Filtering for hybrids (and a general problem with all subspecific filters)

[tony rebelo]

I have had a request for hybrid data for a taxon.  in theory this should be easy: filter by rank: high = hybrid and low = hybrid.

But it does not work: it ignores the rank filter entirely.  In fact, it misbehaves it for all subspecies taxa. 

For example (defaults in my community to southern Africa): 

genus Rubus: 178 observations: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=113055&subview=grid&taxon_id=47544&verifiable=any

species only in genus Rubus: 111 observations: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?hrank=species&lrank=species&place_id=113055&subview=grid&taxon_id=47544&verifiable=any

subspecies only in genus Rubus: 14 observations: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?hrank=subspecies&lrank=subspecies&place_id=113055&subview=grid&taxon_id=47544&verifiable=any

varieties only in genus Rubus: 14 observations (same 14 as in subspecies) https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?hrank=variety&lrank=variety&place_id=113055&subview=grid&taxon_id=47544&verifiable=any

subspecies and varieties in Rubus;  14 observations https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?hrank=subspecies&lrank=variety&place_id=113055&subview=grid&taxon_id=47544&verifiable=any

hybrids only in genus Rubus: 111 observations: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?hrank=hybrid&lrank=hybrid&place_id=113055&subview=grid&taxon_id=47544&verifiable=any  

(should be about 4 observations by community ID). 

Could this be fixed please.

Does anyone know a workaround for now please?

[bouteloua]

I reported the same issue here https://inaturalist.trydiscourse.com/t/when-lrank-and-hrank-are-equal-sometimes-shows-wrong-results/97

Tony Iwane said they'd look into it.

For now you should be able to change it to just rank=hybrid (no hrank or lrank) and get the results.

[tony rebelo]

Cool thanks.  Perfect!! much appreciated.