Fwd: Ecology biased against non-native species?

Skip to first unread message

J.M. Garg

Jun 10, 2011, 6:50:02 AM6/10/11
to efloraofindia
Forwarding pl.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: vsram2003 <vsra...@yahoo.co.in>
Date: 9 June 2011 15:30
Subject: Ecology biased against non-native species?


Ecology biased against non-native species?
Nature authors: End bias, focus on impact, function rather than origin

The recent field of invasion biology faces a new challenge as 19 eminent ecologists issue a call to "end the bias against non-native species" in the journal Nature.

Often called aliens, hitchhikers or invasives, some scientists say that non-native species could just as easily be coined "abductees" whose transport links to activities by humans.

The authors of the Nature comments section note that assumptions that "introduced species" offer only deleterious impacts are misguided and "that human-induced impacts, such as climate change, nitrogen eutrophication, urbanization and land use change are making the native-versus-alien species dichotomy in conservation increasingly meaningless."

Mark Davis, lead author and professor with Macalester College in Saint Paul, Minnesota, says that a nativism perspective – native species equals good, non-native species equals bad – has dominated conservation efforts over the past few decades. He points to a number of ecologists, "including those who rightly could be called legendary for their contributions to the field over the past decades, who believe there has been way too much ideology and not enough good science associated with the anti-non-native species perspective."

The authors believe that a shift in the field is needed to consider outcomes and impacts of an organism on an environment rather than focus on native origins.

"Scientists who malign introduced plants and animals for thriving under favorable conditions seem to be disregarding basic ecological and evolutionary principles," say Matthew Chew, an ecologist and historian of invasion biology, and Julie Stromberg, a plant ecologist, with Arizona State University. "Evaluating whether a species 'belongs' in a particular place is more complicated than just finding out how and when it arrived."

Scientific studies show that while some introduced species have resulted in extinctions, not all natives are beneficial, as in the example of the Pine Bark beetle, which is decimating North American pine forests.

Chew and Stromberg have studied the impact of the non-native species in riparian ecosystems, most particularly tamarisk trees in the Southwest United States. Introduced to control erosion, Chew and Stromberg consider its continued perception as a pest species, water consumer and invader overplayed, while research shows its ecological role and ecosystem services have been undervalued. They point to outmoded perspectives and continued deference to outdated science as playing strong roles in negative perceptions of the species and intensive investment in eradication efforts. Recent discoveries have found that tamarisk in fact provides nesting habitat for birds, including the endangered Southwestern willow flycatcher, and that regional water management and climate change increasingly favor tamarisk over once-common cottonwoods and willows.

While the introduction of non-native species was noted as early as the 1620s, by Sir Francis Bacon, the field of invasion biology arose as an ecological approach as recently as the 1980s and 90s, inspired by Charles Elton's 1958 The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. More recent appraisals of Elton's research and publications by prominent ecologists now prompt a call for a change, these authors believe: "Invasion implies so many values. We need to consider the impact of these terms and approaches and how they affect scientific perception, public perception, and in turn, decision-making in conservation and restoration management."


Recent Activity:


    'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
    The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
    For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group: http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 1600 members & 70,000 messages on 30/5/11) or Efloraofindia website: https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database of around 5000 species)

    J.M. Garg

    Jun 10, 2011, 6:52:33 AM6/10/11
    to efloraofindia
    Forwarding pl.

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: sathya mukkara <mcsa...@yahoo.com>
    Date: 10 June 2011 11:14
    Subject: Re: Ecology biased against non-native species?

    Ecology biased against non-native species?

    Case study-Lantana camara in Tamilnadu,India

    With emergence of conservation of biodiversity
    as a major priority, conservationists require a broader knowledge about the
    distribution, abundance and ecological service provided by Lantana camara . Conservation emphasis is now shifting from the
    traditional species approach to wider issue by biodiversity conservation. We
    have to work with a clear strategy rather than just saying that weeds have to
    be uprooted and spend money on it. It is emphasized in the article 12 and 13 of
    the convention on biological diversity to not only promote research on the
    hidden potentials of Lantana camara  but also to change popular perceptions based
    on sound scientific research too.
    There are a number of reports in support of Lantana camara  utilization which provides shelter and vital
    winter food for many native birds. A number of endangered bird species utilize Lantana camara  thickets when their natural habitat is
    unavailable. The Babblers inhabiting the river valleys and swamps at Mount
    Kenya depend on small thickets of Lantana
    camara  for shelter and nest sites.
    It is a known fact that the invasive plants now perform important ecological
    functions. For example, fleshy-fruited invasive plants provide food that
    supports indigenous frugivore populations. Sathyanarayana and Ramesh (2007)
    reported that the intake of Lantana fruits by Grey jungle fowl, Gallus sonneratii   at Gudalur, Theni Forest division, Western
    ghats ,Tamilnadu. They have also observed the sambar deer, barking deer, mouse
    deer, sloth bear, wild boar, black napped hare and insects were also using Lantana camara  for food or shelter or nesting or escape
    cover or roost.  Bhat (2002) has reported
    that it is far from truth that Lantana
    camara  is not eaten by native fauna.
    He further stated, apart from its ability to grow and house many fauna and
    flora, it is put to a lot of social uses. Further, Lantana camara  is a major
    nectar source for many species of butterflies and moths. Some unpublished work
    has apparently suggested that several populations of Western ghat species now
    rely on Lantana camara  and a crash will be imminent if there is no
    uncontrolled removal of this weed. The link between maintenance of Lantana camara  thickets and biodiversity conservation has at
    least been suggested (Dann, 2003). Lantana
    camara  is proposed to be providing
    habitat essential to the promotion, or at least maintenance, of regional
    biodiversity. To evaluate the effect of introduced species on species richness,
    however, is to encounter a puzzling phenomenon. Both ecological theory and
    observation confirm that “invasions may actually increase total species
    richness” (Parker et al., 1999). It is emphasized that ecosystem level
    consequences of Lantana camara  invasion particularly on the biodiversity of
    native flora are little understood and studies are needed to fulfill this
    knowledge gap. There are, however, no recent data regarding the exact number
    and incidence of these introduced invasive species in India. . The effects of
    introduced species are so poorly understood and the record of predicting which
    ones will cause problems is  so bad that
    one can question how much credence to place in a risk assessment  (Schmitz and Simberloff , 1997 ) . There is
    so much  contingency involved among
    organisms that we regard as invasive, that their study has to be essentially a
    case by analysis.
    Njoroge et
    al.(1998) reported that in many regions, Lantana camara  has become a
    dominant component of natural and agricultural ecosystems. He also stated that Lantana camara  may provide Shelter and vital winter food for
    many native birds. It is very important to note that a number of endangered
    bird species utilize Lantana camara  when their natural habitats becomes
    unavailable. In Australia, the vulnerable black –breasted buttonquail, Turnix melanogaster, feeds and roosts in Lantana camara  thickets.  In central Kenya, where natural riverine thickets nave been almost
    completely cleared, the endangered Hinde’s Babbler, Turdoides hindei, has become dependent on Lantana thickets, and
    unless sufficient suitable natural habitat can be restored the survival of this
    species depends on the retention of Lantana infestations.
    In the view of the aforesaid facts , I [Dr.
    M.C. SATHYANARAYANA]  have suggested to
    one of my   M.Sc.  Wildlife Biology students   Mr.Thirumalainathan to undertake a short
    term research work on the utilization of Lantana
    camara  by different groups of
    animals at  Gudalur Range , Theni  Forest Division, Western Ghats ,
    The studies carried out at Gudalur Range ,
    Theni Forest Division , Western Ghats , Tamilnadu , revealed that different
    species  of Insects , Arachnids ,
    Reptiles , Birds and Mammals utilized Lantana
    camara   for various activities . It
    is  interesting to note that totally   59 species of Insects (55) and Arachnids (4)
    utilized Lantana camara .  During the present study Insects and
    Arachnids made 8826 visits (Butterflies 7643 visits and Spiders 53 visits) in
    948 man hours spent. Other species such as ants, bees, flies, grasshopper,
    beetle, bug, bumble bee and moth also utilized Lantana camara . The results showed that Insects and Arachnids
    spent 24.25 hours / 948 Man hours spent. Of these butterflies spent 21.12 hours
    / 948 man hours spent. This shows that Lantana
    camara  plays a role in providing
    ecological services to insects which in turn increases not only the diversity
    of animals but also plant species.
    It was also noticed during the present study
    four species of Reptiles , viz., Southern green Lizard ( Calotes calotes ) , Garden Lizard ( Calotes versicolor ) , Rat Snake ( Ptyas mucosus ) and Green vine Snake  ( Ahaetulla
    nasuta ) utilized Lantana camara  for  shelter , escape  cover and as a
    substrate for basking . The reptiles spent most of their time basking (2.21
    hrs) upon Lantana camara . This is
    because the plant receives large amount of sunshine as it grows in the forest
    During the study period 21 species of birds
    utilized Lantana camara   for foraging on flowers and fruits  , perching and nesting site .The results
    showed that  Lantana camara  provides a good
    habitat for birds at Gudalur Range, Theni  Forest Division  , Western ghats ,
    Tamilnadu . Four species of Mammals were found using Lantana camara  as a shelter/
    escape cover and for food.    There had
    been a number of sightings of   Three
    Striped Palm squirrel (Funambulus
    palmarum) feeding on unripe drupes of Lantana
    camara .
    With a view of developing a better
    understanding of the prevalent myth and value of Lantana camara  ,  a consultation has to convened to bring  together scientists , researchers , forest
    officials , managers , policy decision makers and NGO  .  It is
    necessary to prepare a backgrounder based on current review of research on Lantana camara . It is emphasized that
    ecological level consequences ofLantana invasion particularly on the biodiversity of native flora and fauna are little
    understood and studies are needed to fulfil this knowledge gap.

    <strong><font face="arial black">Dr.M.C.Sathyanarayana</font></strong>
    <font color="#0000ff"><strong>
    old address:Department of Zoology &Wildlife Biology
    Mayiladuturai 609 305, Tamilnadu, India

    CHENNAI 600099

    </strong></font>mcsa...@yahoo.com MOBILE NO 09442225759

    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

    Recent Activity:


      J.M. Garg

      Jun 10, 2011, 8:21:17 AM6/10/11
      to efloraofindia
      Forwarding pl.

      ---------- Forwarded message ----------
      From: Satya Prakash <spm...@yahoo.com>
      Date: 10 June 2011 16:59
      Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:71402] Fwd: Ecology biased against non-native species?
      To: sathya mukkara <mcsa...@yahoo.com>
      Cc: "J.M. Garg" <jmg...@gmail.com>, Sarita Mehra <green...@yahoo.co.in>

      Dear Dr Sathya,

      It is indeed very true that many of the invasive species have the ecological importance for the other organisms especially birds of the invaded sites.

      During our study at Abu Hills (Mt Abu WLS, Sirohi, Rajasthan, India) specially related to globally threatened species - Green Munia/ Green Avadavat (Amandava formosa) or endemic subtaxa -  Tawny bellied babbler (Dumetia hyperthra abuensis) are well adapted for the habitats made by Lantana for their nesting and also feed on its fruits. Other then these - Red Spurfowl & Grey Junglefowl find their shelter in the Lantana bushes.

      In the mammals - Sloth Bear eat Lantana fruits and is main cause of dispersion of its seeds through their droppings.

      I will share one of our example of Lantana bushes:
      On the Sunset Road at Abu Hills, the bushes were ideal habitats fro Tawny bellied babbler (TBB). If any birder/ researcher/ photographer interested in seeing the species, we use to take them at this spot. Unfortunately, in the move of clearing WLS from invasive species (Lanatana sp), Dept of Forest cleared the bushes and the small population of TBB was out. Now, if anyone has to see this species s/he has to travel in some deep areas.

      When we informed Dept of Forest about this they immediately took action to clear those pockets only which is devoid of avifauna specially when it matters with the key bird species of Abu. For this step we appreciate the move and helped them further in clearing the pockets whenever we could got time to accompany with them.

      Other than Lanatana there is Water Hyacinth. We found that this species is natural purifier and could play great role (in controlled manner) if used for the purification of the urban lakes. Unfortunately, on the name of beautification of lakes, these plants were completely removed from lakes and now one could see the pollution load in the lakes of Udaipur (Rajasthan, India)


      Thus, I will appreciate the work. RSNH Team will help you if you make a move in the state.

      Kind Regards

      Satya Prakash Mehra (Mr.), Ph.D.
      Conservation Biologist, Rajputana Society of Natural History (RSNH)
      Rajasthan, India
      +91-9414165690/ 9829144163 (Rajasthan, India)

      --- On Fri, 10/6/11, J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
      Reply all
      Reply to author
      0 new messages