Hello Steven,
I would like to have the opinion of Hernan on this subject. He's the
"official" maintainer from my point of view.
He gave me the rights to write on his repo on SmalltalkHub after I
made some patchs but to this day I have only used it to little things
and I keep all experimental work in my own project.
As it should be quite obvious I am interested in producing new
versions of Iliad. But time is a big factor, and we should take care of
having a policy to decide what to include and what not if we get very
distinct contributions...
My needs with Iliad are quite special : I use it to make mono user web
applications (think owncloud apps). So I need to let the user be able to
change lots of things without coding. I want to let the user, from his
browser do thoses things :
- moving widgets (hence my work on drag and drop support) ;
- modiying the css ;
- modiying all non-input text (think translation mecanism) ;
- sharing contents (adding urls to sub parts of the app).
Now for what I think Iliad need :
- upgrade to newer versions of jQuery => I am testing jQuery
1.12.4, some things are broken, I need to investiguate more (not nice
cause it's javascript code and not smalltalk
- release a version tagged for Pharo 5 (to get visibility) => I can
work on that ;
- a website, or at least more public code to show how to use it
(allmost all my code is public, but not really of good quality) ;
- release a version tagged for Pharo 6 => not sure when I will go
to Pharo 6 myself, so...
- switch from KomHttpServer to Zinc one => I think it will be
usefull to avoid bitrotting and to get better integration with other
pharo tools (oh, that's actually something we need to discuss : which
platform Iliad should support ? I use only Pharo) ;
- some work on the security part, I am quite sure that the way
Iliad handle sessions needs to be made more secure.
@+
Benoit
Le 07/06/17 à 00:02, Steven Costiou a écrit :