So, it is actually WHIG

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Umedia T. Durgen

unread,
May 12, 2016, 12:47:00 AM5/12/16
to Number 72 1/2
Seems these dudes would have been helpful:

"The Whig Party was a political party active in the middle of the 19th century in the United States. Three Presidents were current members of the Party.[1] Along with the rival Democratic Party, it was central to the Second Party System from the early 1830s to the mid-1850s.[2] It originally formed in opposition to the policies of President Andrew Jackson (in office 1829–37) and his Democratic Party. In particular, the Whigs supported the supremacy of Congress over the Presidency and favored a program of modernization, banking and economic protectionism to stimulate manufacturing. It appealed to entrepreneurs and planters, but had little appeal to farmers or unskilled workers. It included many active Protestants, and voiced a moralistic opposition to the Jacksonian Indian removal policies. The "Whig" name was chosen to echo the American Whigs of 1776, who fought for independence. "Whig" meant opposing tyranny.[3] Historian Frank Towers has specified a deep ideological divide:

Democrats stood for the 'sovereignty of the people' as expressed in popular demonstrations, constitutional conventions, and majority rule as a general principle of governing, whereas Whigs advocated the rule of law, written and unchanging constitutions, and protections for minority interests against majority tyranny.[4]"

Look, clearly the democrats are no longer about the 'sovereignty of the people' given you can get two superdeligates for the price of one suitcase of cash these days, and I wouldn't mind a representative that stood up for our constitutional rights... if the democrats can get into office using dead voters, can the people just vote for dead WHIG's? No? 

Then god damn it, let Bernie in on the super delegates, what the fuck? Give us something here, someone not under indictment. I mean come on, when did that become to much to ask for in leading a "free" people? If we are going with crooks, then why did we waste so much time on Nixon? If the oval office must be open to crooks and deal makers, then you do know that by pushing Hill! on us, you actually are laying the ground work for voting in Trump. Given two crooks to choose from we are going with the smarter of the two crooks, not the dumber... duh fucking duh.

I'm not a Trump fan, but the guy can use a smart phone and I'm done with letting chicks with dicks drive anything we can call either culture or rule of law. There exists in people like me a lot of give and take... but you want me to take Hill!, Chicks with dicks, a burger-king based economy as you outsource the jobs of most the people I know.... seriously what the fuck is wrong with the democrat party?

I'm a god damn libertarian who identifies as a liberal conservative progressive with an anarchistic world view and you pushed me away, just think what you have done with the middle of the road "I really love my vanilla scoops" average voter.

Give me Biden, Give me Bernie, hell give me that fucking jackass on your logo... but please I'm begging you, do not expect me or a multitude of others to except Hill!, we won't, and you'll be just as fucked as we are. 

Yet in all that fuck, and there will be so much fuck I don''t want to think about it... I will have one small place of zen, it will not be as bad as the fuck Hill! would have brought to town.

I really hate everyone of you republicans and democrats, I kept my nose clean, to my self, accepted and compromised, never ran up any credit or debt, have a carbon toe print instead of a footprint, live by the California motto of yellow and brown (flush or no flush). Yeah I supported gun rights but come on, you know I've never even wanted or owned one... and this is how you do me? Fuck you both, if China wants to invade, I'll unlock the fucking gate for them.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages