well said and expressed...
my frustration with herbal medicine was the other way around...like in
your example of Palak...]
to many regional names in too many books ..authors of which claimed to
be experts and if they were also examiners or their pet students were
examiners ..that was a terror....
so I am very grateful for the scientific binomials, they have brought
some semblance of order... although their work goes on... and on.. to
further refinement of classification ...
usha di
=======
> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Anand Kumar Bhatt
> <
anandkbh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > What is the rationale behind changing the names of plants without any rhyme
> > or reason. This is such irritant for a layman like me. You fix a name in
> > your mnd, and suddenly somebody informs yu that the new name is noot XYZ but
> > XYZ1. Is this the way to maintain the superiority of the subject expert?
> > AK
>
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Gurcharan Singh <
singh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> Urararia alopecuroides was earlier under U. lapopus DC. (FBI 2: 156), now
> >> considered as synonym of
>
> >> *Uraria* *lagopodoides* (L.) DC
>
> >> Yes this could be possible as most leaves are simple (rather unifoliate)
>
> >> --
> >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> >> Retired Associate Professor
> >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> >> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089
> >>
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:49 AM, H S <
hemsan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> I guess Uraria alopecuroides
>
> >>> regards,
>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Gurcharan Singh <
singh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>>> Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please.
>
> >>>> Some earlier relevant feedback:
>
> >>>> “Looks like *Uraria crinita*, to me.
> > <
http://www.flickr.com/photos/akbhatt/>(NEW PHOTOS HAVE BEEN ADDED ON 15