Whats going on there is that Terrapene ornata has an atlas
https://www.inaturalist.org/atlases/632
You can read more about Atlases here
https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/atlases but they prevent listings
from being automatically generated/updated from observations
The idea is that for atlased species curators curate an atlas
independent of observations so they can be used to put observations in
context (e.g. 'this observation must be misID'd or important, its way
out of range') rather than having that observation update the listing
so the two can't be compared
Automated listings on iNat populate up, e.g. if someone listed a
county in Georgia it would also create a listing for the state. So we
have to also turn off automatically creating/updating listings at the
county level even though the atlas is at the state level for this
species. Creating an atlas thus essentially just freezes listed taxa
where they are and assumes the curator who made the atlas maintain
them. This atlas is at the state level, so the atlas curators probably
just aren't thinking about counties.
But you can manually find and update listed taxa for counties by
searching for the places e.g.
https://www.inaturalist.org/listed_taxa/21272850
and there's a little 'refresh' button to manually have it check for
the presence of RG observations