RESULTS: IHE Radiology PC final vote selection results
TeRhonda McGee
- Manifest Based Access to DIACOM Objects MADO (1 place)
B. Imaging Diagnostic Report (Phase II) Proposal (2 place)
C. Radiation Exposure Monitoring Patient REM - PRDSR (3 place)
D. Radiology AI Metadata Index (4 place)
|
First choice |
Second choice |
Third choice |
Total pts |
|
|
A. Imaging Diagnostic Report (Phase II) |
7 votes x 3 = 21pts |
4 votes x 2 = 8pts |
3 votes x 1 = 3pts |
32 |
|
B. Manifest-Based Access to DICOM Objects (MADO) |
6 votes x 3 = 18 pts |
8 votes x 2 = 16 pts |
1 vote x 1 = 1pt |
35 |
|
C. AI Metadata Index |
0 vote x 3 = 0 pts |
1 vote 2 = 2pts |
6 votes x 1 = 6pts |
8 |
|
D. REM PDSR |
2 votes x 3 = 6pts |
2 votes x 2 = 4pts |
5 votes x 1 = 5pts |
15 |
TeRhonda Mcgee
Informatics Coordinator
Department of Informatics
Radiological Society of North America
820 Jorie Blvd, Oak Brook, IL 60523
FAX 1-630-571-7837
Radiological Society of North America
820 Jorie Blvd, Oak Brook, IL 60523
TEL 1-630-571-2670
FAX 1-630-571-7837
RSNA.org
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
Become a member
RSNA.org/Membership
Ho, Kinson
Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 12:20 PM
To: 'Corbijn van Willenswaard, Wim' via IHE Radiology Technical Committee <ihe-ra...@googlegroups.com>, IHE Radiology Planning Committee <ihe-ra...@googlegroups.com>, 'Narra, Vamsi' via IHE Committee <i...@lists.rsna.org>
Cc: TeRhonda McGee <tmc...@rsna.org>
Subject: [IHE-Rad-Tech4294] RESULTS: IHE Radiology PC final vote selection results
Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "IHE Radiology Technical Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to IHE-Rad-Tech...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/IHE-Rad-Tech/MN2PR16MB3133F871D92F1BAED6D0992BBDE0A%40MN2PR16MB3133.namprd16.prod.outlook.com.
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or intended recipient’s authorized agent, the reader is hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
Andrei Leontiev
From the Technical Committee’s perspective, the top two choices at Full scope would account for 80% of effort, leaving just enough for Maintenance (20%).
Based on the experience of the last few cycles, we have decided not to exceed 100% allocation.
An alternative would be to take #1 at Full scope and #2 and #3 at MUE, which will drop Maintenance allocation to 15% (which is still acceptable) to stay within 100% allocation.
We will need Planning Committee guidance on what course to take.
- andrei
.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/IHE-Rad-Tech/LV8PR22MB5714076FF452E812397EB40780E0A%40LV8PR22MB5714.namprd22.prod.outlook.com.
O'Donnell, Kevin
Hi Andrei,
https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Radiology_Planning_Committee
Per the Selection Voting Process linked from the Planning Cmte page, we add Full profiles until we hit the target effort. If adding the last Full profile would put us over but adding that profile at MUE would fit, we do that. So the alternative of reducing multiple profiles to MUE to squeeze in more profiles isn’t part of the process.
Cheers,
Kevin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "IHE Radiology Planning Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
ihe-rad-plan...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ihe-rad-plan/CH0PR16MB4401EF0816BE4895DA7981B4BFE0A%40CH0PR16MB4401.namprd16.prod.outlook.com.
Corbijn van Willenswaard, Wim
Hi Kevin,
You are correct that we don’t have this in the formal procedure for finalizing the selection.
However, in this case I would not say directly no to the proposal for taking two MUE profiles.
Main reason is that with the current fast track of the MADO profile the intention is to have this off the plate after our January/February meeting.
Which would likely give a limited use of our April meeting with only IDR II and maintenance on the schedule.
Which opens the door for a slightly different balance over the different meetings.
Maybe reducing maintenance little bit more in the first two and use the last week to catch up.
Other question I would have is how much of the IDR II will be done with support of the Gemini project run for IDR, does this give extra input/reviews/quality?
Regards,
Wim
(Friday is my day off)
From: ihe-ra...@googlegroups.com <ihe-ra...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of O'Donnell, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 2:52 AM
To: Andrei Leontiev <aleo...@visageimaging.com>; Ho, Kinson <kins...@optum.com>; TeRhonda McGee <tmc...@rsna.org>; 'Corbijn van Willenswaard, Wim' via IHE Radiology Technical Committee <ihe-ra...@googlegroups.com>; IHE Radiology Planning Committee
<ihe-ra...@googlegroups.com>; 'Narra, Vamsi' via IHE Committee <i...@lists.rsna.org>
Subject: [IHE-Rad-Tech4298] RE: RESULTS: IHE Radiology PC final vote selection results
Caution: This e-mail originated from outside of Philips, be careful for phishing.
The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Andrei Leontiev
My thoughts were in the same direction as Wim’s… With adoption of MADO fast track, we probably should revise the procedures that did not take it into account, which means we would front-load MADO but then should be able to bring the third profile at slightly later date…
We also may consider additional meeting in June (maybe for 3 days), to catch those extra 20%... Just a thought…
- andrei
David Clunie
Is that part of the "process" that Kevin referred to?
Or is someone try to do an end run around the normal process with less technical scrutiny
in order to meet some external timeline, and RadTech is playing catch-up to rubber-stamp
some other group's design?
Are you laying the grounds for another abomination like PGP?
David
O'Donnell, Kevin
The "fast track" that Wim refers to is a pilot program that IHE Rad Tech worked out a few months ago for trial with MADO since they'd like to have a spec ready for a Spring Connectathon. The key points are:
- Assuming MADO is approved on Oct 1 for this cycle (it was), it will still go through the three main phases, but moved earlier by one meeting.
- The IHE RAD "Kickoff Meeting" for MADO will occur during three 2 hour tcons in early October (scheduled for Oct 7, 9, 16 - currently underway)
- The IHE RAD PC Prep Meeting for MADO will occur during the Nov 10-14 Meeting in Oakbrook
- The IHE RAD Public Comment for MADO will occur during December/January
- The IHE RAD PC Resolution/TI Prep for MADO will occur during the Feb 2-6 Meeting in Oakbrook
Meanwhile, IDR will follow the usual schedule of Kickoff @ Nov 10-14 Mtg, PC Prep @ Feb 2-6 Meeting, PC during Feb/March, TI Prep @ Apr 20-24.
There will also be an EU-driven Public Comment on an earlier draft of MADO in November.
The degree of abomination that results remains to be seen. :-)
Wim may be bringing some topics arising from the Kickoff to the Nov 3-7 WG-6 Mtg.
Cheers,
Kevin
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "IHE Radiology Technical Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to IHE-Rad-Tech...@googlegroups.com.