Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight:: Crassulaceae:: Sedum oreades from VOF- NS 32

[Nidhan Singh]

Dear All,

This malacohyllous herb was recorded from way to VOF in Uttrakhand...

I hope this is Sedum oreades...

--

Regards,

Dr. Nidhan Singh

Assistant Professor
Department of Botany
I.B. (PG) College
Panipat-132103 Haryana
Ph.: 09416371227

[chrischa...@btinternet.com]

Repeat of images.  Not Sedum oreades.  Rhodiola - will attempt to name in due course.

[J.M. Garg]

Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'

Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia. 

For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world- around 2700 members & 2,40,000 messages on 31.3.16) or Efloraofindia website (with a species database of more than 11,000 species & 2,20,000 images).

The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.

Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of India'.

[J.M. Garg]

In that case it may be Rhodiola wallichiana as per images herein and as per images from Valley of Flowers in FOI at Wallich's Rhodiola

On 6 November 2016 at 21:51, J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.

[C CHADWELL]

I repeat that Rhodiola is an extremely difficult genus.  I shall look into the genus in the Himalaya further

in due course but at this point cannot meaningfully comment further.  Much easier to say what a specimen

is not, rather than what definitely is.  Will not help the situation of frequent misidentifications by prematurely

confirming an identification.   At present I am not certain how to distinguish Rhodiola wallichiana.

In some cases the characteristics visible in some photos are insufficient to be sure. 

 

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk

---

From: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>
To: "chrischa...@btinternet.com" <chrischa...@btinternet.com>
Cc: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>; Nidhan Singh <nidhans...@gmail.com>; Tabish <tab...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 November 2016, 10:52
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:256814] Re: Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight:: Crassulaceae:: Sedum oreades from VOF- NS 32

In that case it may be Rhodiola wallichiana as per images herein and as per images from Valley of Flowers in FOI at Wallich's Rhodiola

On 6 November 2016 at 21:51, J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/b9AdTUh2ZSA/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.

[C CHADWELL]

I repeat that Rhodiola is an extremely difficult genus.  I shall look into the genus in the Himalaya further

in due course but at this point cannot meaningfully comment further.  Much easier to say what a specimen

is not, rather than what definitely is.  Will not help the situation of frequent misidentifications by prematurely

confirming an identification.   At present I am not certain how to distinguish Rhodiola wallichiana.

In some cases the characteristics visible in some photos are insufficient to be sure. 

 

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk

---

From: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>
To: "chrischa...@btinternet.com" <chrischa...@btinternet.com>
Cc: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com>; Nidhan Singh <nidhans...@gmail.com>; Tabish <tab...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 November 2016, 10:52

Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:255875] Re: Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight:: Crassulaceae:: Sedum oreades from VOF- NS 32

In that case it may be Rhodiola wallichiana as per images herein and as per images from Valley of Flowers in FOI at Wallich's Rhodiola

On 6 November 2016 at 21:51, J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks a lot, Chadwell ji.

[J.M. Garg]

Thanks, Chadwell ji

On 16 Nov 2016 8:14 pm, "C CHADWELL" <chrischa...@btinternet.com> wrote:

I repeat that Rhodiola is an extremely difficult genus.  I shall look into the genus in the Himalaya further

in due course but at this point cannot meaningfully comment further.  Much easier to say what a specimen

is not, rather than what definitely is.  Will not help the situation of frequent misidentifications by prematurely

confirming an identification.   At present I am not certain how to distinguish Rhodiola wallichiana.

In some cases the characteristics visible in some photos are insufficient to be sure. 

 

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk

---

From: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>

To: "chrischadwell261@btinternet.com" <chrischadwell261@btinternet.com>
Cc: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>; Nidhan Singh <nidhans...@gmail.com>; Tabish <tab...@gmail.com>

To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

[J.M. Garg]

Thanks, Chadwell ji

On 16 Nov 2016 8:15 pm, "C CHADWELL" <chrischa...@btinternet.com> wrote:

I repeat that Rhodiola is an extremely difficult genus.  I shall look into the genus in the Himalaya further

in due course but at this point cannot meaningfully comment further.  Much easier to say what a specimen

is not, rather than what definitely is.  Will not help the situation of frequent misidentifications by prematurely

confirming an identification.   At present I am not certain how to distinguish Rhodiola wallichiana.

In some cases the characteristics visible in some photos are insufficient to be sure. 

 

Best Wishes,

Chris Chadwell

81 Parlaunt Road 
SLOUGH
SL3 8BE
UK

www.shpa.org.uk

---

From: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>

To: "chrischadwell261@btinternet.com" <chrischadwell261@btinternet.com>
Cc: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>; Nidhan Singh <nidhans...@gmail.com>; Tabish <tab...@gmail.com>