FALSE HISTORY AS DISHED BY CONGRESS / COMMUNIST BASTARDS WHO MILK THE SYSTEM FOR MATERIAL BENEFITS ....~~~~
3 views
Skip to first unread message
ravi
Aug 12, 2009, 7:28:08 AM8/12/09
to Indian History
FALSE HISTORY AS DISHED BY CONGRESS / COMMUNIST BASTARDS WHO M,ILK THE
SYSTEM FOR MATERIAL BENEFITS ....~~~~
Distortion of Indian History for Muslim appeasement, Part 6C
Posted by Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari on 8/10/09
faithfreedom2 @ gmail.com
http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/08/10/distortion-of-indian-history-f...
By Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari
It has been mentioned in the previous article that, according to the
Encyclopaedia Britannica, Shah Jahan floated a global tender and the
respondents were asked to submit designs and wooden models along with
the tender. Innumerable plans with models had been received by the
authorities and at last, according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica,
“The plan was prepared by a council of architects from India ,
Persia , Central Asia and beyond and the credit for the final plan was
given to Ustad Isa of either Persian or Turkish origin.” [1] Some
historians believe that the name of the chief architect was Makamal
Khan. And some others believe that his name was Abdul Karim.[2]
It is really amusing to note that, according to some Western
historians, the chief architect was from Venice , Italy and his name
was Jarenimo Verona [2]. But, most surprisingly, a French traveller
called Thevenot, in 1650, said that the Taj Mahal was an excellent
example of India ’s finest artitechtural and artistic skill. [2] From
the above discussions, it is not difficult to understand that there is
no authentic source that contains the name of the chief architect and
the names provided above are outcomes of wild conjectures. But the
Munj Bateswar edict clearly states that the building, now called Taj
Mahal, was built by the Chandel King Paramardi Dev nearly 500 years
before the times of Shah Jahan and hence its architect must have been
none other than an Indian or a Hindu architect.
Mr D J Kale, in his Epigraphica India, has given a genealogy of the
Chandratreya or Chandel Kings, that shows that King Paramardi Dev
ascended the throne in 1165 (or 1167 AD).[3] According to R C
Majumdar, the Chandel Raj Paramardi Dev ruled from 1163 to 1203 AD.
[4] It has also been mentioned earlier that, the Munj Bateswar Edict
was laid in 1212 Vikram Samvat or 1156 AD. Or in other words, it was
laid nearly 475 years before the death of Arjumand Banu, the wife of
Shah Jahan.
The so called secular and Marxist historians of India, according to
their policy of Muslim appeasement and to glorify the foreign Muslim
invaders, are used to project Shah Jahan as a luxurious and foppish
man having refined taste and say that due to this reason Shah Jahan
used marble to build palaces and monuments. So, the historian S K
Saraswati writes, “Imbued with the prevailing ideas and his (Shah
Jahan’s) love for pomp and luxury and display of splendour, Shah
Jahan chose marble as the chief medium for all his architectural
undertakings.”
[5] There is no doubt that Mr Saraswati points to Taj
Mahal of Agra and the marble palace, called Dewan-i-Khas, inside the
Red Fort in Delhi . But the Munj Bateswar Edict has disproved the
claim of Shah Jahan’s authorship of Taj Mahal. It has also been
pointed out earlier that Shah Jahan’s authorship of the Red Fort in
Delhi is a fraud. But these spineless slave historians are harping on
the same string and say that Shah Jahan built Taj Mahal in Agra and
the Red Fort in Delhi .
It has been mentioned in the previous article that, according to the
Munj Bateswar Edict, the Chandel King Paramardi Dev built two marble
temples, one for Lord Vishnu and the other of Lord Shiva, in Agra and
the Muslim invaders Shah Jahan converted the temple of Vishnu to the
mausoleum of Idmat-ud-daula and the temple of Shiva to the mausoleum
of his wife Arjumand Banu. And there are so many evidence to show that
the building, called Taj Mahal today, was, firstly a Hindu temple and
more pointedly, a temple of Lord Shiva .
A few evidence that Taj Mahal was a Hindu Temple :
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2887-1/
figure1+Red+Lotus.jpg“>
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2887-1/
figure1+Red+Lotus.jpg“>
Figure 1, Red lotus at apex of the entrance
As shown in Figure-1, there is a red lotus at the apex of the main
entrance of the so called Taj Mahal. There is no doubt that, Hindus
use lotus for worshipping their deities and the lotus is a Hindu
symbol.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2889-1/
figure2+OM
+design.jpg“>
Figure 2, The figure of the OM design, in Devnagrii, within the
carved marble flower, is definitely a Hindu design.
The Figure-2 shows the design of OM in Devnagri, carved out of stone
in the wall of Taj Mahal. It is well known that OM and Swastika are
considered holiest symbols by the Hindus. It should also be mentioned
here that, had the building, now called Taj Mahal, been built by the
Muslim ruler Shah Jahan, he would certainly not have tolerated Hindu
symbols like OM and lotus in stone carvings of Taj.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2891-1/
figure3+conch+shell.jpg“>
Figure 3, Here is an example of the conch shell design incorporated
into the three top central petals in the flowers.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2893-1/figure4+
+gates.jpg“>
Figure 4. In a detail on the gate, we can see two elephant’s trunks,
one on either side of the design, which would indicate Lord Ganesh.
The Figure-3 shows conch-shells, as petals of flowers, carved out in
the stone wall of Taj Mahal. It is exclusively a Hindu religious
Practice to blow conch-shells during worshipping of gods and
goddesses. Hence conch-shell is a Hindu symbol which Muslims abhor.
So, the existence of these conch-shells on the stone wall of Taj Mahal
is a strong evidence the once upon a time the building, now called Taj
Mahal, was a Hindu temple. In Figure 4, the reader should notice that
the Idol of Lord Ganesha has been carved out of leaves and flowers.
One should also notice two elephant trunks on both sides of the idol
of Lord Ganesha. This provides strong evidence that the building, now
called Taj Mahal, was originally a Hindu temple.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2895-1/figure
+5+SouthGate.jpg“>
Figure 5.Picture of the South Gate of typical Vedic style
The Figure-5 shows the top of the South Gate of Taj Mahal. One should
notice inverted water-pots, which is a Hindu system of decoration.
The number pots must always be in odd numbers and there are 11 in
the picture. One should also notice the design of cobras in pairs,
just below the gallery. It should be mentioned here that copying
Allah’s creation, either in painting or in sculpture, is a terrible
sin in Islam. So, there is no doubt that, had the Muslims been the
designer and builder of the building, now called Taj Mahal, they would
not have incorporated such designs declared sinful in Islam. One
should also notice that the Koranic inscriptions were a graffiti added
by Shah Jahan in order give the entire edifice an Islamic face.
The Figure-6 shows the Naqqar Khana or Naubat Khana, alias a Music
House, in the Taj Complex, which is a contradiction. A mausoleum is
generally a place of silence and hence the existence of this Music
House is a strong evidence that the building, now called Taj Mahal,
was originally not a mausoleum. On the contrary, it provides a
strong evidence in favour of the claim that originally it was a
Hindu temple complex, as a Music House is an integral part of many
temple complexes of the Hindus. In a Hindu temple complex, the Naobat
Khana or the Music House is used for playing Shehnai and other musical
instruments at dawn and at sunset.
The Figure-7 shows a corridor, built according to typical Vedic or
Hindu design. The Vedic or Hindu design is reflected in the design of
the ceiling of a room, shown in Figure-8. Hindu, particularly Rajput
design, is also prominent in the design of the veranda shown in
Figure-9.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2897-1/figure
+6+Naqqar+Khan.jpg“>
Figure 6. Naqqar Khana alias Music House in the Taj Mahal
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2899-1/
figure7+Vedic+Style.jpg“>
Figure 7. Typical Vedic style corridors
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2901-1/
figure8+vedic+design.jpg“>
Figure 8.Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2903-1/
figure9+Veranda.jpg“>
Figure 9. Note the veranda is typical Rajput architecture
Tavernier mentioned in his Travel in India that a big shopping market
had sprung up surrounding the Taj complex. Such markets usually grow
up around a Hindu temple complex, but not in a Muslim mausoleum. Even
today, one finds such market complexes around the temples at Benares,
Puri, Hardwar , Madurai , Kalighat in Kolkata and so on. It is also an
evidence that proves that the Taj Mahal of today was originally a
temple complex of the Hindus.
In this article, we have provided a few evidence to show that the
building now known as Taj Mahal, was originally a Hindu temple
complex and in the next instalment, we shall try prove that the said
temple complex was dedicated to Lord Shiva.
(To be continued)
References:
[1] Encyclopaedia Britannica, (1964), XXI, 759.
[2] A C Roy, Bharater Itihas (in Bengali), I, 186.
[3] D J Kale, Epigraphica India , published by S D Kale & M D Kale, I,
140-141.
[4] R.C. Majumdar (General Editor), The History and Culture of the
Indian People, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan (in 12 volumes), Mumbai (1996)
V, 122.
[5] R.C. Majumdar, ibid, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Mumbai (1996) VII,
781.
SYSTEM FOR MATERIAL BENEFITS ....~~~~
Distortion of Indian History for Muslim appeasement, Part 6C
Posted by Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari on 8/10/09
faithfreedom2 @ gmail.com
http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/08/10/distortion-of-indian-history-f...
By Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari
It has been mentioned in the previous article that, according to the
Encyclopaedia Britannica, Shah Jahan floated a global tender and the
respondents were asked to submit designs and wooden models along with
the tender. Innumerable plans with models had been received by the
authorities and at last, according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica,
“The plan was prepared by a council of architects from India ,
Persia , Central Asia and beyond and the credit for the final plan was
given to Ustad Isa of either Persian or Turkish origin.” [1] Some
historians believe that the name of the chief architect was Makamal
Khan. And some others believe that his name was Abdul Karim.[2]
It is really amusing to note that, according to some Western
historians, the chief architect was from Venice , Italy and his name
was Jarenimo Verona [2]. But, most surprisingly, a French traveller
called Thevenot, in 1650, said that the Taj Mahal was an excellent
example of India ’s finest artitechtural and artistic skill. [2] From
the above discussions, it is not difficult to understand that there is
no authentic source that contains the name of the chief architect and
the names provided above are outcomes of wild conjectures. But the
Munj Bateswar edict clearly states that the building, now called Taj
Mahal, was built by the Chandel King Paramardi Dev nearly 500 years
before the times of Shah Jahan and hence its architect must have been
none other than an Indian or a Hindu architect.
Mr D J Kale, in his Epigraphica India, has given a genealogy of the
Chandratreya or Chandel Kings, that shows that King Paramardi Dev
ascended the throne in 1165 (or 1167 AD).[3] According to R C
Majumdar, the Chandel Raj Paramardi Dev ruled from 1163 to 1203 AD.
[4] It has also been mentioned earlier that, the Munj Bateswar Edict
was laid in 1212 Vikram Samvat or 1156 AD. Or in other words, it was
laid nearly 475 years before the death of Arjumand Banu, the wife of
Shah Jahan.
The so called secular and Marxist historians of India, according to
their policy of Muslim appeasement and to glorify the foreign Muslim
invaders, are used to project Shah Jahan as a luxurious and foppish
man having refined taste and say that due to this reason Shah Jahan
used marble to build palaces and monuments. So, the historian S K
Saraswati writes, “Imbued with the prevailing ideas and his (Shah
Jahan’s) love for pomp and luxury and display of splendour, Shah
Jahan chose marble as the chief medium for all his architectural
undertakings.”
[5] There is no doubt that Mr Saraswati points to Taj
Mahal of Agra and the marble palace, called Dewan-i-Khas, inside the
Red Fort in Delhi . But the Munj Bateswar Edict has disproved the
claim of Shah Jahan’s authorship of Taj Mahal. It has also been
pointed out earlier that Shah Jahan’s authorship of the Red Fort in
Delhi is a fraud. But these spineless slave historians are harping on
the same string and say that Shah Jahan built Taj Mahal in Agra and
the Red Fort in Delhi .
It has been mentioned in the previous article that, according to the
Munj Bateswar Edict, the Chandel King Paramardi Dev built two marble
temples, one for Lord Vishnu and the other of Lord Shiva, in Agra and
the Muslim invaders Shah Jahan converted the temple of Vishnu to the
mausoleum of Idmat-ud-daula and the temple of Shiva to the mausoleum
of his wife Arjumand Banu. And there are so many evidence to show that
the building, called Taj Mahal today, was, firstly a Hindu temple and
more pointedly, a temple of Lord Shiva .
A few evidence that Taj Mahal was a Hindu Temple :
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2887-1/
figure1+Red+Lotus.jpg“>
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2887-1/
figure1+Red+Lotus.jpg“>
Figure 1, Red lotus at apex of the entrance
As shown in Figure-1, there is a red lotus at the apex of the main
entrance of the so called Taj Mahal. There is no doubt that, Hindus
use lotus for worshipping their deities and the lotus is a Hindu
symbol.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2889-1/
figure2+OM
+design.jpg“>
Figure 2, The figure of the OM design, in Devnagrii, within the
carved marble flower, is definitely a Hindu design.
The Figure-2 shows the design of OM in Devnagri, carved out of stone
in the wall of Taj Mahal. It is well known that OM and Swastika are
considered holiest symbols by the Hindus. It should also be mentioned
here that, had the building, now called Taj Mahal, been built by the
Muslim ruler Shah Jahan, he would certainly not have tolerated Hindu
symbols like OM and lotus in stone carvings of Taj.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2891-1/
figure3+conch+shell.jpg“>
Figure 3, Here is an example of the conch shell design incorporated
into the three top central petals in the flowers.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2893-1/figure4+
+gates.jpg“>
Figure 4. In a detail on the gate, we can see two elephant’s trunks,
one on either side of the design, which would indicate Lord Ganesh.
The Figure-3 shows conch-shells, as petals of flowers, carved out in
the stone wall of Taj Mahal. It is exclusively a Hindu religious
Practice to blow conch-shells during worshipping of gods and
goddesses. Hence conch-shell is a Hindu symbol which Muslims abhor.
So, the existence of these conch-shells on the stone wall of Taj Mahal
is a strong evidence the once upon a time the building, now called Taj
Mahal, was a Hindu temple. In Figure 4, the reader should notice that
the Idol of Lord Ganesha has been carved out of leaves and flowers.
One should also notice two elephant trunks on both sides of the idol
of Lord Ganesha. This provides strong evidence that the building, now
called Taj Mahal, was originally a Hindu temple.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2895-1/figure
+5+SouthGate.jpg“>
Figure 5.Picture of the South Gate of typical Vedic style
The Figure-5 shows the top of the South Gate of Taj Mahal. One should
notice inverted water-pots, which is a Hindu system of decoration.
The number pots must always be in odd numbers and there are 11 in
the picture. One should also notice the design of cobras in pairs,
just below the gallery. It should be mentioned here that copying
Allah’s creation, either in painting or in sculpture, is a terrible
sin in Islam. So, there is no doubt that, had the Muslims been the
designer and builder of the building, now called Taj Mahal, they would
not have incorporated such designs declared sinful in Islam. One
should also notice that the Koranic inscriptions were a graffiti added
by Shah Jahan in order give the entire edifice an Islamic face.
The Figure-6 shows the Naqqar Khana or Naubat Khana, alias a Music
House, in the Taj Complex, which is a contradiction. A mausoleum is
generally a place of silence and hence the existence of this Music
House is a strong evidence that the building, now called Taj Mahal,
was originally not a mausoleum. On the contrary, it provides a
strong evidence in favour of the claim that originally it was a
Hindu temple complex, as a Music House is an integral part of many
temple complexes of the Hindus. In a Hindu temple complex, the Naobat
Khana or the Music House is used for playing Shehnai and other musical
instruments at dawn and at sunset.
The Figure-7 shows a corridor, built according to typical Vedic or
Hindu design. The Vedic or Hindu design is reflected in the design of
the ceiling of a room, shown in Figure-8. Hindu, particularly Rajput
design, is also prominent in the design of the veranda shown in
Figure-9.
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2897-1/figure
+6+Naqqar+Khan.jpg“>
Figure 6. Naqqar Khana alias Music House in the Taj Mahal
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2899-1/
figure7+Vedic+Style.jpg“>
Figure 7. Typical Vedic style corridors
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2901-1/
figure8+vedic+design.jpg“>
Figure 8.Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room
<img src=”http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/d/2903-1/
figure9+Veranda.jpg“>
Figure 9. Note the veranda is typical Rajput architecture
Tavernier mentioned in his Travel in India that a big shopping market
had sprung up surrounding the Taj complex. Such markets usually grow
up around a Hindu temple complex, but not in a Muslim mausoleum. Even
today, one finds such market complexes around the temples at Benares,
Puri, Hardwar , Madurai , Kalighat in Kolkata and so on. It is also an
evidence that proves that the Taj Mahal of today was originally a
temple complex of the Hindus.
In this article, we have provided a few evidence to show that the
building now known as Taj Mahal, was originally a Hindu temple
complex and in the next instalment, we shall try prove that the said
temple complex was dedicated to Lord Shiva.
(To be continued)
References:
[1] Encyclopaedia Britannica, (1964), XXI, 759.
[2] A C Roy, Bharater Itihas (in Bengali), I, 186.
[3] D J Kale, Epigraphica India , published by S D Kale & M D Kale, I,
140-141.
[4] R.C. Majumdar (General Editor), The History and Culture of the
Indian People, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan (in 12 volumes), Mumbai (1996)
V, 122.
[5] R.C. Majumdar, ibid, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Mumbai (1996) VII,
781.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages