Identifiation for this Cardamine sp.

[Shakir ahmad (Ammatuer Taxonomist)]

Location:Kulgam.

Habit:small herb. 

[Saroj Kasaju]

Cardamine impatiens L. ??

Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:04 PM Shakir ahmad (Ammatuer Taxonomist) <saadiks...@gmail.com> wrote:

Location:Kulgam.

Habit:small herb. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAKSJquG-1WXOAD9_5WMP%2BTEMF9bdsAfNuDvp%3D8HpfB9mB-yV8w%40mail.gmail.com.

[J.M. Garg]

Hi, Shakir ji,

What minimum we want for a proper id is a habit image, habitat image, side view of the flowers showing calyx, clear picture of the leaves showing its position on the stem or branch etc. 

Images posted by you are mostly flowers (without showing calyx and sepals).

Our given ids here are going to be wrong (despite our best efforts), even if provided based on your incomplete set of images. Also it takes about three to four times more effort to arrive at tentative ids based on such incomplete sets.

We are ready to help you with the ids, provided to post a complete set of images.

So pl. post a complete set of images (you can post as many as you want within 8 mb at a time and remaining in reply to the same mail) in the 1st instance only.

Based on these images, Cardamine macrophylla Willd. is also possible. 

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

[J.M. Garg]

Thanks, Shakir ji.

Such images are required in the initial mail itself.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Shakir Ahmad (Amateur Taxonomist) <saadiks...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 12:50
Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:386747] Identifiation for this Cardamine sp.
To: J.M. Garg <jmg...@gmail.com>

Please check again sir. I have added more photographs. 

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

[Saroj Kasaju]

I don't think it matches with Cardamine macrophylla !

Thank you.

Saroj Kasaju

To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFA%3D3K%3DLxPugnVbNSPGbf2qGaf%3DpTFKcCoJco5oBFuU1VQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[Gurcharan Singh]

C. macrophylla would have much larger flowers and distinctly toothed leaves, this should be C. impatiens only, first image does suggest auricles at base, leaves somewhat lobed but margin entire. Image focusing the leaf base would clinch the issue.

[Saroj Kasaju]

Thank you Gurucharan Sir !

Saroj Kasaju

To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/359c5e8d-129e-4307-b6d5-580492dfe74fn%40googlegroups.com.