The molecular studies by Bouman et al. are based on meagre sampling and not dependable. Hence it is better to return back to Phyllanthus sensu lato till further molecular studies covering wider areas are carried out. They studied no specimen from India. At least I am not agreeing to their classification. There are numerous mistakes in their paper indicating they do not know taxonomy.
Kind regards,
Tapas Chakrabarty
Dear Saroj ji,
It is better to ignore this paper till wider consensus is arrived at. Even POWO has not entered any name so far proposed by Bouman.