The terminology of history is derived from Greek word ‘Historia’ meaning there by an enquiry.

[yogesh saxena]

The terminology of history is derived from Greek word ‘Historia’
meaning there by an enquiry. Since the enquiry is nothing but the same
is attributed to the different branch of knowledge. Thus the
inquisitiveness is always generated in educated mind. The history
should not be guided solely on etymological terminology. The meaning
of ‘Itihas’ which is a Sanskrit word leads to three terminology .The
first one namely ‘iti’ means such and such (a happening or
event) ,’ha’ means indefinitely while ‘aas’ means happened. Thus the
history is chronological happening of the different event during the
past period.
Arab mission of India’.Our scientific inventions have now provided us
a great insight to reveal the truth, which are happening in the outer
atmosphere. Since due to the technological advancement of conducting
the research regarding the authorship of the monuments built by
different Hindu rulers prior to the conquest by its invaders thus we
may shift our endeavor in search of the truth. History will always
deal with those who wielded power. In Russia the czars lost power to
the proletariat, the communist party wielded all power and the Russian
History of post 1917 era would mostly talk of the proletariat and
monolithic communist party.
Some of the historians have deliberately, unknowingly while some
cowardicely lacked the nerve to declare that these rulers have cheated
the public in the name of Indian History. Thus the distortion,
perversion and anomalies of the misleading inaccuracies and
fabrications are required to be exposed before the masses as the
minority community of our Muslim citizens may also be enlighten that
the foundation on which the Muslim invaders was dependent are
themselves non existent throughout the world. There may be the minor
differences at the beginning between the followers of a particular
religion but it is undesirable for the majority of the population that
the invaders who ruled India for about one thousand years may not be
credited with the authorship of the monuments to their credit. The
monuments at Delhi, Agra, Fatehpur Sikri, Allahabad, Ahmedabad and in
Naini other prominent cities were built by Indians who constructed
the Madurai Temple, Rameshwaram, Konark, Khajuraho, Ajanta, Ellora,
Dilwara Temple and mighty forts at Ranthanbhor ,Ambar, Udaipur and
Jaipur itself. This is providing and impact upon the psychology of
most of the citizens that despite the atrocities committed by
foreigners like Afghans, Turks, Iranians, Mongols, Abyssinians, Kazaks
and Uzbeks, the monuments built by Hindu may still be credited for
being constructed by these invaders and as such the aggressive
attitude adopted by these persons throughout the world may get a jolt
through the exposure of the falsehood, on the basis of which the
foundation of a particular religion are based from mediaeval period.

Long slavery, paradoxically enough, makes the slave to
look upon the very change that bind him as his life support. This
story was told to the convict in ancient time and who was confined in
the dingy cell for fifteen years. After fifteen year the detainee was
set free and he gingerly step out of the prison gate. His eyes, which
were used to the dim light wilted at the bright sunshine outside
everything including traffic, the gazing eyes were the strange look to
the detainee and as such he felt terrified. He took a long look at the
outside world and thereafter he inhaled a deep breath and there after
by a sudden dash he again reached to his dog’s tether in the cell as
his imprisonment has sapped his self-confidence. This is what has
happened in India. This feeling utter destitution, dejection,
desperation and the loss of all confidence is the result of our
slavery by which the Indians have forgotten their own past history,
lost freedom and obliviousness of the delights of an unfettered life
thus it is necessary to keep the flame of the truth burning in the
heart of every enlightened citizen as the majority of the public is
unaware of the truth. The glory of our country may only be restored
when our traditional heritage culture may revive every citizen from
unadulterated history. The historical concepts, which were distorted
during the long period of slavery, may become a task of utmost
importance and urgency. An inadequate understanding on impressionable
citizen has resulted the further accessibility in implanting the
misleading concepts and there by breaking the heads and idols of the
fellow citizen due to the segmentation of the society in many
composition. A true history must atleast be written in the
contemporary language and it should remain independent from
interpolation otherwise the very existence of our cultural heritage
may be evaporated from the sight of the future generation.
Later Percy Brown, James Fergusson, Sir Kenneth
Clarke, Sir Bannister Fletcher and Encyclopaedia Britannica
orchestrated the same cunning tune of Cunnigham. That resulted in
firmly establishing and perpetuating a colossal archaeological fraud
which is being sedulously taught all over the world as profound
academic truth and is echoed in newspaper articles and telecasts for
over a century. Cunningham’s suggestion was obviously highly
appreciated. Because when he retired from the army as a Major General
he was straightaway appointed the first archeological surveyor of
India in 1861,as director from 1862 to 1865 and as Director General
from 1871 to 1885. Thus the historical data based on archeological
study conducted by Cunningham are scheming brain of notorious design
regarding their vagueness and
deceptive notions. The archeological survey of India was dramatically
closed from 1861 to 1865 when the two assistant of Cunningham namely J
D Beglar and Carlleyle took over the charge and prepare the list of
historical monuments with fabricated historical records. Consequently
persons working around the world as the expert Muslim known as
saracenic architecture in museum became the pseudo experts unwittingly
perpetuating the fraud with the people. T he historical cities were
converted to Islam and the pre Muslim edifices built according to the
Vedic architecture were vanished from existence.
The ancient Indian history is remarkable from the
time of the epic of Ramayana and Mahabharata. There are the evidence
that their exists the Hindu palaces having the creation of it by the
marble and other precious stone. In the ancient time there was
sculputure based on our ethical and religious concepts. The cultural
heritage was in existence in the form of iron pillars,the mandate of
the ruler on copper scripts and the creation of the artistic image
indicating civilization on the different religious temple of the
contemporary period. These were the valuable antique which were
ruthlessly destructed by the foreign invaders. The portraits of the
ruler and their identification could be seen on the rocks and coins of
the relevant period which are hidden inside the earth due to the
barbaric destruction of our Hindu heritage.the prominent place of
thsee heritage found are at Mohinjaddeo ,Harrapa(Sind) ,Takshila
(Punjab),Kaushambi, Sarnath, Mathura(Uttar Pradesh), Patilaputra ,
Nalanda(Bihar), Rajgiri , Sanchi, Burhotra (Madhya Bharat),Agadi,
Vanvasi,Talkand and Maski(south).
There has been number of articles written by foreign
visitors/delegates/diplomat and ambassdors amongst whom Magastahenes
from Domiscus (Syria) and Deoneses (Egypt) are prominent .The
descirption of the great ruler Sri Chandragupta Maurya may be found
in the writing of Magasthenes.The chinese writer Faiyan left the
glimpse of Vikramaditya period thereafter Honchong came to India and
remained here for about 15 years who has described the period of
Harshavardhan religious and social coordination. Harshvardhan was the
prominent ruler of our nation. At the last we may get some description
from the article of Alavruni who came along with Mohammed Ghaznavi and
examined the traditions of Hindu which are described in (Tahikate
hind )
Thus the civilization at Sindh river at Harappa has got the enormous
storing capability of the food articles which were distribute by the
Hindu rulers during their ‘Anustan’ in the different part of our
country .The discovery of ‘Godam’ meant for storage of the grains is
still found in Harrapa civilization which has become a part of
Pakistan after th division of our country. It is evident that the
people of the contemporary period were having their expertise in
molding the copper pots for storage of the valuable herbal extracts
meant for providing the cure from the ailments. All these cultural
heritage of our Hindu civilization has not been preserved by our
archeological department.
The period of destruction after reaching to the optimum
heights after the propagation of Jain religion and Buddhism, may be
relate back from the period of Ajatshatru , Nand Samrajya when
Sikander invaded our country in 267 B.C. at Peshawar. He fought a
battle from King Puru near Jhelum river and due to natural calamity
of unprecedented rains ,the elephant could not provide any impact upon
aggressors who were fully equipped to fight the Guerilla battle. The
defeat of King Abhishad in Kashmir was the beginning of external
invasion by the foreign invaders.
During the Maurya dynasty, the King Chandragupta Maurya who
was getting instructions from great Chanakya had successfully defeated
Celucus but subsequently he entered with a compromise with
Chandragupta Maurya as a result of which Chandragupta got eastern
part of Unan namely aria , archosia , gadrosia and
paronishdi.Chandragupta Maurya subsequently married with the daughter
of King of Unan. Thus our country under the domination of the dynasty
of Chandragupta Maurya was extended up to Unan to Mysore in the south.
Thus except Kashmir and Kalinga the boundary our country was extended
upto Afghanistan and Baluchistan. But unfortunately the period of
Chandragupta Maurya could not remain intact.There was the revolt at
tatshila which was suppressed during the reign of Bindusar by great
ruler of our nation namely Ashoka the great .King Ashoka fought a
battle with Kalinga and in this manner the dimension of the area which
was extended upto Baluchistan was further extended from
makaram ,sindh,kutch,kyauli,swat ki vally but Kashmir Nepal and Assam
remained in exclusion to the aforesaid domination.
Subsequently Great King Ashoka became the
disciple of Lord Buddha and he has started expansion to the percepts
of the religion by having the affixation of the symbolic predomination
adhered with the aforesaid religion. He constructed the Ashoka pillars
from mono block of a rock .On the top of which there was the symbolic
resemblance of four lion while in midst there was a chakra
comprising of 24 arches and the Bull and the elephants scriptures were
carved out in the middle of the single rock below which there was the
lotus in the downward directions. The symbolic resemblance of the
lotus became a tradition for construction of the temple. Thus we may
find out that wherever the lotus is evident on any monument with the
scripture like the vegetable leafs, grapes , peacock and other
religious offering provided to the deity kept inside the temple.
The foundation of Muslim religion were based on the
concepts of destruction of the existing values prevalent amongst the
Buddha and Hindu religion. Although prophet Mohammed was himself the
follower of Hindu religion he was initially opposed to existence of
other religious adomination. There was the preaching that whosoever he
might be ,he does not follow the Islam then there may be the army of
Muslim followers who may terrorize him for conversion to the Islam. In
this process if there may be the use of terrorism by showing of it the
follower of other religion may loose the confrontation in the
expansion of Islamic Muslim fundamentalist then even the Kuran use to
profess the aforesaid crusade. Thus after the existence of such a
drastic army of the crusaders, there was no possibility that the other
peace loving religion may still remain in existence. Unfortunately
Hindu, Jain, Buddh religion followers were dependent upon the policy
of non-violence, peace and tranquillity and under there religious
philosophy the entire world is like a family of the different
ideology. Thus the beginning of the Muslim invasion in our country
starting from the time of Mohammed Bin Quasim in 712 A.D., there was
the gruesome murder committed of King Daher and thereafter his two
daughters after outraging their modesty were handed over by Mohammed
Bin Quasim to his uncle namely Abdul Abbass of Oman. However the
Muslim ruler after been instigated by the daughters of the King Daher
got this Mohammed Bin Quasim death by putting him alive inside the
leather of the cow for invading the chastity of two girls prior to
their offering to Sultan. This was the beginning of destruction of our
cultural heritage by these ruthless invaders. The description of it
may be seen in a book written by R.C.Mazumdar namely the ‘Arab mission
of India’.
Sultan Mohammed Ghaznavi robbed Somenath
temple ultimately after invading and defeating the different Rajput
rulers for more than seventeen time from the year of 1000 to 1026 A.D.
This man was the follower of Islam who destructed many temples during
his aggression. Abdul Fateh Daud ,a Muslim ruler of Sultan was so
terrified that he offered his apology to Mohammed Ghaznavi and at the
same time Jaypal who committed the suicide instead of being
surrendered before Mohammed Ghaznavi, his son Anand Pal was also
defeated near Peshawar. In the sixth attack committed upon our nation
by Mohammed Ghaznavi. Anand Pal thereafter associate dthe King of
Ujjain, Gwalior, kalingar , kannuanj ,Delhi and Ajmer but due to the
division in the army , Mohammed Ghaznaviu again defeated him and
thereafter the he attacked on the Palace of Nagarkot Kingdom. These
invasions started from the year of 1007 upto 1027 A.D. continued to
remain near Sindhsagar Navnandh ,
Yagesghwar,Barran,Mahram,Mathura ,Kalinjar and ultimately at Katiabad
due to dis integrity of the Hindu rulers. Ultimaley Mohhamed Ghaznavi
died on 30th April 1030.
The journey of Shahabuddin Mohammed Gauri started from
1176 to 1178 for the victory of Multan and Kutch,He conducted so many
attacks with the help of King of Jammu upto 1186. He entered in Gujrat
but Mool Raj the King of Anhilavada got him defeated. However in 1191
he conquered Malinga and Shar-Hind which included the territory of
Delhi. Thus Delhi and Ajmer remained under his domination while he
attacked at Kannuaj, Chandivada (near Etawah), Gwalior and Vijana.
Gayasuddin Mohammed Gauri died in 1102.
The reason for the defeat of Rajput rulers was on account
of the fact, which is exhibited by the recital of Turk aggressors that
there is the survival of the fittest. There was no morality in the
Hindu army and as such they were defeated by the Muslim rulers. The
main reason for the defeat were the caste system, and idol worshipness
prevalent at the relevant time. The intellectuals were side tracked
and the society was divided into many segmentation in which Kshatriya
only were considered to be the fighting class amongst the Hindus. The
citizens were having the orthodox feeling and they were very much
living under the domination of superstitions. This was the reason that
the Hindus were subjected to the cruelty by the foreign
invaders.
Kutubuddin Aibak appointed a Muslim governor upon Ajmer. He
expanded the territory of Mohammed Guari to Meerut, Jhansi, Kol and
Runthambor. He converted many temples into Muslim Mosques at Gwalior
and Anhilvada. Bengal was invaded by Bakhtiyaruddin Khilji at the time
of Kutubbuddin.
There were many rulers namely Aalathmus , Razia Sultana,
Naseeruddin Mohammed, Tuglaq Khan, and ultimately Jalaluddin Khilji
came to the power. But his real nephew and son-in-law Allauddin Khilji
trapped him and killed as a traitor. He committed the murder of
Jallaluddin’s sons namely Aktali khan and Rukunniddin. This Allauddin
after getting his enemy killed became the ruler to control the
governance of the occupied territory. There was the stability in
respect of the price of food grains. The cow was sold at one by third
cost of the goat during his period. However Alluaddin died in the year
of 1316 A.D.
The starting of Gayasuddin Tuglaq and after his death one Mohammed
Tuqlaq who was called as a symbol of many contradictions at the same
time he was intelligent and cruel while on the other hand he was a
religious and lunatic but he was called as unfortunate idealistic who
shifted his capital from Delhi to Devgiri at Daulatabad .The successor
of Mahmmaed Tuglaq was Feroz Tuglaq who developed the government farm
and made the invention for the rotation of the crops. He converted
many Hindu monuments and all these monument description is described
at Fatauath- e-ferozshahi .The cities were known as
Feroza,Ferozabad,Hissar,Jaunpur and Fatehabad during his time period.
He created a army of the slaves comprising of about one lakh eighty
thousand people belonging to the inhabitant of the same place where he
was the conqueror. After the end of Tuglaq dynasty the Taimur dynasty
completely vanished the remains of Tuglaq rluers. However soon the
Taimur dynasty appointed Khijr Khan as there represntative who created
Syed regime.It has been said by the great German philosopher Gete that
the success and the defeat are the part of the same coin as the joy
and sorrow are reactionary and the unity is disintegrity are the
reflections of the same quality. This was also the reason that after
Mohhamed tuglaq there was the extinction of Muslim dynasty and there
was the beginning of hindu rulers at Vijaynagar.
Hindu Religion is still based on diversity of different
caste, Creed, Sects and Multiplicity of Religion
The correspondent of BBC, London Times, Derspegel , New
York Times ,Washington Post ,Christian Science ,Monitor Times and
‘life’ weekly’s continue to misrepresent these Hindu Building as that
of Muslim origin. The freedom of expression continues to ruthlessly
suppress the truth about these historical buildings belonging to the
pre-Muslim origin. These Historian have meticulously calculatively
kept their readership ignorant regarding the truth of pre–existing
palaces and temple prior to declare them the building as Muslim
monuments. Now our government has provided the restriction for taking
even the photograph of the prominent historical buildings in India
under the guise of archeological department as to maintain the status
quo regarding the falsehood created by the historian and to avoid the
alleged animosity between the majority class of the Hindu with the
minority Muslim. It has been revelaed by Encyclopaedias Islamia that
the Arabia itself obliterated all its past history by destroying image
before the foundation of Islam. The origin of Kaba which is the
central shrine is in itself a Hindu temple surrounded by huge shrine
consisting of 360 HIndu images belonging to Indian king Vikarmaaditya
who founded them in 58 B.C. Even the word ‘Allah’ Is a Sanskrit. Word
signifies “Mother or goddess“ while mekha in Sanskrit signifies a
sacrificial fire of Vedic worship prevalent during the pre Islamic
days. The monuments have not only been destroyed in the peninsula of
arvasthan belonging to King Vikramaditya, which was captured by the
Arabian during the Islamic invasion. The intriguing aspect of
regarding the existence of Shivalinga in Kaba shrine in Mecca is well
known as sungay aswad that is black stone.
The poetic composition of pre Islamic Arabian poets kept in famous
library called as Makahtab-e-Sultania in Istambul in turkey contains
the biographic details of these pre Islamic construction while the
second part embodies the period beginning just after prohphet
Mohammaed upto the end of Vanee- umaya dynasty resembling the Sanskrit
name of Krishnayya voice. There has been a big signboard few mile away
from Mecca banning the entry of any non Muslim in the area. This
signboard signifies the period shrine was stormed and captured by the
invader having their faith in Islam. The same position is visualized
at Azmer sharif where there is still the covering over the Shivalinga
for which the Islamic follower are strictly providing the vigilance as
it may not be disclosed the existence of the Temple of Lord Shiva.
Thus it be go on searching the different historical facts with the
open eyes we will find that there are ample evidence to deflate the
indo- saracenic architecture theory bubble.
Iron Pillar near the Qutub Tower The iron pillar
bearing a Hindu inscription has been standing un-rusted through rain
and shine for milleniums beside the so–called Qutub Minar amidst the
surrounding temples battered by Muslim hordes. Qutubuddin could never
have brought piles of material and dug a sprawling foundation for the
stone tower called (Qutub) inside the narrow confines of surrounding
temples and other building work. Dislodged stones bearing Hindu images
on one side and Arab lettering on the other found the so called Qutub
Tower also prove that Muslim conquerors staked false claim to Hindu
monuments through sculptural forgeries.
Kutub Minar This 238 ft. tall tower euphemistically called Kutub
Minar was erected by King Vikramaditya for astronomical observation
centuries before Islam was even founded.The adjoining township called
Mehrauli is the corrupt form the Sanskrit term Mihira-Awali meaning
the Mihira township. Mihira was Vikramaditya’s royal mathematician-cum-
astronomer-cum meteorologist.Even the Arabic term Kutub Minar
signifies an astronomical tower.Kutub and Kutubuddin was a subsequent
unwitting mix-up. Around the tower were 27 constellation temples which
Kutubuddin’s inscription vaunts to have destroyed.The tower too has 27
flutings. Near the first storey ceiling are 27 holes one in each is
likely. True to the significance of the term Kutub, this Tower’s
entrance faces due north.
Quwat-ul-Islam Mosque Turned into a mosque called Quwat-ul-Islam the
rows of ornamental pillars of this monument by the side of the so
called Qutub Tower are a clear proof of its having been a Hindu
temple. No genuine mosque has ever such pillars lest reciters of Namaz
standing and bending with half-closed eyes inadvertently break their
heads against them.
Nizam-ud-din Tomb The ornamental Hindu style pillars in the white
marble structure turned into Nizamuddin Tomb. The arch on the right
and parts of arches visible on either side of the dome are clear proof
that this haphazard conglomerate of heterogeneous buildings was a part
of an ancient Hindu township stormed by invading Muslim armies. Fakirs
like Nizamuddin following in their wake used to take up residence in
the ruins of battered buildings for preaching Islam to terrorize
‘infidels’. On their death they used to be buried in the ruins where
they lived. That is why tombs like those of Nizamuddin and Bakhtiar
Kaki in Delhi, Salim Chisti in Fatehpur Sikri and of Moinuddin Chisti
in Ajmer present a mix-up of Hindu structure devoid of any coherent
plan. Around the Nizamuddin tomb in Delhi are fanciful halls called
Chausath Khamba, crumbling walls, bastions, towers, decadent graves,
cellars ,plinths and cornices which are remnants of the stormed Hindu
township still remembered by the term Keel-Ukhri(Kilokri). Keel used
to be the central pillar erected when a Hindu township was planned.
Since it got up-rooted in the Muslim assault that area came to be
known as Kilokri.
So called Humayun’s Tomb Just about half a mile away from this
building known as Humayun Tomb is the narrow staircase from which
Humayun the second generation Moghul emperor fell, in Delhi. He was
carried to his palace say contemporary chronicles. This was the palace
he was carried to and it was there that he died a few days later. He
was buried in the central chamber where he lay ill as has happened
throughout Muslim history in India. This solves the tantalizing riddle
why we have tombs but apparently no palaces of luxury-steeped pleasure-
seeking alien potentates. This monument still forms part of Jaipur
Estate in Delhi. It is surrounded by ruined walls, annexes,
guesthouses and guardrooms. An arcade of arches leads to it. Close-by
is a huge annexes euphemistically called Arab-ki-Serai deriving its
name from the times that invading Arab hordes encamped in it .The
entire grounds are littered with graves of invading Muslim soldiers
slain by Hindu defenders. Before being turned into a tomb Humayun as a
usurper lived in this sprawling Hindu captured palace which was the
focal point of the ruined township since known as Kilokri. The nearby
ruins in which Fakir Nizamuddin lies buried were a part of this huge
Hindu citadel.
Roshanara Garden This is believed to be the tomb of Roshanara, the
daughter of the last powerful Moghul emperor Aurangzeb. Note that it
has neither domes nor minarets. Instead it has ornamental pillars,
Hindu arches and cupolas. Very parsimonious and hardhearted as the
Hindu-baiter Aurangzeb was he would hardly spend any money on a Hindu
style resting-place for his daughter’s corpse. Obviously, therefore,
this is a usurped Hindu garden palace commandeered to serve as a tomb
as was usual in those times.
Fatehpuri Mosque This so called Fatehpuri Mosque at one end of
Delhi’s crowded Chandni Chowk highway was a pre-Muslim Rajput temple
of the city’s guardian and royal deity Lord Shankara alias Eklingaji.
Its entrance arches have the Hindu stone flower emblems on either side
of the apex. The word ‘Fatehpuri’ means a conquered (Hindu) township.
The marble slab on the red-stone entrance proclaiming it to be a
mosque is evidently as interpolation. The monuments, arches and
pillars and cupolas are entirely of Hindu Rajput style. The so called
mosque’s rental revenue is all derived exclusively from Hindu shops
swarming its fringes. This proves that while the stalls remained with
the Hindu their temples fell a victim to conquest and conversion.
Mausoleum of Safdar Jang This so called Safdarjang tomb in Delhi was
an ancient Rajput palace which devolved on the Muslim aristocracy
through conquest .It has an ornamental Rajput style gateway and a
protective wall with watch-towers and bastions which are superfluous
for a genuine tomb. Safdarjang, an ex-chief Minister of the Nawab of
Oudh had been disgraced and dismissed prior to his death. Who would
foot the bill to build a palace for an unemployed deceased nobleman’s
corpse? A little prodding with two sharp questions brings down the
entire illusory structure of tall Muslim claims to Hindu building-
work. We ask that if Safdarjang’s corpse could afford such a
stupendous palace he should have had at least ten palaces when
living. But there is none. The other question is that if his heir and
successor built this palace for the corpse of the deceased Safdarjang
the former must himself have had tens of palaces in Delhi. But he too
had none. Our answer to this riddle is that Safdarjang and in fact all
alien Muslim rulers and noblemen were buried in their own palaces.
Diwan-I-Khas,Red Fort ,Delhi Contrary to popular belief the Red Fort
in Delhi is a very ancient structure. Prithviraj used to stay in this
Lalkot (red palace). Saffron and ochre are colours sacred to the
Hindus, but avoided by Muslims The main highway of Delhi known as
Chandni Chowk connects the Red Fort with the royal and guardian deity’
temple now turned into Fatehpuri Mosque. Around this axis was built
Old Delhi protected by a massive wall .According to Akbarnama and the
Agni Purana, Delhi was built by the Hindu King Anagpal around 372
A.D. before founding of Islam.
Agra the Taj Mahal This symphony in marble was a royal Hindu palace.
Its very name Taj Mahal signifies nothing more or less. Its octagonal
shape and the cupolas and four towers at the plinth corners are all
Hindu features. Havell, the English architect has all along stressed
that the Taj is an entirely Hindu structure in design and execution.
The four towers used to sport multi-coloured lights. The Taj precincts
are a huge building complex encompassing over three hundred rooms. The
locality was known as Jaisinghpur.
The Marble Screen at the Taj This ornate marble trelliswork entirely
in the Hindu style now encloses tow tombs believed to be those of
Mumtaz and Shahjahan .The network was stuffed with rare gems.
Traditional accounts tell us that this enclosure had silver doors and
gold railings to boot. Even Shahjahan’s and Mumtaz’s palaces never
boasted of such fabulous fixtures when the pair was alive and kicking
from the imperial throne. How come then that when Mumtaz died(1630
A.D.) all this wealth descended on earth all of a sudden. Far from
that this expensive and resplendent enclosure was made to house the
dazzling Hindu peacock throne that throne, wrongly credited to
Shahjahan, came to his possession when he dispossessed the Taj Mahal’s
last Rajput owner Jai Singh of this fabulous ancient Hindu palace.
The Gateway of Taj The gateway leading to the Taj garden is like any
other Hindu gateway tallying in every detail with those of other forts
and palaces depicted. The tiny domes over these gateways in a row
invariably make an odd figure like 5,7,9, or 11,since in Hindu
tradition the odd figure is preferred to the even. For instance donors
give away 101,501,1001 rupees but never an even figure .

Delhi Gate, Agra Fort This gateway of the Red Fort Agra is entirely
in the traditional Rajput style. Like many other Rajput forts this too
had elephant images flanking it. Emperors Kanishka and Ashok made use
of this fort in the pre-Christian era. All its interior apartments too
are of the exclusive Rajput variety. The version which ascribes
authorship of this fort to Akbar, is a piece of court flattery. All
its gateways have Hindu names. In addition to elephant images this
fort had images of Rajput horses.

Anguri Bagh ,Agra fort The Anguri bagh pavilion inside Agra fort
proves that the geometrical pattern garden has Rajput origins. Note
the arches, the pillars, the brackets, the cupola at the right, the
curved ceiling partly visible adjoining the cupola, which are all
Rajput characteristics.

Golden Pavilion, Agra fort The cupola in the top left hand corner, the
curved roof and the spikes on it vividly depicts that this Golden
Pavilion in Agra’s Red Fort was built by the Rajputs for the
Rajputs.

Diwan-I-Aam, Agra fort The so called Diwan-I-Aam or hall of public
audience inside Agar fort has neither domes nor minarets. Its graceful
arches and slender pillars is still the pattern for Hindu pandals
raised for auspicious ceremonies. Muslim tradition has always avoided
such Hindu, ‘infidel’ patterns. Theirs are grotesque, tortuous shapes.
The Red Fort in Delhi too has an identical pavilion.

Statue of Akbar’s Horse This replica believed to be of Akbar’s horse
is in fact an earlier Rajput horse. Akbar, a Muslim ordered no
statues. Rajputs were known to erect elephant and horse statues. Those
slyly attributing the construction of Agra Fort to Akbar had willy
nilly also to thrust upon him the erection of ‘infidel’ statues.

Statue of Amar Singh’s Horse Outside Agra Fort This horse head belongs
to pre Muslim times. It commemorates a brave steed. There were ever so
many Amar Singhs in Rajput history. The invented story that this
replica is Moghul wrought and is of the horse on which Amar Singh
galloped away in a huff from the Moghul court takes for granted that
the lay visitor has hardly the time or the necessary grounding in
history to debunk such canards.

Tomb of Sadiq Khan This truncated corner tower cum-bastion of a
demolished Rajput palace standing in splendid isolation was later used
to shelter Sadiq Khan’s corpse. That should not, however blind
visitors to the fact that this monument was part of a Rajput palace.
Its niches, the arched entrances and the upper floor all show that it
was meant to be a place for the living.

Jahangiri Mahal, Agra fort The entrance to the so-called Jahangiri
Mahal inside Agra fort is of the typical Rajput design and
workmanship. Usurpation and centuries of occupation resulted in Moghul
names being given to earlier captured Rajput buildings. Gullible
Western Scholars lacking indigenous insight perpetuated the myth of
Muslim authorship of buildings misled by their names and latest
associations. They hardly cared whether a building was attributed to
a Fakirchand or a Fakir Mohammad.


Jama Masjid,Agra All so called mediaeval Jama Masjids in India were
earlier main (Jama) temples of the town. This so called Jama Masjid in
the centre of Agra was a Rajput citadel with ladies apartments and an
underground passage to the fort. It has a huge basement too.
The inscription crediting its construction to Jahanara Begum is an
interpolation.
Jahanara an unmarried lady who spent her sorrowing life in the
smothering confines of the Muslims purdah nursing her imprisoned and
deposed father Shahjahan, had hardly any money left with her. Even for
two square meals a day she was at the mercy of her wily and
hardhearted brother Aurangzeb.

Salim Chisti Tomb,Fatehpur Sikri This so-called Salim Chisti tomb in
Fatehpur Sikri is clearly an ornate Rajput temple. Note the two round
stone flower emblems on either side of the arch, and the curving
brackets. In the right background is the typical Rajput gateway capped
by cupolas. The lotus shaped fountain base in the foreground tank is
also reminiscent of Rajput ownership.
This ornamental pillar Pillar supporting Akbar’s Throne in Diwan-I-
Khas with a narrow circular perch on top approached by four stone-slab
bridges in Fatehpur Sikri could as well have been a royal Rajput
bathroom while concocted Akbar legends claim it to be a throne room.
But throne rooms in Akbar’s time were not as tiny as a Pigeon house.

Hiran Minar,Fatehpur Sikri This so called Hiran Minar infront of the
Hathi Pol gate of Fatehpur Sikri is falsely calimed to mark the burial
of a pet deer(Hiran) of Akbar .We ask whether th edeer had whispered a
dying wish in Akbar’s ear to be commemorated with a fat Hindu temple
lamp post? The bristles were used to support oil lamps Such pillars
are common infront of Hindu Temples and palaces.The spiralling
staircase inside leading to the cupola on top remins one of the so
called Kutub Minar in Delhi which have proved to be of Hindu
origin.This tower was known as ‘Hiranmaya’ since it sparkled like gold
when it bristled with flames of hundreds of lamps hung on it. That
Sanskrit word has been deftly twisted to be stuffed into the
concocted Akbar legend.

Buland Darwaza, Fatehpur Sikri This towering gateway in Fatehpur Sikri
is currently known to us as Buland Darwaza.It is a typical Rajput
Township. The stone flower emblems flanking the arch are an
unmistakable sign of its Hindu origin. The three big cupolas and the
13 tiny ones in front in a row on the terrace front are of the
exclusive Rajput design. The slender pillars spiked at the top were
used for hoisting flags. Such pillars are a part of almost all-
mediaeval Rajput monuments. The stone flower emblems are invariably
present on all Hindu homes and temples of the orthodox design, while
they never exist on genuine mosques.
Itmad-ud-Daulah’s TombThis interior mural decoration in the so called
Itmad-ud-Daulah tomb ,Agra is no different from that found the pre-
Muslim Ambar palace in Jaipur,which proves that the building was an
earlier Rajput palace.

So-called Akbar’s Mausoleum at Sikandra Every arch, supporting
brackets and capping cupola of this mansion consisting of pile upon
pile of pavilions proves to the hilt that it was a Rajput palace.
Euphemistically called Sikandra ever since Sikandar Lodi a Pathan
ruler lived in it, this mansion six miles to the north of Agra is
known to posterity as Akbar’s tomb. Akbar lay ill and died here.

Gateway Sikandra This is the majestic gateway to Sikandra Palace. The
mansion inside was turned into a tomb after Akbar’s death. It was
built by the Rajputs centuries before Muslim invaders launched on a
career of vandalism and usurpation. The four towers rising above the
gateway are replicas of the Taj Mahal towers. The mosaic flooring of
the mansion has the esoteric Hindu Shakti-Chakra (interlocked
triangles) inlaid in it by the dozen. Muslim funeral rites admit of no
such design.

Salabat Khan’s Mausoleum,AgraThis Salabat Khan’s mausoleum is a
truncated Rajput pavilion allotted to Khan for his residence.On his
death he was buried there.

Ganesh Pol Ambar Palace,Jaipur It was built around 984 A.D.,it had
obviously no Muslim influence. the gates of all extant mediaeval
monuments in India are similar to the Ganesh Pol. Gates of Mosques and
tombs in west Asian countries are also of identical design. This
proves that far from Indian mediaeval monuments having being designed
or ordered by Muslim potentates and craftsmen, it was West Asian
monuments, which were designed and executed by Indian technicians as
recorded by Mohammed Ghazni and Taimurlang.
Incidentally it may also be pointed out that the recorded fact of
Mohammed Ghazni having been buried in his own palace in Ghazni(1030
A.D.) also proves that all so called Muslim tombs whether in India or
in West Asian countries are usurped palaces which they occupied during
their life times.
Shish Mahal Ambar
This Shish Mahal inside the Ambar fortress in Jaipur was built (about
984 .A.D.) centuries before the founding of Muslim Kingdoms in India.
Its ornate inlay work is no different from that in what are believed
to be mediaeval Muslim mosques and tombs. It proves two things;
firstly that the so-called tombs and mosques were of Rajput origin and
secondly that they were intended for the living not for the dead.

Palace Garden Ambar This pavilion and the garden in the Ambar Palace
with its spiked and curved roof, the graceful Hindu arch and the
geometrical design in the foreground is typical of all mediaeval
buildings. Ambar which lies three miles away from modern Jaipur, was
founded not later than 984 A.D. That was much before alien Muslims
established their principalities in India.
Readers not acquainted with legal procedure might then ask as to
whether there is any documentary evidence available to prove that the
fort was built by the Hindus in the pre-christian era. The answer to
this is that the immense Hindu evidence that existed in the form of
Hindu idols, inscriptions and documents in the archives of ancient
Hindu kings was all looted and destroyed when Mohammad Ghazni first
raided the red fort in the early part of the 11th century and again
when the fort remained under continued Muslim occupation from 1526 to
about 1760 A.D. If the owner of a building is forced out of his
mansion and the aggressor remains in occupation for several centuries
will the owner find his record intact on obtaining possession of his
mansion after several centuries?