--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ihe-xdw-implementors" group.
To post to this group, send email to ihe-xdw-im...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ihe-xdw-implemen...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ihe-xdw-implementors?hl=en.
Abderazek,
I am confused with some of your words:
- Adding a new task in an XDW workflow document for a Document Updater Actor is fine.
- I am unclear about: “add eventually an XDW document History/Document Event”, adding a new task requires to update the EventHistory,, so eventually is improper.
- When you say “Set the workflow status of the document”, I suppose you mean “set the workflow status to complete”.
- Update the workflow sequence. No issue.
It would be good to reference a newly created document in the task. This would do two things: ensure that the mechanism to publish a document and creating a task are implemented. In general, performing an unexpected task that produces nothing would be unusual.
Charles
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ihe-xdw-implementors" group.
To post to this group, send email to ihe-xdw-im...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ihe-xdw-implemen...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ihe-xdw-implementors?hl=en.
Abderrazek,
This statement : “I think that modifying a task, or adding a new task without the modification of the workflowStatus does not require an update of the /XDW.WorkflowDocument/XDWdocumentHistory element.”
Is incorrect. Any display of the History shall allow a review of all changes/step of the workflow. Adding a step is definitively important.
If your understanding what that it is only changes in the workflow status that needs to be tracked in the history….the history would be empty except for one element.
This is wrong: the history is what a physician looks at when it reviews the overall workflow history !
If this is not clear in the profile, a CP is needed, I believe.
What do other think ?
Charles
2012/3/22 Sven Rienstra <Sven.R...@topicus.nl>
Abderazek,
I am confused with some of your words:
- Adding a new task in an XDW workflow document for a Document Updater Actor is fine.
- I am unclear about: “add eventually an XDW document History/Document Event”, adding a new task requires to update the EventHistory,, so eventually is improper.
- When you say “Set the workflow status of the document”, I suppose you mean “set the workflow status to complete”.
- Update the workflow sequence. No issue.
It would be good to reference a newly created document in the task. This would do two things: ensure that the mechanism to publish a document and creating a task are implemented. In general, performing an unexpected task that produces nothing would be unusual.
Charles
From: ihe-xdw-im...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ihe-xdw-im...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Boufahja Abderrazek
Sent: jeudi 22 mars 2012 13:53
To: sven.r...@topicus.nl
Cc: ihe-xdw-im...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [ihe-xdw-implementors:12]] Question regarding Test Case 16310
Hi Sven,
<ns3:XDWdocumentHistory>
<ns2:documentEvent>
<ns2:eventTime>2006-05-04T18:13:51.0Z</ns2:eventTime>
<ns2:eventType>OPEN</ns2:eventType>
<ns2:previousStatus></ns2:previousStatus>
</ns2:documentEvent>
<ns2:documentEvent>
<ns2:eventTime>2006-05-07T09:53:45.0Z</ns2:eventTime>
<ns2:eventType>CLOSE</ns2:eventType>
<ns2:previousStatus>OPEN</ns2:previousStatus>
</ns2:documentEvent>
</ns3:XDWdocumentHistory>
Mauro, Abderazek,
You are right. Thanks for clarifying.
Charles