Roscoea alpina from Chakrata

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Balkar Arya

unread,
Jul 2, 2010, 9:34:58 AM7/2/10
to indiantreepix
Dear All
Roscoea alpina from Chakrata

Regards

--
Dr Balkar Singh
Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology
Arya P G College, Panipat
Haryana-132103
09416262964

Roscoea alpina-1 Eflora.jpg
Roscoea alpina-2 Eflora.jpg
Roscoea alpina-3 Eflora.jpg
Roscoea alpina-4 Eflora.jpg
Roscoea alpina-5 Eflora.jpg

tanay bose

unread,
Jul 2, 2010, 9:46:11 AM7/2/10
to Balkar Arya, indiantreepix
Roscoea alpina Royle, Illustr. Bot. Himal. 361, t. 89, fig. 1. 1839. (see note); Wight, l.c. VI, t. 2013. 1853; Baker in Hook. f., Fl. Brit. Ind. 6:207. 1890; Kitam. in Kihara, Fauna & Fl. Nepal Himal. 98. 1955; Stewart, Ann. Cat. Vasc. Pl W. Pak. & Kashm. 66.1972.

SHAHINA A. GHAZANFAR and ROSEMARY M. SMITH

Plants 15-25 cm tall. Leaves 7-15 x 1.3-L7 cm, lanceolate to ovate-lanceolate, excluding the sheath, apex subacute; sheaths as long as, or shorter than the leaf blades, forming an apparent stem. Flower dark purple, 1-5. Calyx tube 2.5-4 mm, split on one side to the base. Corolla tube longer than the calyx; anterior segment c. 15 x 15 mm, rounded, erect; lateral segments oblong. Labellum c. 2 cm, bifid in lower 1/3. Staminodes circular to elliptic, shorter than the lateral segments. Fertile stamen about as long as the staminodes; anther cells linear. Style slender, margin of erect stigma ciliate.

Type: India, Simla to Fagu, Jacquemont 1024.

Distribution: From Kashmir to Bhutan.

The flowers often come out before the leaves and appear very attractive. The flowers are protandrous and entomophilous. Pollination is ensured by the versatile anther (with the stigma) hitting the back of the insect as it probes on the labellum.

Note: The figures in Royle’s Illustrated Himalayan Mountain Plants, plate 89, have been mixed (as pointed out by Collett in a note in Oct. 1897 in the RAW copy of the book). Figs. 1 & 3 are of the same species, Roscoea alpina. Fig. 3 of a plant with more developed leaves is wrongly given as Roscoea purpurea. The copy at K is annotated “not purpurea Sm” for Fig. 3 and quoted by Baker in Flora of British India 6: 207, as Roscoea alpina; see ms. unsigned note by Bentham on Herb. Royle specimen of “Roscoea purpurea Royle”, Ill. t. 89 at K-“no-this is purpurea var. procera (Wall.), but not the plant figured by Royle as purpurea, which is only the more leafy form of alpine”. All the drawings in Fig. 1 are of Roscoea alpine; var. minor Royle is not recognised (see Cowley in Kew Bull. 36(4): 766. 1982).

Tanay




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.




--
Tanay Bose
+91(033) 25550676 (Resi)
9830439691(Mobile)


Balkar Arya

unread,
Jul 2, 2010, 9:54:40 AM7/2/10
to tanay bose, indiantreepix
Oh Again full details within no time
Again Thanks Tanay

Pankaj Kumar

unread,
Jul 11, 2010, 1:10:51 PM7/11/10
to indian...@googlegroups.com
Nice pics Balkar ji. He has given nice C&P but missed the information
on Type. Infact this plant, Roscoea alpina, was first collected in
1849 and the type is still there at RBG, Kew. Attaching
V.V.Jacquemont 1024 (K).
You can make out the issue of identification as there are more than
one species on the sheet...
I hope this links with the original post, as I cant attach the sheet
from the group....Anyone can give me an idea how to attach a picture
while replying from the community itself.....
BTW you came to Chakrata but you didnt come to Dehradun, that was not right.....
Regards
Pankaj
Roscoea alpina Type K.jpg
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages