You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
This is not Ampelocissus latifolia [Vitis latifolia]. In A.latifolia the leaves are orbiculare,cordate, 3-7 lobed,sharply toothed and reticulately veined. Sending some of my photographs of A.latifolia taken on my property for comparison. [The leaves are admixed with those of Dioscorea bulbifera].
--- On Sat, 6/19/10, tanay bose <tanay...@gmail.com> wrote:
You are right. The leaves in the second photograph are definitely of Kala Kuda [Wrightia tinctoria]. The leaves of the climber are not seen in any of the photographs. [What caused the confusion was the 'hairless and unlobed' & the 'glabrous and entire' statements made by you and Tanay].
--- On Sat, 6/19/10, R. Vijayasankar <vijay.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
We are referring to the original photographs in question sent by Ms.Shobha Chavda.
--- On Sat, 6/19/10, Dinesh Valke <dinesh...@gmail.com> wrote: