No sir
The plant is different from that
The leaves are glabrous on both sides
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/fe0c6417-229b-4abb-9039-1c727d08ef5en%40googlegroups.com.
Secondary and tertiary nervation is also different from the Ficus hispida!
Thank you
Seems to Lauraceae member may be Litsea monopetala
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CALNKF_X-g0TrZ4DeqDC5hTNpN6QV%3DqTPxAyeC4uj2qv%2B3BZsXA%40mail.gmail.com.
Yes dear Kumar prabhat Sir for helping the id
It's close to Litsea monopetala
Thank u
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAGCJLmgqc8zowXHAwB5ceymCt92%3DRxVTGr%3DV0ZXo_C13A4ptNg%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CALNKF_U-UOa75pqaLE9Ra6sH72m--Qez4uvmKQsg2DwUR0uhuQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
Some earlier relevant feedback:
Ficus hispida?: https://indiabiodiversity.org/observation/show/18589648- from me |
Yes, I agree with Ficus hispida regards Radha |
No sir |
The plant is different from that |
The leaves are glabrous on both sides- from Mandru ji |
Secondary and tertiary nervation is also different from the Ficus hispida!- from Mandru ji |
Seems to Lauraceae member may be Litsea monopetala- from Prabhat ji |
Yes dear Kumar prabhat Sir for helping the id |
It's close to Litsea monopetala - from Mandru ji |
Maybe. |
I am not sure as per images at |