--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "INA Nonsuch Discussion Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to INA-Nonsuch-Discussion-Group+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Linda.
My brother warned you that I might reply. Here it is, probably more then you wanted. I have laid out my thought processes to give you matters to think about. The factors that affect you and the weight that you give them might well lead to different conclusions.
La Reina came to me with her original Westerbeke 13hp 2 cylinder still installed along with a 2 blade feathering MaxProp and PYI Dripless prop shaft seal. With a clean bottom, clean prop and flat water the engine would reach its design maximum of 3000 rpm and the boat would do about 6 knots. I would generally run the engine at 2400 to 2600 rpm (roughly 5-5.5 knots). Above 2400 she was getting noisy and rough. After pounding for 30 miles against wind and waves where at times we were down to 3.5 knots even at 2900 rpm I decided it was time to repower. I also figured that if I kept La Reina for 10 years I would definitely need to repower so I might as well do it now and enjoy the new engine rather then install it only to sell the boat to some one else to use. The current norm for engine power is about 4 hp per ton. It used to be 2hpo per ton. Loaded for cruising La Reina comes in at about 10,000 pounds. 18 to 21 hp seemed about the correct size given the new norm.
I wanted more power, less noise and a smoother engine. I strongly considered going electric however here in the Pacific Northwest it did not offer what I felt I needed. We often have little or no wind. Given the currents, the passage gates that have to be taken at or near slack, the complications of the Fraser River outflow and the distances to prime cruising grounds I felt I needed to be able to reliably run at 5.5 knots for between 20 and thirty miles while fighting current, waves and head winds (sometimes the demands of life don't let you wait for the wind to change direction). An electric system with a big lithium battery pack would cost much more than a diesel. A lead battery pack big enough to provide the range I was looking for would add too much weight and still not give the range. Electric would probably meet 80- to 90 percent of my needs but it was going to be too much money to reach that level
So the search for the diesel engine was on. Generally more cylinders are smoother than less. Any four cylinder engine would be too big so I looked at 3 cylinder models. The good news is that the 13hp Westerbeke came with a 1" prop shaft, which is what the three cylinder engines in the power range I was looking at would require. I ruled out Volvo engines because the initial cost is high, the parts are extremely expensive, they have left hand or counter clockwise rotation which would require a new prop. Because the MaxProp has adjustable pitch and the shaft size for the new engine was going to be 1” I could use the existing prop if the engine ran clockwise. Based on my research some of the Volvo engines have had reliability problems, which I did not want. Nanni and Sole are not popular in this area and again tend to be more money then the Beta so I ruled them out.
The smallest Westerbeke 3 cylinder currently for sale is the 30C rated at 25hp. This engine is over 29 inches long, which is too long to fit into the engine compartment with the PYI dripless shaft seal. One advantage Westerbekes have is that they have self bleeding fuel systems. I don’t believe the Universals have that. Westerbeke owns the Universal brand and offers a 20hp 3 cylinder based on the Kubota small diesel engine. As others have pointed out it is the same engine as Beta uses for its 2ohp engine. Both companies modify the Kubota engines for use in boats. I liked the Beta conversion better than the Universal for a number of reasons. All of the service points on the Beta are at the front of the engine so access is easy. They install a handy oil drain pump, which makes oil changes a breeze. They will make custom engine feet (although I did not take advantage of this feature) and Beta happily gives you the Kubota part numbers. Westerbeke/Universal is proprietary and tries to force you to buy parts from them at exorbitant prices. Furthermore, I could get the Beta at a slightly lower cost, my brother already had experience installing the Beta in his 26 Nonsuch and the fellow who installed his engine was happy to work with me for the install of a Beta in La Reina. I also considered the Yanmar 3YM 20 which is rated at 21hp however the service points were not as easily accessible, it was slightly heavier, it was physically bigger (about 2 inches longer and 1" wider), it was more money, Yanmar parts are very expensive and they have a history of problems with the exhaust mixing elbow.
Here is a chart I prepared when I was comparing engines.
|
Engine Specs |
|||||||||
|
Beta 20 |
Westerbeke 13 |
Universal M3-20B |
Yanmar 3ym20 |
||||||
|
Weight |
228.8 lbs/ 104 k |
298 lbs |
241 lbs – 266 lbs |
266? |
|||||
|
Displacement |
719 cc |
566 cc |
718 cc |
854 cc |
|||||
|
HP |
20 at 3600 |
13.5 at 3000 |
20 at 3600 |
21 @ 3600 |
|||||
|
Torque |
45 ft lbs at 2600 |
21 ft lbs at 2600 |
33 ft lbs at 2500 |
38@2600 |
|||||
|
RPM |
3600 |
3000 |
3600 |
3600 |
|||||
|
Rotation |
clockwise |
rt h/ clockwise |
rt hand |
rt hand |
|||||
|
Dimensions |
|||||||||
|
Length |
655mm/25.79" |
26.96"/684.78mm |
26.4"/ 670.6mm |
693.5mm/27.3" |
|||||
|
Width |
442/17.4 |
17.75/450.85 |
18.1/ 477.5 |
463/18.2 |
|||||
|
Height |
587/23.11 |
22.05/560.1 |
20.1/510.6 |
600.3/23.6 |
|||||
|
Feet width |
370/14.56 |
15/381 |
370/14.6 |
||||||
The dimensions given are both metric and imperial. You can see that the Beta is actually smaller and lighter then the Westerbeke 13. I know that Thor Powell suggests the 26 Nonsuch could use more weight in the stern but I always think lighter is better for sail boats and the lighter engine lets me carry more beer and wine while cruising.
For all of those reasons the Beta was the best choice for me. As I said earlier the factors effecting your decision may be different and lead you to a different choice.
Rebuilding
I did not really consider rebuilding as an option since it would not solve the problems of noise, vibration and lack of power that I was hoping to overcome with the engine change. I am not a mechanic and did not feel I had the skill set to do the work myself so I would be paying for labour. A "full rebuild" means different things and can vary greatly in price depending on what you do. One form of rebuild is to go through the engine and replace accessories such as water and fuel pumps alternator and hoses. This leaves you with an engine that still has a large number old parts which may or may not last. Another option is a full tear down and replacement of most parts (pistons, rings, bearings) and peripheries such as water pumps and alternators. This would likely cost more then a new engine once you add in the labour costs. A "full rebuild" can fall anywhere between those two extremes. A rebuild is cheaper to reinstall then a new engine unless you are buying a new engine that matches the old. This is because extra time is need to plan and change any of the layout and as you know time is money. In addition some of the existing parts such as the prop and exhaust system may be reusable so you don't have to buy as many new parts. The Westerbeke 13 is fresh water cooled so the engine block is not generally exposed to salt water and therefore likely to be in good condition, which is an advantage in a rebuild as compared to raw water-cooled engines. When I went to remove the W13 from La Reina I found that I had to take off the exhaust riser. It did not want to cooperate. Being a ham fisted mechanic I managed to break the heads off of a couple of bolts and still had to cut the riser pipe. If I had been doing a rebuild I would have had to find a way to get the riser apart. That became the problem of the fellow that bought the W13 from me. By the way the old engine was easy to sell on Craig's list.
Installation
When the old engine was out I clean up the engine compartment and installed new sound deadening insulation panels. I should have also used Silent Running. It is expensive but I think it has made the engine quieter on my brother's boat. We beefed up the engine bed/stringers (not absolutely necessary) and we changed everything from the water intake to the exhaust outlet. We increased the water intake line to 1" and the exhaust system to 2". The routing of the exhaust worked out well and I was able to use the existing platform for the new water lift muffler, although I did have to increase the size of the mounting base easily done with a piece of plywood.
The PYI dripless shaft seal is longer than the standard stuffing box. The Beta engine comes with a soft coupler that fits between the transmission and prop shaft couplers. This takes up space. I ordered the shortest transmission that Beta sells with the 20. The dealer took it upon himself to order a different transmission because the cost was the same and he thought the substitute was a better transmission. The transmission he ordered was an inch longer than the one I ordered. I did not notice until we went to hook up the prop shaft. It was almost impossible to make everything fit. We could not pull the prop shaft back far enough against the PYI seal to fit the bolts from the soft coupler in. The engine was as far forward as we could comfortably fit it in the engine compartment. We were looking at getting shorter coupling bolts, not using the soft coupler or getting the correct transmission until my brother put in a Herculean effort and pulled the shaft back the final 1/8" need to get everything together (thank you Rob). Length does matter.
Using the same pitch (22 degrees or 10.7 inches) on the prop as I had for the for the Westerbeke 13 I can make 3300 rpm, slightly less that the engine max rating of 3600. If I change the pitch down to 20 degrees or 9.6 inches I can pull 3600 rpm however I then have to run the engine faster to get the same boat speed as before. Hull speed on the 26 is about 6.5 knots. At 6 knots and above under power the stern is squatting down a considerable distance. It takes a lot of power and fuel to get from 6 to 6.5 knots. The net result is that with this engine and a 14 inches two blade prop, 10 inches of pitch is probably the sweet spot and from a practical stand point the extra power has not given much in the way of extra speed. It is smoother and quieter than the W13.
I did not keep exact numbers but the engine and install came to about $15,000.00. I did a lot of the work myself and the shipwright gave me a break on his time and parts. We could have saved money by not changing the intake and exhaust. The diesel fuel lines did need replacing.
Will try to attach a couple of pictures showing the before and after.
Hope this helps in your deliberations. Sorry to be so long winded.
Good luck.
Mark Powers
La Reina 26C
Vancouver, B.C.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "INA Nonsuch Discussion Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to INA-Nonsuch-Discussi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<P1180288.JPG>
<P1180363.JPG>
Linda,
Any photos of the installation you want to share with the group?
Great advice on being thorough and patient, in addition to getting an oil analysis. I do agree that the Westerbeke should not be discounted, despite its servicing challenges. I will continue to size and weigh the different options. I have no doubt that "new" would indeed provide opportunities for improved serviceability and better performance. I am in the early stages of educating myself and sizing the different options and very much appreciate this thread and specifically your input. Thank you!
Charlie
Hi Charlie,I would be reluctant to offer an opinion on what you should do, but would like to share our experience with Nessie. I also had some deferred engine maintenance and needed a few thousand in repairs related to a coolant leak (purchased in 2017 with 1150 hours). I got the engine inspected and tested (oil & compression) by a Westerbeke master dealer. The repairs were limited to the coolant system so I went with the repairs. Since that time I've put on about 225 hours with no troubles and she starts better now than when I first got her. I am very happy with the choice now but very much felt overwhelmed at the time.Whatever you decide, enjoy!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "INA Nonsuch Discussion Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to INA-Nonsuch-Discussi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/INA-Nonsuch-Discussion-Group/9dc4e112-5918-4669-a371-c748cb870999%40googlegroups.com.