Ficus subincisa

[J.M. Garg]

Thanks, Dipankar ji    

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Mr. Dipankar Borah <dipanka...@goalparacollege.ac.in>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 at 07:40
Subject: Fwd: Inclusion in POWO
To: J. Garg M. <jmg...@gmail.com>

Ficus subincisa

Behali Reserve Forest, Biswanath, Assam, India

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

[J.M. Garg]

This should be Ficus heteropleura Blume

Basal bracts not clear in photos, and leaves lack coarsely toothed margins above the middle which are present in F. subincisa.

Kind regards,
Varun

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

[J.M. Garg]

Thanks, Dipankar ji

On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 12:45, Dipoo Dipankar Borah <dipankar...@gmail.com> wrote:

This is definitely not F.heteropleurea. I have once confirmed it with the help of Sudhakar Ji. But I might have misplaced the name with F.subulata. But will confirm soon. 

But it's not F.heteropleurea, which have pubescent figs, and long caudate and coriaceous leaves. 

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

[J.M. Garg]

Thanks a lot, Varun ji

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Varun Sharma
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 at 14:18
Subject: Re: Ficus subincisa
To: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>

Dear Sir,

Thanks for confirmation by Mr Dipankar Ji, but photos are in macro shots and hard to differentiate sessile or sub-sessile receptacles found in Ficus subulata, beside sessile receptacles stipules are as long as the petioles in F. subulata.

Whereas stipules are minute in attached leaf photograph.

Kind regards,
Varun

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

[J.M. Garg]

Hi, Dipankar ji,

Could you pl. confirm?

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

[Saroj Kasaju]

I guess Ficus subincisa  in FOI should be Ficus sarmentosa Buch.-Ham. ex Sm. !

Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

[J.M. Garg]

I think the FOI page has already been deleted.

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

[Saroj Kasaju]

Yes Mr. Garg. Already Checked .

Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

[J.M. Garg]

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg