistance.  Please call or write me ASAP so we can begin this process immediately at:  
 
in...@pactsntl.org or call at:
 
California is starting to lead the nation in standing up to government surveillance technologies.  Hopefully other states will soon follow suit as well. 
 
This email was sent to twindeermother@whitebuffalocalfwoman.org

Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs)

AUG262015

Remote Neural Monitoring for Covert Control of Society

In the modern times of the internet and digital devices permeating our daily habits and routines, the issue of privacy is becoming more and more of a hot button issue. One needs to just look at how Facebook is increasingly encroaching upon the vast amounts of personal information that is recorded willingly and correlated with friends and family to understand that there is a huge amount of our personal lives available for review, whether it be for commercial marketing reasons or for legal justifications. Many scandals have come out regarding AT&T working with our government to intercept our phone calls, our text messages and other private communications. Such breaches of privacy have even come with legislation giving these companies retroactive immunity from prosecution for snooping around in our personal lives, regardless of their motivations.

But what if such ways of obtaining personal information were considerably outdated?

The NSA may think so.

Remote Neural Monitoring is a way to measure the EMF (electromagnetic frequency) waves of an individual and are able to translate them into the words heard/spoken and the images seen by an individual. Labeled under the Signal Intelligence department, remote neural monitoring is a technology that has been around and used for quite some time and has been kept secret from the public along with all other developments of electronic weaponry, research and development of paid for by the taxpayers.

While it may seem a bit of a stretch to consider that it is possible for technology to read our minds and that this technology would be kept from the public, there has been a lawsuit against the NSA claiming remote monitoring and manipulation. John St. Claire Akwei filed a lawsuit detailing his comprehension of the secretive NSA technology and its covert operations against unwitting citizens.

How does the technology work?

Remote neural monitoring focuses on the audio and visual portions of the brain by sending signals which are then transmitted back to the origin and analyzed by a computer. While the decoding and encoding of brain signals for surreptitious communication with someone’s brain is certainly a complex feat, there is much that can be done from a remote vantage using this technology. The technology can measure sounds that an individual hears, can transmit its’ own words and images into the brain and can manipulate emotions and behavior. A prison study in Vacaville, conducted by IBM was able to cause complete lethargy in prisoners to the point where sleep was imposed for 18-20 hours per day. Indeed, the spectrum of human emotion and reaction is up for remote manipulation. Paranoia can be instilled as easily as anger. The ability to force emotional reactions on people is a very important consideration as it is a dangerous tool which opens the possibility for people to force criminal behavior without culpability. Forcing a suicide in a depressed individual, as some people have considered the possibility, constitutes remote murder and would be untraceable.

The type of research for this is certainly invasive and due to the manipulations possible the secrecy for it is indeed paramount as they would send every human rights organization into a frenzy. Cloaked under reasons of national security (but developed by the corporate and university worlds), the information and technology has been ridiculed in official mainstream media to dissuade any actual consideration. Thusly, the technology is now free to be used in secret and without any oversight or transparency.

But the concerns aren’t just based on privacy rights. Many scientists and human rights advocacy groups are claiming that the unknown risks imposed on a person when targeted could be hazardous to ones health. Sources cite a Cold War example, from the 1960’s in which the Soviet Union beamed radiation into the American Embassy in Russia, causing health problems that were studied by the Americans in an operation dubbed ‘Project Pandoa’. The Soviet Union, along with the United States, were developing electromagnetic weapons in what was the Cold War era – developing psychotronic weapons as opposed to solely developing nuclear weaponry as the mainstream media focused upon.

In essence, the reality of remote neural monitoring is the result of decades of research into behavioral modification of human beings, with the goal to be able to remotely influence the actions and mental perception of any given individual. The reality of such a goal really brings a lot of very human ideas to the forefront. Such as, what is consciousness and what constitutes the individual. Is it okay for people to understand the very nature of the human animal and how it reacts without sharing such knowledge? Is it okay to manipulate someone into believing a false reality? Is it okay to create a false reality to further these aims, such as Fox news recently winning a case against a whistleblower asserting its’ rights to mislead the public intentionally as a protection of free speech?

The list goes on and while there is a subsection of the population fighting to expose this technology and the implications it has for humanities future, there are still a lot of people who aren’t even aware that remote neural monitoring is even possible. Others that have heard of it have no idea how to incorporate the knowledge as the effects, if one were targeted, are on such a subtle level as to make conscious awareness a very difficult endeavor especially when society has already been conditioned to consider that these types of concerns are born of mental illness.

The persuasion of opinion has long been a goal of authority. To remain in the position of authority, one must have the agreement of the populace. Can it be considered agreement if the populace is subconsciously manipulated into agreement? Or does it matter if the populace does not comprehend or recognize that their agreement was predetermined and manufactured beforehand?

Such basic questions are exactly what we consider human rights and to keep such weapons in secret for the consideration of only an elite few is certainly an epic travesty and breach of humanity. No longer must we be concerned about the lies we are being fed from mainstream media and even our leaders. Now we must consider whether or not our opinion and agreement were perhaps manufactured by them.

This article is written by Ryan Watton for Mind Power World: http://www.mindpowerworld.com/remote-neural-monitoring-for-covert-control-of-society

Social Media Surveillance survey (Richmond Police Department)

Share

Beryl Lipton filed this request with the Richmond Police Department of RichmondVA.
SubmittedJan. 18, 2017
STATUS
Completed

MuckRock users can file, duplicate, track, and share public records requests like this one. Learn more.

From: Beryl Lipton

Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request: Social Media Surveillance survey (Richmond Police Department)

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to Virginia Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the following records:

Any and all contracts (as well as all associated amendments, exhibits, and materials), memorandums of understanding, and other equivalent agreements entered into by this agency with or any other social media surveillance software or equipment company, including but not limited to:

• BrightPlanet
• Geofeedia
• Intrado Inc.
• LifeRaft
• Magnet Forensics
• Media Sonar
• Signal Corporation
• ZeroFOX

Responsive materials should include but not be limited to:

• the initial Invitation to Bid, Request for Proposal, or equivalent call for contractors
• the responsive materials provided by the winning bidder
• other bidder responses
• the current contract
• all exhibits
• all amendments
• all performance work statements
• all deliverables inventories
• all invoices related to the deliverance of software, services, or goods

Please also include:

• all policies related to the acquisition and use of social media and surveillance software by individual officers and representatives of this agency
• all materials related to the use of any other social media platform, including but not limited to Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 5 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Beryl Lipton

    From: Peters, Karla E. - Police

    Subject: Richmond Police FOIA Extension Request

    Mr. Lipton,

    Attached please find the Richmond Police Department's request for an
    extension regarding FOIA requests pertaining to the Department's
    contracts, MOUs and/or agreements with any social media surveillance
    software or equipment company.

    Thank you,

    Karla E. Peters

    Richmond Police Department

    Office of General Counsel

    (804) 646-5147

    The contents of this email are CONFIDENTIAL and may be protected by
    attorney-client privilege. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
    by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in
    error, PLEASE NOTIFY ME and PROMPTLY DELETE this email.

    • Lipton FOIA Extension 012417

      •  View
      •  
      •  Embed
      •  
      •  Download
        • https://www.muckrock.com/foi/richmond-151/social-media-surveillance-survey-richmond-police-department-32045/

          FLORIDA

          Inside the ACLU’s nationwide campaign to curb police surveillance

          ‘The only place we face resistance is from the police’

          by Roshan Abraham 

          In summer 2014, an intern at the ACLU found a memo from a public meeting in which the San Jose Police Department asked to be reimbursed for a “UAV,” which he immediately recognized as a type of drone.

          “It was tucked in the back of an agenda item,” says Nicole Ozer, director of technology and civil liberties policy for the ACLU of California. The City Council approved the purchase of the $8,000 drone as part of a million-dollar federal grant, but there had been no public debate over the merits of acquiring such a controversial piece of equipment.

          Ozer asked community members if they knew about the drone purchase. “We thought maybe we just missed it but everyone else knew about it,” Ozer says. But no one they reached out to had any idea.

          The incident confirmed a fear shared by civil liberties advocates: police departments around the country were buying surveillance equipment with FEMA homeland security grants with little oversight. Each year, over $1 billion of these grants are funneled to municipalities across the country, bypassing local budget processes and leaving community members in the dark about the acquisition of advanced surveillance arsenals. Cities in California have purchased or attempted to acquire dronescellphone tower simulators, and other tools previously reserved for the federal government.

          “We found, across the board, that even basic public conversation and debate was absent,” Ozer says.

          The drone discovery was one of the events that led California’s Santa Clara County to become, in June 2016, the first in the country to pass an ordinance requiring transparency for police surveillance technology based on a recent ACLU model. The law requires public input, an impact report, and a use policy with details about data sharing before equipment is purchased. (Seattle passed a similar law in 2013, also with ACLU involvement, but its scope was limited to video surveillance.)

          Last fall, the ACLU announced a nationwide strategy in partnership with over a dozen other civil liberties groups to promote similar bills in cities across the country. Called Community Control Over Police Surveillance, or CCOPS, the ACLU says there are bills with sponsors in 19 cities nationwide and one public transit system, the Bay Area’s BART. Chad Marlow, who is overseeing the nationwide strategy for CCOPS at the ACLU, says that organizing is underway in an additional 46 cities and one state, though he doesn’t expect them all to find sponsors.

          In California, bills are up for debate in Oakland, Berkeley, San Francisco, and Palo Alto. Similar initiatives are underway in New York City, which will hold a hearing on June 14th, as well as smaller cities nationwide such as Somerville, Massachusetts; Madison, Wisconsin; and Richmond, Virginia.

          Nicole Ozer says that over and over again she has seen communities fight back against the creep of surveillance technology. She believes ordinances like the one the ACLU is pushing are a first step to accomplish this.

          “When communities know what’s happening, they are in a much better position to fight against it,” Ozer says. “You can’t fight what you don’t know.”

          In Santa Clara County, where the law has been enforced since June 2016, community members say it’s working as intended, though the quality of use policies vary. After the law was introduced, 16 use policies were submitted at once for new and existing equipment. Some policies passed quickly with little scrutiny, while others were rejected; at least one policy passed despite public criticism.

          When the Sheriff’s Department sought to fit officers with body-worn cameras, the ordinance required them to publicize a surveillance-impact statement and use policy before a scheduled public hearing. A draft use policy was deemed too broad by critics at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, ACLU, and CAIR, who voiced their objections in a letter to the Board of Supervisors. They took issue with the policy’s year-long data retention period, the ability of officers to view footage before giving testimony in certain situations, and lack of protections against biometric analysis like facial recognition.

          Following an update on the use policy, the body-worn cameras were approved by the board of supervisors on January 24th, 2017. The new requirements prohibit the use of data for biometrics, requiring future approval from the county.

          But when questions arose over a purchase enabling aerial infrared surveillance, the input of civil liberties advocates through the CCOPS process was brushed aside. In 2016, the Santa Clara Sheriff’s Department proposed a $620,000 purchase of an integrated helicopter mapping system that included a Forward Looking Infrared Imaging System, or FLIR, a type of thermal camera. The technology has been controversial since the early ‘90s, when the Supreme Court ruled that thermal imaging constituted a search requiring a warrant.

          The use policy of the Sheriff’s Department and an early impact report approved a broad range of uses for the mapping system and thermal camera, and dismissed concerns about privacy as misinformed. Approved uses in the draft policy include “tracking suspects,” “evidence collection,” and, most vaguely, “other law enforcement or first responder uses not prohibited by law.”

          That triggered a critical letter from the Electronic Frontier Foundation that called into question the necessity of the mapping system, arguing that aerial recordings of civilians created significant civil liberties problems. The letter was not enough to sway Santa Clara’s Board of Supervisors, and the Sheriff’s Department’s use policy stayed as is.

          Adam Schwartz, a lead counsel at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who authored the letter to the board, says that both the body cam and the FLIR case are evidence that CCOPS is effective.

          “We would never have known this was happening if it wasn’t for the ordinance,” Schwartz says. “In both instances, we think the system worked the way it’s supposed to work. We don’t just wake up as civilians and all of a sudden there’s a new mapping system on a helicopter, or a new body-worn camera on the officers. Rather there’s a notice to the public beforehand, and an opportunity for public discussion.”

          Other community members reiterated that merely being able to ask questions about surveillance technology and have them answered is reassuring.

          Sameena Usman is a coordinator at the Council of American-Islamic Relations’ Bay Area office, one of the groups that advocated for the ordinance in Santa Clara. Usman attended the hearing when the FLIR was discussed. To Usman, the value of the ordinance is that it mandates transparency.

          “That transparency has built trust,” Usman says.

          The ACLU’s Marlow says that support for CCOPS-modeled legislation has largely been bipartisan. “We face neither resistance from the left or right,” Marlow says. “The only place we face resistance is from the police.”

          In Pensacola, Florida, a version of the ordinance is being sponsored by City Council member Jewel Cannada-Wynn, and it is backed the state’s NAACP chapter, as well as libertarian and Republican groups.

          “How often do people from both parties agree on anything?” says Sara Latshaw, regional organizer for the ACLU in Northwest Florida, who is overseeing CCOPS in Florida.

          Bill Fetke is a member of the Republican Liberty Caucus, a conservative grassroots group, and a supporter of the ordinance in Pensacola. He says he has confidence in local law enforcement, but opposes what he views as overreach by the state.

          “There’s a camera watching you every five feet,” Fetke says. “I don’t do anything wrong, but I don’t want a camera staring at me every five seconds.”

          Reaction from some conservatives he knows has been mixed, Fetke says.

          “Most people kind of think I’m wearing a tinfoil hat,” he says. “They don’t think it applies to them. Even the libertarians who are in the middle aisle.” But he believes conservatives who don’t support the ordinance are thinking short-term.

          “We need to force our government to follow rules,” Fetke says. “If we don’t stop them here, they’re going to trample all over our Fourth, Ninth, 10th Amendments.”

          The spread in the use of body cameras by police departments across the country, often implemented with poor use policies, is another reason the surveillance bill is finding support. Promoted as accountability tools, departments also view body cameras as tools for gathering incriminating evidence, and most use policies make it difficult for family members of a victim in an officer-involved shooting to acquire footage.

          In Hattiesburg, Mississippi, where a CCOPS ordinance is being sponsored, a police spokesman told the press that officers would use body cameras to gather evidence. “A lot of times we may not catch everything, but we can go back and look at it later,” the spokesman told the Hattiesburg American. A use policy for Hattiesburg’s body-worn cameras has never been made public. CCOPS legislation would force the department to release that policy.

          Zaki Manian, of Restore The Fourth, a Bay Area-based civil liberties group, says organizations like his have a complicated relationship with body cameras. Manian believes they can be a tool for accountability, but mounting evidence suggests they could be used as just another surveillance technology.

          “The only way you can ethically sort of balance these concerns is with consent of people in the community,” Manian says.

          But even supporters of CCOPS admit the legislation has its limits. One fear is that the law would merely legitimize surveillance technologies that now exist in legal gray zones.

          “When you pass a law, you create legality where there wasn’t,” says Malkia Cyril of the Center for Media Justice, a Bay Area nonprofit. “We create the legal framework where they can be legally abused.”

          Cyril is opposed to police body cameras, and is skeptical that use policies, such as those arbitrated through CCOPS legislation, will be enough to rein in the abuse of surveillance in over-policed communities.

          “Whether or not you have a use policy, does not mean there’s a way to enforce a use policy,” Cyril says.

          “I can’t reiterate enough how dangerous it would be to me to if we rested on the laurels of a municipal policy. It’s insufficient. It’s important and insufficient,” Cyril says.

          The limit of the ordinance is particularly visible in NYC, where the state’s constitution does not allow the City Council to veto NYPD purchases, and where pressure from a powerful police union has caused Mayor de Blasio, who campaigned on police reform, to bow to pressure more than once.

          NYC’s CCOPS ordinance, dubbed the POST Act, is sponsored by 15 council members and is set for a City Council hearing on June 14th.

          Like the ordinance in Santa Clara and bills elsewhere, it requires a use policy and public comment for the purchase of any surveillance equipment. But while the police commissioner would need to submit a use policy informed by public comments to the City Council, no city entity would need to approve a purchase. The only oversight would come from the NYPD Inspector General, an independent agency that audits the NYPD, which would be tasked with making sure the NYPD’s surveillance deployments are consistent with its own use policies. The process is similar to the public consultation that the NYPD undertook prior to rolling out a pilot body camera program in April. But that use policy came under criticism for not fully taking citizens’ opinions into account.

          Nevertheless, proponents argue the legislation will promote transparency and force police departments to think critically about surveillance.

          “It’s really about getting them to change the way they think,” says Brian Hofer of Oakland Privacy. He says in the months since the Santa Clara ordinance was put in place, he’s seen the use policies submitted by the police improve. It’s a sign, he suggests, that the law is working.

          But the uncertainty as to whether the NYPD, or any police department across the country, will adhere to strengthened guidelines for their surveillance gear may be why advocates like Center for Media Justice’s Malkia Cyril are skeptical about an over-reliance on policy, while also acknowledging it as a necessary first step.

          “Policy is one thing,” Cyril says. “Power is another.”

          https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/14/15795056/aclu-police-surveillance-curb-campaign-nationwide


          Associations International

          http://www.eucach.org

          People Against Covert Torture & Surveillance, International
          www.pactsntl.org





    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Oct 16, 2017, 8:46:06 AM10/16/17
    to Hoop 6
     attachments
    Preservation Act 2001 Targeting and Space Trash.BILLS-107hr2977ih.pdf
    Richmond Police-support-TIs-in-Richmond-CA.docx

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Oct 16, 2017, 8:50:01 AM10/16/17
    to Hoop 6
    4 attachments

    On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:45 AM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
     attachments
    Oakland Surveilance oak061975.pdf
    Palo Alto Surveillance Application ID# 8180 6-13-2017 P&S.pdf
    Constitution Project Video_Surveillance_Guidelines_Report_w_Model_Legislation4.pdf
    NSA 201501-aclu_ca_surveillancetech_summary_and_recommendations.pdf

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Oct 16, 2017, 8:53:31 AM10/16/17
    to Hoop 6
    3 attachments



    On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:49 AM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    4 attachments
    ...

    [Message clipped]  

    Amy Anderson Richmond Investigator Report 121715.pdf
    Richmond Amy Anderson Police Report Electronic Torture . mk-ultra-projesi-telegram-kurbani-amy-andersonin-polis-raporu-abd-1100a991-953c-4d4c-a46b-2276d96fc6d6.pdf
    Santa Clara County's Surveillance Technology and Community Safety Ordinance 5-24-16.pdf

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Oct 16, 2017, 8:55:15 AM10/16/17
    to Hoop 6
    3 attachments
    Richmond City Council. Jovanka-Beckles-Letter-for-TIs-1-1.pdf
    Palo Alto Letter to Chief of Police Dennis Burns.rtf
    Berkley 2017-05-02 Item 30 Proposed Surveillance and Community.pdf

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Oct 16, 2017, 8:56:39 AM10/16/17
    to Karen Melton-Stewart, Hoop 6
    2 attachments

    On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:55 AM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    3 attachments
    Oakland Board of Supervisor Valle_251955 Surveilance Ordinance Committee.pdf
    Oakland City Council for Surveillance Ordinance. oak061975.pdf

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Oct 16, 2017, 9:04:25 AM10/16/17
    to Hoop 6
    Beloved Sister Karen and Hoop 6,
    14 attachments all together. The email was too large and had to send in pieces. Looking forwards to viewing your pamphlets. 

    For everyone, we are working hard to help, heal and promote unity across the world.

    PLEASE, PLEASE, no matter how tired you are, plug up all the holes in the walls and ceilings, 
    because nanites/morgellons and poisons can get in. And if you leave your car or your house
    they will be violated, including vandalism (broken locks/ doors/ exhaust, etc.). No matter how small
    get it plugged up. Use elmers (school or white) glue which sticks to almost everything and is safe. Use toilet paper
    with glue in bigger holes. Some of you have yellow stuff on the walls, it is poison and you need
    get it off your walls. Wash it off, because they shoot it and it is released, especially if you are in the 
    room. 

    Blessings and prayers for all of our TI's Targeted Individuals. We know you are the honorable
    your devoted servant,
    White Buffalo calf Woman your Twin Deer Mother


    On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:56 AM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    2 attachments

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Oct 16, 2017, 9:07:01 AM10/16/17
    to Hoop 6
    ps. yellow poison stuff on walls, wash with pure alcohol (rubbing 91%) and use rubber gloves. It is time
    to live in groups, at least 16 people. Time to look at larger homes where groups can live together to watch 
    over each other as well. Time to swell, the heart trail. Twin Deer Mother wails, the tears of the targeted, 
    spiritual revolution.

    On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:04 AM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Beloved Sister Karen and Hoop 6,
    14 attachments all together. The email was too large and had to send in pieces. Looking forwards to viewing your pamphlets. 

    For everyone, we are working hard to help, heal and promote unity across the world.

    PLEASE, PLEASE, no matter how tired you are, plug up all the holes in the walls and ceilings, 
    because nanites/morgellons and poisons can get in. And if you leave your car or your house
    they will be violated, including vandalism (broken locks/ doors/ exhaust, etc.). No matter how small
    get it plugged up. Use elmers (school or white) glue which sticks to almost everything and is safe. Use toilet paper
    with glue in bigger holes. Some of you have yellow stuff on the walls, it is poison and you need
    get it off your walls. Wash it off, because they shoot it and it is released, especially if you are in the 
    room. 

    Blessings and prayers for all of our TI's Targeted Individuals. We know you are the honorable
    your devoted servant,
    White Buffalo calf Woman your Twin Deer Mother

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Oct 16, 2017, 9:13:56 AM10/16/17
    to Hoop 6
    We are here
    Targeted: California Surveillance Ordinances

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Oct 25, 2017, 6:25:58 PM10/25/17
    to Hoop 6


    US: New Evidence Suggests Monitoring of Americans

    Documents Point to Warrantless Surveillance



    Pentagon An aerial view of the Pentagon building in Washington, June 15, 2005. © 2005 Reuters 201709usp_pentagon_presserplus.jpg


    ​  (New York) – Newly released documents reveal a US Defense Department policy that appears to authorize warrantless monitoring of US citizens and green-card holders whom the executive branch regards as “homegrown violent extremists,” Human Rights Watch said today. Separately, the documents also reinforce concerns that the government may be gathering very large amounts of data about US citizens and others without warrants. Both issues relate to a longstanding executive order that is shrouded in secrecy and should be a focus of congressional inquiry.

    The new materials, which Human Rights Watch obtained through a freedom of information request https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/01/23/human-rights-watch-asks-us-about-use-secret-surveillance-drug-immigration-purposes, are training modules that primarily concern Executive Order 12333 https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-12333-2008.pdf (EO 12333). That order broadly governs the US intelligence agencies’ activities, and includes provisions allowing the agencies to collect information on US persons – meaning US citizens and lawful permanent residents, as well as some corporations and associations – in a manner the government has never fully explained to the public https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/meet-executive-order-12333-the-reagan-rule-that-lets-the-nsa-spy-on-americans/2014/07/18/93d2ac22-0b93-11e4-b8e5-d0de80767fc2_story.html?utm_term=.8eb0644b1589. The training slides largely summarize Defense Department procedures http://dodsioo.defense.gov/Portals/46/DoDM%20%205240.01.pdf?ver=2016-08-11-184834-887 concerning EO 12333 that were released in 2016 https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/910089/dod-releases-update-of-manual-governing-defense-intelligence-activities/, updating a 1982 version. Using plain language to demystify the procedures’ phrasing, the slides offer hints about Defense Department intelligence practices that require further inquiry and exposure.

    “These documents point to just how thoroughly the public has been kept in the dark about warrantless surveillance under Executive Order 12333,” said Sarah St.Vincent https://www.hrw.org/about/people/sarah-stvincent, US surveillance and national security researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Their explanations of the order suggest that the government may be carrying out monitoring that poses serious problems for human rights, and Congress should seek more information about what the intelligence agencies are doing in this respect.”

    One of the documents’ most troubling aspects is the indication that the Defense Department has authorized its intelligence components to carry out at least some forms of monitoring of US persons without a warrant, based on designations that use unknown and potentially discriminatory criteria. Specifically, one of the training documents indicates that this monitoring is permitted for US persons whom the government regards as “homegrown violent extremists” (referred to as “HVEs” in the slides) – even when they have “no specific connection to foreign terrorist(s).” The government’s basis for this authorization is a revised definition of “counterintelligence” collection found in the 2016 procedures.

    The procedures address several forms of surveillance, and it is unclear which types the government plans to use when monitoring “homegrown violent extremists.” However, a current senior Defense Department official who provided comments to Human Rights Watch on condition of anonymity stated that “the [Department’s] counterintelligence elements would be unable to collect necessary information on potential HVEs” without this change.

    The Defense Department official did not respond to a question from Human Rights Watch about whether the monitoring of US persons under this policy may include electronic surveillance. If it does, this would raise concerns that the government is violating – or believes it is exploiting a possible loophole in – federal law, which generally prohibits deliberate spying on the content of US persons’ telephone or internet communications without a warrant.

    The authorities may only obtain such a warrant if they show probable cause to believe that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime, or that the person is “a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1805.” The disclosure of the government’s policy regarding the surveillance of “homegrown violent extremists” who are not connected to a foreign group raises concerns about whether intelligence and/or law enforcement bodies are using EO 12333 to do an end-run around these legal protections.

    Human Rights Watch is also concerned about the methods and criteria the government may be using to define and identify “homegrown violent extremists,” and particularly about the risk that people who are exercising their legitimate free-expression rights will be targeted for monitoring in a discriminatory or arbitrary manner. As an example of “homegrown violent extremists,” the Defense Department official who commented to Human Rights Watch pointed to individuals who “may be self-radicalized via the internet, social media, etc., and then plan or execute terrorist acts in furtherance of the ideology or goals of a foreign terrorist group.” However, the official did not respond to a question about the criteria the executive branch uses when designating a US person a “homegrown violent extremist” for the purposes of this policy.

    Additional questions remain about the range of agencies that may warrantlessly monitor such individuals. The Defense Department official’s comments imply that the policy disclosed in the slides applies to the Department’s “counterintelligence elements,” such as the Naval Criminal Investigative Service and the Air Force Office of Special Investigations. These bodies, the official stated, “investigate activities by active duty military members of their Service or [Defense Department] civilian personnel engaged in activities targeted against interests of their Service.” The official noted, “If the military counterintelligence elements conduct investigations of persons other than active duty military members, they do so jointly with the FBI [Federal Bureau of Investigation].”

    Although the official’s remarks focused on the military counterintelligence bodies, further information is needed about whether other agencies – such as the National Security Agency (“NSA”) or the FBI – may rely on similar policies to identify and/or monitor US persons who do not have an affiliation with the military, Human Rights Watch said.

    The Defense Department official emphasized that “counterintelligence collection against these, or any other individuals or groups, must be predicated upon the ‘reasonable belief’ standard, which is reviewed through the operational and legal chain of command prior to initiation of any activity. Field personnel may not rely solely upon ‘hunches’ or intuition’ as justification for the initiation of counterintelligence activities.” However, the government’s failure to disclose its methods and criteria for designating US-person “extremists” makes the effectiveness of these stated protections difficult to evaluate.

    “The government’s authority to monitor people doesn’t depend on their beliefs, or what the government thinks they believe, but on specific evidence that gives sufficient reason to think a criminal offense is occurring or that the person is an agent of a foreign power,” St.Vincent said. “A secret determination that someone’s rights should be curtailed based on undisclosed criteria is incompatible with the rule of law. The government should explain what it’s doing as well as its legal basis for doing it.”

    A separate problem to which some of the newly released materials point is the potential volume of data collection – including collection affecting US persons – under EO 12333. The 2016 procedures created the category of “special circumstances collection” to encourage the authorities to consider whether surveillance activities “raise special circumstances” and merit extra safeguards based on “the volume, proportion, and sensitivity” of US-person information the government is likely to obtain. (The category itself does not authorize any surveillance that could not otherwise take place under the order.) However, the training documents use the informal term “big data” to describe “special circumstances collection,” raising the possibility that the government may be carrying out or contemplating surveillance on a massive scale.

    Documents revealed by the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden beginning in 2013 have indicated that the government uses EO 12333 as the basis for bulk communications surveillance programs https://cdt.org/files/2014/09/cdt-aclu-upr-9152014.pdf overseas. However, these new references to “big data,” while fleeting, appear to represent one of the most direct acknowledgments yet by the government that warrantless monitoring under the order may entail seizing very large or systematic sets of data – including about US persons.

    Details regarding the newly released documents are provided below, and the documents themselves are posted on the Human Rights Watch website. Human Rights Watch shared the documents with Reuters, which published a related story on October XX.

    Human Rights Watch is also releasing documents obtained from the National Reconnaissance Organization and the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis.

    To view the documents, please visit:

    Air Force Office of Special Investigations FOIA documents

    https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/supporting_resources/air_force_foia_documents.pdf

    National Reconnaissance Office FOIA documents

    https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/10/19/national-reconnaissance-office-foia-documents

    DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis FOIA documents

    https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/10/19/dhs-office-intelligence-and-analysis-foia-documents

    The following are elements of the training documents obtained by Human Rights Watch that give rise to new concerns.

    1. Expansion of warrantless Defense Department intelligence collection on US persons for “counterintelligence” purposes to include “homegrown violent extremists”

    One of the documents indicates that pursuant to a 2016 change in procedures http://dodsioo.defense.gov/Portals/46/DoDM%20%205240.01.pdf?ver=2016-08-11-184834-887 concerning Executive Order 12333, the Defense Department may now extend the monitoring of US persons for “counterintelligence” purposes to people the government regards as “HVEs,” which a senior Defense Department official consulted by Human Rights Watch confirmed means “homegrown violent extremists.” The official indicated that the term is “shorthand … used in the counterintelligence community to describe people who may not have a specific connection to a particular foreign terrorist group but are engaged in violent extremist activities, often following engagement with these groups’ propaganda on the Internet or social media, etc.”

    The procedures themselves do not directly mention such “homegrown violent extremists,” instead providing in more general terms that the monitoring of US persons for “counterintelligence” purposes may extend to “[a]n individual, organization, or group reasonably believed to be acting for, or in furtherance of, the goals or objectives of an international terrorist or international terrorist organization, for purposes harmful to the national security of the United States.”

    In indicating that this category includes “HVEs,” the training document depicts this expansion of the “counterintelligence” collection definition as a “[k]ey” change in the new procedures. The document indicates that the change allows the collection of intelligence on US persons even in the absence of a “specific connection to foreign terrorist(s).” As examples, it alludes to the individuals who carried out mass shootings in San Bernardino, California in 2015, and in Orlando, Florida in 2016.


    Key Changes 1.201709usp_foia_documents_p_62.png


    ​Key Changes 2.201709usp_foia_documents_p_68.png

    The Defense Department’s methods and criteria for identifying “homegrown violent extremists” remain unclear, raising fears that the designation could be applied in ways that are arbitrary, inconsistent, or discriminatory. It is also unknown whether US persons who merely exercise their free-expression rights by visiting a controversial website, espousing certain political or religious views, or criticizing the government might be targeted.

    The government also has not yet disclosed its legal justification for this policy, especially insofar as it involves any warrantless monitoring of US persons that would normally require a warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, other statutes, or Fourth Amendment case law. The government should fully disclose the policy, its legal underpinnings, the type(s) of monitoring to which it may lead, and its anticipated and actual application.

    Human Rights Watch remains concerned that several other aspects of this important policy change have not yet been publicly revealed. For example, as mentioned above, it is not yet clear whether the policy (or a similar one) may also apply to the NSA or non-Defense intelligence agencies, or whether people who have no affiliation with the Defense Department may be monitored.

    1. “Special circumstances” collection and references to “big data”

    The Defense Department procedures adopted in 2016 refer to the idea of “Special Circumstances Collection”: intelligence “collection opportunities” for which certain extra safeguards may be appropriate due to the “volume, proportion, and sensitivity of the [US person information] likely to be acquired,” as well as the “intrusiveness of the methods used to collect the information.” The Defense Department official Human Rights Watch consulted said the concept of special circumstances collection itself “does not provide any new or independent authority to conduct electronic surveillance”; that is, it does not give the Defense Department any powers it did not already have. However, the scope and scale of such collection is unknown, including the kinds of data that may be collected.

    Two of the newly disclosed training documents suggest that at least some of the collection the government may be carrying out that falls into the “special circumstances” category includes the gathering of “big data” – a term that lacks a settled definition but can refer https://datascience.berkeley.edu/what-is-big-data/ to enormous troves of information. These explicit references to “big data” raise renewed concerns that under EO 12333, the government may be sweeping up huge amounts of data containing private communications or other sensitive information – including information belonging to US persons. They may also be some of the most direct acknowledgments yet by the government itself of this possibility.


    ​Key Changes 3.201709usp_foia_documents_p_125.png


    ​​Key Changes 4.201709usp_foia_documents_p_191.png

    The possibility of the collection of “big data” is particularly troubling in light of the Defense Department’s power to disseminate “large amounts of unevaluated” information about US persons to entities both within and outside the federal government, as confirmed in the 2016 procedures.

    Congress should seek, and the executive branch should provide, detailed explanations of the scale and nature of all “special circumstances collection” activities, including their impact on US persons.

    1. “Physical surveillance” of non-US persons in the United States

    The 2016 Defense Department procedures define “physical surveillance” as the “deliberate and continuous observation … of a person to track his or her movement or other physical activities while they are occurring, under circumstances in which the person has no reasonable expectation of privacy,” and say this monitoring may include the use of “enhancement devices” such as “binoculars or still or full motion cameras.”

    The new training documents highlight a section of these procedures that allows the Defense Department’s intelligence components to conduct such physical surveillance of any non-US person in the US without a warrant, as long as the surveillance takes place for “an authorized foreign intelligence or [counterintelligence] purpose.” Non-US persons in the US include undocumented immigrants and temporary visa holders.

    By comparison, the Defense Department’s intelligence components may only subject US persons in the US to such physical surveillance if they are current or prospective employees of (or contractors for) those components, or if they are members of another element of the armed services.

     
    ​Key Changes 5.201709usp_foia_documents_p_140.png


    Key Changes 6.201709usp_foia_documents_p_213.png

    The senior Defense Department official Human Rights Watch consulted indicated that this new provision of the procedures “was needed to maintain [a] long standing rule that allows the physical surveillance of non-U.S. persons inside the U.S.” This rule was not stated explicitly in the earlier version of the procedures, although the government appears to view it as having been implicit.

    The rule raises troubling questions about whether the government, contrary to the general understanding that all persons in the territory of the US enjoy rights under the constitution, believes it has wider latitude to engage in national security or criminal surveillance of non-US persons in the US than it does to surveil US citizens and green-card holders in the country. The policy also prompts questions about its potential effect on any US persons who become caught in a dragnet intended for non-US persons.

    “Physical surveillance” does not include communications surveillance. However, some activities that may qualify as “physical surveillance” may have Fourth Amendment implications: for example, US federal courts are currently divided https://www.eff.org/cases/united-states-v-vargas as to whether the government needs a warrant for continuous video monitoring of areas that are visible to the public. The government should clarify what the manual means when it refers to “circumstances in which the person has no reasonable expectation of privacy”; it should also explain the specific types of monitoring that may take place under this policy as well as any rules for storing, searching, and sharing the data.

    As a general matter, the government should explain how it regards the Fourth Amendment as applying to people in the US who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents.

    1. Military law enforcement “Intercept Program” associated with Department of Defense Instruction O-5505.9

    One training document briefly refers to an “Intercept Program” associated with Department of Defense Instruction O-5505.9 – a document whose current version is not publicly available, although a 1995 version https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/dodd/corres/pdf/d55059_042095/d55059p.pdf addressed the interception of wire, electronic, and oral communications for law enforcement by Defense Department entities. The Defense Department official said the program “pertains exclusively to DoD law enforcement entities” and that Instruction O-5505.9 “does not authorize any DoD intelligence activity.” The government should release this instruction along with information about its uses.


    Key Changes 7.201709usp_foia_documents_p_168.png


     
     
    1. National Security Letters

    A set of slides in one of the training presentations offers a stark illustration of the possible scope of warrantless National Security Letters, which the government may use https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/3414 to obtain financial and other records as part of foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations. While the information found in the slides was already publicly available, the array of records the FBI may seek through the letters without court approval – from bank account and credit card transaction histories to documents held by pawnbrokers, jewelers, travel agencies, car dealers, real estate agents, and casinos – is vividly on display.


    ​Key Changes 8.201709usp_foia_documents_p_229.png


     
     
    1. Recommendations to the US government

    The US executive branch should release clear and comprehensive information about the monitoring the intelligence agencies may conduct under Executive Order 12333 and other surveillance authorities.

    In response to specific concerns raised by the new materials, the executive branch should:

    • Ensure that all surveillance authorities, legal interpretations, and policies are clear, detailed, and publicly available. The language in these documents should enable the public to understand the circumstances in which surveillance may take place.
    • Release any legal interpretations or policies concerning the definition, designation and monitoring of US persons the government regards as “homegrown violent extremists.”
    • Provide explanations and legal justifications for all “special circumstances collection” activities, as well as an explanation of their scale.
    • Provide a clear and comprehensive explanation of the types of “physical surveillance” to which non-US persons in the US may be subjected as well as the sharing, storage, and usage of any resulting data.
    • Disclose Department of Defense Instruction O-5505.9 and explain the activities conducted under that authority.

    The US Congress should also ask for further information about each of the policies and activities detailed above, and ensure that all government surveillance complies with US constitutional and international human rights law and takes place within a statutory framework that is effective in preventing abuses. Congress should also ensure that as much information as possible is disclosed to the public.

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Nov 27, 2017, 4:00:32 PM11/27/17
    to Hoop 6
    Space Trash used for Targeting

    Dr. STEVEN GREER, MURDER ATTEMPT; NICOLAS SARKOZY - UFO/ET DISCLOSURE


    Relatives, suggest you view the whole video, however at this beginning start point, it talks about how space trash or psychonic weapons should not be used.
    Apparently congress did not outlaw (space trash) but only viewed the legislation, says Sister Karen previous NSA (national security agency). Sister Amy in Richmond used this legislation to get Oakland to start it's only ordinance. Now cities all over San Francisco bay area are creating no surveillance ordinances. Just this year June 27, 2017 all of California has created law statewide. WE are taking steps forwards. This video is taking us forwards into a time of plenty. IN the meantime there is lots to get accomplished in order to save our Targeted People around the world
    your devoted servant,White Buffalo Calf Woman your Twin Deer Mother
    Angel Services Around the World
    Sioux Task Force and Rainbow Warriors of Prophecy
    Jews for the Ark of the Covenant, holy people of the rainbow

    Dr. STEVEN GREER feat. NICK BEGICH, PSYCHICS BEING ATTACKED BY THE CABAL - PART 2




    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Nov 27, 2017, 4:26:05 PM11/27/17
    to Hoop 6
    https://youtu.be/lp3i1tsxb3k?t=7m24s
    Mind Control Scripts

    Relatives,
    This is a great big issue about mind control.Without a stable spiritual daily life, one is not able to distinguish reality and planted dreamscapes. 

    They are defiling and put scripts right into your mind. The only way to combat this is through spiritual works.

    You have to use your right brain and right brain, to and fro. THis is why the ghost dance will save the people, teaching how to purify as well as stimulate other parts of the brain. Making your own pathways, rather than someone outside of you mindcontroling you, defiling you and down right nasty view of the world and society. All is free. All have great powers. All belong to the spiritual realm. Time to get cracking, because the spiritual fit are taking over the world.
    White Buffalo Calf Woman on the knoll (bump on a log)

    ps, closer to that manual for all Targeted and their cures. Time is coming and we will be taking back what belongs to the spiritual being, love and blessings all around. Thank you Mother Earth and Father Sky. We bow with the rainbow and cry, tears of joy and tears of sorrow. We long for paradise tomorrow.

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Nov 27, 2017, 5:16:18 PM11/27/17
    to Hoop 6

    MICROWAVE WEAPONRY'S USE ON PEOPLE EXPLAINED BY DR BARRIE TROWER


    On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:25 PM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://youtu.be/lp3i1tsxb3k?t=7m24s
    Mind Control Scripts

    Relatives,
    This is a great big issue about mind control.Without a stable spiritual daily life, one is not able to distinguish reality and planted dreamscapes. 

    They are defiling and put scripts right into your mind. The only way to combat this is through spiritual works.

    You have to use your right brain and right brain, to and fro. THis is why the ghost dance will save the people, teaching how to purify as well as stimulate other parts of the brain. Making your own pathways, rather than someone outside of you mindcontroling you, defiling you and down right nasty view of the world and society. All is free. All have great powers. All belong to the spiritual realm. Time to get cracking, because the spiritual fit are taking over the world.
    White Buffalo Calf Woman on the knoll (bump on a log)

    ps, closer to that manual for all Targeted and their cures. Time is coming and we will be taking back what belongs to the spiritual being, love and blessings all around. Thank you Mother Earth and Father Sky. We bow with the rainbow and cry, tears of joy and tears of sorrow. We long for paradise tomorrow.

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Nov 27, 2017, 5:33:02 PM11/27/17
    to Hoop 6
    Consciousness of the Human
    Beings of Light
    Crystalline Beings of Light
    Stones, star of david (beloved stones)
    Crystal Indigo Children
    Rainbow Warriors of Prophecy
    Ark of the Covenant and promise of the Rainbow (sukkah, temporary dwelling, the sacred buffalo robe, four directions of light robe each being wears, the powers a being can cultivate).

    (south to west) Second orange phase of evolution (we the seed (orange hoop)) past appears to be
    meets with 
    (north to east) Fourth green phase of evolution (they the aliens from the stars (green hoop) future appears to be.
    together merges
    the 
    (west to north) Third phase of evolution (third leg of the sacred buffalo), the heaven and earthly, paradise, the yellow phase of evolution (yellow hoop), past, present and future)

    ​Evolution8Directions.jpg

    Relatives,
    This video talks about spiritual advancements, however talks about it in a physical way. So, you must understand it is through spiritual practice one cultivates a spiritual being. This means you have to spend half your day in spiritual works. Get to it, because that is the only way to get through with the loving practice of joy and abundance. Please understand, it's so much easier, just practice spiritual works daily not intellectual pursuits. There are not all those dimensions. There is Heaven and there is Earth. Light and shadow, density and buoyancy. The blue road is the sound wave, woman, heart, dark. The red road is the light wave, man, mind, light. The yellow road is moving from sound to light wave or to and fro, the dream.
    Your devoted servant
    White Buffalo Calf Woman

    Dr Steven Greer ★ TRANSDIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (November 7 2017)



    On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:16 PM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:

    MICROWAVE WEAPONRY'S USE ON PEOPLE EXPLAINED BY DR BARRIE TROWER

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Nov 27, 2017, 5:42:10 PM11/27/17
    to Hoop 6

    On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:32 PM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Consciousness of the Human
    Beings of Light
    Crystalline Beings of Light
    Stones, star of david (beloved stones)
    Crystal Indigo Children
    Rainbow Warriors of Prophecy
    Ark of the Covenant and promise of the Rainbow (sukkah, temporary dwelling, the sacred buffalo robe, four directions of light robe each being wears, the powers a being can cultivate).

    (south to west) Second orange phase of evolution (we the seed (orange hoop)) past appears to be
    meets with 
    (north to east) Fourth green phase of evolution (they the aliens from the stars (green hoop) future appears to be.
    together merges
    the 
    (west to north) Third phase of evolution (third leg of the sacred buffalo), the heaven and earthly, paradise, the yellow phase of evolution (yellow hoop), past, present and future)

    ​Evolution8Directions.jpg

    Relatives,
    This video talks about spiritual advancements, however talks about it in a physical way. So, you must understand it is through spiritual practice one cultivates a spiritual being. This means you have to spend half your day in spiritual works. Get to it, because that is the only way to get through with the loving practice of joy and abundance. Please understand, it's so much easier, just practice spiritual works daily not intellectual pursuits. There are not all those dimensions. There is Heaven and there is Earth. Light and shadow, density and buoyancy. The blue road is the sound wave, woman, heart, dark. The red road is the light wave, man, mind, light. The yellow road is moving from sound to light wave or to and fro, the dream.
    Your devoted servant
    White Buffalo Calf Woman

    Dr Steven Greer ★ TRANSDIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (November 7 2017)


    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Nov 27, 2017, 5:43:58 PM11/27/17
    to Hoop 6

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Dec 28, 2017, 12:23:07 PM12/28/17
    to Hoop 6
    PRESS RELEASES
    New Executive Order Implements Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act,
    Provides for Treasury Sanctions Against Malign Actors Worldwide

    United States Sanctions Human Rights Abusers and Corrupt Actors Across the Globe


    New Executive Order Implements Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act,
    Provides for Treasury Sanctions Against Malign Actors Worldwide

    Washington – Today, the Trump Administration launched a new sanctions regime targeting human rights abusers and corrupt actors around the world.  Building on the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act passed by Congress last year, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order (Order) today declaring a national emergency with respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world and providing for the imposition of sanctions on actors engaged in these malign activities.  In an Annex to the Order, the President imposed sanctions on 13 serious human rights abusers and corrupt actors.  In addition, the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), acting on behalf of the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, imposed sanctions on an additional 39 affiliated individuals and entities under the newly-issued Order.

    “Today, the United States is taking a strong stand against human rights abuse and corruption globally by shutting these bad actors out of the U.S. financial system.  Treasury is freezing their assets and publicly denouncing the egregious acts they’ve committed, sending a message that there is a steep price to pay for their misdeeds,” said Secretary of the Treasury Steven T. Mnuchin.  “At the direction of President Trump, Treasury and our interagency partners will continue to take decisive and impactful actions to hold accountable those who abuse human rights, perpetrate corruption, and undermine American ideals.”

    As a result of today’s actions, all of the assets within U.S. jurisdiction of the individuals and entities included in the Annex to the Order or designated by OFAC are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.  Further details on these designations are included below.


    Yahya Jammeh

    Yahya Jammeh (Jammeh), the former President of The Gambia who came to power in 1994 and stepped down in 2017, has a long history of engaging in serious human rights abuses and corruption.  Jammeh created a terror and assassination squad called the Junglers that answered directly to him.  Jammeh used the Junglers to threaten, terrorize, interrogate, and kill individuals whom Jammeh assessed to be threats.  During Jammeh’s tenure, he ordered the Junglers to kill a local religious leader, journalists, members of the political opposition, and former members of the government, among others.  Jammeh used the Gambia’s National Intelligence Agency (NIA) as a repressive tool of the regime – torturing political opponents and journalists. Throughout his presidency, Jammeh routinely ordered the abuse and murder of those he suspected of undermining his authority.

    During his tenure, Jammeh used a number of corrupt schemes to plunder The Gambia’s state coffers or otherwise siphon off state funds for his personal gain.  Ongoing investigations continue to reveal Jammeh’s large-scale theft from state coffers prior to his departure.  According to The Gambia’s Justice Ministry, Jammeh personally, or through others acting under his instructions, directed the unlawful withdrawal of at least $50 million of state funds.  The Gambian Government has since taken action to freeze Jammeh’s assets within The Gambia.

    In a related action, OFAC designated Africada Airways, Kanilai Group International, Kanilai Worni Family Farms Ltd, Royal Africa Capital Holding Ltd, Africada Financial Service & Bureau de Change Ltd, Africada Micro-Finance Ltd, Africada Insurance Company, Kora Media Corporation Ltd, Atlantic Pelican Company Ltd, Palm Grove Africa Dev’t Corp. Ltd, Patriot Insurance Brokers Co. Ltd, and Royal Africa Securities Brokerage Co Ltd.

    Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes

    As President of Nicaragua’s Supreme Electoral Council, drawing a reported government salary of $60,000 per year, Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes (Rivas) has been accused in the press of amassing sizeable personal wealth, including multiple properties, private jets, luxury vehicles, and a yacht.  Rivas has been described by a Nicaraguan Comptroller General as “above the law,” with investigations into his corruption having been blocked by Nicaraguan government officials. He has also perpetrated electoral fraud undermining Nicaragua’s electoral institutions.

    Dan Gertler

    Dan Gertler (Gertler) is an international businessman and billionaire who has amassed his fortune through hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of opaque and corrupt mining and oil deals in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).  Gertler has used his close friendship with DRC President Joseph Kabila to act as a middleman for mining asset sales in the DRC, requiring some multinational companies to go through Gertler to do business with the Congolese state.  As a result, between 2010 and 2012 alone, the DRC reportedly lost over $1.36 billion in revenues from the underpricing of mining assets that were sold to offshore companies linked to Gertler.  The failure of the DRC to publish the full details of one of the sales prompted the International Monetary Fund to halt loans to the DRC totaling $225 million.  In 2013, Gertler sold to the DRC government for $150 million the rights to an oil block that Gertler purchased from the government for just $500,000, a loss of $149.5 million in potential revenue.  Gertler has acted for or on behalf of Kabila, helping Kabila organize offshore leasing companies.

    In a related action, OFAC designated Pieter Albert Deboutte, Fleurette Properties Limited, Fleurette Holdings Netherlands B.V., Gertler Family Foundation, Oil of DR Congo SPRL, Jarvis Congo SARL, International Diamond Industries, D.G.D. Investments Ltd., D.G.I. Israel Ltd, Proglan Capital Ltd, Emaxon Finance International Inc., Africa Horizons Investment Limited, Caprikat Limited, Foxwhelp Limited, Caprikat and Foxwhelp SARL, Lora Enterprises Limited, Zuppa Holdings Limited, Orama Properties Ltd, DGI Mining Ltd, and Rozaro Development Limited.

    Slobodan Tesic

    Slobodan Tesic (Tesic) is among the biggest dealers of arms and munitions in the Balkans; he spent nearly a decade on the United Nations (UN) Travel Ban List for violating UN sanctions against arms exports to Liberia.  In order to secure arms contracts with various countries, Tesic would directly or indirectly provide bribes and financial assistance to officials.  Tesic also took potential clients on high-value vacations, paid for their children’s education at western schools or universities, and used large bribes to secure contracts.  Tesic owns or controls two Serbian companies, Partizan Tech and Technoglobal Systems DOO Beograd, and two Cyprus-based companies, Grawit Limited and Charso Limited.  Tesic negotiates the sale of weapons via Charso Limited and used Grawit Limited as a mechanism to fund politicians. 

    In a related action, OFAC designated Preduzece Za Trgovinu Na Veliko I Malo Partizan Tech DOO Beograd-Savski Venac (“Partizan Tech”), Charso Limited, Grawit Limited, and Technoglobal Systems DOO Beograd.

    Maung Maung Soe

    In his former role as chief of the Burmese Army’s Western command, Maung Maung Soe oversaw the military operation in Burma’s Rakhine State responsible for widespread human rights abuse against Rohingya civilians in response to attacks by the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army.  The Secretary of State determined on November 22 that the situation in northern Rakhine state in Burma constituted ethnic cleansing.  The United States Government examined credible evidence of Maung Maung Soe’s activities, including allegations against Burmese security forces of extrajudicial killings, sexual violence, and arbitrary arrest as well as the widespread burning of villages.  Security operations have led to hundreds of thousands of Rohingya refugees fleeing across Burma’s border with Bangladesh.  In August 2017, witnesses reportedly described mass killings and arson attacks by the Burmese Army and Burmese Border Guard Police, both then under Maung Maung Soe’s command in northern Rakhine State.  In August 2017, soldiers described as being from the Western Command allegedly entered a village and reportedly separated the inhabitants by gender.  According to witnesses, soldiers opened fire on the men and older boys and committed multiple acts of rape.  Many of the women and younger children were reportedly also shot.  Other witnesses described soldiers setting huts on fire with villagers inside.

    Benjamin Bol Mel

    Benjamin Bol Mel (Bol Mel) is the President of ABMC Thai-South Sudan Construction Company Limited (ABMC), and has served as the Chairman of the South Sudan Chamber of Commerce, Industry, and Agriculture.  Bol Mel has also served as South Sudanese President Salva Kiir’s principal financial advisor, has been Kiir’s private secretary, and was perceived within the government as being close to Kiir and the local business community.  Several officials were linked to ABMC in spite of a constitutional prohibition on top government officials transacting commercial business or earning income from outside the government. 

    Bol Mel oversees ABMC, which has been awarded contracts worth tens of millions of dollars by the Government of South Sudan.  ABMC allegedly received preferential treatment from high-level officials, and the Government of South Sudan did not hold a competitive process for selecting ABMC to do roadwork on several roads in Juba and throughout South Sudan.  Although this roadwork had been completed only a few years before, the government budgeted tens of millions of dollars more for maintenance of the same roads.

    In a related action, OFAC designated ABMC Thai-South Sudan Construction Company Limited and Home and Away LTD.

    Mukhtar Hamid Shah

    Shah is a Pakistani surgeon specializing in kidney transplants who Pakistani police believe to be involved in kidnapping, wrongful confinement, and the removal of and trafficking in human organs.  As an owner of the Kidney Centre in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, Shah was involved in the kidnapping and detention of, and removal of kidneys from, Pakistani laborers.  Shah was arrested by Pakistani authorities in connection with an October 2016 incident in which 24 individuals from Punjab were found to be held against their will.  Impoverished and illiterate Pakistanis from the countryside were reportedly lured to Rawalpindi with the promise of a job, and imprisoned for weeks.  Doctors from the Kidney Centre were allegedly planning to steal their kidneys in order to sell them for a large profit.  Police state that one of the accused arrested in connection with the events estimated that more than 400 people were imprisoned in the apartment at various times.

    Gulnara Karimova

    Gulnara Karimova (Karimova), daughter of former Uzbekistan leader Islam Karimov, headed a powerful organized crime syndicate that leveraged state actors to expropriate businesses, monopolize markets, solicit bribes, and administer extortion rackets.  In July 2017, the Uzbek Prosecutor General’s Office charged Karimova with directly abetting the criminal activities of an organized crime group whose assets were worth over $1.3 billion.  Karimova was also charged with hiding foreign currency through various means, including the receipt of payoffs in the accounts of offshore companies controlled by an organized criminal group, the illegal sale of radio frequencies and land parcels, siphoning off state funds through fraudulent dividend payments and stock sales, the illegal removal of cash, the non-collection of currency earnings, and the import of goods at inflated prices.  Karimova was also found guilty of embezzlement of state funds, theft, tax evasion, and concealment of documents.  Karimova laundered the proceeds of corruption back to her own accounts through a complex network of subsidiary companies and segregated portfolio funds.  Karimova’s targeting of successful businesses to maximize her gains and enrich herself in some cases destroyed Uzbek competitors.  Due in part to Karimova’s corrupt activities in the telecom sector alone, Uzbeks paid some of the highest rates in the world for cellular service.

    Angel Rondon Rijo

    Angel Rondon Rijo (Rondon) is a politically connected businessman and lobbyist in the Dominican Republic who funneled money from Odebrecht, a Brazilian construction company, to Dominican officials, who in turn awarded Odebrecht projects to build highways, dams, and other projects.  According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Odebrecht is a Brazil-based global construction conglomerate that has pled guilty to charges of conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and agreed to a criminal fine of $4.5 billion.  In 2017, Rondon was arrested by Dominican authorities and charged with corruption for the bribes paid by Odebrecht.

    Artem Chayka

    Artem Chayka (Chayka) is the son of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation and has leveraged his father’s position and ability to award his subordinates to unfairly win state-owned assets and contracts and put pressure on business competitors. In 2014, reconstruction of a highway began, and Chayka’s competitor for supplying materials to the project suddenly fell under prosecutorial scrutiny.  An anonymous complaint letter with a fake name initiated a government investigation against the competitor.  Government inspectors did not produce any documents confirming the legality of the inspections, and did not inform subjects of the investigation of their rights.  Traffic police were deployed along the route to the competitor, weight control stations were suddenly dispatched, and trees were dug up and left to block entrances.  The competitor was forced to shut down, leaving Chayka in a position to non-competitively work on the highway project.  Also in 2014, Chayka bid on a state-owned stone and gravel company, and was awarded the contract.  His competitor contested the results and filed a lawsuit.  Prosecutors thereafter raided his home.  After Chayka’s competitor withdrew the lawsuit, prosecutors dropped all charges.

    Gao Yan

    Gao Yan (Gao) was the Beijing Public Security Bureau Chaoyang Branch director.  During Gao’s tenure, human rights activist Cao Shunli was detained at Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau Chaoyang Branch where, in March 2014, Cao fell into a coma and died from organ failure, her body showing signs of emaciation and neglect.  Cao had been arrested after attempting to board a flight to attend human rights training in Geneva, Switzerland.  She was refused visitation by her lawyer, and was refused medical treatment while she suffered from tuberculosis.

    Sergey Kusiuk

    Sergey Kusiuk (Kusiuk) was commander of an elite Ukrainian police unit, the Berkut.  Ukraine’s Special Investigations Department investigating crimes against activists identified Kusiuk as a leader of an attack on peaceful protesters on November 30, 2013, while in charge of 290 Berkut officers, many of whom took part in the beating of activists.  Kusiuk has been named by the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s Office as an individual who took part in the killings of activists on Kyiv’s Independence Square in February 2014.  Kusiuk ordered the destruction of documentation related to the events, and has fled Ukraine and is now in hiding in Moscow, Russia, where he was identified dispersing protesters as part of a Russian riot police unit in June 2017.

    Julio Antonio Juarez Ramirez

    Julio Antonio Juarez Ramirez (Juarez) is a Guatemalan Congressman accused of ordering an attack in which two journalists were killed and another injured.  Guatemalan prosecutors and a UN-sponsored commission investigating corruption in Guatemala allege that Juarez hired hit men to kill Prensa Libre correspondent Danilo Efrain Zapan Lopez, whose reporting had hurt Juarez’s plan to run for reelection.  Fellow journalist Federico Benjamin Salazar of Radio Nuevo Mundo was also killed in the attack and is considered a collateral victim.  Another journalist was wounded in the attack.

    Yankuba Badjie

    Yankuba Badjie (Badjie) was appointed as the Director General of The Gambia’s NIA in December 2013 and is alleged to have presided over abuses throughout his tenure.  During Badjie’s tenure as Director General, abuses were prevalent and routine within the NIA, consisting of physical trauma and other mistreatment.  In April 2016, Badjie oversaw the detention and murder of Solo Sandeng, a member of the political opposition.  In February 2017, Badjie was charged along with eight subordinates with Sandeng’s murder.  Prior to becoming Director General, Badjie served as the NIA Deputy Director General for Operations.  Prior to becoming a member of the NIA’s senior leadership, Badjie led a paramilitary group known as the Junglers to the NIA’s headquarters to beat a prisoner for approximately three hours, leaving the prisoner unconscious and with broken hands.  The following day, Badjie and the Junglers returned to beat the prisoner again, leaving him on the verge of death. 

    For identifying information on the individuals and entities designated today, click here.

    New Executive Order Implements Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act,
    Provides for Treasury Sanctions Against Malign Actors Worldwide


    On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:43 PM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Dec 28, 2017, 12:25:07 PM12/28/17
    to Hoop 6

    EXECUTIVE ORDERS

    Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption

     

     Issued on: 

    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) (INA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

    I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.

    I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

    I hereby determine and order:

    Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

    (i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;

    (ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

    (A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

    (B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

    (1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

    (2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;

    (C) to be or have been a leader or official of:

    (1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

    (2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

    (D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and

    (iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

    (A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

    (1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;

    (2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

    (3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;

    (B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

    (C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section.

    (b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.

    Sec. 2. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1 of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

    Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

    Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:

    (a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

    (b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

    Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

    (b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

    Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

    (a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

    (b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

    (c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

    Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.

    Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA and the Act as may be necessary to implement this order and section 1263(a) of the Act with respect to the determinations provided for therein. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

    Sec. 9. The Secretary of State is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, the INA, and the Act as may be necessary to carry out section 2 of this order and, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the reporting requirement in section 1264(a) of the Act with respect to the reports provided for in section 1264(b)(2) of that Act. The Secretary of State may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States consistent with applicable law.

    Sec. 10. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to determine that circumstances no longer warrant the blocking of the property and interests in property of a person listed in the Annex to this order, and to take necessary action to give effect to that determination.

    Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

    Sec. 12. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, December 21, 2017.

    Sec. 13. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    DONALD J. TRUMP

    THE WHITE HOUSE,
    December 20, 2017.

     

    ANNEX

    1. Mukhtar Hamid Shah; Date of Birth (DOB) August 11, 1939; alt. DOB November 8, 1939; nationality, Pakistan

    2. Angel Rondon Rijo; DOB July 16, 1950; nationality, Dominican Republic

    3. Dan Gertler; DOB December 23, 1973; nationality, Israel; alt. nationality, Democratic Republic of the Congo

    4. Maung Maung Soe; DOB March 1964; nationality, Burma

    5. Yahya Jammeh; DOB May 25, 1965; nationality, The Gambia

    6. Sergey Kusiuk; DOB December 1, 1966; nationality, Ukraine; alt. nationality, Russia

    7. Benjamin Bol Mel; DOB January 3, 1978; alt. DOB December 24, 1978; nationality, South Sudan; alt. nationality, Sudan

    8. Julio Antonio Juárez Ramírez; DOB December 1, 1980; nationality, Guatemala

    9. Goulnora Islamovna Karimova; DOB July 8, 1972; nationality, Uzbekistan

    10. Slobodan Tesic; DOB December 21, 1958; nationality, Serbia

    11. Artem Yuryevich Chayka; DOB September 25, 1975; nationality, Russia

    12. Gao Yan; DOB April 1963; nationality, China

    13. Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes; DOB July 6, 1954; nationality, Nicaragua


    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Dec 28, 2017, 12:27:09 PM12/28/17
    to Hoop 6

    President Trump Declares National Emergency Over Global Rights Abuses and Corruption

    December 21, 2017 7:30 pm Last Updated: December 23, 2017 5:13 pm
    President Donald Trump at the White House on Sept. 24. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

    President Donald Trump declared a national emergency on Dec. 21 in response to severe human rights abuses and corruption around the world.

    In his executive order, the president said that rights abuses and corruption “have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems.”

    “I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat,” Trump said.

    The executive order allows for the freezing of assets, within U.S. jurisdiction, of foreigners who commit severe human rights abuses, or for corruption, for the most part, outside of the United States.

    The executive order also targets foreigners and U.S. nationals who have assisted, sponsored, or provided financial or material aid to the foreign nationals who committed the crimes.

    Offending individuals will be identified by the Treasury Department in consultation with the Secretary of State and Attorney General.

    The executive order targets individuals, entities, and government officials.

    In effect, the executive order allows for the United States to crack down on international criminal networks who engage in human rights abuses, such as child traffickers.

    It also allows the United States to target individuals within regimes who have committed human rights abuses, such as in China or North Korea.

    “Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degraded the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets,” Trump wrote in the executive order.

    While it is unclear what the scope of the national emergency will be, 13 individuals have already been identified as serious human rights abusers and corrupt actors.

    In addition, the Treasury Department said that it has identified 39 affiliated individuals and entities under the new order.

    Among those initially targeted by the sanctions is Gao Yan, who was the director of the Beijing Public Security Bureau Chaoyang Branch. During Gao’s tenure, human rights activist Cao Shunli died in detention in March 2014.

    “Cao fell into a coma and died from organ failure, her body showing signs of emaciation and neglect,” said the Treasury Department in a statement.

    China has seen widespread human rights abuses over the years. Among them is the persecution of practitioners of the spiritual discipline, Falun Gong.

    In June 2016, the House passed a resolution expressing concern about the “persistent and credible reports of systematic, state-sanctioned organ harvesting from non-consenting prisoners of conscience in the People’s Republic of China, including from large numbers of Falun Gong practitioners and members of other religious and ethnic minority groups.”

    Officials involved in these abuses could now be targeted under the national emergency.

    It also includes Mukhtar Hamid Shah, a Pakistani surgeon specializing in kidney transplants who Pakistani police believe to be involved in kidnapping, and the removal of and trafficking in human organs.

    A full list of the individuals targeted can be found here.

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Dec 28, 2017, 12:28:17 PM12/28/17
    to Hoop 6
    The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave by Cisco Wheeler and Fritz Springmeier
    pdf file here

    Marion Grant, M.D.

    unread,
    Dec 28, 2017, 1:00:48 PM12/28/17
    to Hoop 6
    Not to brag or anything, but I and even my perps were involved in this. We are ending targeting. We think, or at least changing it significantly. I wrote him a letter and pointed out the abuses involved in targeting... and suggested removing the market or taking their ill-gotten gains.

    Empowered Individuals

    unread,
    Dec 28, 2017, 3:06:23 PM12/28/17
    to indigocrys...@googlegroups.com
    https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

    This is rather interesting. You may want to look into this new order effective immediately upon all government  officials who have a hand in corruption 
    --
    Hoop 6 (Stepping Stone) - Teach what is right, that law is the LOVE, then when two hearts is united, we share with intelligence. However if LOVE doesn't lead the way, then we fight to unite LOVE, two broken hearts, then we know that we are walking the truth path, the love to each other, the kind that lasts, over rolling hills in time, over the suns, and into the heart of the blue seas of every one. We are the Prophecy, the Rain upon the Land, so parched, it will need a Rainbow, to serve it home the right way and know where to land (the Rainbow always lands on the pot of gold, abundance, brotherhood)! "I Bless Myself" and "I Bless the World"
     
    Relatives, Email "Hoop 6" <indigocrystalchildren@googlegroups.com> (yahoo and hotmail virtual space limitation, recommend free gmail.com). Thank you, whitebuffalocalfwoman@gmail.com
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hoop 6 Indigo Crystal Children Adults" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indigocrystalchildren+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
    Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indigocrystalchildren.
    To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indigocrystalchildren/CAHw4v8S1b0HWpLdFptCn4Ppxsj1J44Qk5ZLSnuidWzzohOs8%3DA%40mail.gmail.com.


    --
    Doing business by the Good Book

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Dec 29, 2017, 10:02:44 PM12/29/17
    to Hoop 6

    EXECUTIVE ORDERS

    Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption

     

     Issued on: 



    President Trump Declares National Emergency Over Global Rights Abuses and Corruption

    December 21, 2017 7:30 pm Last Updated: December 23, 2017 5:13 pm
    On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Empowered Individuals <probu...@gmail.com> wrote:
    This is rather interesting. You may want to look into this new order effective immediately upon all government  officials who have a hand in corruption 
    Relatives, Email "Hoop 6" <indigocrystalchildren@googlegroups.com> (yahoo and hotmail virtual space limitation, recommend free gmail.com). Thank you, whitebuffa...@gmail.com

    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hoop 6 Indigo Crystal Children Adults" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indigocrystalchildren+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.


    --
    Doing business by the Good Book

    --
    Hoop 6 (Stepping Stone) - Teach what is right, that law is the LOVE, then when two hearts is united, we share with intelligence. However if LOVE doesn't lead the way, then we fight to unite LOVE, two broken hearts, then we know that we are walking the truth path, the love to each other, the kind that lasts, over rolling hills in time, over the suns, and into the heart of the blue seas of every one. We are the Prophecy, the Rain upon the Land, so parched, it will need a Rainbow, to serve it home the right way and know where to land (the Rainbow always lands on the pot of gold, abundance, brotherhood)! "I Bless Myself" and "I Bless the World"
     
    Relatives, Email "Hoop 6" <indigocrystalchildren@googlegroups.com> (yahoo and hotmail virtual space limitation, recommend free gmail.com). Thank you, whitebuffa...@gmail.com

    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hoop 6 Indigo Crystal Children Adults" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indigocrystalchildren+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Dec 29, 2017, 10:14:36 PM12/29/17
    to Hoop 6
    Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act BILLS-114s284rfh.pdf (attached)
    Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act BILLS-114s284rfh.pdf

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Dec 29, 2017, 10:16:45 PM12/29/17
    to Hoop 6
    Thank you Relatives
    Twin Deer Mother

    On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 7:14 PM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act BILLS-114s284rfh.pdf (attached)

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Dec 31, 2017, 7:43:43 PM12/31/17
    to Hoop 6
    Golden Father Marion
    Did not find anything on "Dr. Marcus", but the presidential orders were on this page. I hope this is what you were looking for.
    Love and blessings,
    your devoted sun,
    Twin Deer Mother
    elder at alightfromwithin.org

    On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Marion Grant, M.D. <lerxs...@gmail.com> wrote:
    you sent out a bulletin to the Indigo crystal children group about dr. Marcus somebody and a presidential order regarding him. Could you resend that to me please? Thanks.


    On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 7:16 PM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Thank you Relatives
    Twin Deer Mother

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Jan 2, 2018, 5:21:02 PM1/2/18
    to Hoop 6

    How U.S. Torture Left a Legacy of Damaged Minds

    Beatings, sleep deprivation, menacing and other brutal tactics have led to persistent mental health problems among detainees held in secret C.I.A. prisons and at Guantánamo.

    Stephen N. Xenakis, a former military psychiatrist, saw symptoms in one Guantánamo detainee that were similar to those exhibited by American troops held prisoner in Vietnam. CreditGeorge Etheredge for The New York Times

    Instead, the government relied on data from a training programto resist enemy interrogators, called SERE, for Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape. The military concluded there was little evidence that disrupted sleep, near-starvation, nudity and extreme temperatures harmed military trainees in controlled scenarios.

    Two veteran SERE psychologists, James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, worked with the C.I.A. and the Pentagon to help develop interrogation tactics. They based their strategies in part on the theory of “learned helplessness,” 

    December 15, 2014 

    An article on Thursday about psychology experiments that architects of the Central Intelligence Agency’s interrogation program drew on as the basis for brutal techniques misstated the name of an association of psychologists. It is The American Psychological Association (not Psychology). And the article misstated the middle initial of a psychologist who conducted early studies on “learned helplessness” in dogs. He is Martin E. P. Seligman, not Martin J.

    a phrase coined by the American psychologist Martin E. P. Seligman in the late 1960s. He gave electric shocks to dogs and discovered that they stopped resisting once they learned they could not stop the shocks. If the United States could make men helpless, the thinking went, they would give up their secrets.

    In the end, Justice Department lawyers concluded that the methods did not constitute torture, which is illegal under American and international law. In a series of memos, they wrote that no evidence existed that “significant psychological harm of significant duration, e.g., lasting for months or even years” would result.

    With fear of another terrorist attack, there was little incentive or time to find contrary evidence, Mr. Rizzo said. “The government wanted a solution,” he recalled. “It wanted a path to get these guys to talk.”

    The question of what ultimately happened to Dr. Seligman’s dogs never arose in the legal debate. They were strays, and once the studies were over, they were euthanized.

    excerpt from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/09/world/cia-torture-guantanamo-bay.html



    1. CIA Trained Guantanamo Prisoners As Double Agents

    2. Guantánamo detainee to testify on 'unspeakable torture' by CIA agents

    Abu Zubaydah to waive immunity to speak publicly about his torture for the first time, at a hearing as a precursor to the trial of men accused of the 9/11 attacks

     Abu Zubaydah was not charged by the US despite being held captive for 15 years at Guantánamo Bay. Photograph: Mladen Antonov/AFP/Getty Images

    Ed Pilkington in New York

    @edpilkingtonWed 10 May ‘17 16.10 EDT

    3. The road to torture: How the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation techniques” became legal after 9/11

    4. Lawsuit against psychologists who designed CIA torture program settles By Laura Jarrett, CNN 
    Updated 2:35 PM ET, Thu August 17, 2017

    5. CIA sex abuse and torture went beyond Senate report disclosures, detainee says

    6. 
    JANUARY 25, 2017 / 8:08 AM / A YEAR AGO

    Trump may reinstate secret CIA 'black site' prisons: U.S. officials

     keep open the detention center at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and send new prisoners there.

    7.

    CIA TORTURE ARCHITECTS CEMENT THEIR INFAMY BY INVOKING ACCUSED NAZI WAR CRIMINALS TO AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY

    28JUL2017 Kevin Gosztola KEVIN GOSZTOLA
    CIA contractor James Mitchell on CSPAN2's "Book TV" (Screen shot from CSPAN2)

    Two CIA psychologists, who were architects of the CIA’s torture program, have resorted to defense arguments once used by accused Nazi war criminals in order to claim they should not be held liable for torture.

    James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen were contracted by the CIA to develop, implement, and personally administer the agency’s experimental torture program against detainees in the War on Terrorism.

    The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued Mitchell and Jessen on behalf of three men, who were tortured. The case alleges Mitchell and Jessen engaged in crimes that include water torture, forcing prisoners into boxes, and chaining prisoners in painful stress positions to walls.

    Ahead of oral argument in Spokane, Washington, on July 28, defense lawyers for Mitchell and Jessen invoked [PDF] the cases of Karl Rasche, a banker who “facilitated large loans to a fund at the personal disposal of Heinrich Himmler,” the head of the S.S., and Joachim Drosihn, who was a gassing technician for the firm that manufactured the poison gas, Zyklon B, used to exterminate Jewish people in concentration camps.

    John Kiriakou, the former CIA officer who blew the whistle on the agency’s use of waterboarding in the torture program, reacted, “This just cements their place in history—and not just in history but in infamy.”

    “When they have to rely on the defenses of accused Nazi war criminals to defend themselves, [they] can’t go any lower,” Kiriakou added. (In fact, at first, Kiriakou did not take this seriously and thought it was some kind of a joke.)

    Mitchell and Jessen’s defense argued, in a case involving Zyklon B, the “‘owner and second-in-command of the firm were found guilty; Drosihn, the firm’s first gassing technician, was acquitted.’ Explaining this result, the court noted: The functions performed by Drosihn in his employment as a gassing technician were an integral part of the supply and use of the poison gas, but this alone could not render him liable for its criminal use, even if he was aware that his functions played such an important role in the transfer of gas.”

    “Here, it is undisputed that, as independent contractors serving on a larger interrogation team, Defendants lacked authority to “control, prevent, or modify” the CIA’s decision to use [enhanced interrogation techniques] on detainees,” their defense added.

    Their defense insisted when they wanted to stop the waterboarding of Abu Zubaydah they had to obtain approval from CIA Headquarters, “which was denied.” They are not liable for the CIA’s alleged “criminal use” of torture because they had “no ‘influence’ over the application of EITs” on CIA detainees, even if they played a part in the supply and use of torture techniques.

    But as Kiriakou countered, Mitchell and Jessen should have known torture was illegal and their training would be used to “carry out an illegal program.”

    There also is no similarity because Mitchell Jessen “actually carried out the torture. So they’re not just the suppliers of the Zyklon B. They’re the deliverers of the Zyklon B.”

    “They were instrumental in the creation and the implementation of that program. They were the ones arguing [for it with the CIA’s leadership]. They were not innocent bystanders,” Kiriakou added.

    Dror Ladin, a staff attorney for the ACLU’s National Security Project, wrote, “A key part of Mitchell and Jessen’s argument hinges on the claim that poison gas manufacturers weren’t held responsible by a British military tribunal for providing the Nazis with the gas because the Nazi government, not contractors, had final say on whether to use it.”

    “In fact, the Nuremberg tribunals that judged the Nazis and their enablers after World War II established the opposite rule: Private contractors are accountable when they choose to provide unlawful means for and profit from war crimes. In the same case that Mitchell and Jessen cite, the military tribunal found the owner of a chemical company that sold Zyklon B to the Nazis guilty — even though only the Nazis had final say on which prisoners would be gassed.”

    Mitchell and Jessen were not powerless individuals lacking influence at the CIA.

    From the Senate intelligence report on the CIA’s rendition, detention, interrogation program, Katherine Eban highlighted for Vanity Fair how the contractors played “so many different roles simultaneously that some CIA and military staff became concerned about the apparent conflict of interest.”

    One such warning, sent in a draft cable to CIA headquarters, noted, ‘Another area of concern is the use of the psychologist as an interrogator. The role of the ops psychologist is to be a detached observer and serve as a check on the interrogator to prevent the interrogator from any unintentional excess of pressure which might cause permanent psychological harm to the subject.” But as the cable continued, “We note that [the proposed plan] contains a psychological interrogation assessment by psychologist [DUNBAR] which is to be carried out by interrogator [DUNBAR]. We have a problem with him conducting both roles simultaneously.”

    Kiriakou called the argument that Mitchell and Jessen were in no position to challenge orders to torture detainees “absolute nonsense.”

    “It is illegal to follow an order that is illegal. That was determined during Nuremberg. You have to refuse to follow an illegal order. You’re compelled to refuse,” Kiriakou declared.

    Mitchell and Jessen had a motive not to challenge requests to carry out techniques—they were awarded $180 million in CIA contracts. (The agreement was ended in 2009, and by then, they had paid $81 million.)

    In a previously published interview, Kiriakou and former U.S. Marine Joseph Hickman discussed their book, “The Convenient Terrorist: Two Whistleblowers’ Stories Of Torture, Terror, Secret Wars, and CIA Lies.” It definitively explores the case of Zubaydah, which Mitchell and Jessen were involved in torturing.

    “We have a federal torture act in this country passed into law in 1946 and signed by President Truman that specifically outlawed exactly the techniques that Mitchell and Jessen had used against Abu Zubaydah,” Kiriakou said.

    Jessen claimed in a deposition that he went through “great, soulful torment” about whether to carry out torture techniques. Hickman found this ridiculous because he knew what torture does to a person, especially if they have post-traumatic stress disorder or any other medical issue. “He knew he was harming people when he [was] doing things like anal feeding or some of the worst [techniques].”

    As the Senate intelligence report documented, Zubaydah suffered some of the worst brutality. He was waterboarded 83 times. At any point, Mitchell or Jessen could have stepped in to say, “Enough!”

    The “aggressive phase of interrogation,” as the CIA called it, lasted for twenty days. Zubaydah spent a “total of 266 hours (11 days, 2 hours) in a large (coffin size) confinement box and 29 hours in a small confinement box, which had a width of 21 inches, a depth of 2.5 feet and a height of 2.5 feet.”

    When he was first waterboarded, Zubaydah “coughed, vomited and had ‘involuntary spasms of the torso and extremities.’” Zubaydah maintained he had no information to provide on threats to the United States.

    A medical officer wrote in an email, “So it begins. The session accelerated rapidly progressing quickly to the water board after large box, walling and small box periods. [Abu Zubaydah] seems very resistant to the water board. Longest time with the cloth over his face so far has been 17 seconds. This is sure to increase shortly. No useful information so far…He did vomit a couple of times during the water board with some beans and rice. It’s been 10 hours since he ate so this is surprising and disturbing. We plan to only feed Ensure for a while now. I’m head[ing] back for another water board session.”

    “The CIA interrogators told Abu Zubaydah that the only way he would leave the facility was in the coffin-shaped confinement box.”

    https://shadowproof.com/2017/07/28/cia-torture-architects-mitchell-jessen-invoke-nazis-avoid-responsibility/

    8. Operation Paperclip was a secret program of the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA) in which more than 1,600 German scientists, engineers, and technicians, such as Wernher von Braun and his V-2 rocket team, were recruited in post-Nazi Germany and taken to the U.S. for government employment, primarily between 1945 and 1959; many were former members and some were former leaders of the Nazi Party.[1][2]

    The primary purpose for Operation Paperclip was U.S. military advantage in the Russo–American Cold War, and the Space Race. The Soviet Union were more aggressive in forcibly recruiting (at gunpoint) some 2,000 German scientists with Operation Osoaviakhim during one night.

    The Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) established the first secret recruitment program, called Operation Overcast, on July 20, 1945, initially "to assist in shortening the Japanese war and to aid our postwar military research".[3] The term "Overcast" was the name first given by the German scientists' family members for the housing camp where they were held in Bavaria.[4] In late summer 1945, the JCS established the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA), a subcommittee of the Joint Intelligence Community, to directly oversee Operation Overcast and later Operation Paperclip.[5]

    The JIOA had one representative of each member agency of the Joint Intelligence Committee: the army's director of intelligence, the chief of naval intelligence, the assistant chief of Air Staff-2 (air force intelligence), and a representative from the State Department.[6] In November 1945, Operation Overcast was renamed Operation Paperclip by Ordnance Corps (United States Army) officers, who would attach a paperclip to the folders of those rocket experts whom they wished to employ in America.[4] In a secret directive circulated on September 3, 1946, President Truman officially approved Operation Paperclip and expanded it to include one thousand German scientists under "temporary, limited military custody".[7][8][9]


    9. Radio Havans Cuba recording 15370 kHz am Jan 12 2017

    A staggering map of the 54 countries that reportedly participated in the CIA’s rendition program

    By Max Fisher February 5, 2013

    Click to enlarge. (Max Fisher -- The Washington Post)

    After Sept. 11, 2001, the CIA launched a program of "extraordinary rendition" to handle terrorism suspects. The agency's problem, as it saw it, was that it wanted to detain and interrogate foreign suspects without bringing them to the United States or charging them with any crimes. Their solution was to secretly move a suspect to another country. Sometimes that meant a secret CIA prison in places such as Thailand or Romania, where the CIA would interrogate him. Sometimes it meant handing him over to a sympathetic government, some of them quite nasty, to conduct its own "interrogation."

    The CIA's extraordinary rendition program is over, but its scope is still shrouded in some mystery. A just-out report, released by the Open Society Foundation, sheds new light on its shocking scale. According to the report, 54 foreign governments somehow collaborated in the program. Some of those governments are brutal dictatorships, and a few are outright U.S. adversaries.

    Their participation took several forms. Some, such as Poland and Lithuania, allowed the CIA to run secret prisons in their countries. Many Middle Eastern, Central Asian and European countries handed over detainees to the CIA, some of whom those countries captured on the agency's behalf. Other states, particularly in the Middle East, interrogated detainees on the CIA's behalf, such as Jordan, which accepted several Pakistanis. Several, such as Greece and Spain, allowed flights associated with the CIA program to use their airports.

    Here's what the Open Society report has to say about the staggeringly global participation in the CIA program, including a full list of the countries it names:

    The report also shows that as many as 54 foreign governments reportedly participated in these operations in various ways, including by hosting CIA prisons on their territories; detaining, interrogating, torturing, and abusing individuals; assisting in the capture and transport of detainees; permitting the use of domestic airspace and airports for secret flights transporting detainees; providing intelligence leading to the secret detention and extraordinary rendition of individuals; and interrogating individuals who were secretly being held in the custody of other governments. Foreign governments also failed to protect detainees from secret detention and extraordinary rendition on their territories and to conduct effective investigations into agencies and officials who participated in these operations.

    The 54 governments identified in this report span the continents of Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America, and include: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Djibouti, Egypt, Ethiopia, Finland, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Iceland, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Libya, Lithuania, Macedonia, Malawi, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Syria, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Uzbekistan, Yemen, and Zimbabwe.

    I was most curious about the involvement of two governments that are very much adversaries of the United States: those of Iran and Syria. It's clear that, in both cases, it was an enemy-of-my-enemy calculus. Iran and Syria are both enemies of al-Qaeda and have struggled against Sunni Islamist extremism (Syria's government is secular, Iran's is Shia). Here's the report's section on Iran:

    Iran was involved in the capture and transfer of individuals subjected to CIA secret detention. In March 2002, the Iranian government transferred fifteen individuals to the government of Afghanistan, which in turn transferred ten of these individuals to the U.S. government. At least six of those transferred to U.S. custody were held in secret CIA detention in Afghanistan. These six individuals included Hussein Almerfedi, Tawfik al-Bihani, Wesam Abdulrahman Ahmed al-Deemawi (Wassam al-Ourdoni), Rafiq al-Hami, Walid Shahir al-Qadasi, and Aminullah Baryalai Tukhi.

    Iran’s transfer occurred as part of a detainee exchange. Because the hand-over happened soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, Iran was aware that the United States would have effective control over any detainees handed over to Afghan authorities. Amin al-Yafia, another individual believed to have been captured in Iran, in 2002, may have been subsequently held in CIA custody. Yafia’s whereabouts are unknown. See the detainee list in Section IV.

    There are no known judicial cases or investigations in Iran relating to its participation in CIA secret detention and extraordinary rendition operations.

    The section on Syria is disturbing. That government's record of horrific abuses has spilled out into the open since the uprising of 2011 became a civil war, with more Syrians subjected to – and speaking out about – a torture regime that sounds as if it were from another century. According to a 2005 article by the New Yorker's Jane Mayer, quoted in the report, Syria was one of the "most common destinations for rendered suspects." Government forces, according to the report, held some U.S.-provided detainees in a prison known as "The Grave" for its coffin-sized cells and subjected them to "torture involving a chair frame used to stretch the spine (the 'German chair') and beatings."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/02/05/a-staggering-map-of-the-54-countries-that-reportedly-participated-in-the-cias-rendition-program/?utm_term=.8bfed5ee9ed7

    Read the draft of the executive order on CIA 'black sites'

    A three-page draft of the executive order titled "Detention and Interrogation of Enemy Combatants" shows the Trump administration is seeking to review whether prisons outside the United States should be reopened. White House draft order calls for review on use of CIA ‘black site’ prisons overseas http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/national/read-the-draft-of-the-executive-order-on-cia-black-sites/2288/ 



    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Jan 2, 2018, 5:35:28 PM1/2/18
    to Hoop 6

    How U.S. Torture Left a Legacy of Damaged Minds

    Beatings, sleep deprivation, menacing and other brutal tactics have led to persistent mental health problems among detainees held in secret C.I.A. prisons and at Guantánamo.

    By MATT APUZZOSHERI FINK and JAMES RISENPhotographs by BRYAN DENTON
    Mr. Sawah does not blame American soldiers for his treatment. “They were afraid of me, afraid for their life,” he said. “Guantánamo on both sides was just very scared people who want to live.”

    Before the United States permitted a terrifying way of interrogating prisoners, government lawyers and intelligence officials assured themselves of one crucial outcome. They knew that the methods inflicted on terrorism suspects would be painful, shocking and far beyond what the country had ever accepted. But none of it, they concluded, would cause long lasting psychological harm.

    Fifteen years later, it is clear they were wrong.

    Today in Slovakia, Hussein al-Marfadi describes permanent headaches and disturbed sleep, plagued by memories of dogs inside a blackened jail. In Kazakhstan, Lutfi bin Ali is haunted by nightmares of suffocating at the bottom of a well. In Libya, the radio from a passing car spurs rage in Majid Mokhtar Sasy al-Maghrebi, reminding him of the C.I.A. prison where earsplitting music was just one assault to his senses.

    And then there is the despair of men who say they are no longer themselves. “I am living this kind of depression,” said Younous Chekkouri, a Moroccan, who fears going outside because he sees faces in crowds as Guantánamo Bay guards. “I’m not normal anymore.”

    After enduring agonizing treatment in secret C.I.A. prisons around the world or coercive practices at the military detention camp at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, dozens of detainees developed persistent mental health problems, according to previously undisclosed medical records, government documents and interviews with former prisoners and military and civilian doctors. Some emerged with the same symptoms as American prisoners of war who were brutalized decades earlier by some of the world’s cruelest regimes.

    Those subjected to the tactics included victims of mistaken identity or flimsy evidence that the United States later disavowed. Others were foot soldiers for the Taliban or Al Qaeda who were later deemed to pose little threat. Some were hardened terrorists, including those accused of plotting the Sept. 11 attacks or the 2000 bombing of the American destroyer Cole. In several cases, their mental status has complicated the nation’s long effort to bring them to justice.

    Americans have long debated the legacy of post-Sept. 11 interrogation methods, asking whether they amounted to torture or succeeded in extracting intelligence. But even as President Obama continues transferring people from Guantánamo and Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, promises to bring back techniques, now banned, such as waterboarding, the human toll has gone largely uncalculated.

    At least half of the 39 people who went through the C.I.A.’s “enhanced interrogation” program, which included depriving them of sleep, dousing them with ice water, slamming them into walls and locking them in coffin-like boxes, have since shown psychiatric problems, The New York Times found. Some have been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, paranoia, depression or psychosis.

    Hundreds more detainees moved through C.I.A. “black sites” or Guantánamo, where the military inflicted sensory deprivation, isolation, menacing with dogs and other tactics on men who now show serious damage. Nearly all have been released.

    “There is no question that these tactics were entirely inconsistent with our values as Americans, and their consequences present lasting challenges for us as a country and for the individuals involved,” said Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security adviser.

    The United States government has never studied the long-term psychological effects of the extraordinary interrogation practices it embraced. A Defense Department spokeswoman, asked about long-term mental harm, responded that prisoners were treated humanely and had access to excellent care. A C.I.A. spokesman declined to comment.

    This article is based on a broad sampling of cases and an examination of hundreds of documents, including court records, military commission transcripts and medical assessments. The Times interviewed more than 100 people, including former detainees in a dozen countries. A full accounting is all but impossible because many former prisoners never had access to outside doctors or lawyers, and any records about their interrogation treatment and health status remain classified.

    Researchers caution that it can be difficult to determine cause and effect with mental illness. Some prisoners of the C.I.A. and the military had underlying psychological problems that may have made them more susceptible to long-term difficulties; others appeared to have been remarkably resilient. Incarceration, particularly the indefinite detention without charges that the United States devised, is inherently stressful. Still, outside medical consultants and former government officials said they saw a pattern connecting the harsh practices to psychiatric issues.

    Those treating prisoners at Guantánamo for mental health issues typically did not ask their patients what had happened during their questioning. Some physicians, though, saw evidence of mental harm almost immediately.

    “My staff was dealing with the consequences of the interrogations without knowing what was going on,” said Albert J. Shimkus, a retired Navy captain who served as the commanding officer of the Guantánamo hospital in the prison’s early years. Back then, still reeling from the Sept. 11 attacks, the government was desperate to stave off more.

    But Captain Shimkus now regrets not making more inquiries. “There was a conflict,” he said, “between our medical duty to our patients and our duty to the mission, as soldiers.”

    After prisoners were released from American custody, some found neither help nor relief. Mohammed Abdullah Saleh al-Asad, a businessman in Tanzania, and others were snatched, interrogated and imprisoned, then sent home without explanation. They returned to their families deeply scarred from interrogations, isolation and the shame of sexual taunts, forced nudity, aggressive body cavity searches and being kept in diapers.

    Mr. Asad, who died in May, was held for more than a year in several secret C.I.A. prisons. “Sometimes, between husband and wife, he would admit to how awful he felt,” his widow, Zahra Mohamed, wrote in a statement prepared for the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. “He was humiliated, and that feeling never went away.”

    Lutfi bin Ali, a former detainee now living in Kazakhstan, has chronic health problems and undergoes physical therapy for injuries he sustained in custody. CreditBryan Denton for The New York Times

    ‘A Human Mop’

    In a cold room once used for interrogations at Guantánamo, Stephen N. Xenakis, a former military psychiatrist, faced a onetime Qaeda child soldier, Omar Khadr. It was December 2008, and this evaluation had been two years in the making.

    The doctor, a retired brigadier general who had overseen several military hospitals, had not sought the assignment. The son of an Air Force combat veteran, he debated even accepting it. “I’m still a soldier,” General Xenakis recalls thinking. Was this good for the country? When he finally agreed, he told Mr. Khadr’s lawyers that they were paying for an independent medical opinion, not a hired gun.

    Mr. Khadr, a Canadian citizen, had been wounded and captured in a firefight at age 15 at a suspected terrorist compound in Afghanistan, where he said he had been sent to translate for foreign fighters by his father, a Qaeda member. Years later, he would plead guilty to war crimes, including throwing a grenade that killed an Army medic. At the time, though, he was the youngest prisoner at Guantánamo.

    He told his lawyers that the American soldiers had kept him from sleeping, spit in his face and threatened him with rape. In one meeting with the psychiatrist, Mr. Khadr, then 22, began to sweat and fan himself, despite the air-conditioned chill. He tugged his shirt off, and General Xenakis realized that he was witnessing an anxiety attack.

    When it happened again, Mr. Khadr explained that he had once urinated during an interrogation and soldiers had dragged him through the mess. “This is the room where they used me as a human mop,” he said.

    “I have dreams of being at the bottom of a well and being suffocated.”

    LUTFI BIN ALI, released without charge after 12 years. Semey, Kazakhstan

    General Xenakis had seen such anxiety before, decades earlier, as a young psychiatrist at Letterman Army Medical Center in California. It was often the first stop for American prisoners of war after they left Vietnam. The doctor recalled the men, who had endured horrific abuses, suffering panic attacks, headaches and psychotic episodes.

    That session with Mr. Khadr was the beginning of General Xenakis’s immersion into the treatment of detainees. He has reviewed medical and interrogation records of about 50 current and former prisoners and examined about 15 of the detainees, more than any other outside psychiatrist, colleagues say.

    General Xenakis found that Mr. Khadr had post-traumatic stress disorder, a conclusion the military contested. Many of General Xenakis’s diagnoses in other cases remain classified or sealed by court order, but he said he consistently found links between harsh American interrogation methods and psychiatric disorders.

    Back home in Virginia, General Xenakis delved into research on the effects of abusive practices. He found decades of papers on the issue — science that had not been considered when the government began crafting new interrogation policies after Sept. 11.

    At the end of the Vietnam War, military doctors noticed that former prisoners of war developed psychiatric disorders far more often than other soldiers, an observation also made of former P.O.W.s from World War II and the Korean War. The data could not be explained by imprisonment alone, researchers found. Former soldiers who suffered torture or mistreatment were more likely than others to develop long-term problems.

    By the mid-1980s, the Veterans Administration had linked such treatment to memory loss, an exaggerated startle reflex, horrific nightmares, headaches and an inability to concentrate. Studies noted similar symptoms among torture survivors in South Africa, Turkey and Chile. Such research helped lay the groundwork for how American doctors now treat combat veterans.

    “In hindsight, that should have come to the fore” in the post-Sept. 11 interrogation debate, said John Rizzo, the C.I.A.’s top lawyer at the time. “I don’t think the long-term effects were ever explored in any real depth.”

    Stephen N. Xenakis, a former military psychiatrist, saw symptoms in one Guantánamo detainee that were similar to those exhibited by American troops held prisoner in Vietnam. CreditGeorge Etheredge for The New York Times

    Instead, the government relied on data from a training programto resist enemy interrogators, called SERE, for Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape. The military concluded there was little evidence that disrupted sleep, near-starvation, nudity and extreme temperatures harmed military trainees in controlled scenarios.

    Two veteran SERE psychologists, James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, worked with the C.I.A. and the Pentagon to help develop interrogation tactics. They based their strategies in part on the theory of “learned helplessness,” a phrase coined by the American psychologist Martin E. P. Seligman in the late 1960s. He gave electric shocks to dogs and discovered that they stopped resisting once they learned they could not stop the shocks. If the United States could make men helpless, the thinking went, they would give up their secrets.

    In the end, Justice Department lawyers concluded that the methods did not constitute torture, which is illegal under American and international law. In a series of memos, they wrote that no evidence existed that “significant psychological harm of significant duration, e.g., lasting for months or even years” would result.

    With fear of another terrorist attack, there was little incentive or time to find contrary evidence, Mr. Rizzo said. “The government wanted a solution,” he recalled. “It wanted a path to get these guys to talk.”

    The question of what ultimately happened to Dr. Seligman’s dogs never arose in the legal debate. They were strays, and once the studies were over, they were euthanized.

    Mohamed Ben Soud drew pictures depicting his treatment in a C.I.A. prison, which included being forced to stand naked, shackled to a bar on the ceiling, and deprived of sleep. It also included being placed in a wooden box and poked through its holes. CreditHolly Pickett/American Civil Liberties Union; via A.C.L.U.

    A Sense of Drowning

    Mohamed Ben Soud cannot say for certain when the Americans began using ice water to torment him. The C.I.A. prison in Afghanistan, known as the Salt Pit, was perpetually dark, so the days passed imperceptibly.

    The United States called the treatment “water dousing,” but the term belies the grisly details. Mr. Ben Soud, in court documents and interviews, described being forced onto a plastic tarp while naked, his hands shackled above his head. Sometimes he was hooded. One C.I.A. official poured buckets of ice water on him as others lifted the tarp’s corners, sending water splashing over him and causing a choking or drowning sensation. He said he endured the treatment multiple times.

    Mr. Ben Soud was among the early captives in the C.I.A.’s network of prisons in Afghanistan, Thailand, Poland, Romania and Lithuania. Again and again, he said, he told the American interrogators that he was not their enemy. A Libyan, he said he had fled to Pakistan in 1991 and joined an armed Islamist movement aimed at toppling Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi’s dictatorship. Pakistani and United States officials stormed his home and arrested him in 2003. Under interrogation, he said, he denied knowing or fighting with Osama bin Laden or two senior Qaeda operatives.

    In 2004, the C.I.A. turned Mr. Ben Soud over to Libya, which imprisoned him until the United States helped topple the Qaddafi government seven years later. In interviews, he and other Libyans said they were treated better by Colonel Qaddafi’s jailers than by the C.I.A.

    Today, Mr. Ben Soud, 47, is a free man, but said he is in constant fear of tomorrow. He is racked with self-doubt and struggles to make simple decisions. His moods swing dramatically.

    “‘Dad, why did you suddenly get angry?’ ‘Why did you suddenly snap?’” Mr. Ben Soud said his children ask. “‘Did we do anything that made you angry?’”

    Explaining would mean saying that the Americans kept him shackled in painful contortions, or that they locked him in boxes — one the size of a coffin, the other even smaller, he said in a phone interview from his home in Misurata, Libya. They slammed him against the wall and chained him from the ceiling as the prison echoed with the sounds of rock music.

    “How can you explain such things to children?” he asked.

    Mr. Ben Soud, along with a second former C.I.A. prisoner and the estate of a third, is suing Dr. Mitchell and Dr. Jessen in federal court, accusing them of violating his rights by torturing him. In court documents, Dr. Mitchell and Dr. Jessen argue, among other things, that they played no role in the interrogations.

    Mr. Ben Soud was one of the men identified in a 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee report as having been subjected to the C.I.A.’s “enhanced interrogation techniques.” Condemning the methods as brutal and ineffective in extracting intelligence, the report noted that interrogators also used unapproved tactics such as mock executions, threats to harm prisoners’ children or rape their family members, and “rectal feeding,” which involved inserting liquid food supplements or purées into the rectum.

    Senate investigators did not set out to study the psychological consequences of the harsh treatment, but their unclassified summary revealed several cases of men suffering hallucinations, depression, paranoia and other symptoms. The full 6,000-page classified report offers many more examples, said Daniel Jones, a former F.B.I. analyst who led the Senate investigation.

    “The records we reviewed clearly indicate a connection between their treatment in C.I.A. custody and their mental state,” Mr. Jones said in an interview.

    “You realize it was a nightmare, but still you feel afraid and shaking with fear.”

    KHALED AL-SHARIF, rendered to Libya in 2004 after two years in C.I.A. secret prisons. Tripoli, Libya

    At least 119 men moved through the C.I.A. jails, where the interrogations were designed to disrupt the senses and increase helplessness — factors that researchers decades earlier had said could make people more susceptible to psychological harm. Forced nudity, sensory deprivation and endless light or dark were considered routine.

    Many of those men were later released without charges, unsure of why they were held. About one in four prisoners should never have been captured, or turned out to have been misidentified by the C.I.A., Senate investigators concluded. Khaled el-Masri, a German citizen, is the best known case.

    Macedonian authorities arrested him while he was on vacation in December 2003 and turned him over to the C.I.A. Mr. Masri said officials beat him, stripped him, forced a suppository into him and flew him to a black site in Afghanistan. He was held for months, he said, in a concrete cell with no bed, and endured more beatings and interrogations.

    Years later, Mr. Masri’s nightmares are accompanied by a paralyzing tightness in his chest, he said. “I have been suffering from absent-mindedness, amnesia, inability to memorize, depression, helplessness, apathy, loss of interest in the future, slow thinking, and anxiety,” Mr. Masri wrote in an email.

    Ms. Mohamed, the widow of Mr. Asad, the Tanzanian businessman, said he returned home paranoid and anxious.

    “He used to forget things that he never would have forgotten before,” she wrote recently. “For example, he would talk with someone on the phone and later forget to whom he had been talking.”

    Mr. Asad believed the C.I.A. seized him because he once rented space in a building he owned to Al Haramain Foundation, a Saudi charity later linked to financing terrorism. Interrogators questioned him repeatedly about the charity, he said in legal papers, then released him with no explanation.

    “Mohammed’s personality changed after his detention,” his wife wrote. “Something tiny would happen and he would blow up — he would be so angry — I had never ever seen him like this before. At these times, he would come close to crying, and he would withdraw to be alone.”

    Younous Chekkouri is back home in Morocco, but he fears going outside because he imagines Guantánamo Bay guards among the crowds. CreditBryan Denton for The New York Times

    ‘Still Living in Gitmo’

    Today at Guantánamo Bay, the Caribbean landscape is reclaiming the relics of the American detention system. Weeds overtake fences in abandoned areas of the prison complex. Guard towers sit empty. It is eerily quiet.

    President Obama banned coercive questioning on his second day in office and his administration has whittled the prison population to 61, down from nearly 700 at its peak. Interrogations ended long ago. Except for the so-called high-value detainees, kept in a building hidden in the hills, most of the remaining prisoners share a concrete jail called Camp 6.

    Asked about their psychological well-being, Rear Adm. Peter J. Clarke, the commander at Guantánamo, said in an interview: “What I observe are detainees who are well adjusted, and I see no indications of ill effects of anything that may have happened in the past.”

    In the early years of Guantánamo, interrogators used variations on some of the C.I.A.’s tactics. The result was a combination of psychological and physical pressure that the International Committee of the Red Cross found was “tantamount to torture.”

    Capt. Richard Quattrone of the Navy, who left his post as the prison’s chief medical officer in September, said his staff mostly dealt with detainees’ anxiety over whether they would be released. “I’ve talked to some of my predecessors,” he said in an interview, “and from what they say, it’s vastly different today.”

    About 20 detainees are cleared for release. Another 10 are being prosecuted or have already been convicted in military commissions. The fate of the remaining men, including some of the high-value prisoners, is unclear. For now they are considered too dangerous to release, but have not been charged.

    For some men who have been released, Guantánamo is not easily left behind. Mr. Chekkouri, a Moroccan living in Afghanistan in 2001, was held for years as a suspected member of a group linked to Al Qaeda. He said he was beaten repeatedly at a United States military jail in Kandahar and forced to watch soldiers do the same to his younger brother.

    Mr. Chekkouri is a Sufi, a member of a mystical Islamic sect that has been oppressed by Al Qaeda and others. At Guantánamo, he was kept in isolation.

    When he asserted his innocence, he said, interrogators threatened to turn him over to the Moroccan authorities, who have a history of torture. The Americans warned that his family in Morocco could be jailed and abused, he said, and showed him execution photos. Interrogators repeatedly made him believe his transfer was imminent, he said. “It’s time to say goodbye,” interrogation files cited in court documents say. “Morocco wants you back.”

    After he was released last year, the United States gave him a letter saying it no longer stood by information that he was a member of a Qaeda-linked group in Morocco. Despite diplomatic assurances that he would face no charges, Morocco jailed him for several months late last year and he continues to fight allegations that he thought were behind him.

    Now, he is under a psychiatrist’s care and takes antidepressants and anti-anxiety drugs. He complains of flashbacks, persistent nightmares and panic attacks. He also suffers an embarrassing inability to urinate until it becomes painful. It started, he said, when he was left chained for hours during interrogations and soiled himself. His doctors say there is nothing they can treat.

    “They tell me everything is normal,” he said. “Your brain is playing games. It is something mental. You’re still living in Gitmo. It’s fear.”

    “It’s like I’m trapped. I stay all day in my house alone.”

    YOUNOUS CHEKKOURI, released without charge after more than 13 years. Safi, Morocco

    Mr. Chekkouri saw psychiatrists at Guantánamo, but he said he did not trust them. He and others believed the doctors shared information about medical problems with interrogators. In one case, a psychiatrist prescribed the antipsychotic medication olanzapine to a prisoner. He then suggested that interrogators exploit a side effect, food cravings, according to another military doctor who later reviewed the records.

    Normally, such information would be confidential, but Guantánamo’s dual missions of caring for prisoners and extracting information created conflicts. Over time, the military created two mental health teams. One, led by psychiatrists, was there to heal. The other, called the Behavioral Science Consultation Team, was led by psychologists with a very different mission.

    On Sept. 3, 2003, after a teenager named Mohammed Jawad was seen talking to a poster on the wall, an interrogator called for a consultation with a BSCT (pronounced “Biscuit”) psychologist. Mohammed’s age at the time is in dispute. The military says it captured him at 17; his lawyer says he was more likely 14 or younger. However old, he was pleading for his mother.

    When the psychologist arrived, the goal was not to ease the young man’s distress, but to exploit it.

    “The detainee comes across as a very immature, dependent individual, claiming to miss his mother and his young siblings, but his demeanor looks like it is a resistance technique,” the psychologist wrote, according to notes seen by The Times. “He tries to look as if he is so sad that he is depressed. During today’s interrogation, he appeared to be rather frightened, and it looks as if he could easily break.”

    The psychologist, who was not identified in the notes, recommended that Mr. Jawad be kept away from anyone who spoke his language. “Make him as uncomfortable as possible,” the psychologist advised. “Work him as hard as possible.”

    The guards placed him in isolation for 30 days. They then subjected him to the “frequent flier program,” a method of sleep deprivation. Guards yanked Mr. Jawad from cell to cell 112 times, waking him an average of every three hours, day and night, for two weeks straight, according to court records.

    After being held for years, Mr. Jawad was charged in 2007 with throwing a grenade that wounded American soldiers. But the evidence collapsed. The military prosecutor, Lt. Col. Darrel Vandeveld, withdrew from the case and declared that there was no evidence to justify charges. “There is, however, reliable evidence that he was badly mistreated by U.S. authorities, both in Afghanistan and at Guantánamo, and he has suffered, and continues to suffer, great psychological harm,” he wrote in a letter to the court.

    Katherine Porterfield, a New York University psychologist, found Mr. Jawad to have PTSD after examining him in 2009. Seven years after his capture, she said, he suffered from flashbacks and anxiety attacks. A panel of military doctors disagreed. Medical records from Guantánamo include repeated notes such as “no psych issues at this time,” or the prisoner “denied any psych problem.”

    The military dropped all charges against Mr. Jawad, who is now living in Pakistan. He declined to discuss his mental health. But in a series of text messages, he wrote: “They tortured us in jails, gave us severe physical and mental pain, bombarded our villages, cities, mosques, schools.” He added, “Of course we have” flashbacks, panic attacks and nightmares.

    Khaled al-Sharif spent two years in a secret C.I.A. prison, accused of having ties to Al Qaeda. He tells New York Times correspondent Sheri Fink what happened there, and how the experience continues to affect him.

     By NEIL COLLIER and SHERI FINK on Publish DateOctober 8, 2016.Photo by Bryan Denton for The New York Times. Watch in Times Video »

    Ignoring a Link

    It has been difficult to determine the scale of mental health problems at Guantánamo, much less how many cases are linked to the treatment the prisoners endured. Most medical records remain classified. Anecdotal accounts, though, have emerged over the years.

    Andy Davidson, a retired Navy captain who served as the chief psychologist treating prisoners at Guantánamo from July to October 2003, said most appeared to be in good health, but he still saw “an awful lot” of mental health issues there.

    “There were definitely guys who had PTSD symptoms,” he said in an interview. “There were definitely guys who had poor sleeping, nightmares. There were guys who were definitely shell shocked with a thousand-mile stare. There were guys who were depressed, avoidant.”

    One of the few official glimpses into the population came in a 2006 medical journal article. Two military psychologists and a psychiatrist at Guantánamo wrote that about 11 percent of detainees were then receiving mental health services, a rate lower than that in civilian jails or among former American prisoners of war. The authors acknowledged, however, that Guantánamo doctors faced significant challenges in diagnosing mental illness, most notably the difficulty in building trust. Many prisoners, including some with serious mental health conditions, refused evaluation and treatment, the study noted, which would have lowered the count.

    Five years later, General Xenakis and Vincent Iacopino, the medical director for Physicians for Human Rights, published research about nine prisoners who exhibited psychological symptoms after undergoing interrogation tactics — a hose forced into a mouth, a head held in a toilet, death threats — by American jailers.

    The two based their study on the medical records and interrogation files of the prisoners, all of whom had arrived at Guantánamo in its first year, had never been in C.I.A. custody, and were never charged with any crimes. In none of those cases, the study said, did Guantánamo doctors document any inquiries into whether the symptoms were tied to interrogation tactics.

    “It is very, very scary when you are tortured by someone who doesn’t believe in torture. You lose faith in everything.”

    AHMED ERRACHIDI, released without charge after five years. Tangier, Morocco

    Today in Tangier, Morocco, Ahmed Errachidi runs two restaurants, has a wife and five children and has been free for nearly a decade. The United States military once asserted that he trained at a Qaeda camp in early 2001, but the human rights group Reprieve later produced pay stubs showing that he had been working at the time as a cook in London.

    Mr. Errachidi had a history of bipolar disorder before arriving at Guantánamo, and after being held in isolation there, he said, he suffered a psychotic breakdown. He told interrogators that he had been Bin Laden’s superior officer and warned that a giant snowball would overtake the world.

    Guantánamo still lurks around corners. Recently, at a market in Tangier, the clink of a chain caused a paralyzing flashback to the prison, where Mr. Errachidi was forced into painful stress positions, deprived of sleep and isolated. On chilly nights, when the blanket slips off, he is once again lying naked in a frigid cell, waiting for his next interrogation.

    “All I can think of is when are they going to take me back,” Mr. Errachidi said in an interview. He compared his treatment by the Americans to being mugged by a trusted friend. “It is very, very scary when you are tortured by someone who doesn’t believe in torture,” he said. “You lose faith in everything.”

    Guantánamo, particularly during its early years, operated on a system of rewards and punishments to exploit prisoners’ vulnerabilities. That manipulation, taken to extremes, could have dangerous effects, as in the peculiar case of Tarek El Sawah.

    Tarek El Sawah, a former detainee, has headaches, mood fluctuations and eating compulsions.CreditBryan Denton for The New York Times

    An Egyptian who said he was a Taliban soldier, Mr. Sawah was captured while fleeing bombing in Afghanistan in 2001 and turned over to the United States. He arrived at Guantánamo in May 2002. Though his brother, Jamal, said he had no history of mental problems, Mr. Sawah began shrieking at night, terrified by hallucinations.

    When he began defecating and urinating on himself, soldiers would hose him down in front of other detainees, a nearby prisoner stated in court documents. Mr. Sawah said he was given antipsychotic drugs, sometimes forcibly.

    After his breakdown, interrogators found Mr. Sawah eager to talk. “‘Bring me good things to eat,’” he told them. They delivered McDonald’s hamburgers or Subway sandwiches, multiple servings at a time.

    Mr. Sawah became a prized informant, though the value of what he offered is disputed, and he says he fabricated stories, including that he was a Qaeda member. He ballooned from about 215 pounds to well over 400 pounds, records show. When the interrogations ended and he was placed in a special hut for cooperators, the food kept coming. His jailers had to install a double-wide door for him.

    “They were afraid of me, afraid for their life. Guantánamo on both sides was just very scared people who want to live.”

    TAREK EL SAWAH, released without charge after 14 years. Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Mr. Sawah called it a competition between the interrogators, who used food as an incentive, and the doctors, who told him to lose weight. He developed coronary artery disease, diabetes, breathing disorders and other health problems, court records show.

    In 2013, General Xenakis examined him and, in a plea for better medical treatment, told a judge that “Mr. El Sawah’s mental state has worsened and he appears apathetic with diminished will to live.” The military responded that he was offered excellent medical care but refused it.

    Today in Bosnia, Mr. Sawah, 58, complains of frequent headaches and begs a doctor for antidepressants. His mood fluctuates wildly. Though he has lost weight, his eating remains compulsive. Over dinner with a reporter after a daily Ramadan fast, he ate a steak, French fries, a plate of dates and figs, a bowl of chicken soup, spinach pie, slices of bread, the uneaten portion of another steak, another bowl of soup, two lemonades, a Coke and nearly an entire cheese plate, six or seven slices at a time.

    “He’s unbalanced,” said his brother, who lives in New York. “He needs care. Mental care. Physical care.”

    Mr. Sawah does not blame American soldiers for his treatment. “They were afraid of me, afraid for their life,” he said. “Guantánamo on both sides was just very scared people who want to live.”

    Hussein al-Marfadi, a former detainee, describes permanent headaches and disturbed sleep.CreditBryan Denton for The New York Times

    Complicating Trials

    In a war-crimes courtroom at Guantánamo Bay in January 2009, five men sat accused of plotting the Sept. 11 attacks. They were avowed enemies of the United States, who had admitted to grievous bloodshed. They had also been subjected to the most horrific of the government’s interrogation tactics.

    During a courtroom break, one of the men, Ammar al-Baluchi, asked to speak with a doctor. Xavier Amador, a New York psychologist who was consulting for another defendant, met with him. As they talked, Mr. Baluchi’s eyes darted around the room, according to a summary of Dr. Amador’s notes obtained by The Times. Mr. Baluchi said he struggled to focus, described “terrifying anxiety” and reported difficulty sleeping.

    Dr. Amador noted that Mr. Baluchi seemed to meet the criteria for PTSD, anxiety disorder and major depression. “No one can live like this,” Mr. Baluchi told him.

    Mr. Baluchi, 39, was captured by Pakistani officers in April 2003. Though he was described as willing to talk, the C.I.A. moved him to a secret prison and immediately applied interrogation methods reserved for recalcitrant prisoners. In court documents and Mr. Baluchi’s handwritten letters, he described being naked and dehydrated, chained to the ceiling so only his toes touched the floor. He endured ice-water dousing and said he was beaten until he saw flashes of light and lost consciousness. He recalls punches from his guards whenever he drifted asleep.

    Today, his lawyer said, Mr. Baluchi associates sleep with imminent pain. “Not only did they not let me sleep,” Mr. Baluchi wrote in a letter provided by the lawyer, “they trained me to keep myself awake.”

    Guantánamo physicians have prescribed Mr. Baluchi antidepressants, anti-anxiety drugs and sleeping pills, according to his lawyer, James G. Connell III, who sends him deodorants and colognes to keep flashbacks at bay. “The whole time he was in C.I.A. custody, you’re sitting there, smelling your own stink,” Mr. Connell said. “Now, whenever he catches a whiff of his own body odor, it sets him off.”

    General Xenakis, who is consulting on the case, found that Mr. Baluchi had PTSD and that he showed possible signs of a brain injury that may be linked to his beatings. He said Mr. Baluchi needed a brain scan, which the military opposes. The test would likely prompt more hearings, which could further complicate a trial.

    “Having caused these problems in the first place, now the United States has to deal with them at the military commissions,” Mr. Connell said. “And that takes time.”

    The compromised mental status of several other prisoners, like Mr. Baluchi, has affected the military proceedings against them.

    Ramzi bin al-Shibh, who admits helping plan the Sept. 11 attacks, has said he believes the military is tormenting him with vibrations, smells and sounds at Guantánamo. Military doctors there have found him to be delusional, and records indicate that his symptoms began in C.I.A. custody, after brutal tactics and years of solitary confinement.

    But Mr. bin al-Shibh refused to meet with doctors to assess his competency and insists he is sane, so the case continues.

    Lawyers have similarly raised questions about Abd al-Nashiri’s psychological state. Accused in the U.S.S. Cole bombing, he was subjected to waterboarding, mock execution, rectal feeding and other techniques — some approved, some not — at C.I.A. sites. Even after internal warnings that Mr. Nashiri was about to go “over the edge psychologically,” the C.I.A. pressed forward.

    Over the years, government doctors have diagnosed Mr. Nashiri with anxiety, major depression and PTSD. His lawyers do not dispute his competency to stand trial, though no such trial is imminent. His torture and mental decline, though, could make it harder for prosecutors to win a death sentence.

    When the Walter Reed doctors evaluated Mr. Nashiri, “they concluded that he suffers from chronic, complex, untreated PTSD,” his lawyer told a military judge in 2014. “And they attributed it to his time in C.I.A. custody.”

    “They killed our youth in Guantánamo and then they tossed us away like garbage.”

    HUSSEIN AL-MARFADI, released without charge after 12 years. Zvolen, Slovakia

    Interrogation’s Shadow

    In Libya today, a former C.I.A. prisoner named Salih Hadeeyah al-Daeiki struggles to focus, and his memory fails him. He finds himself confusing the names of his children. Sometimes, he withdraws from his family to be alone.

    A survivor of the C.I.A. interrogation in the Salt Pit, Mr. Daeiki says he was kept naked, humiliated and chained to the wall as loud music blared. Sleep is difficult now, but when it comes, his interrogators haunt him there.

    “Something is strangling me or I’m falling from high,” he said in an interview. “Or sometimes I see ghosts following me, chasing me.”

    Last year, a video surfaced showing Colonel Qaddafi’s son, Saadi, being blindfolded and forced to listen to what sounded like the screams of other prisoners inside Al Hadba, a prison holding members of the former regime — Libya’s own high-value detainees. Someone beat the soles of his feet with a stick.

    As the scene unfolded, Mr. Daeiki appeared on the screen.

    The beating was a mistake, he later acknowledged, but he did nothing to stop it. The goal was to collect intelligence to prevent bloodshed, he said.

    He was an interrogator now.

    Reporting was contributed by Jawad Sukhanyar from Kabul, Afghanistan; Rami Nazzal from Jerusalem; Nour Youssef from Cairo; Hwaida Saad from Beirut, Lebanon; Maher Samaan from Paris; Suliman Ali Zway from Berlin; and Karam Shoumali from Istanbul. Kitty Bennett and Alain Delaquérière contributed research.

    A version of this article appears in print on October 9, 2016, on Page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: U.S. Torture Leaves a Legacy of Detainees With Damaged Minds.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/09/world/cia-torture-guantanamo-bay.html#story-continues-1


    Photo





    >>
    >> n Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 7:14 PM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffalocalfwoman@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act BILLS-114s284rfh.pdf (attached)
    >>> https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/s284/BILLS-114s284rfh.pdf
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> --
    >>>>> Doing business by the Good Book
    >>>>>
    >>>>> --
    >>>>> Hoop 6 (Stepping Stone) - Teach what is right, that law is the LOVE, then when two hearts is united, we share with intelligence. However if LOVE doesn't lead the way, then we fight to unite LOVE, two broken hearts, then we know that we are walking the truth path, the love to each other, the kind that lasts, over rolling hills in time, over the suns, and into the heart of the blue seas of every one. We are the Prophecy, the Rain upon the Land, so parched, it will need a Rainbow, to serve it home the right way and know where to land (the Rainbow always lands on the pot of gold, abundance, brotherhood)! "I Bless Myself" and "I Bless the World"
    >>>>>  
    >>>>> Relatives, Email "Hoop 6" <indigocrystalchildren@googlegroups.com> (yahoo and hotmail virtual space limitation, recommend free gmail.com). Thank you, whitebuffa...@gmail.com
    >>>>> ---
    >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hoop 6 Indigo Crystal Children Adults" group.
    >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indigocrystalchildren+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.
    >>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indigocrystalchildren.
    >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indigocrystalchildren/CALdH8OE4WYss75xU2Ui5Kz1OzX9t37Xa07JyhN_yBhnqbbXOEg%40mail.gmail.com.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>
    >

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Jan 10, 2018, 6:25:23 PM1/10/18
    to Hoop 6
    Most of Mengele’s concentration camp research is still classified. Much of it dealt with mind control. A researcher can visit the top floor, but underground below the top floor are the real secrets. The real secrets are lying in millions of sheets of classified documents hidden behind blast proof doors. There they have vault after vault, and row after row of top-secret files that only a few privileged persons with security clearances above COSMIC--such as with a "C3" or "MJ" security clearance can visit. Everyone with these high security clearances which I have identified is connected to the Illuminati. Each underground area at Suitland Annex has its own subset of secret access words, known only to the initiated. Most of the OSS records have been destroyed, a few have been left, the important ones have been misfiled or remade. (This is according to a reliable British intelligent agent.) Also according to reliable inside sources the CIA is working night and day to remake old records, to expunge all the real dirty secrets from their records. The basement of CIA HQ is known as "the Pit," In the Pit documents are being shredded and burned on a round the clock basis. The large remains of these secrets are sold for landfill. The Illuminati have developed secrecy to a fine art. They train their people in the art of secrecy from the time they are born. Most everything they do, is done orally. They are trained not to write rituals and other things down. There is very little paper trail left by the Illuminati.
    pg 3 The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave  http://christianobserver.net/documents/the-illuminati-formula-used-to-create.pdf


    November 03, 2014

    *Dr. Josef Mengele: The Cruelest Nazi Doctor of the Holocaust

    One of the most atrocious eras in human history is without a doubt the Holocaust. About 11 million people, including approximately 6 million Jews, are estimated to have been slaughtered at the hands of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. Jews were forced to live in ghettos and then rounded up to be sent to concentration and extermination camps, where they were herded into gas chambers and killed. At a number of concentration camps, Nazi doctors conducted gruesome and horrific medical experiments on prisoners against their will. This leads us to one of the most infamous Nazi doctors who ever lived, Dr. Josef Mengele.

    Born on March 16, 1911 in Günzburg, Germany to a prosperous family, Josef Mengele was the eldest of 3 children. In 1935, he earned a PhD in physical anthropology from the University of Munich, and 2 years later he became the assistant of Dr. Otmar von Verschuer, a leading scientific figure known for his research with twins, at the Institute for Hereditary Biology and Racial Hygiene in Frankfurt. That same year, Mengele joined the Nazi Party, and in 1938, joined the SS. In 1940, he was drafted into the military, where he volunteered for medical service in the Waffen-SS. However, his time in the military was cut short after being wounded while on campaign and he was sent back to Germany, where he resumed work with von Verschuer at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology.

    Auschwitz

    Encouraged by von Verschuer, Mengele applied for transfer to the concentration camp service to take advantage of the opportunity to conduct genetic research on human subjects. His application was accepted and he was posted to Auschwitz in the spring of 1943. Mengele first gained notoriety for supervising the selection of arriving prisoners to the camp, determining who would be sent to the gas chambers and who would become a forced laborer. This earned him the reputation as the “Angel of Death.” Whereas most of the other doctors viewed the selection process as one of the most horrible duties and had to get drunk in order to endure it, Mengele had no problem with the task. He often arrived smiling and whistling a tune, and even showed up for selections he wasn’t assigned to.

    Within a month of his arrival at Auschwitz, an outbreak of noma erupted in the Gypsy camp. Mengele’s solution was to send over 1000 Gypsies to the gas chamber. A similar event occurred in the women’s camp a month later, and the doctor sent more than 600 women with typhus to the same fate. In one of the most horrific exterminations, Mengele and a group of other officers circled a fire pit before about 10 dump trucks filled with children arrived. The trucks backed up to the fire and Mengele and the other officers started throwing the children into the pit. The children screamed as they were burned alive, while others managed to crawl out of the pit. But the officers walked around the pit with sticks and pushed those who managed to get out back into the fire.

    Human Experimentation

    Mengele then moved to experimentation. His work revolved around genetic engineering to eradicate inferior genes from the human population to create a German super-race. He believed that twins held these mysteries, and about 1500 pairs of them were brought to Mengele through the selection process. The twins were provided more comfort than the other prisoners and given extra food rations to keep them healthy. As soon as a pair of twins arrived at Auschwitz, they were tattooed and Mengele would ask them questions about their history. Every morning, they reported for roll call, where they ate a small breakfast. Mengele would then come to talk to them, give them candy, and even play games with some of them. Some of the younger children even called him “Uncle Mengele.” Life wasn’t so bad for twins at the barracks, until it came time for the experiments.

    Every day, twins were selected for experimentation. He would require that they give blood and sometimes so much was drawn that a twin would faint. Some underwent huge blood transfusions from one twin to the other. In an attempt to change their eye color, he painfully injected chemicals into their eyes, only to result in infection. One night he collected 7 sets of twins with different colored eyes, killed them, dissected them, and then sent the eyes to von Verschuer for analysis. Twins as young as 5 were killed from experiments, then their bodies dissected. For one pair of twins, he attempted to create conjoined twins by sewing their backs together and trying to connect blood vessels and organs. A few days after the extremely painful process, the twins developed gangrene and died. Many twins had their limbs and organs removed without the use of an anesthetic. Other experiments included isolation endurance, reactions to various stimuli, spinal taps without anesthesia, the removal of sexual organs, and incestuous impregnations. Out of the 1500 twins experimented on by Mengele, only around 200 survived the horror.

    The End of the War

    At the end of the war, Mengele became a fugitive and fled from Auschwitz on January 17, 1945. He spent the next 34 years in hiding. He assumed a fake identity and worked as a farm hand near his native Günzburg until 1949. He fled to Argentina, where he was able to get by unnoticed. The search for Mengele ended in 1985 when West German police raided the home of a lifelong friend of the monster. They seized several letters from Mengele, and within a week, authorities identified the families that had harbored Mengele in South America. They discovered that Mengele had died in a drowning accident in 1979. 

    http://www.medicalbag.com/despicable-doctors/dr-josef-mengele-the-cruelest-nazi-doctor-of-the-holocaust/article/472824/


                                                                                                        UN's Luciferian Agenda:

    1. Abolition of ALL ordered national governments.

    2. Abolition of inheritance.

    3. Abolition of private property.

    4. Abolition of patriotism.

    5. Abolition of the individual home and family life as the cell from which all civilizations have stemmed.

    6. Abolition of ALL religions established and existing so that the Luciferian ideology of totalitarianism may be imposed on mankind.

    More on the agenda here:        NWO, Jesuits, Illuminati, New World Order and the NWO timeline            NWO Agenda, The 1776 AGENDA of the New World Order – ordered by a Rothschild – designed by a Jesuit             NWO Agenda, The 1776 AGENDA of the New World Order – ordered by a Rothschild – designed by a Jesuit      

    More here: http://www.internallydisplacedpeople.org/joomla30/index.php/home/unlearn-america-world 

    Any Questions on who is trying to keep the people in perpetual fear to justify in an attempt to help justify a Police State - that will be used to move us ever closer to a One World Order Global Government! 

    Any questions on who is running the UNITED STATES Federal Corporation [Title 28 Section 3002 (15)(A)] via the FEDERAL RESERVE Money System (same are behind the UNITED NATIONS Corporation):

    Rothschild Bank of London
    Rothschild Bank of Berlin
    Warburg Bank of Hamburg
    Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
    Lazard Brothers of Paris
    Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
    Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
    Goldman, Sachs of New York
    Lehman Brothers of New York
    Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York

    And why UNITED STATES gave $233.7Bn to Israel over six decades? 

    "You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out."

    "In A Time Of Universal Deceit, Telling The Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell, Author

    The phrase “MIXED WAR” means "a war carried on between a nation on one side and private individuals on the other [See definition HERE]. Mixed war occurs whenever the government of a nation is an enemy of, and at war against, its own People. The most insidious and perfidious type of mixed war exists when the government acts against the People under guise of protecting the People’s rights and upholding the nation’s most cherished values and ideals." In such case, government officials are “wolves in sheep’s clothing,” occupying positions of prestige and power, with the support of the People, while treasonously betraying that trust. This is an ideal confidence game whereby arch-charlatan criminals can engage in piracy on an ongoing basis under color of law and be tolerated or even treated as heroes by their victims.


    ​Military Actions by the USA.png

    Energy Weapon Caught Red Handed Setting Fire to California


     Directed Energy Weapon.png

    ​Geoengineering California Fires.png


    DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS INCLUDING CHEM TRAILS

    NOBODY in America is Talking about this...This video is blocked in almost every country (2017-2018)


    ​Aware Directed Weapons.png

    Paul Hellyer The Extraterrestrial Takeover will Begin in 2018 Tom De Longue Background in Box https://youtu.be/EfBBrLcuHK0


    After Candy Jones’s husband deprogrammed her enough that she could participate in writing a book exposing some of what had been done to her, the secret was out. (See The Control of Candy Jones Hypnotism and the CIA by Donald Bain.) Ever since then, the intelligence agencies and the Illuminati have been carrying out damage control. Their biggest damage control campaign has enlisted the power of Hollywood and the controlled Media. This campaign is known as the False Memory Syndrome campaign, or as those of us who know the facts like to call it ""the false memory spindrome."  

    The headquarters of the False Memory Spin-drom Foundation is located at 3401 Market St., Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Some of the original founders were doctors of the University of Pennsylvania. The inside story about these early FMS doctors of the University of Pennsylvania is that they practiced Satanic Rituals during their work days. What is unusual about this--is that generally satanic rituals are performed at night, but these doctors did their coven work during the day. I know about these men. Now you can see why these men started the FMS! They started it to cover their own sins, because many of them were abusers themselves. In other words many of the EMS people are abusers of trauma-based mind-controlled slaves, or the victims of abuse who are in denial about their own abuse from trauma-based mind-control. Martin T. Orn (the person credited with founding the FMS) had ties to the CIA. 

    pg 4 The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave  http://christianobserver.net/documents/the-illuminati-formula-used-to-create.pdf


    When a valid case of SRA and repressed memories went to trial in Washington state involving a police officer whose family was MPD, Dr. Richard Ofshe of the False Memory Spindrom showed up to cause mischief. And mischief he did work. The case involved the children of a ""Christian"" police officer named Ingram who had satanically ritually abused his family for years. The daughter won in court, but Ofshe of the EMS was not above writing a book full of lies and distortions about the case. Lynn Crook, who was the abused daughter in the case wrote up a paper exposing what EMS person Richard Ofshe did to her, The controlled media is giving full license and great coverage to the EMS people. Rather than fighting the government for scraps of declassified documents which have had their secrets marked out, and which may even be fake documents manufactured by the CIA, I have decided that there is a much better approach to expose the Monarch Mind Control to the world. If a person could never go to Nepal, he can see pictures of it and believe it exists. If a person can not get into the top secret records of the CIA and Office of Naval Intelligence and MI6, they can be given the exact RECIPE for creating a Monarch slave. I believe that by giving the step by step recipe, people will see that A. all the ingredients are available, B. it is possible to combine the ingredients, C. all it takes is the motive to do it, and that motive is selfevident. We’ll even provide some of the names and places as we go along.

    pg 5 The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave  http://christianobserver.net/documents/the-illuminati-formula-used-to-create.pdf


     
    Relatives,
    These things have been brought to you to share electronic terrorism. The CIA, FBI and NSA dealings to handle terrorism has not changed since world war 2. Further more, corruption comes from everywhere. What is hidden is revealed. And all that was sealed (within our darkness) is visible to all. The shadows are at play, this has to do with the second sun being visible by the naked eye. 

    >>>>> Relatives, Email "Hoop 6" <indigocrystalchildren@googlegroups.com> (yahoo and hotmail virtual space limitation, recommend free gmail.com). Thank you, whitebuffalocalfwoman@gmail.com

    >>>>> ---
    >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hoop 6 Indigo Crystal Children Adults" group.
    >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indigocrystalchildren+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    May 30, 2018, 2:01:09 AM5/30/18
    to Hoop 6
    Memorandum to President Donald Trump:

    Memorandum on Domestic US Torture Programs Running Under Cover of Surveillance Covert US Military/Intel/Justice Physical Mutilation of the Population EMF Weapons, Neuro-Weapons, Bio-Terrorism, & Organized Stalking

    Date: 25 January 2017

    To President Donald J. Trump
    Dear Mr. President,
    We unite in asking you to act to terminate immediately the ongoing covert programs of Electronic Warfare and COINTELPRO-based domestic terrorism that are currently being run by the US Intelligence agencies, US Military, US Homeland Security, and their contractors in the name of Electronic “Surveillance” and National Security against the American population. (...)
    As Intelligence analysts, human rights activists, advocates, whistleblowers, writers, scientists, victims, and highly productive and accomplished members of society with varied science, arts, and humanities backgrounds in critical thinking, systems analysis, engineering, education, healthcare, law, and Intelligence, we are here to inform you otherwise: These are NOT normative Intelligence and Surveillance activities. Using the deadly weapons of Electronic Warfare, these are organized Terror programs, committing the most horrific crimes and human rights violations, causing grievous bodily harm to countless numbers of innocent citizens. (...)
    Thanks to the trillions of dollars poured annually into Covert Operations funding, the carte blanche given to Intelligence and Military agencies, both pre- and post-911, and the convenience of classification and concealment of all manner of dubious activities as necessary for National Security, fraud, waste, and corruption at the highest levels of Government is now endemic. Corrupt factions in Intelligence agencies and in Military departments are now openly committing war crimes and crimes against humanity in acts of direct enmity against the American people. (...)
    Current military and Intelligence directives (5240.1R, the NDAA, EO 12333, and the CIA's AR 2-2) together permit the US military to detain citizens indefinitely, and to use those Americans “under surveillance” for experimentation purposes. This is used for an outright, public enslavement and torture of a large fraction of the US population. (...)
    In the name of the War on Terror, and masquerading as necessary Electronic Surveillance, condoned and orchestrated by US Homeland Security and the US Department of Justice, the most deadly weapons of Electronic Warfare are being routinely used on civilians under so- called surveillance inside their own homes including:
    ◦ directed-energy and microwave weapons,
    ◦ infrasonic and ultrasonic weapons,
    ◦ military radar weapons,
    ◦ neuro-weapons,
    ◦ infections with biological or synthetic self-replicating nanotechnology agents (“smart dust”) that aid the readout of brain activity.
    These are military weapons of war, designed to incapacitate, degrade, and destroy human organs, nerves, bodies, and brains; they are further being used inhumanely, in non-stop, 24/7 scenarios of attack. (...)
    Psychiatry has been roped in as political tool to subjugate those reporting these programs by naming them delusional, a verdict that Law Enforcement and CIA-controlled media then run with. (...)
    The scam goes like this, random people, or people who are dissidents or whistleblowers are purposely mislabeled as “terrorists” and put on an Enemies List, which is then turned over to Defense Contractors to target under perverted interpretations of NDAA and PAA.
    This allows them to engage the Military and Law Enforcement in either the active harassment and torture of individuals illegally targeted for fraudulent cause, or it gives the Defense Contractors carte blanche to commit criminal assault upon innocent citizens while demanding (unconstitutionally) that Police stand down and do nothing to help their victims." (...)
    These crimes against humanity need to be stopped if the United States of America wants to retain its national resilience and keep the goodwill of its partners worldwide.
    You have an opportunity today to set right many historic wrongs. Much is made of America's history of slavery. Yet this reality on the ground today shows us, that with the stealth weapons of Electronic Warfare and Neurowarfare, slavery has entered a new phase.

    You have said:
    “There should be no fear -- we are protected, and we will always be protected.
    We will be protected by the great men and women of our military and law enforcement and, most importantly, we are protected by God.
    ...We will make America safe again.”
    --President Donald J. Trump, Inauguration Day Address, 1/20/2017

    But there are NO laws on the books today in the USA—land of the free and home of the brave—to prevent non-consensual experimentation on humans. Americans today are enslaved and are exporting this medieval travesty into every corner of the world.
    Your children and grandchildren are just as much at risk as ours.
    Please act today to put an end to these horrific, shameful crimes against humanity which are tearing apart our society.

    Sincerely,


    [Ref. .PDF file]

    Death Camps & The Global Genocide




    SOS – Global Nazi Extermination Program!

    Certain members of the media, police, judiciary and secret services are all knowingly complicit in a global Nazi extermination program and its cover-up that is using directed energy weapons, covert implants and nanotechnology to commit systematic mutilation and silent genocide against the population around the world for the sake of a Nazi ideology.


    The (Silent) Death Camp Program

    Systematic Physical Mutilation

    The mutilation and murder program is run by the Secret Services and their cronies in the military and in private corporations. It utilises the fact that microwaves are harmful to organic tissue but can pass through most building materials. This means that people can be hurt and given organ damage, heart attacks, strokes and cancer remotely inside their own homes. This is combined with nanotechnology and synthetic materials that are covertly given to the victims to systematically disintegrate their health and brain functions, using radiation to interact with the nanotechnology inside the body for maximum destructive effect.

    Neighbourhood Terror Campaigns

    The death camp programs begin with intensive psychological terrorism of the victim. The victims are placed under intrusive surveillance to infiltrate and subvert their life. It is for this reason that gang-stalking is the first aspect of this program that the victims complain about. The violations get worse with time: victims’ homes are surrounded by agents who either rent properties or corrupt neighbours.

    For these terror campaigns, the Secret Services mobilise their vast networks of agents, informants, collaborateurs and sympathisers to gang-stalk the victims as soon as they leave their home. They also pay a lot of money to corrupt neighbours to join in the abuse of the victim. The goal is to get the neighbours addicted to voyeurism and the abuse of the victim. For these reasons, the surveillance footage from the victim’s private quarters is broadcast to the neighbours and they are given the freedom to abuse the victim in whatever way they can come up with.

    For example, Dr. Horton’s downstairs neighbours, who joined in the surveillance campaign as soon as Dr. Horton moved in in September 2015, had ramped up their hate and terror campaign into a frenzy such that in July 2017, they would catch her coming through the door at 11pm and openly swear at Dr. Horton on a pretext and threaten physical violence. The recording of the incident with English subtitles is below (see here for the German version). Corrupt proletarians like that are the driving element of the Secret Service terror campaigns.

    Terror by the Neighbours (Stop 007)

    jointinvestigation.org

    Individual Concentration Camps

    The next step in the genocide program is to set up microwave weapons and radar devices with which the perpetrators can monitor the victims inside their home 24/7 and shoot at them from the outside at will. Body parts can be targetted with a precision of a few millimeters. By this means, victims find themselves in an individual concentration camp that the intelligence agencies erect around them. Inside, the victims are systematically shot to pieces with the military weapons, using the fact that the shots from microwave guns don’t leave bullet holes. What this looks like is shown here:

    International Blacklisting

    The victims of this program are placed on international blacklists intertwined with the terrorism watchlists. The secret services treat the people on these blacklists as outlaws with no right to life and do whatever they like with them. Once a victim gets on one of these blacklists they stay on them for life and are systematically and brutally mutilated alive and slowly murdered in the most dreadful way possible. Their family members are also placed on the blacklist and also slowly murdered off.

    When a victim tries to complain about the assaults, for example by making a police report, the corrupted police turns on the victim. If a victim happens to chance on an honest police officer, the victim is retaliated against by other means. For example, after reporting brutal microwave assaults on an air plane to the Hamburg Airport police, Dr. Horton was machine-gunned with Directed Energy Weapons in the thigh in the parking lot of the airport straight after making the police report. The car was carrying Directed Energy Weapons and caused massive bruising that is still faintly visible at the time of writing, a quarter of a year later.

    Bruises on Dr. Horton’s thigh after being machine-gunned with Directed Energy Weapons in retaliation for making a crime report to Hamburg Airport police on 4th October 2017. Note the longitudinal line at the top of the bruises that was caused by Dr. Horton turning slightly sideways the moment the shots started being fired.

    Sexual Sadism Actively Fostered

    Agents from the intelligence agencies and their trainee spies mock the victims throughout the torture and sexually denigrate them. The sexual sadism is actively fostered by the secret services. It is used to groom and cultivate psychopaths and to generate the blackmail material for the control files on the perpetrators. Agents and their minions also break into homes, poison food, systematically sabotage computer equipment, digital communications, launch slander and smear campaigns and subvert the victims’ medical care to prevent victims from getting help and to hurt them even more.

    Most victims experience shots with Directed Energy Weapons in the genitals and even genital mutilation. Those victims that have implants tend to have them in the genital and rectal regions too. These can be used for remote-controlled rape and sadistic torture. Both can also be done with Directed Energy Weapons alone, but once the chips are used it is almost impossible to shield from it and the victim becomes entirely helpless against the attack. What remote-controlled rape sounds like on high-frequency measuring equipment is shown below, where Dr. Horton was raped by the Swiss Secret Services, NDB, in her home near Zurich. Like mamny victims, Dr. Horton is raped on a daily basis.

    Break-ins and Covert Implanting

    As part of the psychopathic obsession for control, agents even break into homes at night and do microsurgery on people, implanting them with chips and even nanotechnology that can be remote-controlled. Dr. Horton was implanted on two dozen locations by these means. The last time, she was overtly implanted was in the middle of June 2017, when 3 months after her request to cease and desist to the Swiss Secret Service in the military HQ in Berne, agents of the Swiss Secret Service broke into her home, slit her navel open using a laser scalpel and implanted her with a radio-frequency emitting chip. That laser surgery scar is shown below, as photographed by Dr. Horton’s doctor the day after Dr. Horton discovered the scar.

    Laser-surgery scar on Dr. Horton’s navel after criminal implanting with a microchip during a break-in into her home by the Swiss Secret Service, NDB. (Click to enlarge)

    Three weeks later, when the microchip was turned on and used for pain torture, Dr. Horton measured the radio-frequency emissions of the chip implanted in the navel with the Aceco bug detector, as shown below. On her YouTube channel, she has posted the full list of chip measurements of her body (8 videos).

    Sniper Shots of Chips, Bioweapons and Nanotech

    Many victims, including Dr. Horton, experience being shot at with projectiles that are aimed at piercing the skin to deliver bioweapons such as germs and nanotech, or lodging the projectile itself in tissue (e.g. radio-frequency chips).

    When Dr. Horton had to flee her home due to the brutality of the Directed Energy Weapon attacks by the Swiss Secret Service, NDB, she was provided refuge by a journalist in Germany, who also recorded an interview with Dr. Horton. In retaliation for the interview, or out of habitual psychopathy, Dr. Horton was shot in the neck by the German Secret Service, BND, at the hotel where the interview was being recorded with a biowarfare agent that mutilated her neck, caused massive swelling created a wound that still hasn’t healed at the time of writing a quarter year later, see below. The journalist testified to observing the sudden swelling in writing.

    Wounds from poison darts shot into the neck of Dr. Horton on 11 December 2017 by the German Secret Service, BND. (Click to enlarge)

    Thousands of Victim Testimonies

    The thousands of testimonies and desperate please for help by the victims of these psychopathic genocide campaigns by our degenerate secret services can be found everywhere online under the keyword “targeted individuals”. This term is a psyop device designed to obfuscate the truth that these are in fact the holocaust victims of the intelligence agencies.

    Already over a decade ago, the victim John Finch assembled over 1500 international victim casesand submitted them to all institutions that have a duty to fight such criminality around the world. John Finch’s list can be found in the Wikileaks Vault 7 releases in an internal email at Stratfor in 2007. All officials who were contacted chose to ignore these crimes against humanity.

    “We have contacted most Governments, Security/Intelligence Agencies, Religious Organisations, International Organizations, Human Rights Organizations, Universities, Scientific and other Institutions, and the International Media all over the world – over and over and over again sending them all our case summaries, appeals for help, info etc..” – John Finch, victim & campaigner

    This shows that most of our governments knowingly allow and commit these crimes against humanity. Given that these are Nazi experiments and Nazi crimes, what we have to face up to is that our governments are in Deep Capture by a global Nazi crime syndicate. This makes those officials, who have been contacted but chose to remain silent and deny victims help, Nazi collaborators and war criminals who assisted the cover-up of these crimes. Covering-up crimes against humanity is the gravest offence in every jurisdiction.


    The Purpose

    Nazi Eugenics and Genocide

    The goal is to entirely subjugate the healthy population by crippling them with health problems and financial difficulties so that they are entirely subservient to a core network of clinical psychopaths who, as a result of their mental illness, consider themselves to be a super-race that should dominate everybody else.

    As part of that program a large scale Intelligenzaktion (as conducted by the German Gestapo in Poland early in World War II) is run by the secret services to debilitate and murder the highly intelligent and articulate members of society, so that they cannot warn others when they spot the pattern of this development. The secret services have already murdered a lot of the best and brightest in the Western world and are continuing to expand their take-down operations to ever larger parts of society. By now, everyone of genuinely high value to society due to their insight, ingenuity and integrity is being assaulted by the criminals and degenerates in the secret services to ensure the subjugation of civil society.

    War of Terror

    The secret services staged fake terrorist events to expand their budgets in the War on Terror. For example, MI5’s budget doubled after 2003 and their head-count tripled (Guardian, 7th Sept 2011). The armies of weaponized morons that were recruited with that money, combined with high-tech surveillance methods, are used to demolish all Western democratic institutions and to restrain and debilitate the population. The goal is to ensure that healthy people cannot stop the psychopaths in the secret services and the military when they expand their program of systematic mutilation and murder, which is modelled on the Gestapo and the death squads run by Western secret services in Latin America and Asia.


    Stopping the Nazis

    Dr Katherine Horton is one of those scientist who is being mutilated to death by the psychopaths and their minions in the secret services. Together with a group of high-profile whistleblowers and especially talented people she is trying to stop the war that the degenerates in our societies are waging on the normal people.

    Together they formed the Joint Investigation Team, US-Europe to investigate crimes committed with Directed Energy Weapons, Military Neuro/Biotechnology and Systemic Corruption.

    Urgently help Dr Horton and her associates if you want to halt the global mutilation and subjugation programs!

    Support our Fighters


    The Wider Genocide Program

    The global genocide program has many other forms and goes back to global plans that have been in place for a long time. Genocide is a staple asset-stripping method of the global crime cartel that it uses to break down nations. It used it against Germany and other countries in World War II, against Russia and China during communism, and later in Vietnam, Latin America, Africa, and more recently in the Middle East like in Iraq and Syria. In other words, it used this asset-stripping strategy everywhere, and each time with full success.

    If we want to stop the genocide this time, we have to work together globally. If humanity succeeds against the global crime cartel, it will in fact be the first time. If humanity fails, the cartel will conduct a global genocide surpassing all previous genocides.

    As a result of the complexity of our systems, we would not be able to maintain any of our system like commerce, manufacturing, pharmaceutical production, electricity grids and computer and telecommunications architecture after such a genocide. That is because most of the people who knew how to run these things or had the training to be able to help run these things, would be dead. In other words, we would be pushed into a new form of the dark ages, which will be a lot worse than the original Dark Ages because vanishingly few of us know how to live off the land and fend for ourselves.

    It is for these reasons that everyone of us has to take the revelations about the following programs very seriously and do our best to fight them.

    Genocide Forecasts by Intelligence Organisation

    The following are the population forecasts by Deagel.com, which is an intelligence provider for NSA, NATO, UN, OECD, World Bank, Stratfor and others. Its reports have been quoted in briefings to the US President. For this reason, Deagel‘s forecasts of mass genocide in the Western world are revelations about the known large-scale plans of the global crime cartel that are expected to be executed fully by governments. Its forecasts for the US, UK, Germany and Switzerland are listed below for download.

    The genocide forecast of Deagel.com was uncovered and publicised by Ryan Zimmermann. The compilation below is intended for court use.

    Deagel_Genocide.Numbers.Germany
    Deagel_Genocide.Numbers.Switzerland
    Deagel_Genocide.Numbers.US
    Deagel_Genocide.Numbers.UK







    Adora B's profile photo
    What are non-lethal weapons?
    Non-lethal weapons (NLW) are intended to incapacitate people and equipment while limiting unnecessary loss of life and damage to property and the environment. Some NLW deliver blows or electric shocks, spread slippery material that makes roads impassable, or disperse rapid-hardening foam to limit access to or disable machinery. Non-lethal weapons, some already available and some in development, can also disable explosive devices and block radio or television broadcasts.
    This publication is now archived.
    [Council on Foreign Relations]

    JIT

    Directed Energy Weapons, Military Neuro/Biotechnology and Systemic Corruption

    About

    The Joint Investigation Team (JIT) was founded by Dr. Katherine Horton at the start of 2017 to counteract the refusal of the police in the US and Europe to investigate crimes involving directed energy weapons and military neuro/biotechnology. The Team comprises 5 core experts who all have personal experience of assaults with directed energy weapons and military neuro/biotechnology. Behind the scenes, the team is also working with microwave weapons experts, former intelligence agents, and medical professionals to advance the investigation.

    Dr. Katherine Horton, Switzerland
    Founder and Leader of the Joint Investigation Team
    High Energy Physicist and Expert on Complex Human Systems

            Experience:

    • DPhil in Particle Physics, MPhys 1st class, University of Oxford
    • Particle Physicist at CERN and DESY
    • Research Fellow at St John’s College, University of Oxford
    Karen Melton Stewart, USA
    Investigator and Intelligence Analyst for the Joint Investigation Team
    ret. NSA Intelligence Analyst, Expert on Weapons Development & Proliferation

            Experience:

    • Intelligence Analyst at the National Security Agency for 28 years
    • Top Secret clearance for 27 years
    • Uncovered and reported widespread corruption of NSA Security
    Dr. Millicent Black, USA
    Investigator and Welfare Officer for the Joint Investigation Team
    Expert on Violence against Women and Military Neuro/Biotechnology

            Experience:

    • Doctor of Ministry, Christian Education and Social Justice
    • Master in Marriage and Family Therapy
    • Past President and Organizer of Hope for the Hurting Ministries
    Ramola Dharmaraj, USA
    Investigator and Press Officer for the Joint Investigation Team
    Investigative Journalist and Expert on Secret Service Criminality

            Experience:

    • Award-winning investigative journalist, fiction-writer, and poet
    • Editor of the Delphi Quarterly, publisher of The Everyday Concerned Citizen
    • Teacher of Creative Writing at Washington DC Universities for 17 years
    Melanie Vritschan, Belgium
    Investigator and Events Manager for the Joint Investigation Team
    Founder of ICATOR, Expert on Civil Rights & Military Neuro/Biotechnology

            Experience:

    • Communications Manager of EGNOS satellites of European Space Agency
    • Working with European Commission & European Parliament for 20 years
    • Fluent in German, English, French, Spanish, Italian & basic in Dutch
    • https://jointinvestigation.org/about/

    ...

    [Message clipped]  

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    May 30, 2018, 6:44:57 PM5/30/18
    to Hoop 6
    Thank you Sister Lonny Le Coulter for your concerns. We can text by phone if you like 6506690412, Palo Alto California. 
    Beloved child of the universe, there is mmmmmuuuuuuucccccchhhhh confusion. I agree with you.

    Sioux are soul elders
    Jews are sole elders

    These are ark of the covenant knowledge, the coordinates of the spacial fields through and injectures (light mathematical gematria). This is the Rainbow Trail and what we talk about, indigo (perfect stone within 6) crystal (perfect stone without 11), as representatives. You can read more about these at http://crystal-indigo-children.blogspot.com Jews are the caretakers of this knowledge, the Great Torah, a path of Hashem (named) Great Spirit Father (17 red-violet). They are able to take care of knowledge and ensure it travels according to the star's path and it get's literal, because it's way ahead of science when we follow God's path, loving at last. The Sioux (Lakota, Dakota, Nakota) are able to move through the spacial fields (it is much more difficult for other nations and tribes, thus elder spirits begin to heal, like carrying spiritual babies on their backs until they can survive), they call it, "ALL MY RELATIVES" (mitakuye oyasin). Around the world, we are talking about the same shared consciousness of the dream story in time and evolution. We have a second star or sun appearing in the sky each day, this reveals what has been hidden, the impurities of our lives.

    Yet if we become holy people, our insides spiritual cry and our outsides will become one eye, unified. 

    We are looking to bring the good natured rule (soldiers, cops, veterans), love is the great tool. Let us become this cry, purified from within. We need all the prayers we can get, all the help we can get, in any way we can receive the hearts of each other, even if we do not understand the story of each other's destination, we can listen and become the sounding block that will nullify any defeat and put them on their feet. This is the loving hands we seek. And yet we still try to be meek. Love is sow sweet. I know your heart my beloved, thank you for your joy and eagerness to respond. We need to hear your sounds. Times are changing and we need to participate. We all hope not to be too late. It is a k/new age, it is the dawning of men, the third phase of evolution, the yellow rolling hill in time, where dreams appear from your mind into time. We must be aware and make our ships knot sink, but link and find a way to appear broken like a wheel that needed a restful daze. Just sit by the water w/hole and I will be bold. Look at the rainbow, look at that glow. I know you were there, because your love appeared. Thank you my beloved, for we experience shame and so much blame, yet within all that, is the "LIGHT" and this birthing is what is occurring while we are cursing. 

    There is a story I want to tell you, color 31 or yellow-red and 32 or yellow-orange, seems to need to jump over this chasm. They start to swear and it gets real bad, but they never stop. It somehow reminds me of the terets syndrome where children and even adults cannot stop swearing from their mouths. Anyway, once they get over that chasm and to the color of 33 or yellow-yellow, it's like a whole restful, royal, honorable, breathtaking hoop around the square. These spiritual relatives are colors or vibrations, which we call frequencies. These frequencies can be used for good or for evil. This is what the "Targeting Game" is all about, using frequencies in a bad or evil manner that harms the world and our neighbors, but if we use these frequencies in holy song, to cleanse with prayers, then we can heal the world, create a "Knew Game". I knew you. I knew you. Hey I know you. I remember you from one of my past life. Oh yes I remember that time many eons ago, where my spirit roared. Those where the days. I had to turn the page. The spiritual ghost within us all had to dance and sing and join with others on the rings. We traveled down the Rainbow Trail, because the Great Spirits had tales. We listened and said, now what are we to say, let love show the waves. So we danced and we sang and brought home those sacred rings, where we had boundaries (coordinates of the stars, held in place by Jews). 

    Text me by phone if you need me and I will reply when I can. Thank you for your kindness.
    your devoted servant,
    White Buffalo Calf Woman your Twin Deer Mother
    elder crystal 11, yellow 3, green 4, gray 14 (buffalo robe, sukkah)

    On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Lonny Le Coulter <lcoul...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Dear White Buffalo Calf Woman,

    I've been reading your emails off and on over the past few years.During this time, I've been on quite the journey with God and been brought to the truth. I hesitated in saying anything, but this is the third time I felt like I should say something so here goes...

    You are mixing "tradition" that came from the Nephilim (offspring of fallen angels and humans) that infiltrated Native culture that go against your true heritage. You are also mixing new age philosophies and lies that came from Aleister Crowley, Hitler and the like that are opening up ancestral curses to run a muck in your families.  I too was caught up in these things to a degree before the Lord revealed the truth to me.  I am willing to share anything I know, and "think I know" and any helpful resources that I have. Unfortunately, I cannot be helpful on a financial level but I do believe the information I have would be greatly helpful to you all and get to the root of some challenges you all are having.

    These practices/ideologies are nullifying any spiritual protection you have from the targeting going on. The real battle is in the spiritual realm. Many well meaning people are being deceived and opening themselves up to targeting without realizing it. Many think it's because they are "special". That is true in a sense, but they target both sides....so the info coming out is convoluted and confusing as to the nature and purpose of the targeting. I have a lot more to say but don't want to intrude or step on any toes, that's why I messaged you directly and not emailing the whole group. 

    The enemy has sought to confuse Natives about their true lineage, roots and traditions and did so quite successfully. A lot of "traditions" are actually demonic entirely. Same thing with Christians, paganism infiltrated the church as did "Jezebel" which is why most churches are in apostasy.  I see that you know you are part of the Tribes of Israel, but there seems to be a lot of misconception as to the nature of that relationship, what God expects of you and so forth. I am in no way perfect in my own walk with God. I am not religious. I am a work in progress, just a fleshly sinner who God showed much mercy and love, and now I speak the truth when he beckons me (I'm still learning to listen). Steven Greer is a pawn for the antichrist and many of the things you and your group are sharing shows me why you all are being targeted so heavily. They have "authority" to operate in your lives, but you aren't seeing it.

    I pray you'll be open to conversation. If you are not here in central Ohio, we can talk on the phone or by email, whatever works best for you.

    You are weary and tired. God loves you so much and wants to give you rest.

    May the Lord always keep you close, the Holy Spirit guide you and the angels protect you.


    In Love,
    Lonny



    --
    Hoop 6 (Stepping Stone) - Teach what is right, that law is the LOVE, then when two hearts is united, we share with intelligence. However if LOVE doesn't lead the way, then we fight to unite LOVE, two broken hearts, then we know that we are walking the truth path, the love to each other, the kind that lasts, over rolling hills in time, over the suns, and into the heart of the blue seas of every one. We are the Prophecy, the Rain upon the Land, so parched, it will need a Rainbow, to serve it home the right way and know where to land (the Rainbow always lands on the pot of gold, abundance, brotherhood)! "I Bless Myself" and "I Bless the World"
     
    Relatives, Email "Hoop 6" <indigocrystalchildren@googlegroups.com> (yahoo and hotmail virtual space limitation, recommend free gmail.com). Thank you, whitebuffa...@gmail.com

    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hoop 6 Indigo Crystal Children Adults" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indigocrystalchildren+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Jun 13, 2018, 2:42:27 AM6/13/18
    to Hoop 6
    Former FBI official Ted Gunderson speaks about ileagal gang stalking. Agent Ted Gunderson died of cancer on July 31, 2011. His illness was induced by silent electromagnetic assault and by other nefarious means like that of the Cuban diplomats recently suffering severe brain and internal organ and central nervous system damage.
    U.S. Code: Title 18.. Section 241.. Conspiracy Against Rights
    "If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise of or the enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of him having so exercised the same; or, if two or more persons go on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise of enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death

    Gunderson has said that government-sponsored gang stalking terrorism is financed “through illegal black operations,” such as sales of illegal drug; gambling; prostitution; and even sexual exploitation of children. But this reporter believes it is more likely that programs of government-sponsored domestic terrorism are funded from military and security “black ops” budgets that have been illegally diverted to covert domestic programs administered and conducted primarily by defense contractors. Thousands of Americans, including this veteran journalist, have publicly reported being the victims of silent electromagnetic assault and community-based home intrusions, vandalism, and even the poisoning of food, water and air.
    Google: "America's Forgotten Anti-Gangstalking Law: USC: 18 Section 241"

    On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Derrick Robinson <derrickc...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Great! Thanks Twin Deer Mother!

    Hon. Assemblymembers,

    My name is Brian Hofer. I’m a member of Oakland Privacy, and I chair the City of Oakland’s Privacy Advisory Commission. I have worked with the counties of Santa Clara and Alameda, the cities of Berkeley, Palo Alto, Richmond, and Oakland, and the Bay Area Rapid Transit District on similar legislative efforts as the proposal before you. Counting votes at the procurement stage, or at the second stage, the underlying use policies themselves, I’ve been a part of thirteen consecutive unanimous yes votes throughout the greater Bay Area, which I highlight to demonstrate that SB21’s approach is reasonable, collaborative, and politically viable. I thank Senator Hill for his leadership in moving this bill, and ask that you support it.

    As someone that has been to the finish line, I can share with you what the impact of SB21 adoption will look like. What we have seen in practice, even in a place as politically aggressive as Oakland, is not a prohibition on surveillance equipment or the educating of criminals as some fear, but rather a narrowing of use. SB21 will encourage mindfulness, forcing us to think about potential impacts and consequences of use prior to implementation.

    Senator Hill’s SB741 and 34 are proof that such oversight and transparency is not fatal to legitimate police work. Although the District Attorney’s association is opposing SB21 for what I assume are typical turf battle reasons, they would be wise to look to Alameda County. I had the pleasure of working with DA O’Malley on a use policy for the new cell site simulator she was acquiring. After a public discussion and feedback, which resulted in a strengthened policy and an annual report requirement for added transparency, we went to the Board united and received a unanimous yes vote.

    Oakland also implemented a ground-breaking policy after a public discussion before the Privacy Commission and collaborating with our police department. In both instances, the public participation resulted in the proponent acquiring controversial equipment, the political buy-in generated good will, and the increased transparency from the public discussion and accountability led to improved trust of law enforcement. This trust, good-will, and cooperation with and from law enforcement should themselves be seen as valuable public safety goals, and benefits of SB21 adoption.

    In response to several of the opposition arguments:

    No law enforcement agency in California has quit using cell site simulators or license plate readers due to SB741 or 34’s passage into law last year.

    ...

    [Message clipped]  

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Jul 16, 2018, 4:20:03 PM7/16/18
    to Hoop 6

    DONATIONS NEEDED FOR BILL SPONSORSHIP

    My name is Dr. Tomo Shibata, an Advisory Board Member of Freedom For Targeted Individuals. As a resident of California, I’m asking for donations to help me lobby legislative sponsorship for a bill proposal to the California State Legislature. I drafted a legislative proposal criminalizing organized covert torture with electronic weapons and activities facilitating such torture, according to the California penal code. Early in 2018, the California Office of Legislative Council converted my proposal into “bill text language”, and the proposal was assigned Reference Number 18 07462. The official bill proposal can be downloaded from:  

    https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/e50b46_ac0248e089e54dc5974f12500920e637.pdf

     Unfortunately, the bill proposal needs sponsorship by one or more CA Assembly Members or State Senators, as well as several non-profit organizations and other concerned groups of CA state residents. To get that sponsorship will require many weeks of lobbying on the part of me and other volunteers. Positive strides in CA to counteract the crimes of organized stalking and organized covert torture through legislation will be a model for other states to follow suit.

    Donations of any size will contribute to this ongoing effort to end this sophisticated crime against humanity.

    Link:  http://gofundme.com/end-torture

    Thank you very much for helping.

    Tomo Shibata
    rev...@hushmail.com

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    The purpose of targeting is to isolate the individual, alienate him from jobs and friends, bring him to the bottom, homelessness and keep him there. There are many ways how to achieve this, V2K , then subtle though manipulation, sending throats to exactly brain part where they originate, so target can not distinguish his thoughts from those implanted. This is very effective way how they manipulate un suspected public and T.Is. He also explains gang mentality of perps; they are happy to have well payed jobs, so much power over targets, support of group, they can date women they want using same techniques they use on T.Is.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Gang Stalking/Organized Stalking Basic Tactics



    Ultrasound Hearing For Organized Stalking of Targeted Individuals



    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    LETTER TO DONALD J. TRUMP BY MIKE PATRICK

    July 9, 2018

                                                                                              SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL

     

    President Donald J. Trump

    The White House

    1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

    Washington, D.C.  20500

     

    President Trump,

    Millions of Americans and people throughout the world STILL have a lethal satellite weapon connected to their brains. 

    This satellite weapon is being used for mass assault, torture, murder and genocide.  It causes most of “mental illness” and numerous physical and medical conditions, possibly including major illnesses and diseases such as cancer and AIDS.  Most, if not all, mass shootings and other mass tragedies were caused by someone being tortured past his breaking point by satellite, NOT by “mental illness” or guns.  This satellite weapon was likely involved in (and the real cause of) 9/11.  Those controlling the satellite weapon, and those with knowledge, are committing treason against the United States.  They initiated a hostile takeover of the United States when they started setting up the satellite connections.   

    I first informed you of this emergency situation in March 2016, when you were running for President.  I sent a second letter and package of documents to you on March 8, 2017.  I sent a third letter to you on July 31, 2017.  I also submitted comments on your campaign website and sent emails to your campaign email address, and I have submitted thirteen comments on the WhiteHouse.org website since you took office.  No one has responded to any of my correspondence, and you and your administration continue to ignore and cover up this medical, national and international emergency.

    What are you and other American leaders doing?  Are you waiting for a doctor or a local government or law enforcement official to make an announcement, WHAT SHOULD BE YOUR ANNOUNCEMENT?  Are you waiting for people to take to the streets?  Are all of you going to act like you couldn’t figure this out? 

    Our country, millions of Americans and people throughout the world are under silent, invisible attack.  This is the biggest situation in U.S. history.  The genocide numbers could surpass the Holocaust.  No one can figure it out?  No one wants to stop it?

    Do you understand the magnitude of the cover-up?  Who has not been informed?  Who cannot be prosecuted?  Who should not be removed from office and locked up?  Who will be left to run the country?   

    PLEASE take immediate action to lock down this satellite weapon and to inform the American people.  This is not going away.

     

    Thank you,

    Michael S. Patrick

    400 N. Park Avenue, Suite 10-B

    Breckenridge, CO  80424

    720-320-0863

    msp.d...@gmail.com

     

    Copy of the letter to:

    Joint Chiefs of Staff

    9999 Joint Staff Pentagon

    Washington, D.C.  20318

     

    Mr. Jefferson B. Sessions III

    Attorney General of the United States

    U.S. Department of Justice

    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

    Washington, D.C.  20530

     

    Mrs. Gina Haspel

    Director of the Central Intelligence Agency

    Central Intelligence Agency

    Office of Public Affairs

    Washington, D.C.  20505

     

    Mr. Christopher A. Wray

    Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

    Federal Bureau of Investigation

    935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

    Washington, D.C.  20535

     

    General Paul M. Nakasone

    Director of the National Security Agency

    National Security Agency

    9800 Savage Road

    Fort Meade, MD  20755  

     

    Ms. Kirstjen M. Nielsen

    Secretary of Homeland Security

    Washington, D.C.  20528

     

    Governor John W. Hickenlooper

    Office of the Governor                                             

    136 State Capitol Building

    Denver, CO  80203

     

    Mrs. Cynthia Coffman

    Colorado Attorney General

    Ralph L. Carr Colorado Judicial Center

    1300 Broadway, 10th Floor

    Denver, CO  80203

     




    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Jul 19, 2018, 12:40:32 AM7/19/18
    to Hoop 6
    https://www.real.video/5809636541001
    Your Smartphone is Eavesdropping On You! (And I can prove it.)

    White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother

    unread,
    Jul 25, 2018, 4:10:10 PM7/25/18
    to Hoop 6

     
    Elisabeth Butcher and Lois Adams posted in List of targeted Individuals.
     
       
    Elisabeth Butcher
    July 25 at 5:53 AM
     
    Sneezing trick: Perps sprinkle dust to make you sneeze. Your mouth opens and more smart dust is sent into your mouth. Terrible!!!

    On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:40 PM, White Buffalo Calf Woman, your Twin Deer Mother <whitebuffa...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.real.video/5809636541001
    Your Smartphone is Eavesdropping On You! (And I can prove it.)
    Reply all
    Reply to author
    Forward
    0 new messages