Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

AFTER THE IN SENATE CANDIDATE

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Ja...@in.st

unread,
Oct 29, 2012, 12:48:33 PM10/29/12
to
AFTER THE IN SENATE CANDIDATE

After the IN Senate candidate Richard Mourdock's comments about rape
leading to a pregnancy is basically God's will, I am not sure that the
Republican Party can be saved. Senators Cornyn and McConnell both seem
to declare it was much to do about nothing. Well it is not nothing to
a lot of women in the Republican Party not to mention other women.
Also doesn't believe that insurance companies should pay for
contraceptives. I am sick and tired of the hard right and their white
male neanderthal thinking. Romney cut the only ad for a Senator for
Mourdock and decided this afternoon to stand by his request to people
of Indiana to send Mourdock to the Senate. The GOP has gone so far
hard right that I do not recognize the party. GOP is turning into the
party of racism along with everything else. The hard right are some of
the meanest people I have ever met here in OK -- they attack if you
dare disagree with them threatening you. Worst are the religious right
who come after you with a vengence. Do we not have anyone in
leadership of the Republican that will work to take back the Party and
shut down the hard right?

Mark Hill

unread,
Oct 29, 2012, 1:05:43 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 10:48 AM, Ja...@in.st wrote:
> AFTER THE IN


Btw, the latest Obama-lie:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-wrong-his-own-iraq-positions_655305.html

The New York Times corrects President Barack Obama:


"President Obama suggested that Mr. Romney was mistaken in seeking to
keep 10,000 American troops in Iraq. But the Obama administration
initially sought to do just that � and ultimately never managed to
negotiate an agreement to allow any American troops in Iraq.

"Mr. Obama sought to negotiate a Status of Forces Agreement that would
have allowed United States troops to stay in Iraq after 2011. Initially,
the Obama administration was prepared to keep up to 10,000 troops in
Iraq. Later, the Obama administration lowered the figure to about 5,000
troops � some 3,500 of which would be continuously based in the country
while the remainder would periodically be rotated through. The role of
the American forces would be to train Iraqi troops, patrol Iraq�s skies
and help Iraqi commandos fight Al Qaeda.

"Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki indicated that he might be willing
to work out an agreement to allow some American troops to stay. But the
Iraqis did not agree to an American demand that such an agreement be
submitted to their parliament for approval, a step the Obama
administration insisted was needed to ensure that any American troops
that stayed would be immune from prosecution under Iraqi law."
0 new messages