Which is the correct XDW Schema?

[Gil]

Hello,

The ftp site: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/TF_Implementation_Material/ITI/schema/IHE/XDW/ contains the following 2 XDW sachems:

XDW-2012-04-02.xsd and XDW-2012-12-19.xsd

Although I would guess that I should use the latest one: XDW-2012-12-19.xsd I would like to be sure that it is the correct version to use also for validation purposes in the IHE Europe 2014 Connectathon..

My questions are:

1) Is the XDW-2012-12-19.xsd is the correct/latest version to use for the XDW implementation purposes?

2) Is this the version that will be used for validation purposed in the IHE Europe 2014 Connectathon? (if not where can I find the version that will be used for the IHE Europe 2014 Connectathon?)

3) is there is a document which explains the main differences/reasoning for the schema changes?

Thank You,

Gil

[Mauro Zanardini]

Gil, 

The main reason for updates are related to CPs accepted and integrated in XDW supplement in the last years. So CP's  balloted during 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 cycles are the only docs that track and describe changes. 

The schema: XDW-2012-12-19.xsd is the last version and the right one for testing and implementation purposes. 

Mauro

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ihe-xdw-implementors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ihe-xdw-implemen...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ihe-xdw-im...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ihe-xdw-implementors.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--

Dott. Mauro Zanardini

Project Engineer

tel. +390422216115

cell. +393346482818

Consorzio Arsenàl.IT
Centro Veneto Ricerca e Innovazione per la Sanità Digitale
Viale Oberdan, 5
31100 Treviso

E-mail: mzana...@consorzioarsenal.it

www.consorzioarsenal.it

[Parisot, Charles (GE Healthcare)]

This should be annotated !!!

 

Charles

[Gil]

Hello Mauro,

 

Thank you for specifying the correct schema.

As I realized the main difference between the old and the new schema is the definition and usage of the “tXDSregisteredDocument” element.

The XDW supplement (page 39) specifies the followings:

“The taskData/input shall contain a taskData/input/part for every clinical document that is

to be used as input to the task. This shall be an element of type tXDSregisteredDocument….”

And

“The element type tXDSRegisteredDocument is a tAttachmentInfo that has

XDSDocumentEntry.uniqueId as the attachmentInfo/identifier and an

attachmentInfo/accesstype of "urn:IHE:iti:2011:xdw:XDSregistered"….”

As I can conclude from the above text the “part” in the “taskData/input/part” is an element of type “tXDSregisteredDocument” and the “tXDSRegisteredDocument is a tAttachmentInfo” so the result is that “part” == (or kind of..) “tAttachmentInfo”

When I checked that assumption in the ws-humantask-types.xsd I saw that “tAttachmentInfo” is not “part” so I assumed that there was a mistake in my assumption.

Can you resolve the confusion based on the supplement text and the schemas: XDW-2012-12-19.xsd ws-humantask-types.xsd.

In addition to the above can you specify if the WorkflowDocument xml example in page 45 (section 5.4.4 Complete Example) is a valid example, That I can refer too?

In addition I would like to ask if you can specify a location: site or ftp site, that I will be able to see more such validated examples as a reference?

Thanks a lot,

Gil