Sender notified by Mailtrack | 07/13/22, 01:14:54 PM |
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/8e57b84b-0ec9-4b00-b006-f5ee23632868n%40googlegroups.com.
yes sir, checked.
Thanks & RegardsSunit SinghAlpine Research Scholar
Sender notified by
Mailtrack
07/13/22, 06:43:37 PM
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/ff8affe7-1cfc-4584-8577-0d1d14b7c15en%40googlegroups.com.
Sender notified by Mailtrack |
07/14/22, 11:30:20 AM |
Yes, it is reported in Gaur, 1999 (Flora of the District Garhwal Northwest Himalaya). The citations in it show that species is also mentioned in Flora of Chamoli vol-1 by Naithani (1984). In The Flora of British India it is described at page 382 of Volume 2 under the name Stravensia glaucescens Lindl. Osmaston 1927 (A Forest Flora for Kumaon) also described it at page 221 under the same name Stravensia glaucescens Lindl. This shows that the species is mentioned under different names in different floras. Even in Uniyal et al. 2007 (Flowering Plants of Uttarakhand A Checklist) is listed under the name Photinia nussia (D.Don) Kalkman and same name is used in Rosaceae of Flora of Nepal.
In flora of India checklist (online) listed it under the name Photinia nussia (Buch.Ham. ex D. Don) Kalkman (to see click here)
Currently accepted name of this species is Stranvaesia nussia (Buch.Ham. ex D. Don) Decne in POWO which is not used in Flora of India checklist (online) or in Hard copy (Mao & Dash, 2020) which prompted me to say it is new to Indian flora, which it is not.
Synonyms must also be checked before any conclusion, which I didn't and so my sincere apologies for this.