Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix

24 views
Skip to first unread message

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Jul 12, 2023, 6:31:08 AM7/12/23
to efloraindia, J.M. Garg
Dear Members,

Location: Dhorpatan, Baglung, Nepal 
Date: 31May 2023
Elevation: 2900 m.
Habit : Wild

Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju
DSC03715.JPG

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Jul 12, 2023, 6:31:36 AM7/12/23
to efloraindia, J.M. Garg

Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

DSC03716.JPG

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Jul 12, 2023, 6:31:51 AM7/12/23
to efloraindia, J.M. Garg

Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

DSC03717.JPG

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Jul 12, 2023, 6:31:52 AM7/12/23
to efloraindia, J.M. Garg
DSC03719.JPG

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Jul 12, 2023, 6:32:07 AM7/12/23
to efloraindia, J.M. Garg
DSC03721.JPG

J.M. Garg

unread,
Feb 8, 2024, 2:31:46 AMFeb 8
to efloraofindia, Saroj Kasaju

A comment as per Ranunculus trichophyllus subsp. trichophyllus:
"...... The plant from Dhorpata needs to be checked for R. himalaicus Tamura. Correct taxonomy below:

Ranunculus aquatilis L., Sp. Pl.: 556 (1753). – Type from Europe (Netherlands or Sweden). The species is restricted to temperate Europe with some extensions to the southern Medterranean and West Asia. Other mentionings are based on misidentification.
= Ranunculus aquaticus Neck., Delic. Gallo-Belg.: 242 (1768). -Type from France, may as well be regarded as orthographic variant of R. aquatilis L.

Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix, Pl. Vapinc.: 31 (1785), nom. cons. prop. – Type from France. The species occurs in the northern hemisphere and may be on the Australian mainland. Other mentionings are misidentifications.
≡ Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix in Villars, Hist. Pl. Dauph. 1: 335 (1786).
≡ Batrachium trichophyllum (Chaix) Bosch, Prodr. Fl. Bat.: 7 (1850). – Batrachium is no longer being regarded a separate genus but a section of Ranunculus.
= Ranunculus peucedanifolius All., Fl. Pedem. 2: 53 (1785), nom. rej. prop. – Type from Italy.
= Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus Withering, Arr. Brit. Pl. ed., 3, 2: 507 (1796). – Type from Britain.
– Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus sensu Whittemore et auct. amer. – An ambiguous taxon which contains several species, besides R. trichophyllus also R. longirostris Godr., R. subrigidus W.B. Drew, R. codyanus Boivin, and may be others.

Ranunculus himalaicus Tamura, J.Geobot. 26(3), 68, 9 (1978); Rajbhabdari & Rai, Handb. Fl. Pl, Nepal 1: 420 (2020); Kumar Ghimire et al., Fl. Kailash. Sacr. Landscape Nepal 1: 259 (2021). – Type from Nepal.
G. Wiegleb, 2024"

Thanks a lot, Wiegleb ji.


--
With regards,
J.M.Garg
DSC03715.JPG

J.M. Garg

unread,
Feb 8, 2024, 2:36:01 AMFeb 8
to efloraofindia, Saroj Kasaju

A comment as per Ranunculus trichophyllus subsp. trichophyllus:
"...... The plant from Dhorpata needs to be checked for R. himalaicus Tamura. Correct taxonomy below:

Ranunculus aquatilis L., Sp. Pl.: 556 (1753). – Type from Europe (Netherlands or Sweden). The species is restricted to temperate Europe with some extensions to the southern Medterranean and West Asia. Other mentionings are based on misidentification.
= Ranunculus aquaticus Neck., Delic. Gallo-Belg.: 242 (1768). -Type from France, may as well be regarded as orthographic variant of R. aquatilis L.

Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix, Pl. Vapinc.: 31 (1785), nom. cons. prop. – Type from France. The species occurs in the northern hemisphere and may be on the Australian mainland. Other mentionings are misidentifications.
≡ Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix in Villars, Hist. Pl. Dauph. 1: 335 (1786).
≡ Batrachium trichophyllum (Chaix) Bosch, Prodr. Fl. Bat.: 7 (1850). – Batrachium is no longer being regarded a separate genus but a section of Ranunculus.
= Ranunculus peucedanifolius All., Fl. Pedem. 2: 53 (1785), nom. rej. prop. – Type from Italy.
= Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus Withering, Arr. Brit. Pl. ed., 3, 2: 507 (1796). – Type from Britain.
– Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus sensu Whittemore et auct. amer. – An ambiguous taxon which contains several species, besides R. trichophyllus also R. longirostris Godr., R. subrigidus W.B. Drew, R. codyanus Boivin, and may be others.

Ranunculus himalaicus Tamura, J.Geobot. 26(3), 68, 9 (1978); Rajbhabdari & Rai, Handb. Fl. Pl, Nepal 1: 420 (2020); Kumar Ghimire et al., Fl. Kailash. Sacr. Landscape Nepal 1: 259 (2021). – Type from Nepal.
G. Wiegleb, 2024"

Thanks a lot, Wiegleb ji.


--
With regards,
J.M.Garg
DSC03716 rs.jpg
DSC03717 rs.jpg
DSC03715 rs.jpg
DSC03719 rs.jpg
DSC03721 rs.jpg

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Feb 8, 2024, 4:36:25 AMFeb 8
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia
Matching elevation is 

Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix

but I'm not sure .
Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

Screenshot 2024-02-08 at 15.18.14.png
Screenshot 2024-02-08 at 15.18.33.png

J.M. Garg

unread,
Feb 13, 2024, 6:24:38 AMFeb 13
to efloraofindia, Saroj Kasaju
Thanks, Saroj ji.
Maybe Dr. Wiegleb clarifies further. 
--
With regards,
J.M.Garg
Screenshot 2024-02-08 at 15.18.14.png
Screenshot 2024-02-08 at 15.18.33.png

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Feb 13, 2024, 6:26:00 AMFeb 13
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia

Thank you Mr. Garg !

Saroj Kasaju

J.M. Garg

unread,
Feb 19, 2024, 4:42:47 AMFeb 19
to efloraofindia, Saroj Kasaju
--
With regards,
J.M.Garg
DSC03715.JPG

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Feb 19, 2024, 6:01:25 AMFeb 19
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia
I think the contents I have postcards should be forwarded to Mr. Wiegleb !
Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

J.M. Garg

unread,
Feb 19, 2024, 9:05:41 AMFeb 19
to Saroj Kasaju, efloraofindia
Forwarded last time itself.
Written to him again.
--
With regards,
J.M.Garg

Saroj Kasaju

unread,
Feb 19, 2024, 9:42:20 AMFeb 19
to J.M. Garg, efloraofindia
OK Mr. Garg!
Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages