VoF Week: Primulaceae - Androsace mucronifolia Watt

29 views
Skip to first unread message

Dr Pankaj Kumar

unread,
Aug 25, 2012, 9:26:11 AM8/25/12
to indian...@googlegroups.com
Androsace mucronifolia Watt in J. Linn. Soc. 18:381. t. xiv B. 1882.

Family: Primulaceae
Distribution: E. Afghanistan, N.W. Himalaya, W. Tibet, W. China
Current pic taken on way to Hem Kunt Sahib.


Suresh Rana

unread,
Aug 25, 2012, 10:07:07 AM8/25/12
to indian...@googlegroups.com
Very beautiful catch of the Androsace flowers Pankaj Sir

Warm regards
Suresh Rana

Gurcharan Singh

unread,
Aug 25, 2012, 5:35:29 PM8/25/12
to Suresh Rana, indian...@googlegroups.com
Too good Pankaj ji


-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089

Suresh Rana

--
 
 
 



chrischa...@btinternet.com

unread,
Nov 8, 2016, 9:02:18 PM11/8/16
to efloraofindia
I am confused by this.  It certainly appears to be an Androsace rather than a Primula.

I can say with confidence that it is not Androsace mucronifolia - in fact the plant from VOF is not remotely similar to A.mucronifolia.  This species is only
recorded from Aghanistan to Kashmir, so would not be expected in VOF anyhow.

The image does seem to match the posting named as Androsace garhwalica (Primula garhwalica).  I am not familiar with this species.  Clearly it has been named by Indian botanists.  Could someone tell me the publication this species was described in and how it is distinguished from related species?

J.M. Garg

unread,
Nov 8, 2016, 11:44:29 PM11/8/16
to chrischa...@btinternet.com, efloraofindia, Dr. Pankaj Kumar

Thanks, Chadwell ji


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

J.M. Garg

unread,
Nov 17, 2016, 7:38:51 AM11/17/16
to efloraofindia, Prashant awale, Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dinesh Valke, Gurcharan Singh, chrischa...@btinternet.com, D.S Rawat

Forwarding again for Id assistance please.

Some earlier relevant feedback:

I am confused by this.  It certainly appears to be an Androsace rather than a Primula.

I can say with confidence that it is not Androsace mucronifolia - in fact the plant from VOF is not remotely similar to A.mucronifolia.  This species is only
recorded from Aghanistan to Kashmir, so would not be expected in VOF anyhow.

The image does seem to match the posting named as Androsace garhwalica (Primula garhwalica).  I am not familiar with this species.  Clearly it has been named by Indian botanists.  Could someone tell me the publication this species was described in and how it is distinguished from related species? --

From Chris Chadwell ji.

See more discussions in another thread at  VOF Week: : Androsace mucronifolia? en-route Hemkund sahib 

 



--
 
 
 




--
With regards,
J.M.Garg

'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'

Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia

For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia website (with a species database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).

The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.

Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of India'.

C CHADWELL

unread,
Nov 17, 2016, 8:40:21 AM11/17/16
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia, Prashant awale, Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dinesh Valke, Gurcharan Singh, D.S Rawat
Dr Rawat has kindly sent me the description of Androsace garwhalicum.  The photos taken in the
VoF are definitely not A.mucronifolia.

We are currently checking through Androsaces recorded from India.  There are quite a number of taxa
where confusion/uncertainty exists.  I am in agreement with Dr Nasir in 'Primulaceae' (Flora of Pakistan) that
past records for this A.globifera in "the Punjab" are misidentifications.  One of the specimens seems to be
Androsace baltistanica whilst the other is likely to prove to be.  I am currently attempting to familiarise
myself with the latter species and how it is distinguished from similar species in Ladakh.  A.baltistanica was
not know to Stewart in his 'Annotated Catalogue...'

I do not understand on what basis Androsace garwhalicum has become a Primula!  Is there DNA
or other non-morphological evidence to support this new combination?  It looks like an Androsace to me.....

I am attempting to familiarise myself with this species and how to distinguish it from similar species and work
out which species it is likely to have been mistaken for in the past.  In the description Dr Rawat sent there is a key
distinguishing it from A.selagini (which I have not heard of) which is apparently another new name (though no
author is given) for A.selago Hook.f. & Thoms.

Since A.selago is not recorded for Uttarakhand or indeed Nepal though is found in Bhutan, Sikkim & Chumbi,
it would have been helpful if the authors had told us how to distinguish this new species from those already
recorded from the region such as A.globifera, which at present I think it the most likely species it was mistaken
for in the past.  Given the challenges this genus present and lack of good reference descriptions such information
would have been useful for all those concerned.

According to 'Flora of Bhutan' (Vol 2 Part 2, 1999) Grierson & Long felt that A.selago and A.tapete are variable species
which appear to intergrade.  Further research is needed on their distinction.  Treatment as varieties may be more
appropriate.

Please can group members look out for an make a special effort to photograph Androsaces in the years to come
both from higher and lower altitudes as knowing where (geographically-speaking) at what altitude and in which
habitats, each species is found, represents meaningful information - as well as helping work out abundance (or
not).  Good close-ups of flowers (incl. petals & sepals) along with foliage will contribute towards us being able to
distinguish between similar species with greater certainty.

I personally, would be particularly pleased to view good close-ups of Androsaces from Ladakh to help me become
clearer about the differences between A.baltistanica, A.robusta and A.muscoidea in that region.  I am reasonably clear
about A.mucronifolia, A.sempervivoides, A.septentrionalis & A.thomsonii which are also recorded from Ladakh.


Best Wishes,


Chris Chadwell


81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK








From: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>
To: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; chrischa...@btinternet.com; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, 17 November 2016, 12:38
Subject: Fwd: [efloraofindia:126083] VoF Week: Primulaceae - Androsace mucronifolia Watt

J.M. Garg

unread,
Nov 17, 2016, 11:49:37 PM11/17/16
to C CHADWELL, efloraofindia, Prashant awale, Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dinesh Valke, Gurcharan Singh, D.S Rawat

To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; chrischadwell261@btinternet.com; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

C CHADWELL

unread,
Nov 23, 2016, 4:56:18 PM11/23/16
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia, Prashant awale, Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dinesh Valke, Gurcharan Singh, D.S Rawat
Thought best to collect my thoughts before responding further.

The problem with the links provided (and most from specialist nurseries, growers and the like) is that such people (in good faith mostly - though it is in the commercial interest of nurseries to list as many different species & cultivars as possible, as there are collectors of all available examples of favoured genera e.g. Androsace, Primula, Iris, Meconopsis, Geranium etc.).  They will buy if the species name or cultivar name is different to what they already have (or think they have).

The problem is that hardly any of those running nurseries, websites (even the top horticulturists in the UK) have any proper training in how to identify plants - to be fair, often few, if any reference books or other resources exist.  They rely on the name something arrived at. 

The result is, as my own informal research suggests, a high proportion of plants are misidentified in cultivation (just as a significant proportion of plants seen during surveys and trips to the Himalaya are misidentified).  For plants under names of species found in the Himalaya (some plants grow in the Himalaya and other regions of the world, so the example may not have originated in the Himalaya) I judge at least 50% to be misidentified (and I do not mean because they are hybrids, another complication in cultivation) - I have checked plants from nurseries and sources of seed, commercial and botanic garden index semina.

Thus, we cannot expect the situation with Androsace in cultivation to be any different.

Of the links provided, the final two do not come close to the others and in my opinion are not Androsace globifera.

As to the identity of the plant photographed in VoF - this, as I have already stated is definitely not A.mucronifolia.  It might be A,globifera but some sources say it should have flower-stalks (others like 'Flowers of Himalaya' say short-stalked or stalkless.  It is the most likely candidate.

There has long been confusion with the mat and cushion-forming species.

Interestingly, the image of A,globifera in 'Flowers of the Himalaya' shows flowers with darker central parts, as does the much larger photo of this species in 'Portraits of Himalayan Flowers' (T.Yoshida), along with one of the images in his 'Himalayan Plants Illustrated'.




Best Wishes,


Chris Chadwell


81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK








From: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>
To: C CHADWELL <chrischa...@btinternet.com>
Cc: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 18 November 2016, 4:49
Subject: Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:256943] VoF Week: Primulaceae - Androsace mucronifolia Watt

To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; chrischadwell261@btinternet. com; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>

C CHADWELL

unread,
Nov 23, 2016, 5:00:09 PM11/23/16
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia, Prashant awale, Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dinesh Valke, Gurcharan Singh, D.S Rawat
Thought best to collect my thoughts before responding further.

The problem with the links provided (and most from specialist nurseries, growers and the like) is that such people (in good faith mostly - though it is in the commercial interest of nurseries to list as many different species & cultivars as possible, as there are collectors of all available examples of favoured genera e.g. Androsace, Primula, Iris, Meconopsis, Geranium etc.).  They will buy if the species name or cultivar name is different to what they already have (or think they have).

The problem is that hardly any of those running nurseries, websites (even the top horticulturists in the UK) have any proper training in how to identify plants - to be fair, often few, if any reference books or other resources exist.  They rely on the name something arrived at. 

The result is, as my own informal research suggests, a high proportion of plants are misidentified in cultivation (just as a significant proportion of plants seen during surveys and trips to the Himalaya are misidentified).  For plants under names of species found in the Himalaya (some plants grow in the Himalaya and other regions of the world, so the example may not have originated in the Himalaya) I judge at least 50% to be misidentified (and I do not mean because they are hybrids, another complication in cultivation) - I have checked plants from nurseries and sources of seed, commercial and botanic garden index semina.

Thus, we cannot expect the situation with Androsace in cultivation to be any different.

Of the links provided, the final two do not come close to the others and in my opinion are not Androsace globifera.

As to the identity of the plant photographed in VoF - this, as I have already stated is definitely not A.mucronifolia.  It might be A,globifera but some sources say it should have flower-stalks (others like 'Flowers of Himalaya' say short-stalked or stalkless.  It is the most likely candidate.

There has long been confusion with the mat and cushion-forming species.

Interestingly, the image of A,globifera in 'Flowers of the Himalaya' shows flowers with darker central parts, as does the much larger photo of this species in 'Portraits of Himalayan Flowers' (T.Yoshida), along with one of the images in his 'Himalayan Plants Illustrated'.
 

Best Wishes,


Chris Chadwell


81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK






From: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>
To: C CHADWELL <chrischa...@btinternet.com>
Cc: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 18 November 2016, 4:49
Subject: Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:256979] VoF Week: Primulaceae - Androsace mucronifolia Watt

Thanks, Chadwell ji.
To me it appears close to Androsace globifera as per the following images (though I may or may not be correct):
To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups. com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; chrischadwell261@btinternet. com; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/zyRbqzpfc4k/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.

J.M. Garg

unread,
Nov 23, 2016, 11:35:21 PM11/23/16
to C CHADWELL, Gurcharan Singh, Dinesh Valke, D.S Rawat, Dr. Pankaj Kumar, efloraofindia, Prashant awale

Thanks, Chadwell ji


On 24 Nov 2016 3:26 am, "C CHADWELL" <chrischa...@btinternet.com> wrote:
Thought best to collect my thoughts before responding further.

The problem with the links provided (and most from specialist nurseries, growers and the like) is that such people (in good faith mostly - though it is in the commercial interest of nurseries to list as many different species & cultivars as possible, as there are collectors of all available examples of favoured genera e.g. Androsace, Primula, Iris, Meconopsis, Geranium etc.).  They will buy if the species name or cultivar name is different to what they already have (or think they have).

The problem is that hardly any of those running nurseries, websites (even the top horticulturists in the UK) have any proper training in how to identify plants - to be fair, often few, if any reference books or other resources exist.  They rely on the name something arrived at. 

The result is, as my own informal research suggests, a high proportion of plants are misidentified in cultivation (just as a significant proportion of plants seen during surveys and trips to the Himalaya are misidentified).  For plants under names of species found in the Himalaya (some plants grow in the Himalaya and other regions of the world, so the example may not have originated in the Himalaya) I judge at least 50% to be misidentified (and I do not mean because they are hybrids, another complication in cultivation) - I have checked plants from nurseries and sources of seed, commercial and botanic garden index semina.

Thus, we cannot expect the situation with Androsace in cultivation to be any different.

Of the links provided, the final two do not come close to the others and in my opinion are not Androsace globifera.

As to the identity of the plant photographed in VoF - this, as I have already stated is definitely not A.mucronifolia.  It might be A,globifera but some sources say it should have flower-stalks (others like 'Flowers of Himalaya' say short-stalked or stalkless.  It is the most likely candidate.

There has long been confusion with the mat and cushion-forming species.

Interestingly, the image of A,globifera in 'Flowers of the Himalaya' shows flowers with darker central parts, as does the much larger photo of this species in 'Portraits of Himalayan Flowers' (T.Yoshida), along with one of the images in his 'Himalayan Plants Illustrated'.




Best Wishes,


Chris Chadwell


81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK








From: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>
To: C CHADWELL <chrischadwell261@btinternet.com>
Cc: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>; Prashant awale <pka...@gmail.com>; Dr. Pankaj Kumar <sahani...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com>; Gurcharan Singh <sing...@gmail.com>; D.S Rawat <drdsrawat...@gmail.com>

Sent: Friday, 18 November 2016, 4:49
Subject: Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:256943] VoF Week: Primulaceae - Androsace mucronifolia Watt
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages