Hello R Baudisch,
Michael here from IMA SDK Team. Thank you for reaching out to us.
It appears that you have opened up a new thread without enough context. Would you be able to confirm if you are having any issues or have any concerns with the SDK?
Regards,
|
||||||
Hello Rene,
Thank you for responding back to us. It appears that you did not receive my last response so I am reposting it here.
I asked if it would be possible for you to share any test page where we can reproduce the issue? Kindly include the navigation steps we need to make in order to replicate it using the test page. After submitting, we will raise it to the rest of our team to get their insights as well.
If you are having trouble receiving private responses from us, please check your spam messages.
Regards,
|
||||||
Hi René,
Looking into the this it seems to be an implementation issue.
Adding the following lines to the adsRequest resolved the error:
adsRequest.omidAccessModeRules = {};
adsRequest.omidAccessModeRules[google.ima.OmidVerificationVendor.OTHER] = google.ima.OmidAccessMode.DOMAIN;
You get more info on this from the OM SDK HTML5 guide. It looks like the tag linked is using doubleverify, which can be specified as a vendor as well (see the OMID verification vendor values).
Regards,
|
||||||
Hello René,
Thank you for responding back to us. Our team have shared their feedbacks below:
I believe this error message starting with "The source window of session client post messages" is usually harmless, so it should not be a cause for concern for the publisher.
It is fixed in the latest version of OM for Web so that it will no longer print unless there is a real problem, and I have yet to see any example of it indicating a real problem. However, that version of OM for Web (1.3.35) has not been fully deployed to all omweb-v1.js URLs. For example, the fix is not yet included in the omweb-v1.js hosted by Google for use by IMA, but I'm hoping it will be in the next few days.
Unlike IMA, PAL does not include any omweb-v1.js script, so I am not sure which version of omweb-v1.js this publisher is using. Do they host omweb-v1.js themselves, or is some ads SDK on the page including it? If I could see the full URL of omweb-v1.js that is printing the error messages, I can determine when it might be fixed.
But the main point is that the error message is almost always a false alarm, so the publisher can ignore it unless they are seeing issues with their viewability metrics as measured by whichever measurement provider they are using.
Let me know if you have further questions.
Regards,
|
||||||