Syn: Geranium grevilleanum Wall.
Perennial herb with thick short vertical rootstock; branches trailing or ascending, up to 50 cm tall; Leaves opposite, stipules broadly lanceolate, free, 8-13 mm long, upper narrower; leaf blade 5-angled, 5-7-lobed to about middle, 6-8 cm broad, with rhomboid-cuneate lobes, appressed-hairy; flowers pale pink, rose-coloured or white,25-35 mm across,in 2-flowered cluster on up to 16 cm long peduncle covered with spreading hairs; pedicel up to 5 cm long; sepals elliptic-ovate, 8-14 mm long, mucro 1.5-2 mm long; petals 15-22 mm long, hairy at base, tip rounded or depressed; filaments lanceolate, hairy outside, anthers black; mericarps smooth, beak ap to 3 cm long.
Photographed from Apharwat Kashmir. The leaves resemble G. wallichianum but stipules are much narrow and free and petals rose to white.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
PHOTOGRAPHING GERANIUMS:
IF only the first one or two flowers have come out don't bother to collect as the form of inflorescence will not be evident.
The rootstock is important; get enough to show
whether compact or creeping, or annual. You can photograph the base of
the plant which should provide this information. Clearly, one requires
permission from the authorities to uproot a plant. There is still a need and indeed role for the collection of
pressed specimens for herbaria in India but that is primarily the domain of
staff of botanic gardens/ institutions.
In the early stages of flowering look out for
the best-developed unripe fruits available.
If fruit is ripe try to include both dehisced
and undehisced states.
If the fruits are falling with the seeds
inside them, collect some (many geraniums disperse their seed explosively but
some seed is often retained).
Include some loose petals when
pressing (detach if necessary). Expose stamens to show filament shape and
hairs by taking 2 or 3 sepals off a flower from which petals have recently dropped.
Smoothing out one or two leaves and
flowers as you close the press may be helpful; a few separately pressed basal
and lower/middle stem leaves are often useful.
Wilted specimens can be very
misleading.
Notes should be taken as to flower
posture, colour and patterning of petals, colour of stigmas, anthers and distal
parts of filaments (not necessary if your photos show these).
And don't forget to ensure the
stipules are clearly shown - something that would have been obviously in
pressed specimens, so not mentioned above by Yeo.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Thanks, Chadwell ji
--
Thanks, Chadwell ji
Thanks, Chadwell ji
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com .
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/ group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ optout.
Thanks, Chadwell ji
Dear Dr SinghThanks for drawing my attention to this. However, in light of Geranium lambertii not being known from Kashmir by Stewart (or indeedNW of Kumaon at that time) and Nasir being sceptical about single collection reported in Swat (Pakistan) - he had not seen the specimen tocomment further, caution/uncertainty about provisional identifications of this species from a small number of photos only (not showing full characteristics) seems reasonable to me.As for the paper 'An Assessment of Diversity Geranium.... in India with Special Emphasis on Indian Himalayan Region' (2015), the authors themselves, who with all due respect are not specialists in the genus and relied solely on what literature was available to them. They personallyare unlikely to have much familiarity with the genus in the wild, many herbaria or cultivation. They did not consult Peter Yeo (thought as he passed away some years back that was not possible but it is highly unlikely that they would have done so, even if he had still been alive). It is fair to say that it has been to the disadvantage of Indian botany that contact and collaboration with Western botanists (or Japanese ones - who have done a lot of worthwhile joint projects in Nepal) and plant specialists has been discouraged at a senior level for decades,Returning to the authors of the 'Assessment', they correctly state in the 'Conclusions' that there is much confusion in identification especially of perennial forms which are often considered difficult of discrimination. They emphasise that the genus needs a revisionary study to comprehensively explore the genus in India and to review existing collection of the herbaria in light of current taxonomic researches. The present study is a prelude for further investigation on Indian Geranium.I note e.g. their first entry of Geranium clarkei named by Yeo (not known to Stewart or Nasir) yet they give no synoymns or indicate which species in Kashmir, G.clarkei was previously understood to be.Yes, they give in a rather odd sequence of distribution of this species: Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim then Kashmir (within Indian territory) for Geranium lambertii yet on what basis, given it was not previously known in Kashmir or HP? Where are the herbarium specimens which have been determined as this species? Surely, when it is claimed that a species has been found in a region it was not known from before, strong evidence is required to support the claim.Otherwise, how can such extensions to ranges be checked? I have just posted a set of images of what I consider to be Geranium lambertii in cultivation on eFI. This allows others to inspect them (if they disagree, they can say why) and comment enabling a meaningful comparison with specimens from Kashmir, HP and Uttarakhand considered to be this species.Too often, identifications of Himalayan flora are based upon comparison between scrappy newly (i.e. in the past few decades) gathered pressed specimens (with few, if any field notes - at time no voucher specimens at all) with often scrappy, poorly pressed, badly preserved, 19th Century reference specimens or by 'matching' with brief guides such as 'Flowers of the Himalaya' (this is not a Flora and covers only a fraction of the total flora of the region) which has at best, single small images and summarised descriptions. Quickly 'matching' with such guides alone is not a reliable method of plant identification and whilst can result in reliable identifications for distinctive species but often misidentifications. I find that most Westerners visiting the Himalaya and Indian botanists use 'Flowers of the Himalaya' poorly. Few seem to have actually read the written descriptions nor checked altitudinal nor geographic distributions to see if their highly provisional identification tallies - if not, it should be checked further.......I hope, if an Indian botanist undertakes a revisionary study of Geranium they do not rely too heavily on just herbarium specimens (many of which were collected in the 19th century) in Indian herbaria. Extensive field-work needs to be undertaken and greater collaboration with foreign botanists, especially if specialists in the genera being studied exist and plant enthusiasts/horticulturalists and specialist gardeners along with specialist horticultural societies in the West. For genera which have ornamental merit there may well be expertise about them in cultivation in the West such was the case for Peter Yeo at Cambridge University. As far as I know he seldom (if ever) visited the Himalaya himself (though corresponded with others, like myself, who had) so his prime source of information were plants in cultivation (along with pressed specimens in UK and European herbaria he inspected). I know of expertise (and publications) on quite a number of genera well-represented in the Himalaya - though some of the experts have now passed away. I realise, as with professional botanists, not everyone is willing to help but for those who were, it is such a pity that their expertise was not put to good use by Indian botanists in the past.I remain doubtful that the geraniums named as G.lambertii from Kashmir are this species.
Thanks, Chadwell ji