Wild Herb captured on 13/8/10 during the trek from Ghangaria (around 11,000 ft.) to Hemkunt Sahib (around 14000 ft.).
----
***********************************************
"TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!"
Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
Research Associate
Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project
Department of Habitat Ecology
Wildlife Institute of India
Post Box # 18
Dehradun - 248001, India
Thanks, Singh ji, Pankaj ji & Ritesh ji.
Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please.
Some earlier relevant feedback:
Rumex acetosella is characterized by having hastate leaves so that possibility is ruled out here. To me it looks like Rumex nepalensis only. Here the plant is in flowering stage so the most important character of the plant i.e. presence of fringed fruiting perianth is not visible here. http://photo.cvh.org.cn/pic/kun/36/366765.jpg Further comments are solicited.
Regards, |
Agreed it is not Rumex acetosella but some how I am not comfortable with R. nepalensis. The first photographs does show some flowers in which the inner perianth is enlarged, but there is no trace of any teeth. I would suggest R. patientia a highly variable species with entire valves.- from Singh ji. |
Thanks, Singh ji, Pankaj ji & Ritesh ji. A link for Rumex patientia (though not mentioned in Concise Flowers of Himalayas by Oleg Polunin & Adam Stainton): |
Yes it is difficult without fruiting specimens. |
Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please.
Some earlier relevant feedback:
Rumex acetosella is characterized by having hastate leaves so that possibility is ruled out here. To me it looks like Rumex nepalensis only. Here the plant is in flowering stage so the most important character of the plant i.e. presence of fringed fruiting perianth is not visible here. http://photo.cvh.org.cn/pic/kun/36/366765.jpg Further comments are solicited. Regards, | |
Agreed it is not Rumex acetosella but some how I am not comfortable with R. nepalensis. The first photographs does show some flowers in which the inner perianth is enlarged, but there is no trace of any teeth. I would suggest R. patientia a highly variable species with entire valves.- from Singh ji. | |
Thanks, Singh ji, Pankaj ji & Ritesh ji. A link for Rumex patientia (though not mentioned in Concise Flowers of Himalayas by Oleg Polunin & Adam Stainton): | |
Yes it is difficult without fruiting specimens. |
Leaves are quite different from R. nepalensis to me.Images of R. patentientia in Stainton's Supplement to Flowers of the Himalaya are attached herewith.DSRawat
Leaves are quite different from R. nepalensis to me.Images of R. patentientia in Stainton's Supplement to Flowers of the Himalaya are attached herewith.DSRawat
On Wed, 23 Feb, 2022, 3:33 pm J.M. Garg, <jmg...@gmail.com> wrote: