iiif.link
38 views
Skip to first unread message
raffaele messuti
Sep 30, 2020, 12:56:14 PM9/30/20
to iiif-d...@googlegroups.com
I show you an experiment: https://iiif.link
Open a manifest, select a canvas, zoom and pan to a desired detail, and click share. A unique URL will be generated that can be shared over the internet; upon opening the URL the viewer will open at the saved zoom and position.
The urls contains opengraph meta tags displaying the manifest label and the selected region, useful to share in tweets or in messaging and chats. More: requesting HEAD returns some informations in http headers.
Code here: https://github.com/atomotic/iiif.link
Comments are welcome.
Disclaimer: feel free to use to share contents. Don't assume stability for now, i'm still figuring some details about scalability and economic cost of running the service (maybe is better don't use those links to cite content in your phd research or paper :)
Bye.
--
raff...@docuver.se
Open a manifest, select a canvas, zoom and pan to a desired detail, and click share. A unique URL will be generated that can be shared over the internet; upon opening the URL the viewer will open at the saved zoom and position.
The urls contains opengraph meta tags displaying the manifest label and the selected region, useful to share in tweets or in messaging and chats. More: requesting HEAD returns some informations in http headers.
Code here: https://github.com/atomotic/iiif.link
Comments are welcome.
Disclaimer: feel free to use to share contents. Don't assume stability for now, i'm still figuring some details about scalability and economic cost of running the service (maybe is better don't use those links to cite content in your phd research or paper :)
Bye.
--
raff...@docuver.se
Tom Crane
Sep 30, 2020, 1:01:23 PM9/30/20
to IIIF Discuss
Hi Raffaele, nice work!
Your thoughts on this draft spec would be very much appreciated - it tries to formalise ways of sharing content state.
Although the state wouldn't be as concise, no infrastructure is required.
Tom
raffaele messuti
Oct 1, 2020, 1:40:53 AM10/1/20
to 'Tom Crane' via IIIF Discuss
On 30/09/2020 19:01, 'Tom Crane' via IIIF Discuss wrote:
> Hi Raffaele, nice work!
> Your thoughts on this draft spec would be very much appreciated - it tries to formalise ways of sharing /content state./
> Hi Raffaele, nice work!
> https://preview.iiif.io/api/content-state-comments/api/content-state/0.3/
> Although the state wouldn't be as concise, no infrastructure is required.
sure, will do!
> Although the state wouldn't be as concise, no infrastructure is required.
i'm finding very useful points here https://github.com/IIIF/discovery/issues that i hadn't seen before (my fault).
--
raff...@docuver.se
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages