Thanks Smita ji for useful information. This should really help in understanding our photographs.
--
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
Hi,
These are mine. Taken on my property in August 2010. Presume they are Physalis minima.
With regards,
|
Hi,
Thank you Prof. Singh for your feedback.
Dr. Almeida in his 'Flora of Maharashtra' Vol 3-B lists Physalis angulata & Physalis minima as distinct species.
Furthermore, he states that though P.angulata has been recorded from a few places in Maharashtra, it is a native of the West Indies.
Will therefore have to stick with my plants being Physalis mininma.
Regards,
Neil Soares. |
Hi Prof. Singh, Sought a clarification from Dr. Almeida. His take on this:
- Most of the Physalis species found in India are not indigenous but introduced from the Americas. - Linnaeus described Physalis minima and hence a type specimen must exist. - The nomenclature of Indian species is rather ambiguous - specimens initially described [possibly even in Cooke’s Flora] as P. minima had large flowers and would therefore now be labelled P.angulata. - P.minima [with tiny flowers] does exist and has been recorded by Dr. Almeida in a few places including the Borivali N.P., Bombay.
My plants have large flowers and would therefore be P.angulata. |