Hey guys,
Now that all the gyaan has already been given away by my most esteemed
colleagues, I find that there is no real need to post here.
Nevertheless, anyone who has a lot of free time on hand can read on:
1. I'll not get into A vs B vs C debate cos it is a never ending one.
Whatever choice you make, try and ensure that you have complete
information. For instance, I saw on some guy's scrapbook on orkut:
"See yaar...I always was Finance focused. C was the natural choice for
me" and the likes.
It amazes me how people can make such statements about one of the most
important choices of their life with almost no information at all.
2. SLB versus IIM(X): Even though the decision has been made, my two
cents: Faced this myself and had a similar offer like Sarangi (I
believe you havent got the offer letter yet cos the salary figure is
gonna make the choice even more difficult :P ). I decided against the
job cos of two reasons: One, wanted to stay in India (GMAT option
ruled out) and two, wasnt sure of cracking CAT again :D
@Sarangi...That must have been a tough decision but now that you have
made it, back urself. As Anuj mentioned, McK, BCG, ATK all visit the
campus for summers. Ample opportunities are there in L...its upto u to
grab them.
3. @batch of 2007-09: I thought we could use more discretion in saying
stuff here. This forum was never meant for this purpose of banter
(harmless or otherwise). Such a thing never happened last year...cant
see what has change this year. All of us remember the circumstances in
which we made choices last year...the last thing we would wanna see is
a set of baseless arguments flying around in the name of upholding the
name of one's institute. We all know how good ABCLIK are: the three
letter prefix before their name will tell us that if their umpteen-
year old history cant. Give people facts and let them take a decision.
Exhibit A:
Teaching methodology (apologies for choice of topic but the major
difference lies here):
IIMA uses the case-based method of teaching where all concepts are
delivered through real business situations framed as cases. IIMA uses
cases for almost all subjects except Economics which is more
conventional text book sort of teaching. Its quite interesting how
fundamentals of a subject like Managerial accounting can be delivered
thru cases. I have absolutely loved it.
IIMC, on the other hand, follows the conventional textbook approach
for most subjects (cases are obviously used but to a much lesser
extent). Sugeet, correct me if I'm wrong here but I believe the stress
is much more on the quantitative side of things. Maybe you can share
some examples here if guys are interested.
I dont have much info about the curriculum at IIMB but I heard they
have an interesting way of teaching accounting(FINAC is it?): thru a
game of monopoly. Bansal and co.: englighten.
By the nature of teaching methodology in these places, academic rigor
is different. At IIMA, you have to put in a little more since you not
only have to study the concepts but also internalise the learnings
from cases. However, the rigor continues only for the 1st term. After
that, its much more chilled out. At IIMC, life is probably a little
more chill but I saw Sugeet up many times at 4 am in the morning
during 1st term (mere observation, no inferences mind u :P) Again, not
too much about IIMB is known to me.
Now that I have bored you to death, lemme address the few who have
been lucky to get this far on my post and stupid not to get off in the
middle:
ALL kinds of liquor, mind you, ALL kinds are available at IIMA campus.
There is room delivery and obviously u have to pay a premium for
drinking in a dry state (still less than most upmarket pubs in
Bangalore :P ). Let that not be a concern while choosing your
destination.
To conclude, wherever you may go: two years later, you're gonna sing
the same song of having the time of your life...so chill out.
Regards,
Rahul
On May 6, 7:41 pm, "Abhishek Bansal" <
abhishek85b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, that's the beauty of IIMs! No one can hear anything against his/her
> insti :) All my responses were in 'reply' to the instigating mails and were
> not initiated.
>
> And at the end of the day, the fact remains that: one who wants to put 14 or
> 16 hrs daily, would do so; and one who doesn't want to, won't put in! Its
> individual's choice. As far as placements go, that again depends entirely on
> the person. Once you get into A/B/C or any IIM, you would again feel the
> "pressure" of summer placements, final placements, acads, etc. Meaning -
> Even if you get into A,B or C, you won't feel yourself into a comfort zone
> that "placement toh ho hi jayegi, this bank or that bank I would surely
> get..", neither would you feel easy if you join C versus if you join A or B.
> As in, all of us would agree that 'firms coming to campus' is 1 thing, to
> get into that firm is in your hand not the insti's. So, have a talk with
> more and more people, take your call and land in your desired B-school :D
> (kidding..!)
>
> And you would surely enjoy your stay either you go to A,B,C or any IIM, I
> can assure you that! I enjoyed being in IITR so much and enjoying the stay
> in B as well. And same holds true for Sugeet, Chaudhary, Anuj and others as
> well..
>
> Regards,
> Abhi..shek
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:20 PM, avinash prakhya <
avinashprak...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Have had a decently long conversation with RC and Manu the other day..
> > though RCs never been in B or C himself he's kinda gave me a very useful
> > analysis and comparision.. Manu's told me the B story total inside out..
> > isliye I was lukin for some gyan related to C.. Thanks a lot dudes..
>
> > @ Sugeet: If it suits you then gimme a chat id and time so that i can chat
> > with you sometime as this B vs C issue seems to be an exclusive issue with
> > me
>
> > Cheers !!!
>
> > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:46 PM, avinash prakhya <
avinashprak...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > ohh man this has turned out to be a battle of instis.. relax folks.. it
> > > doesnt need an IIM insider to say A B and C are all really good.
>
> > > @ Bansal : Dude there was no subtlety or sarcasm in my reply to Sugeet
> > > and I am really confused and would have liked to hear more than the Chill
> > > ground comparision.
>
> > > @ Sugeet : Honestly I haven't made a decision yet though I am partially
> > > inclined to join B as its close to my place and the weather is awesome..
> > > Nothing beyond those reasons, and I would still like to hear from you if I
> > > can gain an edge if I join Cal. maybe on the academics front or others ..
>
> > > @ Ankit : Kaptaan saab aap to kahin bhi jao phod doge .. u will be the
> > > first person i will tell my final decision :P
>
> > > Hope all subtle offenses end here and we get some more gyan to share.
>
> > > Truce !!
>
> > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Sugeet Miglani <
sugeet.migl...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > and yes, we might be "chill" compared to A or B or L... but its not
> > > > exactly a picnic in the park... we put in plenty of hard work and I guess
> > > > the results of the past 47 years speak for themselves...
>
> > > > at the end of the day, it's all relative... so if you guys out in 18
> > > > hour days and we manage only 14, doesn't mean we are no good...
>
> > > > or putting this is a really offensive manner (no offense meant to any
> > > > person or institute), maybe we can achieve the same amount by putting in
> > > > fewer hours...
>
> > > > ~~~just think about this~~~
>
> --
> Abhishek Bansal
> PGP-1, Class of 2009
> IIM Bangalore.
> Ph:.
+91 99169 50145- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -