J.M. Garg
unread,Jun 7, 2010, 8:57:16 AM6/7/10Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message as abuse
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to raghu ananth, Rashida Atthar, efloraofindia, mani nair, rashida atthar, navendu page, Dr. Pankaj Kumar, tanay bose, Balkar Arya
A reply:
"Dear Raghu ji,
Thanks for the info.
That Darwin's orchid is now called Anagraecum sesquipedale and the moth which was discovered around 40 years later was called, Xanthopan morganii praedicta, also called the predicted one. But later this insect name was rejected as the concerned insect was already described earlier. Very interestingly, on the basis of Darwin's comment, one of his friends, Thomas William Wood made a hypothetical sketch of the moth in 1863 in Darwin's, Various contravinces by which orchids are fertilized by insects. You may check that book available on internet.
To add to this, do you know that this Anagraecum were found distributed on two more nearby islands to Madagascar. and they realized that they were a different species which were not pollinated by these moths, so what were they pollinated by, was revealed recently....and the pollinators were Crickets. This was found by one of the researchers from Royal Botanic Gardens Kew on 2010.
Orchids are always interesting, you can never imagine.....
You know orchid species were described much before the description of the family Orchidaceae....approximately 20 years.
Secondly, the accepted name of family orchidaceae is actually not according to ICBN and supposed to be incorrect but it is still accepted............. Orchids starts with errors and very strangely, all errors are accepted!! Orchids are always unique, from their origin to taxonomy to ecology.....they are totally different and out of the world.
..............
Regards
Pankaj"