You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to in-por...@googlegroups.com
This is really cool and useful!
Can I specify a plain text and not the label in empty_label? Example, using +just test? That would be really cool too!
DA
Alexander Obuhovich
unread,
Nov 14, 2011, 6:13:27 AM11/14/11
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to in-por...@googlegroups.com
Nope, label only for now. In all projects, that I was involved in I needed a label to be displayed instead 1st option, especially, when list of dropdown values are not labels at all (e.g. "None" (lu_None), "Please Select").
Phil -- wbtc.fr --
unread,
Nov 14, 2011, 8:22:41 AM11/14/11
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to in-por...@googlegroups.com
Yes, this would be helpful in some case, as optgroup label is not displayed as empty value, but only when clicking to see all choices.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to in-por...@googlegroups.com
Hi guys,
Here is a little improvement to Alex's patch so it supports Plain Text Empty Option (ie. +please select, where + indicated that it's a non-label phrase)
Alex, please review if this can be included / committed to 5.2.0 branch